2 hours ago, nauseus said:

From the ever sensationalist socilist Guardian:

KNIFE ATTACK ON DINGHY

In footage livestreamed to his followers, Thomas can be seen stabbing the inflatable several times as air escapes from the vessel.

A rescue worker wearing high-visibility clothing and a helmet was on the dinghy at the time. Not just hi viz gear, there was thermal gear and a personal floatation device. The worker approached the rubber inflatable after Thomas did and he was supported by his crewmates in their Fast Rescue Craft, very close nearby. Sea like a millpond.

The footage does not show what happened to the rescue worker after Thomas's boat moved away. Thomas did not attempt to slash the "worker", who was well equipped and escorted but seemed more worried about recovering the outboard motor than potential harm to himself. Nothing was shown later because there was nothing to see.

The incident has prompted condemnation from refugee charities and triggered a police investigation. Of course it did.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary said officers were making inquiries into the boat-slashing incident. Of course they were.

Which bit is the sensational socialist bit?????.......seems like a straight forward account of what is in the video.

4 hours ago, Chivas said:

I understand from Twitter/X they he has now been detained by Police

Him and that coked up Yaxxey-Lennon are a danger to society

Good job .. the outcry from the right last night was that the coaches from Gosport had a police escort.

But you got to wonder what goes through their heads - From what I saw from Tommos garbled YouTube uploads, the boat couldn't land in Portsmouth, he got close enough in the rescue to disrupt the route, then after the boat put some distance between him, were heading to Gosport. I could be wrong, but basically he made himself a nuisance at sea, possibly endangering the rescue crew, then the idiots were amazed there was a massive police escort, what could possibly go wrong? a concrete post being launched from a bridge? Tommo and his crew should be proscribed. hes verging on KKK intimidation.

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Yes, I imagine they were legal..............there are no legal routes which allow individuals to apply for asylum, if outside the UK........you have to be, in effect, chosen by an organisation UKRS, ARAP.......or "get yourself into the UK", hence the small boats.

You are assuming that the tens of thousands of young men who've arrived - and continue to arrive - in the UK by the small boat route are all genuine asylum seekers. Another common trope: conflating illegal migration with the seeking of asylum.

I'll go out on a limb here and say that, in the main, these new arrivals are not fleeing persecution. In the main, I suspect, also, their views on, say, homosexuality and women's rights are unlikely to be as liberal and tolerant as one might like.

2 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

These Invaders might have been at Sea for over 36 hours. Landed undetected by Border force just allowed to hit the beach then run off no one knows who they are or where they went.

This isn't the states ... its not the end game, lol.

The idea is to arrive, be picked up and claim asylum.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s not illegal to enter the UK to seek amnesty as a refugee.

I’d have to back and check your posts on BREXIT to determine your views on migrants arriving by a ‘legal’ route.

Ah. Sophistry in action.

Plus the UK Government describes small boat arrivals as an "illegal entry route".

They may all want to claim asylum but the data show that many of them are assessed as undeserving.

Figures for asylum claims from small boat arrivals in the illegal entry routes ...

Since 2018, 95% of the people arriving on a small boat have claimed asylum. Of the 178,845 small boat arrivals claiming asylum since 2018, almost three-quarters (74% or 132,894) had received a substantive decision on their claim. Of these, 79,589 were granted asylum or some other protection status and 53,305 were refused.

For small boat arrivals who have received an initial decision on their asylum claim, outcomes vary by nationality and individual circumstance. Some nationalities have relatively high asylum grant rates (for example, 86% of Eritreans who arrived in 2025 via small boat were granted at initial decision), whereas others have much lower grant rates (for example, 34% for Afghans).

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-system-statistics-year-ending-march-2026/how-many-small-boat-arrivals-have-claimed-asylum-or-been-referred-to-the-national-referral-mechanism

46 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

When you look up can you see any daylight?

Yes mate - I have Velux windows - it's a sunny day here in England - a perfect 24 degreesso I'll be off to the pool later!

Anyway, have you stopped to consider if this guy Danny Thomas may be another government psyop
to paint people who likes border rules / enforcement as dangerous extremists?

We saw how the UK governments 'Nudge'/propaganda/PR/PsyOp Unit and their partners in the MSM were used to scare the <deleted> out of everyone over coldvid and WMDs - what's to say it isn't being used again here?

The real winners in a Yookay race-war scenario wouldn’t be any of the people actually deflating dinghies.

It would be the same soft-handed, over-credentialed, permanently alarmed class that already runs the place.

Chaos is their favourite growth industry.

Here's the menu of lovely new powers they’d quietly serve themselves:

Emergency powers and curfews become permanent “temporary” measures.

First it’s “just until things calm down,” then it’s “for public safety,”

then it’s just the new normal.

Entire postcodes locked down at 9pm because some committee decided the vibes were off.

You want to walk your dog after dark?

Better have the right paperwork and the right skin tone for that particular street, mate - that is IF you're still allowed dogs in that postcode.

Surveillance on steroids.

Facial recognition cameras on every corner that used to only watch the high street now watch your living-room window.

Phone location data handed over “voluntarily” under the new Public Order Continuity Act.

Every WhatsApp group flagged if more than three people complain about the same thing.

Privacy becomes a luxury product for people who already live behind gates.

Enforced zones.

“No-go” and “protected” areas drawn on maps by people who have never set foot in them.

Certain neighbourhoods officially designated “high-tension community management zones.”

You need a digital pass to enter, exit, or buy milk.

The same civil servants who spent years denying two-tier policing suddenly get to formalise it with nice colour-coded maps and funding streams.

Expanded enforcement apparatus.

More police with fewer constraints, more private security firms on government contracts, more “community liaison officers” who answer to the Home Office rather than the public.

The Met gets shiny new toys and the legal cover to use them.

Arrests for “online incitement” spike while actual street violence is managed with press conferences.

Narrative control upgrades.

The Online Safety Act gets emergency amendments so any footage that contradicts the official story can be throttled in real time.

Independent journalists and livestreamers find their bank accounts frozen “pending investigation.”

The BBC and the rest of the legacy outlets become even more explicitly state-adjacent information management organs.

In short, the establishment doesn’t fear a race war the way ordinary people do.

They fear losing control.

A messy, visible breakdown lets them tighten every remaining screw under the banner of “restoring order.”

More cameras, more permits, more zones, more curfews, less privacy, and a population too exhausted and divided to notice that the people writing the rules never have to live under them.

That’s the real prize for the managerial class: not victory in any tribal sense, just a bigger, thicker, more permanent cage with them holding the keys.

Classic British decline strategy - crisis into career advancement and call it competence.

Edited September 23Sep 23 by Tourist2

2 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

the system would get overwhelmed

And who might want the system to be overwhelmed?

34 minutes ago, recom273 said:

Good job .. the outcry from the right last night was that the coaches from Gosport had a police escort.

But you got to wonder what goes through their heads - From what I saw from Tommos garbled YouTube uploads, the boat couldn't land in Portsmouth, he got close enough in the rescue to disrupt the route, then after the boat put some distance between him, were heading to Gosport. I could be wrong, but basically he made himself a nuisance at sea, possibly endangering the rescue crew, then the idiots were amazed there was a massive police escort, what could possibly go wrong? a concrete post being launched from a bridge? Tommo and his crew should be proscribed. hes verging on KKK intimidation.

The only people endangering rescue crews are boatloads of illegals leaving a perfectly safe country.

24 minutes ago, BKKBike09 said:

You are assuming that the tens of thousands of young men who've arrived - and continue to arrive - in the UK by the small boat route are all genuine asylum seekers. Another common trope: conflating illegal migration with the seeking of asylum.

I'll go out on a limb here and say that, in the main, these new arrivals are not fleeing persecution. In the main, I suspect, also, their views on, say, homosexuality and women's rights are unlikely to be as liberal and tolerant as one might like.

Not too sure I would disagree with you.......soz.

Not only are many simply chancing their arm, they are, in many respects, destroying the chances of genuine asylum seekers from reaching safety.

I think my issue is with the unnecessary rhetoric from some on here, from some politicians and from the most loathesome creatures of all....those who probably don't really care, but are looking to make money out of the whole sad situation.

16 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

Yes mate - I have Velux windows - it's a sunny day here in England - a perfect 24 degreesso I'll be off to the pool later!

Anyway, have you stopped to consider if this guy Danny Thomas may be another government psyop
to paint people who likes border rules / enforcement as dangerous extremists?

We saw how the UK governments 'Nudge'/propaganda/PR/PsyOp Unit and their partners in the MSM were used to scare the <deleted> out of everyone over coldvid and WMDs - what's to say it isn't being used again here?

The real winners in a Yookay race-war scenario wouldn’t be any of the people actually deflating dinghies.

It would be the same soft-handed, over-credentialed, permanently alarmed class that already runs the place.

Chaos is their favourite growth industry.

Here's the menu of lovely new powers they’d quietly serve themselves:

Emergency powers and curfews become permanent “temporary” measures.

First it’s “just until things calm down,” then it’s “for public safety,”

then it’s just the new normal.

Entire postcodes locked down at 9pm because some committee decided the vibes were off.

You want to walk your dog after dark?

Better have the right paperwork and the right skin tone for that particular street, mate - that is IF you're still allowed dogs in that postcode.

Surveillance on steroids.

Facial recognition cameras on every corner that used to only watch the high street now watch your living-room window.

Phone location data handed over “voluntarily” under the new Public Order Continuity Act.

Every WhatsApp group flagged if more than three people complain about the same thing.

Privacy becomes a luxury product for people who already live behind gates.

Enforced zones.

“No-go” and “protected” areas drawn on maps by people who have never set foot in them.

Certain neighbourhoods officially designated “high-tension community management zones.”

You need a digital pass to enter, exit, or buy milk.

The same civil servants who spent years denying two-tier policing suddenly get to formalise it with nice colour-coded maps and funding streams.

Expanded enforcement apparatus.

More police with fewer constraints, more private security firms on government contracts, more “community liaison officers” who answer to the Home Office rather than the public.

The Met gets shiny new toys and the legal cover to use them.

Arrests for “online incitement” spike while actual street violence is managed with press conferences.

Narrative control upgrades.

The Online Safety Act gets emergency amendments so any footage that contradicts the official story can be throttled in real time.

Independent journalists and livestreamers find their bank accounts frozen “pending investigation.”

The BBC and the rest of the legacy outlets become even more explicitly state-adjacent information management organs.

In short, the establishment doesn’t fear a race war the way ordinary people do.

They fear losing control.

A messy, visible breakdown lets them tighten every remaining screw under the banner of “restoring order.”

More cameras, more permits, more zones, more curfews, less privacy, and a population too exhausted and divided to notice that the people writing the rules never have to live under them.

That’s the real prize for the managerial class: not victory in any tribal sense, just a bigger, thicker, more permanent cage with them holding the keys.

Classic British decline strategy - crisis into career advancement and call it competence.

Farage.....Lowe?

OMG....now that is scary.....all in on it.

2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

What Patriot? THE RNLI are way in the background, no other patriots in shot.

Do you have eyes? He was on the boat before Danny Thicko reached it, and well before he started slashing it. And there will be lots of other videos from different angles that the police will obtain.

He's going to be in serious trouble for this one. Better start begging for donations for his legal fund if he hasn't already.

I doubt he will be in "serious trouble", because of the Public Interest aspect. He will be in trouble, of a technical nature, which he will try and spin as "serious trouble". Its not so much begging as grifting. Yaxley-Lennon used his legal fund donations to go on holiday. He grifted for donations, promising a ground shaking defence, promptly pleaded guilty, so no need for a brief, did his bird, probably pretty soft one at that. Tommo wants a bit of that action. He's done prison, found out the shower raping wasn't that bad, if it means he can get that M3 he's been after. People complain about the state of the UK. This is what it looks like, people committing criminal acts for the likes and clicks and £££s. He's a Public Schoolboy, probably was hopeless at his exams, so joined the army as a squaddie, medically discharged during training (if he had done decently at his GCSES and A-Levels, then the school cadet force would have encouraged him into Sandhurst). Then bricklayer, sales scumbag and "web designer" (which any muppet can do, if your customers are 70+ years old), before somehow becoming a bodyguard with a criminal record (so not actually a proper body guard with appropriate liability insurance).

5 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

I doubt he will be in "serious trouble", because of the Public Interest aspect. He will be in trouble, of a technical nature, which he will try and spin as "serious trouble". Its not so much begging as grifting. Yaxley-Lennon used his legal fund donations to go on holiday. He grifted for donations, promising a ground shaking defence, promptly pleaded guilty, so no need for a brief, did his bird, probably pretty soft one at that. Tommo wants a bit of that action. He's done prison, found out the shower raping wasn't that bad, if it means he can get that M3 he's been after. People complain about the state of the UK. This is what it looks like, people committing criminal acts for the likes and clicks and £££s. He's a Public Schoolboy, probably was hopeless at his exams, so joined the army as a squaddie, medically discharged during training (if he had done decently at his GCSES and A-Levels, then the school cadet force would have encouraged him into Sandhurst). Then bricklayer, sales scumbag and "web designer" (which any muppet can do, if your customers are 70+ years old), before somehow becoming a bodyguard with a criminal record (so not actually a proper body guard with appropriate liability insurance).

I think he will be seriously pee'd off if this doesn't result in a big court case and, preferably, another stint inside.

Pretty sure he doesn't give a damn about the 'small boats'.......this is about publicity to make money.

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Sorry, I don't need AI to watch a video for me, especially unattributed AI

LOL. And then you post a screenshot from the exact same AI I used. Mine's unattributed but yours is? How does that work?

Okay, so there's a French rescue worker on the dinghy as Thomas slashes it. I'd need the extenuating circumstances. All of them. The rescue worker obviously came off of a boat so where's the boat? He's on the dinghy but is he in any real danger? If he wasn't then this is just being hyped up.

20 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Farage.....Lowe?

OMG....now that is scary.....all in on it.

Looks like you've caught the English variant of Trumps Dreangement Snydrome.
Too bad

Edited September 23Sep 23 by Tourist2

2 hours ago, Tourist2 said:

The Yookay establishment is obviously 100% into and likely behind it ALL.

Migrants for cheap labour for their big business donors.
Extra bodies to prop up land and housing values (again benfits the 0000.01% disproportionately)
Extra Crime = they can bring in new controls and laws esp criminalising the 'white working class' who the establishment have feared and hated since the peasants revolt.
Breed the whites out with more docile, lower IQ, and easier to control 3rd worlders.

BUT

60% on here seems to think the Oxbrige educated politicians and social engineers are 'stupid'
and that they just need their stupidity explained to them 🙄

Or the other

35% seems to think the migrants are honest and just escaping war 🤣

FFS. Which group are are more stupid?

PS I think you NEED it:
https://miri.substack.com/p/the-kids-of-the-sexual-revolution

.

Thanks for the offer, T2. It's a damn long read. I see where it's going but my ideas have developed beyond the ideas expressed in that substack. It might be useful and helpful for some but it's not for me.

Everyone has their views of that era. And every view is an interpretation based on individual beliefs. No two are the same. But interpretations they are in the end. I have my own. This is not the place to have that discussion, though.

47 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

I doubt he will be in "serious trouble", because of the Public Interest aspect. He will be in trouble, of a technical nature, which he will try and spin as "serious trouble". Its not so much begging as grifting. Yaxley-Lennon used his legal fund donations to go on holiday. He grifted for donations, promising a ground shaking defence, promptly pleaded guilty, so no need for a brief, did his bird, probably pretty soft one at that. Tommo wants a bit of that action. He's done prison, found out the shower raping wasn't that bad, if it means he can get that M3 he's been after. People complain about the state of the UK. This is what it looks like, people committing criminal acts for the likes and clicks and £££s. He's a Public Schoolboy, probably was hopeless at his exams, so joined the army as a squaddie, medically discharged during training (if he had done decently at his GCSES and A-Levels, then the school cadet force would have encouraged him into Sandhurst). Then bricklayer, sales scumbag and "web designer" (which any muppet can do, if your customers are 70+ years old), before somehow becoming a bodyguard with a criminal record (so not actually a proper body guard with appropriate liability insurance).

And:

40 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

I think he will be seriously pee'd off if this doesn't result in a big court case and, preferably, another stint inside.

Pretty sure he doesn't give a damn about the 'small boats'.......this is about publicity to make money.

Both spot on.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

They get their claim for asylum assessed.

And since Labour were elected, those that fail in their claim get deported.

Refer to the audit published by the UNHCR in September 2026 which highlighted systemic processing issues within the UK asylum system. I hear it's rather damning. Give it a read.

32 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

LOL. And then you post a screenshot from the exact same AI I used. Mine's unattributed but yours is? How does that work?

Okay, so there's a French rescue worker on the dinghy as Thomas slashes it. I'd need the extenuating circumstances. All of them. The rescue worker obviously came off of a boat so where's the boat? He's on the dinghy but is he in any real danger? If he wasn't then this is just being hyped up.

Yes, I was saying that you would rather use AI then look at the video, so as well as a description of what was clearly going on, I said:

But seeing as you don't trust your own eyes but prefer AI to watch it for you, here you go (and I include the question so you know if it was loaded or not):

But seriously, just watch the video, it really is much easier.

It was taking the mick out of your insistence on using AI rather than just watching the damn thing.

Okay, so there's a French rescue worker on the dinghy as Thomas slashes it. I'd need the extenuating circumstances. All of them. The rescue worker obviously came off of a boat so where's the boat? He's on the dinghy but is he in any real danger? If he wasn't then this is just being hyped up.

Don't worry, the police will go through everything and I am sure will gather other video evidence and witnesses. So I can wait for that.

Do you think "well there was another boat nearby that could have picked him up so he wasn't in real danger" is going to be accepted as an excusing for slashing a boat up when there's someone on it in the open sea?

It's like if the patriots racist wife-beating boneheads setting fire to the asylum hotel responded by saying "we knew the fire brigae would be called so they were in no real danger" as "extenuating circumstances".

Sorry, that's not going to help him.

1 hour ago, BKKBike09 said:

You are assuming that the tens of thousands of young men who've arrived - and continue to arrive - in the UK by the small boat route are all genuine asylum seekers. Another common trope: conflating illegal migration with the seeking of asylum.

I'll go out on a limb here and say that, in the main, these new arrivals are not fleeing persecution. In the main, I suspect, also, their views on, say, homosexuality and women's rights are unlikely to be as liberal and tolerant as one might like.

A whistleblower in the UK claimed that just 1% of asylum-seekers are genuine.

16 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Yes, I was saying that you would rather use AI then look at the video, so as well as a description of what was clearly going on, I said:

But seeing as you don't trust your own eyes but prefer AI to watch it for you, here you go (and I include the question so you know if it was loaded or not):

But seriously, just watch the video, it really is much easier.

It was taking the mick out of your insistence on using AI rather than just watching the damn thing.

I got that. It seems this entire explanation is just a bit of backsliding because you skipped around the one and only point you replied to..

57 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

LOL. And then you post a screenshot from the exact same AI I used. Mine's unattributed but yours is? How does that work?

I do pay attention to nuance.

22 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Don't worry, the police will go through everything and I am sure will gather other video evidence and witnesses. So I can wait for that.

Why wait for more factual details. Seems to me your mind has already been made up. I think you're keeping your fingers crossed that the police will confirm the outcome you desire so perhaps you can come back here to gloat about being right.

I don't have my mind made up and I don't wish an outcome that makes me right. I just want the truth — whatever it happens to be. If Thomas did indeed seriously jeopardize someone's safety then he should pay the price. If the Frenchie was in no serious danger then this is overblown and Thomas shuld walk.

Now that's a completely different approach towards this incident than other folks who are pro-immigration and they're only interest is to railroad someone who is anti-immigration, truth be damned. Is that your approach to this? I dunno. I'm asking you.

33 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Do you think "well there was another boat nearby that could have picked him up so he wasn't in real danger" is going to be accepted as an excusing for slashing a boat up when there's someone on it in the open sea?

It's like if the patriots racist wife-beating boneheads setting fire to the asylum hotel responded by saying "we knew the fire brigae would be called so they were in no real danger" as "extenuating circumstances".

Sorry, that's not going to help him.

Given this I kinda think I know what your approach is.

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s not illegal to enter the UK to seek amnesty as a refugee.

I’d have to back and check your posts on BREXIT to determine your views on migrants arriving by a ‘legal’ route.

So illegal if not a refugee.

7 hours ago, 23RD said:

What crime could he be charged with?

Destroying the property of criminal crime syndicates and human Traffickers?

Preventing illegal immigration?

According to the article below, he could be charged with recklessly endangering the life of the rescue worker that was in the dinghy.

https://searchlightmagazine.com/2026/09/danny-tommo-could-face-serious-jail-time-after-channel-knife-stunt/

6 hours ago, 23RD said:

Funny enough I can't see the Human Traffickers who purchased the dinghy turning up in a UK Court as witnesses

I suspect it's much more likely that the French rescue worker whose life he endangered would be the one turning up to testify against him.

13 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

According to the article below, he could be charged with recklessly endangering the life of the rescue worker that was in the dinghy.

https://searchlightmagazine.com/2026/09/danny-tommo-could-face-serious-jail-time-after-channel-knife-stunt/

That would go down well with the British Public charge a Patriot for attempting to stop a crime whilst at the same time letting a bunch of Dinghy Invaders off with braking UK Immigration Laws and funding organised crime.

I strongly suspect that's exactly the effect Patriot Platform want to achieve.

11 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

I suspect it's much more likely that the French rescue worker whose life he endangered would be the one turning up to testify against him.

Easy defence what was a French rescue worker doing aiding and abetting illegal immigration in UK territorial waters.

7 hours ago, Will B Good said:

We had a married Syrian couple move in next door to us........we didn't know them socially, by pure chance we were moving out........he was a neurosurgeon and his wife was a cardiologist.

I'm a nuclear scientist and so's my wife do you believe me too?

16 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

I'm a nuclear scientist and so's my wife do you believe me too?

Based on many of your previous posts I'd guess you don't even understand the principle of equivalence.....embarrassing.

16 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

I'm a nuclear scientist and so's my wife do you believe me too?

I had 1500 rapists/ terrorists/thieves from small boat crossings move into a disused military base next to me.

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Based on many of your previous posts I'd guess you don't even understand the principle of equivalence.....embarrassing.

I don't recall ever writing a single post about equivalence never mind the "many" you refer too. Is there a specific one that you remember ? Anyway to be honest Its pretty basic stuff , I could explain it in a single post and you'd soon get your head round it, Why do you feel embarrassed?

15 minutes ago, sungod said:

I had 1500 rapists/ terrorists/thieves from small boat crossings move into a disused military base next to me.

Oh my god that must be awful are there any doctors or engineers amongst them?