Just now, sandyf said:

First of all, I went back to the UK to vote against loosing my EU citizenship.

I doubt Trump can bribe Greenland. There would be more chance bribing Denmark and the EU with some carrot to influence Greenland.

Of course he can also do a Putin and that won't end well. Glad my time on this planet is coming to an end.

Well, they've mulled making a lowball offer for about $100,000 per greenlander. The total cost of that would come to about $6 billion. If they offered to make each greenlander a millionaire, the total cost would be about $60 billion. Still a bargain price.

3 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Well, they've mulled making a lowball offer for about $100,000 per greenlander. The total cost of that would come to about $6 billion. If they offered to make each greenlander a millionaire, the total cost would be about $60 billion. Still a bargain price.

If it goes to auction watch out for other bidders.

7 minutes ago, sandyf said:

If it goes to auction watch out for other bidders.

I hadn't thought of that. That's an excellent point.

16 minutes ago, sandyf said:

If it goes to auction watch out for other bidders.

The Greenlanders can always sell to China and then move to the States.

15 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Pele Broberg, opposition leader in Greenland, is pushing for talks with the USA. Worth noting that not all Greenlanders approve of Denmark's role in it's former colony. Denmark's record in this regard, including the forced sterilisation of Inuit women up until 1953, has left an aura of resentment to this day.

According to polls from last year, the majority of Greenlanders (67%) favour independence. 6% favour a US buy-out.

15 minutes ago, RayC said:

According to polls from last year, the majority of Greenlanders (67%) favour independence. 6% favour a US buy-out.

True. And nothing seems to have changed for the Greenlanders since then.

1 hour ago, sandyf said:

First of all, I went back to the UK to vote against loosing my EU citizenship.

I doubt Trump can bribe Greenland. There would be more chance bribing Denmark and the EU with some carrot to influence Greenland.

Of course he can also do a Putin and that won't end well. Glad my time on this planet is coming to an end.

No, there is no chance Denmark is giving in to USA, and sell Greenland. Then you haven't followed the harsh Danish answers to all this. Their stand is crystal clear, "back off", and they have a pretty much united Europe behind them.

However, Denmark certainly have thought of the possibility to let Greenland become independent, but that is an internal discussion for a later time.

So after having complained that Europe was not doing enough to defend itself, Vance now complains they do. 😁

On 1/10/2026 at 1:48 PM, candide said:

It should be remembered that the US has by itself decreased its military presence in Greenland after the collapse of the Soviet Union.....

Exactly. An own goal. Someone posted a map of the previous US bases in Greenland during the cold war. I recall that Thule air base was the furthest north and possibly the biggest. The US had more than a dozen bases on Greenland at that time. Can't they just re-open them and upgrade them?

6 hours ago, thaibreaker said:

No, there is no chance Denmark is giving in to USA, and sell Greenland.

You under estimate the power of incentive, and I never suggested a financial incentive.

Denmark/EU would have little option but to give in to a US invasion, would be better they took the initiative.

7 hours ago, stevenl said:

The Greenlanders can always sell to China and then move to the States.

Many a true word spoken in jest.

The US does not need the Venezuelan oil, it was all about stopping China and Russia getting their hands on it.

Bit the same with Greenland, a case of stopping China or Russia talking control of the Artic.

If the EU is not prepared to step up and take control of the Artic then as much as it is unpalatable, better the devil you know.

15 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Many a true word spoken in jest.

The US does not need the Venezuelan oil, it was all about stopping China and Russia getting their hands on it.

Bit the same with Greenland, a case of stopping China or Russia talking control of the Artic.

If the EU is not prepared to step up and take control of the Artic then as much as it is unpalatable, better the devil you know.

Prevent China and Russia from taking control of the Arctic? I don't see the EU giving them any chance of doing that.

2 hours ago, ronnie50 said:

Exactly. An own goal. Someone posted a map of the previous US bases in Greenland during the cold war. I recall that Thule air base was the furthest north and possibly the biggest. The US had more than a dozen bases on Greenland at that time. Can't they just re-open them and upgrade them?

I was thinking the same, wondering how long is the lease they have on those bases. They already have a presence there, so why not simply increase it if it's all about Greenland being a strategic military location.

Then, my focus turned to rare earth minerals. 🙂

1 hour ago, sandyf said:

You under estimate the power of incentive, and I never suggested a financial incentive.

Denmark/EU would have little option but to give in to a US invasion, would be better they took the initiative.

I don't think I am. Denmark will never take any initiative to transfer (in any way) Greenland over to the US. Their stand, and our support from countries in Europe, are crystal clear. Back off, is the official language used.

An eventual invasion is a whole other matter. The US can invade any country in the world, if they want to, and no one can do much about that. But they'll lose so much more than they'll gain, their bond to Europe will be gone in a heartbeat.

Maybe I'm naive, but I think there are still some sensible voices in America who will stop this huge mistake. Greenland is not for sale, or up for grabs.

On 1/10/2026 at 12:22 PM, BMW Overlander said:

Pam Bondi, too. She literally crawls up his ass.

There is no need to go into the sordid details of how she got her job!

The appointment was apparently entirely due to talent, quite what talent is not reported...

On 1/9/2026 at 3:31 AM, webfact said:

JD Vance. Picture courtesy of AP

US Vice-President JD Vance has criticised Denmark and Europe's handling of Greenland, calling it "critical" for US and global defence against potential Russian or Chinese missile threats. Vance stated that Europe and Denmark have underinvested in Greenland's defence and failed to seriously consider Donald Trump's previous concerns. The White House confirmed ongoing discussions about potentially purchasing Greenland, alongside the controversial suggestion of military annexation.

Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory, has been deemed essential due to its strategic location between North America and the Arctic, ideal for early missile warning systems. Despite its sparse population, its resources and geographical position have caught international interest. Denmark, a NATO ally, strongly opposes the US proposal, warning it would jeopardise the alliance. Both Greenland and Denmark affirm the island is not for sale.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans talks with Denmark next week. Meanwhile, European leaders released a statement supporting Denmark, emphasising that Arctic security must be a collaborative effort among NATO allies. The statement reiterated that Greenland's future lies with its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide its fate.

Vance emphasised Greenland's significance, saying its role in missile defence was crucial. He questioned Europe's commitment to securing Greenland for global security, suggesting it has been inadequate. The US already has military personnel stationed at Greenland’s Pituffik base, reflecting its longstanding strategic interest.

In Greenland, local sentiments vary. Aaja Chemnitz, a Danish parliament MP representing Greenland, sees the US moves as a "clear threat" but improbable. She believes the US will maintain pressure to gain control over time. Meanwhile, Aleqatsiaq Peary, a resident of Qaanaaq, expressed indifference, equating potential US ownership with existing Danish control. The melting sea ice affecting traditional hunting has underscored the impact of external governance on local livelihoods, reported the BBC.

Key Takeaways

• Vance criticises EU and Denmark for under-investing in Greenland's defence.

• US discussions about buying Greenland arise, despite strong Danish and NATO opposition.

• Strategic interest stems from Greenland's resources and its missile defence importance.

Related stories:

Nato Alarm as Trump Weighs Military Grab of Greenland

Trump Draws Attention with Greenland Purchase Talks Again

  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2026-01-09

 

 

let them talk first... talking doesn't cost anything. that's what the Don should have done from the beginnng... fighting doesn't solve much, talking does...

On 1/10/2026 at 9:56 AM, sandyf said:

Indeed, there is a historic deal to be made. The EU should bite the bullet and give up Greenland, on the basis that Ukraine joins the EU and NATO.

Why NATO territory, inwich the USA may deploy whatever military they want, has to be occupied by Trump ? Is it toito rob the recourses and.or to show some of his followers how magnificent he is as US president ?

Bye-the-way: according NATO, there was NEVER a Chinese ship in Greenland's neighbourhood and close to never a Russian vessel.

His Unendless Whisdom, the rancunous and narcistic lyer "grab them buy the pussy' US President is lying again.

14 hours ago, sandyf said:

You under estimate the power of incentive, and I never suggested a financial incentive.

Denmark/EU would have little option but to give in to a US invasion, would be better they took the initiative.

14 hours ago, sandyf said:

Many a true word spoken in jest.

The US does not need the Venezuelan oil, it was all about stopping China and Russia getting their hands on it.

Bit the same with Greenland, a case of stopping China or Russia talking control of the Artic.

If the EU is not prepared to step up and take control of the Artic then as much as it is unpalatable, better the devil you know.

It would be better fir Denmark to force the point and if Trump wants Denmark then he would have to invade.

Appeasing dictators never worked, look at 1938 when Hitler wanted part of Czechoslovakia and they appeased him.

Trump invading Greenland would most likely spell the end of his presidency.

Any idea of China or Russia taking Greenland is ridiculous. Any attempt to do that would be a declaration of war on both NATO and America. Anybody who even entertains this idea is completely removed from reality.

On 1/11/2026 at 5:47 AM, spidermike007 said:

It is simply Trump's nature to be belligerent, nasty, hostile, aggressive, abusive, unfair, a bully, a snob, a pig, a junkyard dog, and a man lacking a single nanogram of grace or dignity.

He is an incredibly low life form and on many levels he inhabits the same arena as a predatory reptile.

Thank goodness you dont stoop to

ad hominem.

3 minutes ago, papa al said:

Thank goodness you dont stoop to

ad hominem.

We know very little about them since we have no history dating back that far, but chances are they were of infinitely greater levels of sophistication than Don is.

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

they

who they.?

ad hominem. ?

5 5 5 5 5

thank you

thank you

thank you

bigly

Perhaps Canada can do a soft annexation? Then Trump can deal for an even larger 51th state?

9 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Perhaps Canada can do a soft annexation? Then Trump can deal for an even larger 51th state?

Washington, Oregon, California and Minnesota should join Canada - to avoid the next US Civil War.

On 1/12/2026 at 7:35 AM, JBChiangRai said:

Any idea of China or Russia taking Greenland is ridiculous. Any attempt to do that would be a declaration of war on both NATO and America. Anybody who even entertains this idea is completely removed from reality.

Feel free to distort the context.

On 1/10/2026 at 3:56 AM, sandyf said:

Indeed, there is a historic deal to be made. The EU should bite the bullet and give up Greenland, on the basis that Ukraine joins the EU and NATO.

No. Not equivalent. Greenland is not Denmark's to give up. The people are 90% Inuit. They are linked to Canada's Inuit. They have nothing in common with the USA who would crush their culture.

If they join with USA, in 25 years time they will be obese diabetics addicted to McD burgers and whinging about their loss of culture.

22 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Feel free to distort the context.

He's not distorting the context. There is no Chinese or Russian threat on Greenland, which is part of NATO.

It's just another lie for the gullible! 😅

JD just doesn't have the same energy as his boss. https://www.reddit.com/r/LateShow/comments/1qd01ot/breaking_in_a_stunning_moment_donald_trump_has/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

That eyeliner could stop nukes

America once had 17 bases in Greenland and shut them down. Under an agreement made in the fifties, America could build as many bases as it needs. It clearly is lying about military defense and just want the the minerals and precious metals.

One thing I don't get. If Trump is getting a percent of the gains, isn't this being documented for future prosecution?

On 1/10/2026 at 6:29 PM, Thingamabob said:

The United States has a history of forced and coerced sterilization of Native American women that primarily peaked in the 1960s and 1970s, as part of a broader eugenics movement and federal population control policies. These actions were often performed without informed consent, knowledge, or under duress by physicians within the federally-funded Indian Health Service (IHS). Pele Broberg, opposition leader in Greenland, is pushing for talks with the USA. Worth noting that not all Greenlanders approve of Denmark's role in it's former colony. Denmark's record in this regard, including the forced sterilisation of Inuit women up until 1953, has left an aura of resentment to this day.