-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
-
Latest posts...
-
0
Israeli ex-security officials call on Trump to end Gaza War
Hundreds of retired Israeli security officials urged US President Donald Trump on Monday to pressure the Israeli government into ending the war in Gaza, saying Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat and calling on the US leader to help "steer" their country’s course. More than 600 retired Israeli security officials including former heads of intelligence agencies have urged US President Donald Trump to pressure their own government to end the war in Gaza. "It is our professional judgement that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel," the former officials wrote in an open letter shared with the media on Monday, calling on Trump to "steer" Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decisions. Hundreds of Israeli ex-security officials call on Trump to end Gaza war -
35
U.K. EV values fall off a cliff
@Cardano doesn't own an EV - he's not that stupid to fall for the hype! @Cardano has never purchased insurance for an EV - see above! @Cardano thinks EV insurance doesn't reflect the replacement cost of the car - Example; 2021 Mazda 2 1.3S, Roojai 2025 1st class premium B6,000, vehicle sum insured B400,000 vs 2023 Neta V Roojai 2025 1st class premium B9,500, vehicle sum insured B200,000, Battery replacement sum insured B200,000......go check it yourself. @Cardano thinks EV insurance doesn't decrease each year as the car's value decreases - don't think anything of the sort and never mentioned this, however it is a well document fact that insurance premiums for EV's are dramatically increasing worldwide, even a major Thai insurer not long ago announced it was actually looking at pulling out of the EV insurance market due to excessive repair costs driving premiums beyond an acceptable range. -
183
Report French President Macron Slams Baseless Rumours Claiming His Wife Is a Man
Conclusive proof. Close the thread🤦 -
30
Report Thaksin Donates 1m Baht: Boosts Border Cops' Morale
No, it's TaxIn not tax out.😀 -
66
Report Aussie Women Get Green Light to Sue Qatar Airways for Airport Ordeal
The women are claiming damages done by Qatar Authorities in Qatar, against Qatar Airways who did not commit any act of negligence or error. However, because Qatar Airways did not refuse to comply with the Qatar Authorities, they were possibly negligent? What a load of total political BS. The politics behind the women being allowed to sue Qatar Airways in the AFC, and the personal financial motives, are atrocious and an insult to international law. This all happened in 2020 and the Authorities in the Qatar Airport were prosecuted (I dont know outcome). Before you continue with the outrage - which I do understand and agree with somewhat - many women were 'searched' - over 100 I believe. A newborn baby was abandoned in the airport toilets and the Qatar Authorities believed the Mother was one of the passengers who had boarded or was boarding planes. In Qatar that is a very very serious crime - it is attempted murder to abandon a new born baby. The Qatar Authorities have since found out who the mother is and have issued an arrest warrant - she had left the country. There is no doubt what was done to the women was unacceptable - in Australia or any civilised country - but it was done by Qatar Authorities in Qatar not Qatar Airways - and the Qatar Government has apologised to all the women involved - I have no idea regarding if any compensation has been offered. But I do know that this case should not have proceeded - it was rejected by the AFC in April 2024 for obvious legal reasons, and it was previously denied in the lower Courts. IMO this has become very political and is now all about women's rights worldwide. But IMO the women should be seeking 'remedy' through ICJ not through AFC - but politics is at play here big time and that you cannot understand that shows your ignorance of the laws. If they somehow win, that would set a legal precedent which would mean that any illegal act under Australian Law committed in any country within the confines of the airport against an Australian, whether legal in that country or not, could be tried against the airline who flew that person into that airport. Forcing legal liability on the airlines to be responsible for such a situation, when that act is outside of their control (eg. raped in airport toilets) is a ridiculous and erroneous legal precedent. What airline will carry an Australian passengers into any country if they are legally liable for anything that happens to them in that other airport?? There is a point when the airline can no longer be held liable for what happens to its passengers - acts by the authorities in another country is surely well past that point of liability. As you have said, Qatar Airways Australia would probably prefer to settle this matter and reach a settlement. But I think the politics behind this may seek to force Qatar itself to be found guilty and be forced to pay compensation, and they are squeezing Qatar Airways to push their Owner to comply. I guess how far this goes in the AFC will depend upon how things are negotiated though the 'back channels. I suspect that if Qatar passed laws prohibiting the medical invasive inspection of women without their permission or a Court Order, the case would be 'allowed' to fade away. -
40
Crime Swedish Tourist Nabbed for Illegal Drone Use in Pattaya
https://uasportal.caat.or.th/ https://www.caat.or.th/en/archives/27220
-
-
Popular in The Pub
.thumb.jpg.3ee24d9400fb02605ea21bc13b1bf901.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now