Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump-Greenland Clash: Danish Official Voices Disagreement

Featured Replies

screenshot_3613.jpg

A senior Danish official expressed a "fundamental disagreement" with US President Donald Trump over Greenland following important discussions at the White House. Talks involving Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio led to an agreement to establish a working group to address their disputes. Trump remains firm on his desire for the US to take control of the semi-autonomous territory from NATO ally Denmark.

This disagreement comes as Trump argues for NATO's involvement, claiming US security depends on acquiring Greenland. The Danish response involves plans to strengthen its military presence in the Arctic and North Atlantic, countering Trump's concerns about Chinese and Russian interests. Though not part of the talks, Trump reiterated his aim, declaring, “We need Greenland for national security.”

Trump's appointment of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy for Greenland highlights the ongoing US focus. Upcoming meetings in Washington will continue addressing this matter. Meanwhile, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt expressed cautious optimism, indicating a potential path for improved cooperation.

The Danish Defence Minister announced an enhanced military presence in the Arctic, aligning it with NATO allies. Though responses from other nations like Germany, Sweden, and Norway appear modest, they reflect growing military interest in the region. NATO is also assessing collective strategies to enhance its Arctic presence.

Greenland's strategic importance stems from potential new trade routes and mineral deposits becoming accessible due to climate change. Trump emphasised Greenland's role in the US missile defence program, but Greenlanders remain sceptical of his motives. Locals question the necessity of US control, attributing Trump’s interest primarily to untapped resources.

Danish and Greenlandic officials discussed the issue with US senators concerned about potential NATO ramifications. Republicans and Democrats shared concerns that Trump's ambitions might favour Russia. Senator Lisa Murkowski described the situation as "stunning", while Senator Angus King dismissed the national security argument as "nonsense". A bipartisan US delegation plans to visit Copenhagen, demonstrating intent for continued dialogue, reported AP.

Key Takeaways

  • Danish and US disagreements persist over Trump's Greenland ambitions.

  • Denmark strengthens Arctic security amid geopolitical tensions.

  • Greenlanders express doubts, viewing US interest as resource-driven.

Related Stories:

US, Denmark Set Talks on Greenland as Trump Floats Force

Greenland PM Rejects Trump, Says Island Chooses Denmark

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from AP 2026-01-15

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Replies 40
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • MisterTee
    MisterTee

    Spot on. If it looked like a hot war was about to break out, the US would move right into Greenland. They wouldn't waste time haggling with a bunch of goofy looking locals. Oldtimers will remember how

  • DaddyWarbucks
    DaddyWarbucks

    Your factoid - while correct - is totally misleading. The implication that US military installations on Greenland are unimportant is flat-out wrong. The Thule AFB, established in 1943 became a key ele

  • DaddyWarbucks
    DaddyWarbucks

    This is political theatre of the most transparent kind. The US already has a significant military presence in Greenland. In the event of hostilities with China or Russia, it would become another Ameri

Posted Images

Seems Trump is all about making United States Of America Union with force the same way Russian formed Soviet Union. You join us either you like it or not!

Interesting times indeed, and those who do not see where this is going, are totally blind.

The video makes it pretty clear: There will be no negotiation about Greenland's sovereignty.

This "high-level task force" is no more than a diplomatic face-saving exercise; the most that will come out of it is some woolly statement about increasing US (and NATO?) defence capabilities and cooperation on the island.

The bottom line is that if the US is adamant that it wants Greenland then it will have to take it by force. Over to you, Donald.

  • Popular Post
28 minutes ago, RayC said:

The video makes it pretty clear: There will be no negotiation about Greenland's sovereignty.

This "high-level task force" is no more than a diplomatic face-saving exercise; the most that will come out of it is some woolly statement about increasing US (and NATO?) defence capabilities and cooperation on the island.

The bottom line is that if the US is adamant that it wants Greenland then it will have to take it by force. Over to you, Donald.

Think you maybe right, Trumps verbal diarrhea has now come to ahead needs to save face ! IF he goes ahead i think he will be in for a big shock NATO will come together and fight him and he will be removed by NATO and the sane american people

1 hour ago, RayC said:

The video makes it pretty clear: There will be no negotiation about Greenland's sovereignty.

This "high-level task force" is no more than a diplomatic face-saving exercise; the most that will come out of it is some woolly statement about increasing US (and NATO?) defence capabilities and cooperation on the island.

The bottom line is that if the US is adamant that it wants Greenland then it will have to take it by force. Over to you, Donald.

Do you think Americans support the desire to conquer Greenland?

The MAGA will, I believe.

3 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

Do you think Americans support the desire to conquer Greenland?

The MAGA will, I believe.

I believe it is up to the Congress, so what do you think they will decide?

If Trump do this without approval of The Congress, they have to impeach him. He might face that in November if the constitution still intact

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

Do you think Americans support the desire to conquer Greenland?

The MAGA will, I believe.

I'm afraid that I'll have to sit on the fence and plead ignorance. I'm a Brit and think that US citizens - especially home-based ones - are best placed to offer an answer to your question.

To date, Europe has been acquiescent and obsequious to Trump's demands but, as I inferred previously, I do think that this issue represents a 'line in the sand' from a European perspective.

Depending on Trump's reaction(s), this could be a real watershed moment or, alternatively, it could peter out to nothing of significance. Let's hope for the latter.

  • Popular Post
20 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I believe it is up to the Congress, so what do you think they will decide?

If Trump do this without approval of The Congress, they have to impeach him. He might face that in November if the constitution still intact

Along with illegal tariffs, invasion of sovereign nations, jackbooted thugs on American streets, kidnapping of world leaders, and double-tapping civilian boats in international waters.

I think I'm tired of all the winning.

2 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

Along with illegal tariffs, invasion of sovereign nations, jackbooted thugs on American streets, kidnapping of world leaders, and double-tapping civilian boats in international waters.

I think I'm tired of all the winning.

Well the congress approved further interventions in Venezuela, so doesnt seems he lost the majority yet.

1 hour ago, sharot724 said:

Do you think Americans support the desire to conquer Greenland?

The MAGA will, I believe.

Of course, they don't. Here's what Copilot AI shows

Screenshot_20260115_131613_Copilot.jpg

Screenshot_20260115_131638_Copilot.jpg

  • Popular Post

China has just said it needs Guam for security and it had people there hundreds of years ago.

It may take it by force.

(Satire)

  • Popular Post
20 hours ago, sharot724 said:

Do you think Americans support the desire to conquer Greenland?

The MAGA will, I believe.

If you don't support it, it's because Trump is the president. You'd probably be totally onboard if it were Biden's idea. This gives the anti-Trump brigade something to latch onto.

A tiny country the size of Maryland, with a population of 6 million and a total GDP of about 500 billion, controlling Greenland from a great distance is absurd. If the US doesn't take it, China or Russia will likely do so.

Trump will not be President for ever. I doubt future Presidents will pursue this Greenland thingy.

For the present, Europe may appear divided sometimes, but Europe is not a banana republic.

8 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

....

A tiny country the size of Maryland, with a population of 6 million and a total GDP of about 500 billion, controlling Greenland from a great distance is absurd. If the US doesn't take it, China or Russia will likely do so.

Whaty about Greenland's population controlling Greenland from Greenland?

20 hours ago, RayC said:

To date, Europe has been acquiescent and obsequious to Trump's demands but, as I inferred previously, I do think that this issue represents a 'line in the sand' from a European perspective.

It's not surprising. Europe has never been a single cohesive entity.

  • Popular Post
10 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

A tiny country the size of Maryland, with a population of 6 million and a total GDP of about 500 billion, controlling Greenland from a great distance is absurd. If the US doesn't take it, China or Russia will likely do so

Any attack by China or Russia would trigger NATOs involvement so not going to happen.

Just now, gargamon said:

Any attack by China or Russia would trigger NATOs involvement so not going to happen.

No, I don't think they will attack it, but in the future, anything is possible. It surprises me that so many Americans seem to be averse to the idea of their country being in control. If Trump succeeds with his ambition and takes it, the Democrats can give it back again when they have power.

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

If you don't support it, it's because Trump is the president. You'd probably be totally onboard if it were Biden's idea. This gives the anti-Trump brigade something to latch onto.

A tiny country the size of Maryland, with a population of 6 million and a total GDP of about 500 billion, controlling Greenland from a great distance is absurd. If the US doesn't take it, China or Russia will likely do so.

That's quite a convoluted stretch at Whataboutism, even for a MAGA.

Even Biden seemed to realize it's not 1750 anymore, and the days of Imperialism and Colonialism are dead. The world is more civilized, though the fat man of Mar-a-Lago is trying to change that.

Russia and China? They've both had centuries to take it, and well before NATO and its Article 5. They chose not to do so. That's is just a MAGA shibboleth.

Trump is just a clown who thinks taking Greenland will put him in the history books, rather than the Sunday Comics where he belongs.

I do hope NATO attacks Mar-a-Lago and seizes the idiot Trump if he sends military to Greenland. Europe has some special forces teams that could not only be stealth, but as easily eliminate Secret Service as Seal Team 6 did Maduro's protectors. It would be a nice floor show for the club's members.

The French are at least as good as Seal Team 6. Of course NATO just might need a C5A Galaxy to carry the bloated fat man, perhaps to a prison in Uganda or to CECOT in El Salvador. A double tap to the fascist invader would save them the trouble of transport.....and the decent people of both the US and the world would rejoice.

  • Popular Post
23 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

A tiny country the size of Maryland, with a population of 6 million and a total GDP of about 500 billion, controlling Greenland from a great distance is absurd. If the US doesn't take it, China or Russia will likely do so.

That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.

Greenland is part of NATO, so you think China or Russia will launch an attack on NATO & therefore the USA?

Get real!

8 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

No, I don't think they will attack it, but in the future, anything is possible. It surprises me that so many Americans seem to be averse to the idea of their country being in control. If Trump succeeds with his ambition and takes it, the Democrats can give it back again when they have power.

So many Americans are against it because it is THEFT and they have moral compasses.

2 minutes ago, Wingate said:

That's quite a convoluted stretch at Whataboutism, even for a MAGA.

Even Biden seemed to realize it's not 1750 anymore, and the days of Imperialism and Colonialism are dead. The world is more civilized, though the fat man of Mar-a-Lago is trying to change that.

Russia and China? They've both had centuries to take it, and well before NATO and its Article 5. They chose not to do so. That's is just a MAGA shibboleth.

Trump is just a clown who thinks taking Greenland will put him in the history books, rather than the Sunday Comics where he belongs.

I do hope NATO attacks Mar-a-Lago and seizes the idiot Trump if he sends military to Greenland. Europe has some special forces teams that could not only be stealth, but as easily eliminate Secret Service as Seal Team 6 did Maduro's protectors. It would be a nice floor show for the club's members.

The French are at least as good as Seal Team 6. Of course NATO just might need a C5A Galaxy to carry the bloated fat man, perhaps to a prison in Uganda or to CECOT in El Salvador. A double tap to the fascist invader would save them the trouble of transport.....and the decent people of both the US and the world would rejoice.

"fat man of Mar-a-Lago"

"clown"

"bloated fat man"

"fascist invader"

"carry... to a prison in Uganda or to CECOT in El Salvador"

I take it you don't like Trump, but it's hard to take anyone who rants like this seriously. You can't be one of the decent people you refer to.

1 minute ago, JBChiangRai said:

So many Americans are against it because it is THEFT and they have moral compasses.

Most of the countries where you and I live were taken from the original inhabitants. Americans are living on stolen land. Please don't preach morals.

  • Popular Post

This is political theatre of the most transparent kind.

The US already has a significant military presence in Greenland.

In the event of hostilities with China or Russia, it would become another American province in a New York minute.

7 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.

Greenland is part of NATO, so you think China or Russia will launch an attack on NATO & therefore the USA?

Get real!

Relax!! I did not use the word "attack"; you did.

  • Popular Post
56 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

Most of the countries where you and I live were taken from the original inhabitants. Americans are living on stolen land. Please don't preach morals.

We can't be responsible for decisions before our time, but neither can we support decisions now that are morally bankrupt.

That is why most Americans don't support taking of Greenland now, to do so by force or even bullying (such as is happening now) is morally bankrupt.

55 minutes ago, DaddyWarbucks said:

This is political theatre of the most transparent kind.

The US already has a significant military presence in Greenland.

In the event of hostilities with China or Russia, it would become another American province in a New York minute.

You call 200 personnel significant !! if China or Russia invaded NATO would respond !!!

1 hour ago, JensenZ said:

It's not surprising. Europe has never been a single cohesive entity.

Notwithstanding the immorality and illegality of Trump suggesting that that he might use force to acquire Greenland, do you think that Europe will capitulate and hand over it to the US?

It is true that Europe has rarely, if ever, been a single cohesive entity and it is also probably true that there are some European states e.g. Hungary who are, at best, indifferent to the fate of Greenland. However, Denmark, Greenland and the nations who set the agenda in Europe have made their position clear: Greenland is not for sale.

As I said previously, imo this issue represents a line in the sand for Europe.

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, MikeandDow said:

You call 200 personnel significant !! if China or Russia invaded NATO would respond !!!

Your factoid - while correct - is totally misleading.

The implication that US military installations on Greenland are unimportant is flat-out wrong.

The Thule AFB, established in 1943 became a key element in Cold War defenses. At one time having an estimated 6000 personnel.

Now taken over by the U.S. Space Force, it continues to play a major role in American defense.

23 minutes ago, DaddyWarbucks said:

Your factoid - while correct - is totally misleading.

The implication that US military installations on Greenland are unimportant is flat-out wrong.

The Thule AFB, established in 1943 became a key element in Cold War defenses. At one time having an estimated 6000 personnel.

Now taken over by the U.S. Space Force, it continues to play a major role in American defense.

wow stating facts which you do not know the us has only 1 base in greenland with aprox 200 personnel usa gave up the rest of there bases in 1966

where did i say the base is not important can you point that out in my post ??? and as i have already pointed out greenland is under the protection of NATO which america is part of nato

Why are stating facts misleading ???

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, DaddyWarbucks said:

This is political theatre of the most transparent kind.

The US already has a significant military presence in Greenland.

In the event of hostilities with China or Russia, it would become another American province in a New York minute.

Spot on.

If it looked like a hot war was about to break out, the US would move right into Greenland.

They wouldn't waste time haggling with a bunch of goofy looking locals.

Oldtimers will remember how quickly the US military occupied Thailand during the Vietnam War.

29 minutes ago, MisterTee said:

Spot on.

If it looked like a hot war was about to break out, the US would move right into Greenland.

They wouldn't waste time haggling with a bunch of goofy looking locals.

Oldtimers will remember how quickly the US military occupied Thailand during the Vietnam War.

you need to get your facts right there was NO occupation of Thailand the US had a significant military presence in Thailand during the Vietnam War, using its air bases (like U-Tapao, Korat, Udorn) to launch bombing missions over North Vietnam and support operations, with up to 50,000 personnel stationed there, though officially these were Thai bases under Thai command, resulting in a unique relationship and an economic boom

be under no illusion NATO will fight back and lets remind everyone the usa has never won a modern war this centuty your madman of a president may give the order but the sane people will prevail

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.