9 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

One guy was adamant muslims were taking over the UK, and the population was now virutally all muslim. When i pointed out to him that Muslims were only 6% of the population, he would not have it and did not believe the statistics. So then how can i continue the discussion ?

Kemi Badenoch - Nigerian Muslim

Rishi Sunak - Indian Hindu

Zia Yusef - Sri Lankan Muslim

Sadiq Khan - Pakistan Muslim

Muslims may not be taking over the UK, but they are surely over-represented as leaders of the country.

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Kemi Badenoch - Nigerian Muslim

Rishi Sunak - Indian Hindu

Zia Yusef - Sri Lankan Muslim

Sadiq Khan - Pakistan Muslim

Muslims may not be taking over the UK, but they are surely over-represented as leaders of the country.

All duly elected by there peers, democracy in action, Winston Churchill’s famous quote that while democracy is inherently messy, flawed, and inefficient, it is still vastly superior to all other forms of government (such as dictatorships, absolute monarchies, or totalitarian regimes).

1 minute ago, Jeff the Chef said:

All duly elected by there peers, democracy in action, Winston Churchill’s famous quote that while democracy is inherently messy, flawed, and inefficient, it is still vastly superior to all other forms of government (such as dictatorships, absolute monarchies, or totalitarian regimes).

Don't think Winston considered bringing in millions of foreigners to change the voting demographic of a country.

Or that criminals would be allowed to run for office and remain in office after they were caught out.

35 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Don't think Winston considered bringing in millions of foreigners to change the voting demographic of a country.

Or that criminals would be allowed to run for office and remain in office after they were caught out.

That's why people voted Reform in the council elections - they'll save the day. Councillor George Woodward's story of what inspired him to get involved - and all the immigration he saw at the airport - is truly inspiring. What a warrior!!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xXY9xr56ja0

And here's another inspiring Reform councillor taking charge. Never let it be said that all they know what to do is shout at boats and are otherwise completely feckless. And no, neither of these are parodies, sadly.

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DYnOnwvDZCp/

10 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Don't think Winston considered bringing in millions of foreigners to change the voting demographic of a country.

Or that criminals would be allowed to run for office and remain in office after they were caught out.

I could find no criminal records attached to any of those 4 individuals.

Deeply influenced by the Victorian and Edwardian eras, Churchill believed in a social Darwinist hierarchy that placed Anglo-Saxons and white Protestants at the top. He viewed British colonialism as beneficial to subject peoples, whom he often regarded as paternalistically inferior. Supporters and biographers argue that evaluating historical figures by modern standards of racism can be anachronistic. They emphasize that his prejudice was typical for a late-Victorian imperialist and that he did not advocate for extermination or race-hatred. Furthermore, they highlight his opposition to biological racists like Adolf Hitler and his occasional push for equal treatment in certain colonial policies.

Kemi Badenoch and Rishi Sunak being elected by the Conservative Party whose membership is typically characterized as predominantly male, older, middle-class, and white, making them less representative of the UK's general population.

The membership is overwhelmingly white (over 90%), with Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups heavily underrepresented compared to the general UK population.

Zia Yusef: self made millionaire, friend of Nigel Farage and one of the largest donors to Reform UK, that bastion of multi-culturalism.

Sadiq Khan is still the Mayor of London because he won a historic third term in the May 2024 mayoral election. He secured 44% of the vote, defeating Conservative candidate Susan Hall and becoming the first mayor in the history of the Greater London Authority to serve three terms. Khan secured over 1 million votes in the May 2024 election, winning 9 of the 14 constituencies and outperforming his 2021 results in several outer-London boroughs.

59 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Kemi Badenoch - Nigerian Muslim

Rishi Sunak - Indian Hindu

Zia Yusef - Sri Lankan Muslim

Sadiq Khan - Pakistan Muslim

Muslims may not be taking over the UK, but they are surely over-represented as leaders of the country.

I'm no fan of Kemi Badenoch but she's certainly not Muslim! And how can a Hindu PM be a sign of a Muslim leader?

Why not be honest and just say black/brown people?

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Kemi Badenoch - Nigerian Muslim

Rishi Sunak - Indian Hindu

Zia Yusef - Sri Lankan Muslim

Sadiq Khan - Pakistan Muslim

Muslims may not be taking over the UK, but they are surely over-represented as leaders of the country.

No, no they are not.

Muslims make up 3.8% of MPs (25 out of 650). And they make up about 6% of the general population. So in fact they are grossly under-represented.

Your ignorance and bigotry is clear. The only thing I can say to your credit is that unlike most people on here you are not ashamed of your bigotry and announce it proudly. I mean bigotry is nothing to be proud of, but at least you're honest about it.

2 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

Not at all. Pointing out racism and hypocrisy is not sad at all.

Basically any immigrant in Thailand should not be pontificating how immigration is bad, when they have taken full advantage of movements. No matter what the rhetoric (usually cited as we are spending tourists, those other immigrants take money out) is usually nonsense, when 1) the government cites immigration brings in more money than takes out, 2) does the work many of the local population do not, etc

You get good and bad immigrants everywhere. I've seen awful immigrants in the UK, who most likely do milk the system. But i've seen career ridden criminals in Thailand who take advantage of the system too.

Just call it out as a racism.

You are not calling out racism at all. What you did was fabricate some fictional story of you hearing talk in a bar in Pattaya, so that you could then promote yourself as some progressive paragon of anti-racism.

You seem to exist in an alternative dimension, in which you believe you can just make up events and present them as factual without any substantiation or validation.

You just invent things to support the narrative you wish to spout; you even claimed that 90% of Brits living in Pattaya are full on racists, which is an absurd thing to claim. You cannot possible know that, yet you just spit it out without any corroborative evidence whatsoever.

Myriad issues.    

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Kemi Badenoch - Nigerian Muslim

Rishi Sunak - Indian Hindu

Zia Yusef - Sri Lankan Muslim

Sadiq Khan - Pakistan Muslim

Muslims may not be taking over the UK, but they are surely over-represented as leaders of the country.

So an Indian Hindu is proof of Muslims being over-represented as leaders of the country. How many leaders of the country would there be and how many would be Muslims?

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

No, no they are not.

Muslims make up 3.8% of MPs (25 out of 650). And they make up about 6% of the general population. So in fact they are grossly under-represented.

Your ignorance and bigotry is clear. The only thing I can say to your credit is that unlike most people on here you are not ashamed of your bigotry and announce it proudly. I mean bigotry is nothing to be proud of, but at least you're honest about it.

Surprised you lefties love Muslims so much,

They deny women and sex deviants rights and want to enforce those views on all around them. Hate dogs/pork/shellfish.

But you hate Jews,

Who have similar views but have no interest on enforcing their beliefs on non-Jews. I know Jewish views quite well because my aunt was married to a Jew and my first girlfriend was a Jew.

But I'm happy to be a bigot,

And I'm ok with women being educated, working, not being owned by men, don't want to kill gays, not keen on shellfish, don't mind dogs, love pork/beacon/sausages. I also have no problems with anyone's skin colour, black friend, Asian wife, mixed race son.

Odd you see me as the bad man.

1 hour ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Kemi Badenoch and Rishi Sunak being elected by the Conservative Party whose membership is typically characterized as predominantly male, older, middle-class, and white, making them less representative of the UK's general population.

Elected by conservative MPs,

As far as I know most conservative members would never vote for a non white. Which is why they weren't allowed any say. Teresa May was the last conservative leader elected by the members.

Edited May 22May 22 by BritManToo

4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Surprised you lefties love Muslims so much,

They deny women and sex deviants rights and want to enforce those views on all around them. Hate dogs/pork/shellfish.

But you hate Jews,

Who have similar views but have no interest on enforcing their beliefs on non-Jews. I know Jewish views quite well because my aunt was married to a Jew and my first girlfriend was a Jew.

But I'm happy to be a bigot,

And I'm ok with women being educated, working, not being owned by men, don't want to kill gays, not keen on shellfish, don't mind dogs, love pork/beacon/sausages. I also have no problems with anyone's skin colour, black friend, Asian wife, mixed race son.

Odd you see me as the bad man.

I was just pointing out your factual inaccuracy, but thanks for calling me a Jew hater and a Muslim lover - very playground.

I don't believe I've ever joined in any of the Israel threads, so where exactly do you get "Jew hater" from? Care to explain? And "Muslim lover" come to that.

Unlike you I don't really have anything against anyone, especially not based on their colour or religious choice.

If Muslims didn't want to oppress me, I wouldn't give a poop what they believed, where they live, or how many children they abused or white women they raped.

I'll fight for my right to own dogs and eat bacon!

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

That's why people voted Reform in the council elections - they'll save the day. Councillor George Woodward's story of what inspired him to get involved - and all the immigration he saw at the airport - is truly inspiring. What a warrior!!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xXY9xr56ja0

And here's another inspiring Reform councillor taking charge. Never let it be said that all they know what to do is shout at boats and are otherwise completely feckless. And no, neither of these are parodies, sadly.

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DYnOnwvDZCp/

Oh my, here's another one. And to think some people think these guys should make a government. He's the leader of the Doncaster council and doesn't even know what day it is. How shockingly embarrassing:

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DVWyS3njFWG/

Edited May 22May 22 by josephbloggs

Watch this full video he says everything about our problems with Islam and Muslims in the UK.

A personal attack and a reply have been removed

On 5/21/2026 at 4:35 AM, stevenl said:

Strange to post an abuse case that happened decades ago as proof it's still happening.

Seven men in 'Norfolk grooming gang' charged with rape and child sex offences GBNews 22/05/26

Seven men allegedly part of a grooming gang in Norfolk have been charged with rape and child sex abuse offences, the Crown Prosecution Service said.

Jamil Khalil, 20, Ahmadin Ahmadzai, 21, Qais Kaker, 20, Fazal Auryakhel, 20, Mohammed Farooq Sinwary, 23, Ali Ahamad, 21, and Sayed Wahid Davdzai, 20, were charged with a range of rape and child sexual abuse offences.

The offences allegedly occurred between August 2023 and May 2025.

Continued https://www.gbnews.com/news/grooming-gangs-seven-men-charged-rape-child-sex-offences-norfolk

Edited May 22May 22 by nexus7

On 5/21/2026 at 3:03 AM, josephbloggs said:

Sorry, you're wrong, completely wrong, there were ongoing trials.

https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2019-07-11/tommy-robinson-handed-nine-month-jail-sentence-for-contempt-of-court?utm_source=chatgpt.com

It is contempt of court when there is a reporting ban as there was in this case. It is contempt of court when your actions can influence or prejudice a trial. It is contempt of court when you ignore a court order. That is why he was warned about contempt of court, that is why he was convicted of contempt of court. You don't get convicted of contempt of court in a court of law if it's not contempt of court.

Read up on it.

https://www.gov.uk/contempt-of-court

Your Russell Brand example is completely different - you can photograph people arriving at court, you can report charges and what was said in court. You can not declare guilt, reveal inadmissible evidence or say anything that can prejudice the trial or the jury.

And in fact there was a media advisory in place, which is why the "MSM" adhered to it, because they are responsible, actual journalists - not some jumped up, coked up little scrote who thinks the rules don't apply to him. And when he finds out the hard way that they do apply to him he squeals he is being silenced and you all swallow it up.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/media-advisory-notice-russell-brand

At Rebel Media he just made provocative, mostly anti Muslim and anti immigration videos - that is not journalism. I can do that and post my videos on YouTube, that doesn't make me a journalist.

And I love the fact you think you're cornered me with this award, like it was the Pulitzer Prize.

The Danish Free Press Society is an anti-Muslim, "counter-jihad" organisation. It was founded by Lars Hedegaard Jensen who is just a massive anti Muslim critic, nothing else. Have a look at his published works - I don't see much about Free Speech, mainly just anti Muslim drivel.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/biography/Lars+Hedegaard

It's one anti Muslim bigotted organisation recognising an anti Muslim bigot.

You have to ask, why was there a contempt of court order for the Leeds grooming gang case and not the Russel Brand case?

Well, whatever the reason, it had the effect of restricting news coverage of it.

One thing common in the grooming gang cases is that while ongoing, they're not reported on at all in the press (in contrast to other cases like Russel Brand where every detail is reported as soon as it happens) but when the groomers are finally convicted and the trial ends, for a lot of them, they don't even report them in the major MSM outlets, but rather small local papers.

10 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I'm no fan of Kemi Badenoch but she's certainly not Muslim! And how can a Hindu PM be a sign of a Muslim leader?

Why not be honest and just say black/brown people?

Kemei Baddenoch: "My grandmother was a muslim, I was born in a country that was 50% muslim...I said muslim prayers on a Friday...because that's what happened there when I was at school..."

45 minutes ago, nexus7 said:

You have to ask, why was there a contempt of court order for the Leeds grooming gang case and not the Russel Brand case?

Well, whatever the reason, it had the effect of restricting news coverage of it.

One thing common in the grooming gang cases is that while ongoing, they're not reported on at all in the press (in contrast to other cases like Russel Brand where every detail is reported as soon as it happens) but when the groomers are finally convicted and the trial ends, for a lot of them, they don't even report them in the major MSM outlets, but rather small local papers.

He was in contempt of court because he was already serving a suspended sentence for contempt of court and he broke the conditions. I outlined it all above.

Russell Brand's case did have a Media Advisory and all the journalists adhered to it - you are allowed to photograph people arriving at court, you are allowed to factually report what happened in court that day, you are not allowed to speculate on guilt, to incite vigilante behaviour, to say or do anything which can prejudice the fairness of the trail. Yaxley-Lennon did all of the above. The main stream media did none of the above.

And not sure about you but I saw news of the grooming gang convictions on the BBC.

Edited May 22May 22 by josephbloggs
Typo

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

He was in contempt of court because he was already serving a suspended sentence for contempt of court and he broke the conditions. I outlined it all above.

Russell Bran'd case did have a Media Advisory and all the journalists adhered to it - you are allowed to photograph people arriving at court, you are allowed to factually report what happened in court that day, you are not allowed to speculate on guilt, to incite vigilante behaviour, to say or do anything which can prejudice the fairness of the trail. Yaxley-Lennon did all of the above. The main stream media did none of the above.

And not sure about you but I saw news of the grooming gang convictions on the BBC.

All he asked them was how they were feeling about the sentence today as they walked into court.

Funnily enough, since they were out on bail during the court case rather than locked up, one of them even managed to flee the country and evade justice.

Edited May 22May 22 by nexus7

1 hour ago, nexus7 said:

All he asked them was how they were feeling about the sentence today as they walked into court.

Funnily enough, since they were out on bail during the court case rather than locked up, one of them even managed to flee the country and evade justice.

Thank you. I watched this livestream as it was happening, and as you state above he did nothing whatsoever to prejudice any trial. His crime was not going along with the keeping our mouths shut for the sake of diversity (wink wink) the rest of the media were doing.

So sad lefties brainlessly parrot the state narrative. I think they know they have been totally wrong on the rape gangs/Tommy narrative for a decade but are in too deep to say, Oh man I fell victim to state propaganda.

Still, serves to illustrate how fascism occurs.

Edited May 22May 22 by SunnyinBangrak

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

He was in contempt of court because he was already serving a suspended sentence for contempt of court and he broke the conditions. I outlined it all above.

Russell Brand's case did have a Media Advisory and all the journalists adhered to it - you are allowed to photograph people arriving at court, you are allowed to factually report what happened in court that day, you are not allowed to speculate on guilt, to incite vigilante behaviour, to say or do anything which can prejudice the fairness of the trail. Yaxley-Lennon did all of the above. The main stream media did none of the above.

And not sure about you but I saw news of the grooming gang convictions on the BBC.

The earlier 2017 Canterbury contempt of court was for filming himself on the court steps and inside the building. As part of the suspended sentence, he was sent on a media training course where the UK contempt rules were explained.

At the later 2019 Leeds court, he never entered the building and he checked for any reporting restrictions on the door which have to be posted by the clerk, of which there were none.

Yet he was still arrested and jailed for contempt.

You claim that at the Leeds case "you are not allowed to speculate on guilt, to incite vigilante behaviour, to say or do anything which can prejudice the fairness of the trail. Yaxley-Lennon did all of the above".

As stated in my previous post to you, all he did was calmly ask them from outside the court how they were feeling about the sentence today as they walked into court.

Here we go again this time Illegal Afgahns some came in a rubber boat some sneaked in on lorrys.

58 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Thank you. I watched this livestream as it was happening, and as you state above he did nothing whatsoever to prejudice any trial. His crime was not going along with the keeping our mouths shut for the sake of diversity (wink wink) the rest of the media were doing.

So sad lefties brainlessly parrot the state narrative. I think they know they have been totally wrong on the rape gangs/Tommy narrative for a decade but are in too deep to say, Oh man I fell victim to state propaganda.

Still, serves to illustrate how fascism occurs.

Sigh. Please dispense with the ridiculous conspiracies.

I don't expect you to read about it. How about you spend a few minutes watching a video that explains exactly what happened and the legalities behind it. No conspiracy, just the criminal justice system in action, and working exactly as it should.

He was already serving a suspended sentence for contempt and was warned if he did it again he would be jailed. He did it again. And he pleaded guilty to it.

Please, it's a nice video for you, give it a watch and educate yourself:

https://youtu.be/eUYPGNvsHXk?si=sSkqmISnCvXsQmYK

Edited May 22May 22 by josephbloggs

15 minutes ago, nexus7 said:

The earlier 2017 Canterbury contempt of court was for filming himself on the court steps and inside the building. As part of the suspended sentence, he was sent on a media training course where the UK contempt rules were explained.

At the later 2019 Leeds court, he never entered the building and he checked for any reporting restrictions on the door which have to be posted by the clerk, of which there were none.

Yet he was still arrested and jailed for contempt.

You claim that at the Leeds case "you are not allowed to speculate on guilt, to incite vigilante behaviour, to say or do anything which can prejudice the fairness of the trail. Yaxley-Lennon did all of the above".

As stated in my previous post to you, all he did was calmly ask them from outside the court how they were feeling about the sentence today as they walked into court.

He committed contempt of court, clear as day, and he pleaded guilty to it. Please, this explains in very clear terms all the legalities and the logic behind the contempt laws, they are there for a very very good reason, and it explains clearly how he broke them, and why he pleaded guilty.

https://youtu.be/eUYPGNvsHXk?si=sSkqmISnCvXsQmYK

25 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

He committed contempt of court, clear as day, and he pleaded guilty to it. Please, this explains in very clear terms all the legalities and the logic behind the contempt laws, they are there for a very very good reason, and it explains clearly how he broke them, and why he pleaded guilty.

https://youtu.be/eUYPGNvsHXk?si=sSkqmISnCvXsQmYK

If you read the comments to that video, you will see you are in the minority in that view!

Edited May 22May 22 by nexus7

12 minutes ago, nexus7 said:

If you read the comments to that video, you will see you are in the minority in that view!

Ah, the comments from his fan boys, the law must be wrong then, thanks!

10 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Ah, the comments from his fan boys, the law must be wrong then, thanks!

You're welcome to post up comments in agreement with the video. Of the 8K there, I couldn't find any, so CH4 need some help!

3 minutes ago, nexus7 said:

You're welcome to post up comments in agreement with the video. Of the 8K there, I couldn't find any, so CH4 need some help!

Fan boys.

He could literally post a video of him punching a kitten in the face and the comments would be his fan boys supporting him.

The only thing relevant here is UK criminal law, his suspended sentence, his pleading guilty to contempt of court, and what his fan boys say in the comments in utterly irrelevant.