Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Somethings Wrong.

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Effective altruism said:

That guy knocked the stuffing out of the female law enforcement officer.

He's in jail awaiting sentence

Edited by roo860

  • Replies 76
  • Views 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • BarraMarra
    BarraMarra

    Well Safety when you get the police Attacked with one female officer recieving hospital treatment for a broken nose and the Attackers looking likely to be let off after a second trial it has to be que

  • roo860
    roo860

  • BarraMarra
    BarraMarra

    Listen you joebloggs and listen well I do not make up story's for a bit of click bait. I don't post false information why would i open myself and give you a bullet to like you. As for the lucy Connoll

7 minutes ago, roo860 said:

He's in jail awaiting sentence

30 days, time served, next!

  • Popular Post
23 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


That's because he's coked off his face - it is so obvious.

Certainly looks like it - but I don’t think so. - way too much attention on him..

He makes some solid arguments - a layman’s Douglas Murray.

He’s divisive and often as paralysing as a flat earther - however, many of his points land.

Ignore the person - ignore the rhetoric rhythm of delivery, ignore the theatre & pantomime & some of his points land hard, they land well, & are difficult to contest when framed from balance.

The loudest extremes are the voices we hear - they balance the opposition - in this case (Tommy) the balance he creates is necessary- the delivery is however, volatile & emotive and presents as rhetoric - but that doesn’t mean he’s wrong - red faced or otherwise.

6 hours ago, wil iam not said:
22/2026 at 5:02 AM, SAFETY FIRST said:

Spoken like a true leftist, Woke.


Your type are very hostile, rarely debate or discuss without hate, always with nasty, angry replies.


You people are not educated, have very little knowledge, you guys get so frustrated with yourself, that you reply like a child, an adolescent.


I feel sorry for you low IQ people, your existence must be a miserable life.

And I feel sorry for you, and others who have to post such stuff, true or not, about members who you and your ilk think are not as good as you

Crikey, your comment was unprovoked, out of the blue.

So you are you one of those type.

What is it with you members who change your names? Recently you and ex @NowNow changed your name but still you continue with the same, bad habits., being a pest with annoying comments.

A leopard can't change its spots.

I'm going to start a thread about your type, I need to know.

Edited by SAFETY FIRST

  • Author

There easily spotted Safetyfirst but we know who he is dont we ?

11 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

There easily spotted Safetyfirst but we know who he is dont we ?

In English, please.

  • Author

You want me to type in bold Brewster, if your having troule reading English ??

25 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

You want me to type in bold Brewster, if your having troule reading English ??

No, just in intelligible grammar - I don't know what you mean by "There easily spotted Safetyfirst". Thanks.

  • Author

Have you left your Brain cell in the kitchen, it was a response to Safetyfirst but i typed it without Capps. It must have confused you having to read it in small print Brewster or your bored.

  • Author

One of the brothers the eldest walked free yesterday a free man after a third trial was not presented. There brief paraded them both infront of the court claiming they had recieved Death threats calls for hanging them etc etc not one piece of Remorse. Questions are being asked now if Muslims are immune to arrests for fear of police brutality. Next our two tier justice will be coughing up for there compensation that surely will be coming next.

Islamophobe!

  • Author

Well thats what happens when you have a Two Tier Police State.

31 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

One of the brothers the eldest walked free yesterday a free man after a third trial was not presented. There brief paraded them both infront of the court claiming they had recieved Death threats calls for hanging them etc etc not one piece of Remorse.


I think it's a shame there won't be a second retrial but a second retrial is highly highly unusual and rare. If two juries can't reach a verdict then that is usually that. I haven't followed the court case or the evidence to know why they couldn't reach a verdict, I guess they took some credence from the "self defence" argument. Like I say, it's a shame he's off, but you have to respect the UK justice system.

31 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Questions are being asked now if Muslims are immune to arrests for fear of police brutality. Next our two tier justice will be coughing up for there compensation that surely will be coming next.


And now you go off in to fantasy land, you could have just expressed your disappointment and left it at that as I share your disappointment. This could have been the first (and probably last) post in the history of the world where I agreed with you. But oh no...

How can anyone take this to mean Muslims are immune to arrest when it was the outcome of a trial of two Muslims who were arrested and were prosecuted, and one of them has already been found guilty and is currently in jail awaiting sentencing? Think about it.

And just the same day, in the same city it happened, two Muslims were sentenced to 11 years and 12 years for causing death by dangerous driving. Obviously the judge didn't get the memo that you got.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yrzy7gkdxo

Muslims are arrested every day. You have picked one result that you don't like and applied that to all Muslims across the entire UK - it is ludicrous.

Edited by josephbloggs

  • Author
1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:


I think it's a shame there won't be a second retrial but a second retrial is highly highly unusual and rare. If two juries can't reach a verdict then that is usually that. I haven't followed the court case or the evidence to know why they couldn't reach a verdict, I guess they took some credence from the "self defence" argument. Like I say, it's a shame he's off, but you have to respect the UK justice system.


And now you go off in to fantasy land, you could have just expressed your disappointment and left it at that as I share your disappointment. This could have been the first (and probably last) post in the history of the world where I agreed with you. But oh no...

How can anyone take this to mean Muslims are immune to arrest when it was the outcome of a trial of two Muslims who were arrested and were prosecuted, and one of them has already been found guilty and is currently in jail awaiting sentencing? Think about it.

And just the same day, in the same city it happened, two Muslims were sentenced to 11 years and 12 years for causing death by dangerous driving. Obviously the judge didn't get the memo that you got.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yrzy7gkdxo

Muslims are arrested every day. You have picked one result that you don't like and applied that to all Muslims across the entire UK - it is ludicrous.

Go away disruptor your not wanted on here. Now be a good boy and run off and spoil another thread. If you can find a member who will have a convo with you most of us ignore you now.

3 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Go away disruptor your not wanted on here. Now be a good boy and run off and spoil another thread. If you can find a member who will have a convo with you most of us ignore you now.


Ah, yes, "disruptor", I forgot I am not allowed to give contrary evidence to anything you say because that's "disruptive".

Most unlike you to flounce instead of actually replying to my points. Oh well. And to think we nearly agreed....

  • Author

Your a disruptive influence on the forum joebloggs, and im not the only one who see's you for what you are.

4 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Your a disruptive influence on the forum joebloggs, and im not the only one who see's you for what you are.


Okey dokey. When I respond I usually respond with counter arguments and links, as we are supposed to. You never do the same, you just flounce and go on the attack, telling people they are not welcome or to "f.o.". Classy.

You are welcome to disagree and explain why and - ideally - provide links to support that. But you never do.

If I was actually disrupting the forum - rather than just pointing out why I disagree with a claim - then the mods would take action. Weird they never have. And I seem to have a pretty decent rating judging by the stats as far as I can tell - not that I care about that stuff or emojis.

I'd love to know who these others are because nobody else has ever said anything like that. Are they perhaps called MarraBarra? BazzaMazza?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.