Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Andy Burnham wins Makerfield

Featured Replies

17 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

The dog whistling racists have had their greyhound fall in the 19.33 at Makerfield and they bet their credibility on it.

Nobody was betting on Reform or Restore. It's been a Labour seat for 120 years. A poor northern area who mistakenly think Labour represent them.

A donkey could win it and in many days it did.

However a donkey is better than a racist dictatorial Brit hating tyrant like <deleted>. Hence the fact this result will lead to Starmers downfall is pleasing even though instead we will get a sixth form socialist/communist who likes like something out of Wallace and Gromet.

Capeesh?

  • Replies 229
  • Views 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • baansgr
    baansgr

    A very bad day for UK politics. This is the guy who fails to recognise the rape gangs.. actively encourages immigration and basically dosent give two hoots about British. One step closer to white mino

  • baansgr
    baansgr

    25% postal voting also....can just imagine where they came from

  • brewsterbudgen
    brewsterbudgen

    Good grief, do you really believe such nonsense? 🤣

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
10 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


That's not how claims work. You make a claim, you are supposed to provide evidence for it. Not only is it a clear forum rule but it is just the way the world works.

I could make a post and say that elephants fly around but only when no one can see them, they are invisible to detection. And then expect you to prove that they don't.

Here you go knock yourself out .... now over to you to prove its not. go find the report

Restore Britain releases 'Rape Gang Inquiry' outlining systemic rape of 250K+ British girls

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Nobody was betting on Reform or Restore. It's been a Labour seat for 120 years. A poor northern area who mistakenly think Labour represent them.

A donkey could win it and in many days it did.

However a donkey is better than a racist dictatorial Brit hating tyrant. Hence the fact this result will lead to Starmers downfall is pleasing even though instead we will get a sixth form socialist/communist who likes like something out of Wallace and Gromet.

Capeesh?

To claim “nobody was betting on Reform” is a massive rewrite of history. Reform absolutely threw the kitchen sink at Makerfield, fully expecting their local candidate to capitalise on the recent local election momentum where they took over 46% of the vote in Wigan. They didn’t just lose; they got utterly trounced.

If a "donkey" could win it, then Reform just got beaten by a landslide by a donkey. Andy Burnham didn't just crawl over the line he crushed Reform by over 9,200 votes, pulling a commanding 54.8% of the total vote share. Even if you combine the votes of Reform and the hardline Restore party, Burnham still beat them both by over 6,100 votes clear. The voter turnout actually rose compared to the general election because people actively turned up to reject the Reform platform.

As for the rest of your made-up rant, I won't dignify it with a reply.

18 minutes ago, Tidal wave said:

And you that it's not.

18 minutes ago, Tidal wave said:

He and his ilk are holocaust deniers they will deny anything,

19 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


That's not how claims work. You make a claim, you are supposed to provide evidence for it. Not only is it a clear forum rule but it is just the way the world works.

I could make a post and say that elephants fly around but only when no one can see them, they are invisible to detection. And then expect you to prove that they don't.

they didn't care about millions of jews do you expect them to care about some white trash teenage girls making racist accusations? dont be daft

30 minutes ago, Tidal wave said:

And you that it's not.

You made the claim you get to provide the evidence to back it up.

30 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


That's not how claims work. You make a claim, you are supposed to provide evidence for it. Not only is it a clear forum rule but it is just the way the world works.

I could make a post and say that elephants fly around but only when no one can see them, they are invisible to detection. And then expect you to prove that they don't.

Elephants flying would be a step up in your usual posts though🤔

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You made the claim you get to provide the evidence to back it up.

He did over to you🤔

A huge amount of tactical voting going on and I suspect quite a bit is stop Reform - good to see the majority of Brits aren't knuckle dragging racist and Restore who offer honest if repugnant views will chip away at their right flank. Lots of reasons to be cheerful right now.

Screenshot 2026-06-19 081321.jpg

27 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

To claim “nobody was betting on Reform” is a massive rewrite of history. Reform absolutely threw the kitchen sink at Makerfield, fully expecting their local candidate to capitalise on the recent local election momentum where they took over 46% of the vote in Wigan. They didn’t just lose; they got utterly trounced.

If a "donkey" could win it, then Reform just got beaten by a landslide by a donkey. Andy Burnham didn't just crawl over the line he crushed Reform by over 9,200 votes, pulling a commanding 54.8% of the total vote share. Even if you combine the votes of Reform and the hardline Restore party, Burnham still beat them both by over 6,100 votes clear. The voter turnout actually rose compared to the general election because people actively turned up to reject the Reform platform.

As for the rest of your made-up rant, I won't dignify it with a reply.

The only reason Labour won was to bring Burnham back to Parliment to oust Stalmer. The labour party have no body they can replace him with, there favourite is Burnham so it was inevitable he would win the seat. I believe if Maggie Oliver fought for Reform in the seat it might have been different.

53 minutes ago, Tidal wave said:

Here you go knock yourself out .... now over to you to prove its not. go find the report

Restore Britain releases 'Rape Gang Inquiry' outlining systemic rape of 250K+ British girls

Rupert Lowe has produced zero evidence to back up his claim of 250,000 rape victims.

He’s simply extrapolated from data produced by others.

There is no evidence to substantiate his extrapolation.

It plays well to simpletons.

21 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

The only reason Labour won was to bring Burnham back to Parliment to oust Stalmer. The labour party have no body they can replace him with, there favourite is Burnham so it was inevitable he would win the seat. I believe if Maggie Oliver fought for Reform in the seat it might have been different.

So if either of the hate not hope candidates had won with the majority Burnham achieved, Starmer would remain safe in No 10?

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Rupert Lowe has produced zero evidence to back up his claim of 250,000 rape victims.

He’s simply extrapolated from data produced by others.

There is no evidence to substantiate his extrapolation.

It plays well to simpletons.

Where is your proof Simplgot? I wait for your evidence of who these others are.

What utter nonsense just look how far you have fallen with this rubbish you spout

Extrapolated from data produced by victims as you well know 🤔

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You made the claim you get to provide the evidence to back it up.

He did and you can't simple as that just all gas and no substance🤔

1 hour ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

To claim “nobody was betting on Reform” is a massive rewrite of history. Reform absolutely threw the kitchen sink at Makerfield, fully expecting their local candidate to capitalise on the recent local election momentum where they took over 46% of the vote in Wigan. They didn’t just lose; they got utterly trounced.

If a "donkey" could win it, then Reform just got beaten by a landslide by a donkey. Andy Burnham didn't just crawl over the line he crushed Reform by over 9,200 votes, pulling a commanding 54.8% of the total vote share. Even if you combine the votes of Reform and the hardline Restore party, Burnham still beat them both by over 6,100 votes clear. The voter turnout actually rose compared to the general election because people actively turned up to reject the Reform platform.

As for the rest of your made-up rant, I won't dignify it with a reply.

People felt that getting rid of the racist fascist tyrant Starmer was far more important and consequential to the country than having 9 reform mps instead of 8.

I agree with them.

It's so simple even you should be able to understand it.

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So if either of the hate not hope candidates had won with the majority Burnham achieved, Starmer would remain safe in No 10?

Far far safer than he is now.

That's why he blocked him from Gorton and Denton previously.

So simple even you can understand it.

Edited by JonnyF

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Far far safer than he is now.

That's why he blocked him from Gotton and Denton previously.

So simple even you can understand it.

Jonny, are you still sticking with your recent flit from being a Farage to a Lowe fan boy?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/19/andy-burnham-wins-makerfield-byelection-paving-way-labour-leadership-challenge

IMG_2237.jpeg

5 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

A relief. Especially the size of his victory over both Reform and Restore. Hopefully a turning point.


Turning point for what?

It's amazing how out of touch people can become after a few years in Thailand.

This ****hole constituency has been labour forever so it's not exactly a big achievement for labour to retain their seat there.

The labour party is currently super toxic - best chance for them is to replace starmer and call and early election as more and more people are noticing and things in England etc keep getting worse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyur1HjOCyM

42 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Rupert Lowe has produced zero evidence to back up his claim of 250,000 rape victims.

He’s simply extrapolated from data produced by others.

There is no evidence to substantiate his extrapolation.

It plays well to simpletons.

The deniers get Chompy a new brush and carpet.

Rupert Lowe exposes the BBC on the BBC for not covering the Rape Gang Crisis.

55 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

The only reason Labour won was to bring Burnham back to Parliment to oust Stalmer. The labour party have no body they can replace him with, there favourite is Burnham so it was inevitable he would win the seat. I believe if Maggie Oliver fought for Reform in the seat it might have been different.

Why did Reform put such a poor candidate up against Andy Burnham?

He may be a good plumber but as an aspiring politician Robert Kenyon was woeful.

His answers on Question Time, or rather his non answer on how to find 30,000 extra police:

'' When you say where they're coming from, you know, that'll be a problem for whoever is recruiting them.''

His refusal to apologize to Carol Vorderman no doubt put many women off.

Then you think, this bloke is supposed to study legislation in Parliament. No way! He'd have to follow party lines, hook, line and sinker.

A bad choice by Reform, thank gawd he's gone back under the sink.

Edited by bannork

.

Edited by Tourist2

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny, are you still sticking with your recent flit from being a Farage to a Lowe fan boy?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/19/andy-burnham-wins-makerfield-byelection-paving-way-labour-leadership-challenge

IMG_2237.jpeg

I prefer restore policy to reform policy if that's what you are clumsily trying to ask.

Interesting that they came third yet the BBC banned them from the debate despite them getting more votes than the conservatives greens and lib dems (who they included) combined.

Almost like the BBC were biased and trying to affect the result. 😃

Nice swerve by the way.

Edited by JonnyF

15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

People felt that getting rid of the racist fascist tyrant Starmer was far more important and consequential to the country than having 9 reform mps instead of 8.

I agree with them.

It's so simple even you should be able to understand it.

"racist fascist tyrant Starmer" - there's no headroom in your mental universe for an actual Hitler.

51 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Rupert Lowe has produced zero evidence to back up his claim of 250,000 rape victims.

He’s simply extrapolated from data produced by others.

There is no evidence to substantiate his extrapolation.

It plays well to simpletons.


Maybe not 250,000 but it's indesputable that pakistani rape gangs were raping and abusing young natives.
imagine that pakistani rape gangs were operating like that in Thailand and not paying!
How would the LOCALS in Thailand react?
Doubt they'd be shouting racist racist racist like some cloewns on here.

I know a few of you are there for the wrong reasons and ma sympathise with or be 'mIn0R aTTraCteD peOplE' but come on, try and see it through the eyes of non perverts trying to bring up kids in England.

Edited by Tourist2

1 minute ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

"racist fascist tyrant Starmer" - there's no headroom in your mental universe for an actual Hitler.

Starmer is not as bad as Hitler in my opinion.

1 minute ago, Tourist2 said:
51 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Rupert Lowe has produced zero evidence to back up his claim of 250,000 rape victims.

Why have you re-posted a pointless Higgot lie when its already been debunked?

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Starmer is not as bad as Hitler in my opinion.

Uniform by lord Alli.

HLGwZmfW4AAO_dF.jpg

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I prefer restore policy to reform policy if that's what you are clumsily trying to ask.

Interesting that they came third yet the BBC banned them from the debate despite them getting more votes than the conservatives greens and lib dems (who they included) combined.

Almost like the BBC were biased and trying to affect the result. 😃

I like Lowe as well because Rupert honestly says that if you want to "restore Britain", you will have to deport millions. For his vision, and for racists like yourself, he's probably right.

Whereas Farage has stuffed his party with grifters, chancers , pushy asians and assorted people who would hardly fit the nostalgic vision of Britain that many of his supporters claim to want.

On the bright side, if Restore cuts into Reform's vote, it will do Farage no end of harm. Keep up the good work.

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Starmer is not as bad as Hitler in my opinion.

His Jewish wife might be a problem when he comes to open the extermination camps and declares war on the world.

3 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Reform have passed their high point I can see fag ash Farage walking away before the next GE to spend more time with his money. It's over and that’s with Rupert Lowe snapping at his heels as well. Hopefully we can get some proper socialism now and help the working and middle class against the economy raping oligarch gangs. They are raping the whole world with their extraction of wealth.

HLJkSkYXIAAAntd.jpg

Proper socialism under Labour? By helping huge corporations by reducing the wages of working class people by importing third world dross to do it cheaper?

Dear oh dear you've really fallen for it 😀

Hook line and sinker 😃

Proper socialism??? Classic 😀😀😀😀

9 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I prefer restore policy to reform policy if that's what you are clumsily trying to ask.

Interesting that they came third yet the BBC banned them from the debate despite them getting more votes than the conservatives greens and lib dems (who they included) combined.

Almost like the BBC were biased and trying to affect the result. 😃

Nice swerve by the way.

You misunderstood me Jonny, I’m just concerned you might flit back to Reform, Restore are clearly a fringe minority party, they really do need your vote.

Restore were not ‘banned by the BBC, they simply fail to meet the inclusion criteria.

The monster raving lunatic party were not included either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.