11 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That must be why she wasn't charged with theft!

The reasons why someone is not charged for an offence are varied and dependent on the agreement between the victim, police and perpetrator.

In this instance she DID commit the offence of Theft by assuming the rights of the owner and pouring the milk on her head.

Police may decide not to charge for Theft as a judge may deem it an excessive punishment as she would be charged for several other offences all based on the same basic facts. It is not normal practice to charge with every offence related to the initial criminal act, but with the most appropriate one/ones.

6 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

20 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That must be why she wasn't charged with theft!

The reasons why someone is not charged for an offence are varied and dependent on the agreement between the victim, police and perpetrator

It is also dependent on whether a crime was committed or not, in this case there was no crime of theft.

The mother of idiots is always pregnant

4 hours ago, Rockyroad said:

I've eaten chocolate before payment.

Several recent cases from EU of custumer stealing from the mix n pay and got cought. Perhaps you where one of the hardened criminals?

“The incident has prompted renewed discussion about the behaviour of some tourists”

She may be a tourist or she may be here on some trumped up education visa or the like.

I hope they find her and punish her severely, otherwise we will have every limelight hungry influencer doing similar stunts.

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It is also dependent on whether a crime was committed or not, in this case there was no crime of theft.

I wonder if Thailand has an offence of vandalism or similar. I recall foreigners being sought after spraying graffiti on a temple wall.

This seems to be a case of damaging property that doesn’t belong to her.

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It is also dependent on whether a crime was committed or not, in this case there was no crime of theft.

That is your subjective opinion, sadly not based on legal understanding or prosecution practice.

I sincerely hope this interpretation does not place you in legal jeopardy in future. Good Luck.

14 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"How is this not theft?"

She didn't steal anything that's how... it's as simple as that. She did not remove anything from the premises which the Thai Criminal Code requires for theft to have occurred.

The food on her person and clothes would have been removed from the store without being paid for

21 hours ago, worgeordie said:

In my day people worked for a living , now you can be an "Influencer" or

"vologer" ,disrupt other people's lives and earn money

They make money, but it's anot a lot of money. Unless you have millions of followers you can't actually make a living on TikTok. Either way Thailand (and the world) would be better without them. As for this specific specimen - make her pay for the damages, compensation, then throw her in the immigration detention center and ship her back home after a couple of weeks.

She used "Full Cream Milk" as well, prefer the light blue top lower fat myself, tastes better in tea and coffee as well for my cereal.

If she posted it on social media it really demonstrates just how idiotic she is as she should be quite easy to track down. She needs to be charged with whatever the appropriate charges are, and perhaps a year or so in prison might help her to work on her attitude.

Either that or she's just completely unglued in which case she should be repatriated and sent to a mental institution and her native country.

1 hour ago, animalmagic said:

3 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It is also dependent on whether a crime was committed or not, in this case there was no crime of theft.

That is your subjective opinion, sadly not based on legal understanding or prosecution practice.

I sincerely hope this interpretation does not place you in legal jeopardy in future. Good Luck

And that is your subjective opinion, sadly not based on legal understanding or prosecution practice.

I sincerely hope this interpretation does not place you in legal jeopardy in future. Good Luck

There's no need for you to worry about my illegal Jeopardy!

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

"How is this not theft?"

She didn't steal anything that's how... it's as simple as that. She did not remove anything from the premises which the Thai Criminal Code requires for theft to have occurred.

The food on her person and clothes would have been removed from the store without being paid for

Hahaha... if you say so.

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

The food on her person and clothes would have been removed from the store without being paid for

Maybe she perfected the crime of the century by removing all her clothing and leaving it inside the store. Now THAT would get a few people on here following her.

On 4/26/2026 at 6:19 AM, Georgealbert said:

A foreign woman has sparked outrage after filming herself pouring milk and scattering food products inside a convenience store in Thailand, creating a mess that staff were left to clean up. The incident, reported on 26 April 2026, quickly went viral after clips circulated on social media, drawing strong criticism from Thai netizens.

Get today's headlines by email

Footage shows the woman removing snacks from shelves, opening them, and dumping the contents onto the shop floor. She then opens two bottles of fresh milk and pours them over her head, splashing liquid across the floor and nearby goods, causing damage and disruption inside the store.

The act was reportedly carried out as part of a social media stunt intended to attract views and engagement. Observers noted that the woman appeared to enjoy the behaviour and showed no visible remorse, despite the inconvenience caused to shop employees who had to clean up the mess and manage affected stock.

The video was initially posted on TikTok but was later initially deleted after widespread backlash. However, other users had already recorded and shared copies, allowing the footage to continue circulating widely online and fuelling further criticism.

Picture courtesy of Daily News

The incident has prompted renewed discussion about the behaviour of some tourists in Thailand and the impact of social media trends that encourage disruptive or irresponsible acts in public places. While no official statement on legal action has been confirmed in the report, such actions could potentially breach local laws relating to property damage or public nuisance.

Public reaction has been overwhelmingly negative, with many calling for stricter enforcement of regulations and greater accountability for visitors who engage in inappropriate conduct. Others have highlighted the burden placed on low-paid service workers who are often left to deal with the aftermath of such incidents.

Daily News reported that authorities may review the case if sufficient evidence is available, particularly given the widespread sharing of the footage. The situation also raises broader concerns about balancing tourism promotion with maintaining public order and respect for local communities.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now Dailynews 26 Apr 2026

View full article

I wish i’d been there. I would of smacked the fish lips right off the cossack bitches face. 🥊

7 hours ago, Krabi King said:

While others discuss the definition of "theft" , I'd like to continue the "clown" discussion please

The most remarkable thing for me is that she can apparently see past her own lips... Grotesque.

2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Hahaha... if you say so.

Are you saying otherwise ?

10 hours ago, animalmagic said:

Some pay the night before, some pay the morning after.

......but we're not talking about chocolate, right??🤣

A viral video showing a Russian influencer pouring milk over snacks inside a 7-Eleven in Thailand has triggered backlash online, with many locals calling the act disres…

Many are annoyed because it is seen as an example of looking down on Thai people. The poor staff would have to clean that mess up. That's what rankles people.

No one gives a hoot she pouted milk over herself or spilt crisps everywhere. Do it in her own and do it all day long.

The post video shows her making half hearted attempts to clean up, but that milk was all over the place. Crisps everywhere. Some staff members would have to clean that up, get under the fridges.

The essence of the videos was to wreck the place - that was the chore of it.

She would not have done this in Dubai, Singapore, or even China. And that's the problem.

On 4/26/2026 at 3:43 PM, Cuchulainn said:

Pig with lipstick seeking attention.

Me. Me. Look at Me. Me. Me

That's exactly the point of TikTok: to create attention to get views and likes... There is no other point to it.

It seems no one watched her start to clean up the milk with paper towels at the end of her video. She either did or intended to clean up the mess she created.

4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

6 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Hahaha... if you say so.

Are you saying otherwise

Yes, I'm saying that the the milk remaining in her hair when she left would not constitute her stealing it.

1 minute ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes, I'm saying that the the milk remaining in her hair when she left would not constitute her stealing it.

What difference does it make s to whether the milks in bottle or not ?

She left the store without paying for goods

On 4/26/2026 at 8:52 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

I would expect that also but it's not theft.

However, damage to someone else's property is a crime. The shop owner can easily claim these costs, as well as the cleaning costs, and also file a criminal complaint.

7 hours ago, wensiensheng said:

14 minutes ago, snowgard said:

However, damage to someone else's property is a crime. The shop owner can easily claim these costs, as well as the cleaning costs, and also file a criminal complaint.

I doubt 7/11 are going to make a complaint. The issue should be public nuisance violations.

1 hour ago, DonniePeverley said:

I doubt 7/11 are going to make a complaint. The issue should be public nuisance violations.

You may be right about 7-11, although I don’t know why they wouldn’t make a complaint.

I’m not sure about public nuisance. Isn’t a 7-11 private property?

16 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That must be why she wasn't charged with theft!

You made the highly suspect claim that "theft" in Thailand requires removal of the goods off-premises, and were subsequently shown to be wrong when others cited the actual law. Now you are moving the goalpost, trying to argue that not being charged makes it "not theft" in the eyes of the law. 😂

When I cited section 334, no one had yet posted that the lady cleaned up the mess and that there was a possibility she had paid for the goods and prearranged consent of staff to make her stupid video. If that's true, then there was no theft. But that info had not been posted in this topic when my post cited the law.

On 4/25/2026 at 11:04 PM, save the frogs said:

7-11 should use that clip in a commercial

Russian? A very bad lip job. I guess she is not getting any at home and thought Thailand would be her best choice to get laid. Unfortunately ended up in the 7 11...No 7 11's in Russia.

"Prearranged prank"? What a load of nonsense.

12 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

......but we're not talking about chocolate, right??🤣

All depends on your preferences.