9 minutes ago, TedG said:

The left who thinks of themselves as kind noble people are some of the hateful people you will ever meet.

........while the MAGA cult consists of selfless, emphatic and caring people full of love for their fellow man, especially the tanned ones!

8 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

........while the MAGA cult consists of selfless, emphatic and caring people full of love for their fellow man, especially the tanned ones!

Thanks for proving my point.

Weren't there 36 respected psychiatrists that questioned Donalds mental health. It made the news.

Even without this assement by psychiatrists, just by looking at his actions and especially his TV appearances, every sane human (born by a woman) must come to the conclusion:

"Boy, there is something wrong with this guy".

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that he was elected into office twice.

An adventurous and blasphemical thought enters the mind: Could it be that there is "something wrong" with the American voters? Or is the American voter so deperate (after the true savior hasn't come back in 2000 years), that they vote for anyone, that promesses the "American Nirvana" by way of modern day Hokus Pokus?

56 minutes ago, TedG said:

Thanks for proving my point.

"If you got nothing, say nothing."*

*Old Aztec proverb

3 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Nope, you're not fact-checking and spreading misinformation to smear Trump.

Trump was tackling corruption. Sounds perfectly sane to me.

Here, from AI:

---

Corruption, waste, and fraud involving the US Agency for International Development (USAID) have been heavily ballotized, leading to sweeping federal investigations, high-profile convictions, and significant structural overhauls to US foreign assistance programs . [1, 2, 3, 4,

]

Major Bribery and Fraud Cases

• $550 Million Bribery Scheme: A major federal investigation uncovered a decade-long bribery scheme involving a USAID contracting officer, Roderick Watson, and three corporate executives. Watson and the executives pleaded guilty after it was discovered he manipulated the USAID procurement process in exchange for lavish gifts, including cash, a country club wedding, and residential mortgage down payments. [1,

  , 3]

Trump tracking corruption LMAO 🤣 talk about the pot calling the kettle black ya just can’t make this stuff up!!omg no that’s funny 😄 anyway on topic any human being who would rather burn food destined for starving children allready bought and paid for ……isn’t the good guy …… not to mention all the folks who died during Covid due to his mismanagement of that …..naaa dear Donald is plenty capable of getting people killed he’s allready proven that by the results of his (leadership)……

33 minutes ago, Tug said:

Trump tracking corruption LMAO 🤣 talk about the pot calling the kettle black ya just can’t make this stuff up!!omg no that’s funny 😄 anyway on topic any human being who would rather burn food destined for starving children allready bought and paid for ……isn’t the good guy …… not to mention all the folks who died during Covid due to his mismanagement of that …..naaa dear Donald is plenty capable of getting people killed he’s allready proven that by the results of his (leadership)……

I came across information indicating that the food has expired.

7 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Nope, you're not fact-checking and spreading misinformation to smear Trump.

Trump was tackling corruption. Sounds perfectly sane to me.

Here, from AI:

---

Corruption, waste, and fraud involving the US Agency for International Development (USAID) have been heavily ballotized, leading to sweeping federal investigations, high-profile convictions, and significant structural overhauls to US foreign assistance programs . [1, 2, 3, 4,

]

Major Bribery and Fraud Cases

• $550 Million Bribery Scheme: A major federal investigation uncovered a decade-long bribery scheme involving a USAID contracting officer, Roderick Watson, and three corporate executives. Watson and the executives pleaded guilty after it was discovered he manipulated the USAID procurement process in exchange for lavish gifts, including cash, a country club wedding, and residential mortgage down payments. [1,

  , 3]

That's pretty ironic to claim that Trump is tackling corruption, when he is single-handedly the most corrupt president in American history by a hundredfold.

8 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

That's pretty ironic to claim that Trump is tackling corruption, when he is single-handedly the most corrupt president in American history by a hundredfold.

That's a bold claim which has no basis in facts.

There's no way you could ever prove that.

Again, it's just a smear and hate campaign.

Given that it's verifiable that USAID was corrupt and illegal immigration was corrupt and he has tackled those two issues, the balance appears to be in his favor for not being the most corrupt president ever.

If you're suggesting he was corrupt in his real estate empire before running for President, that is possible. But it's not the same as corruption during a presidency.

Edited June 6Jun 6 by save the frogs

13 hours ago, swissie said:

Could it be that there is "something wrong" with the American voters?

The most news consumed by US viewers is Fox, though thankfully that number is dropping. Fox has been proven to be a malicious group of liars poisoning the airwaves. MSNBC isn't far from being the same though their facts are more defendable.

The MAIN FOCUS of these groups is to keep the US divided, and damned if they aren't accomplishing just that.

10 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

That's pretty ironic to claim that Trump is tackling corruption, when he is single-handedly the most corrupt president in American history by a hundredfold.

Another example of Trump going after corruption.

Lisa Cook of the Federal Reserve - real estate fraud.

But the Federal Reserve is "deep state", so they have a lot of power and protection.

Trump still went after her.

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

That's a bold claim which has no basis in facts.

There's no way you could ever prove that.

Again, it's just a smear and hate campaign.

Given that it's verifiable that USAID was corrupt and illegal immigration was corrupt and he has tackled those two issues, the balance appears to be in his favor for not being the most corrupt president ever.

If you're suggesting he was corrupt in his real estate empire before running for President, that is possible. But it's not the same as corruption during a presidency.

As of June 2026, Trump has not been convicted of corruption while serving in his second term, but there are several major controversies and allegations:

1. Conflicts of interest involving Trump-owned businesses

   • Ethics groups argue that Trump has continued to benefit financially from his businesses while in office, including hotels, golf resorts, and cryptocurrency ventures. Critics say this creates opportunities for individuals, corporations, or foreign governments to seek influence by spending money at Trump-affiliated businesses.

2. Cryptocurrency ventures

   • Watchdog organizations and some lawmakers have raised concerns about Trump-linked crypto projects and digital assets, arguing they blur the line between public office and private profit.

3. Use of government power to benefit allies

   • Critics have accused the administration of rewarding political allies and weakening oversight mechanisms. A controversial Justice Department fund established in 2026 has been described by opponents as a political "slush fund" and is facing legal challenges.

4. Removal of ethics and oversight officials

   • Trump's firing of inspectors general and officials involved in ethics and whistleblower oversight has been criticized as weakening anti-corruption safeguards. Supporters argue presidents have authority to appoint and remove executive branch officials.

5. Appointments of political loyalists

   • Some appointments have drawn criticism from both ethics experts and lawmakers who argue loyalty was prioritized over qualifications, raising concerns about politicization of government agencies.

6. Foreign-government interactions and business ties

   • Critics continue to raise concerns about foreign officials and interest groups using Trump properties or maintaining business relationships connected to Trump-affiliated organizations.

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

That's a bold claim which has no basis in facts.

There's no way you could ever prove that.

Again, it's just a smear and hate campaign.

Given that it's verifiable that USAID was corrupt and illegal immigration was corrupt and he has tackled those two issues, the balance appears to be in his favor for not being the most corrupt president ever.

If you're suggesting he was corrupt in his real estate empire before running for President, that is possible. But it's not the same as corruption during a presidency.

Even most of my friends and family that support Trump admit that he's the most corrupt president in history and that he's using the presidency to the advantage of himself and his family for major levels of enrichment. The fact that you're living in such a deep level of denial, means that there's nothing I can say and no facts that I can demonstrate that will convince you otherwise.

Psychotherapist warns Trump will kill more than Hitler

Don't worry.

That's Bebe's department.

Trump is in charge of funneling money into Kushners investment fund and building ballrooms, arches, repainting swimming pools and arenas for gladiator sports for Bread and Circuses.

Uhhh, Bread and circuses is supposed to be about providing food and entertainment to distract people from political issues and maintain social control.

WHERE'S THE FOOD

"Let them eat AI slop" 😄

Edited June 6Jun 6 by SiSePuede419

49 minutes ago, JT25 said:

As of June 2026, Trump has not been convicted of corruption while serving in his second term, but there are several major controversies and allegations:

Because he has a lot of enemies in the deep state.

So they are desperate to find dirt on him.

They even went back 40 years to a cash real estate transaction to try to nab him.

Not saying he wasn't corrupt in real estate.

As for the presidency, claiming he is the most corrupt ever is unfounded nonsense.

2 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Because he has a lot of enemies in the deep state.

By Deep State you mean anyone who doesn't goose-step to whatever Trump believes.

What did JD Vance refer to Trump before he got assimilated into The Organization*

Refresh my memory. 🥂

*Elite Pedophile Group composed of world famous celebrities, game show hosts, financial geniuses and men who all have Kompromat on them and are being blackmailed not to talk about The Organization

11 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Because he has a lot of enemies in the deep state.

So they are desperate to find dirt on him.

They even went back 40 years to a cash real estate transaction to try to nab him.

Not saying he wasn't corrupt in real estate.

As for the presidency, claiming he is the most corrupt ever is unfounded nonsense.

What is this "Deep State" thing?

Do you also believe in 10' Green Lizard People from the rogue planet Nibiru?

How about QAnon?

Santa Claus?

All have equal veracity...though Santa Claus does make other children happy.

The "Deep State", however, does resonate well in trailer parks and among the poorly educated.

On 6/4/2026 at 9:20 PM, Rockyroad said:

So you want Americans to fund bad parents having kids?

So you believe having kids is based on whether the parents are "good" or "bad"?

Who decided your parents were "good" enough to have you?

Please elaborate on your grand and glorious pedigree of worthiness and validity of existence.

I'm sure you must have a solid chain of greatness that only the very greatest achievers among us can possibly reach.

Please include all the objective measurement of "good" that your parents had before you were born including awards, Nobel prizes, sport trophies, scholarships at Oxford, knightships from the Royals and other qualifications

Do tell us glorious elite master of the universe 😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣

6 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

By Deep State you mean anyone who doesn't goose-step to whatever Trump believes.

Yes, the boss is the boss.

I bet you tough guys on here used to walk into your boss' office every 15 minutes and tell your boss how to run the company, right?

The Federal Reserve is one example -- they can do what they want. The President can't tell them what to do.

Trump was elected, Federal Reserve was not elected.

Of course people twist it into "he's a dictator", but an elected leader is in charge.

1 minute ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Who decided your parents were "good" enough to have you?

I don't know what you're talking about.

This is going off the rails.

Bye bye.

1 minute ago, save the frogs said:

Yes, the boss is the boss.

Oh my, you forgot what JD Vance called him before he got assimilated.

In order to be in a cult, you must IMMEDIATELY forget every fact that makes you look stupid.

Checks out ✅

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

I don't know what you're talking about.

Oh, weird. Now all of a sudden you don't understand basic English.

When the facts make you look gullible and wrong.

I agree with the facts. 😂

31 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

So you believe having kids is based on whether the parents are "good" or "bad"?

Who decided your parents were "good" enough to have you?

Please elaborate on your grand and glorious pedigree of worthiness and validity of existence.

I'm sure you must have a solid chain of greatness that only the very greatest achievers among us can possibly reach.

Please include all the objective measurement of "good" that your parents had before you were born including awards, Nobel prizes, sport trophies, scholarships at Oxford, knightships from the Royals and other qualifications

Do tell us glorious elite master of the universe 😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣

You sound like a complete flog. No parent should have kids unless they can support them. Not up to others.

27 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Oh, weird. Now all of a sudden you don't understand basic English.

When the facts make you look gullible and wrong.

I agree with the facts. 😂

You're just creepy. Typical coward on a keyboard.

7 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

No parent should have kids unless they can support them. Not up to others.

So you're against all benefits for parents in your home country?

U.S.: Child Tax Credit (refundable portion acts like cash)

UK: Child Benefit (monthly payment per child)

Germany: Kindergeld (monthly payment per child)

Parents can claim dependents and reduce taxes significantly

Includes credits like the Child Tax Credit (U.S.), transferable allowances (UK), and child allowances (Germany)

UK & Germany: Extensive paid maternity/paternity/parental leave

U.S.: Limited federally, but some states offer paid leave

Strong protections in Germany and UK to return to job after childbirth U.S. offers partial protection (FMLA)

Germany: Heavily subsidized Kita (daycare)

UK: Free childcare hours for young children

U.S.: Subsidies and tax credits for childcare expenses

Families with children often get higher priority get Priority access to social housing or larger units in UK and Germany explicitly favor households with kids

Children often qualify families for expanded coverage U.S.: Medicaid/CHIP eligibility thresholds increase with children UK/Germany: Family coverage structures reduce marginal cost per child

Free public schooling (obviously tied to having children)

Additional grants, school meals, and transportation support targeted at families

UK & Germany: Legal right to request flexible hours or reduced schedules for parents

Stronger protections than for non-parents

Germany: Pension credits for years spent raising children

UK: National Insurance credits for caregivers

Helps parents avoid long-term financial penalties

Bottom line

Across all three countries, governments redistribute resources toward parents through:Direct cash, Tax advantages, Time (leave + flexibility), Services (childcare, education, healthcare)

Non-parents generally do not receive equivalent benefits, though they indirectly benefit from the future workforce and tax base those children create.

14 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

You're just creepy.

Ad Hominem attack.

Instead of addressing the facts or argument, someone attacks the person presenting them (often with insults or slurs).

If the facts don't agree with your opinions, then low class people then call the person who delivers the facts childish slurs. ✅

Edited June 6Jun 6 by SiSePuede419

15 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

So you're against all benefits for parents in your home country?

U.S.: Child Tax Credit (refundable portion acts like cash)

UK: Child Benefit (monthly payment per child)

Germany: Kindergeld (monthly payment per child)

Parents can claim dependents and reduce taxes significantly

Includes credits like the Child Tax Credit (U.S.), transferable allowances (UK), and child allowances (Germany)

UK & Germany: Extensive paid maternity/paternity/parental leave

U.S.: Limited federally, but some states offer paid leave

Strong protections in Germany and UK to return to job after childbirth U.S. offers partial protection (FMLA)

Germany: Heavily subsidized Kita (daycare)

UK: Free childcare hours for young children

U.S.: Subsidies and tax credits for childcare expenses

Families with children often get higher priority get Priority access to social housing or larger units in UK and Germany explicitly favor households with kids

Children often qualify families for expanded coverage U.S.: Medicaid/CHIP eligibility thresholds increase with children UK/Germany: Family coverage structures reduce marginal cost per child

Free public schooling (obviously tied to having children)

Additional grants, school meals, and transportation support targeted at families

UK & Germany: Legal right to request flexible hours or reduced schedules for parents

Stronger protections than for non-parents

Germany: Pension credits for years spent raising children

UK: National Insurance credits for caregivers

Helps parents avoid long-term financial penalties

Bottom line

Across all three countries, governments redistribute resources toward parents through:Direct cash, Tax advantages, Time (leave + flexibility), Services (childcare, education, healthcare)

Non-parents generally do not receive equivalent benefits, though they indirectly benefit from the future workforce and tax base those children create.

Yes they are all parasites

14 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Ad Hominem attack.

Instead of addressing the facts or argument, someone attacks the person presenting them (often with insults or slurs).

If the facts don't agree with your opinions, then low class people then call the person who delivers the facts childish slurs. ✅

Pot kettle black. I'm high class. You are just a weirdo.

13 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

Pot kettle black. I'm high class.

Your denial of what's painfully obvious to others and complete inability to even begin to address the facts is quite typical of people in The Organization.

Remember, Epstein portrayed himself as high class, too.

Did you see how he decorated his island villas?

Looks like something he found on the curb, Jeff was low class trash couldn't even graduate from college much less have a coherent thought about anything

Oh, your Uncle Jeffrey sure took a keen interest in using AI to survail people.

Hmmm, wonder why...?

Edited June 6Jun 6 by SiSePuede419

20 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

Yes they are all parasites

Sure thing, Pal.

Unlike you, a totally self-made man You want us to believe YOUR PARENTS didn't accept a single government benefit, ever.

The Immaculate Economic Conception or more of a MAGA afterbirth on the floor...?

You're a LEGEND in your own mind.

What a HERO

On 6/5/2026 at 12:15 PM, Nick Carter icp said:

That is quite an unpleasant thing to say about fellow human being .

But hardly out of character , its absolutely normal for the oh so tolerant far left . Don't hear that sort of thing so much from the "nasty" far right