Nato rules block expulsion as US fumes at Spain stance

No way out — even if Washington wants one

NATO has slapped down speculation it could boot out or suspend members, after reports the US was weighing action against Spain over its refusal to back strikes on Iran.

The alliance made it crystal clear: its founding treaty simply doesn’t allow for expulsion or suspension — full stop. No legal lever, no emergency clause, no quiet backdoor.

Pentagon anger boils over

The row erupted after a leaked Pentagon memo suggested punishing allies seen as dragging their feet. Press secretary Kingsley Wilson didn’t deny the frustration, bluntly saying the US had done “everything” for allies who “were not there for us.”

Defense chief Pete Hegseth doubled down, accusing Europe of freeloading while relying on American muscle — and warning that era is ending.

At the centre: Spain’s refusal to allow US forces to use bases on its soil for operations against Iran — a red line that’s clearly hit a nerve in Washington.

Trump pressure campaign widens

President Donald Trump has long blasted NATO as a “one-way street,” and the latest clash shows that rhetoric turning into policy muscle.

The reported memo even floated hitting allies where it hurts diplomatically — including revisiting US support for the Falkland Islands, a sensitive sovereignty issue between Britain and Argentina since the Falklands War.

That’s not just pressure — that’s geopolitical leverage with teeth.

Europe pushes back — carefully

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez brushed off the reports, insisting Madrid follows “official positions,” not leaked emails. Britain’s Keir Starmer has also kept distance from deeper involvement, despite allowing limited US operations from UK bases.

Meanwhile, Italy’s Giorgia Meloni urged unity, warning the alliance itself is a “source of strength” — code for: don’t let this spiral.

What it really means

Strip away the diplomacy and one thing is obvious: NATO can’t eject anyone — but Washington can still make life very uncomfortable.

And right now, the message from the US is blunt: fall in line… or feel the squeeze.

SOURCE

"NATO can't eject anyone", I guess according to the current rules.

If Trump invades or otherwise attempts to seize Greenland, however, NATO members will be obliged to defend Greenland/Denmark against the US aggressor and that will effectively end NATO. Current members, minus the US, will need to establish a new defensive alliance, a new treaty organization.

Previously in history the us was very fond of isolationism. Seems to be becoming more popular at the top.

29 minutes ago, JTPR1 said:

"NATO can't eject anyone", I guess according to the current rules.

If Trump invades or otherwise attempts to seize Greenland, however, NATO members will be obliged to defend Greenland/Denmark against the US aggressor and that will effectively end NATO. Current members, minus the US, will need to establish a new defensive alliance, a new treaty organization.

European members have China, Iran and Hezbollah to help with a new defensive alliance.

Perhaps the USA should withdraw from NATO and let the big boys deal with problems. The USA is acting like a child that throws its toys out of the cot.

I doubt very much the Pentagon professionals are upset. It's Trump having a hissy fit, with his toadies maintaining a wailing Greek chorus.

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I doubt very much the Pentagon professionals are upset. It's Trump having a hissy fit, with his toadies maintaining a wailing Greek chorus.

And you know this how?