Aerial Photography
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
92
US Nurse Suffers Devastating Facial Injuries in Krabi Moped Crash
The lack of compassion so many of the posters on these threads is sickening. Most of you would be playing a different tune if it was one of your family members...but then again maybe not. -
48
Trump Administration Debuts Legal Blueprint for Disappearing Anyone It Wants
Thanks buddy. I always like to be told I'm special. Nonetheless, this dude did not have the legal right to be in the US: the judge in his case only granted him 'withholding of removal to El Salvador', which - as per the recent Supreme Court ruling - does not confer any lawful status within the United States while DHS remains free to remove the person to a third country other than the country to which removal has been withheld. The guy himself also accepted back in 2019 that he could be deported. Book him, Dan O. In October 2019, after Abrego Garcia had “conceded his removability as charged,” an IJ ordered Abrego Garcia’s removal from the United States under Title 8. App., infra, 7a; see id. at 60a. The IJ determined, however, that it was more likely than not that, if Abrego Garcia returned to El Salvador, he would be subject to persecution on account of his affiliation with his mother, whose “earnings from the pupusa business” had been allegedly targeted by “the Barrio 18 gang.” Id. at 15a.2 The IJ therefore granted Abrego Garcia withholding of removal to El Salvador under 8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3). App., infra, 11a-15a. Withholding of removal “only bars deporting an alien to a particular country or countries,” INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415, 419 (1999)—in Abrego Garcia’s case, to El Salvador. Because “withholding of removal is a form of ‘ “country specific” ’ relief ” but does not confer any lawful status within the United States, DHS remains free to “remov[e] the alien to a third country other than the country to which removal has been withheld.” Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, 594 U.S. 523, 531-532 (2021) (brackets and citations omitted). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A949/354843/20250407103341248_Kristi Noem application.pdf -
81
-
81
Those of you who live on 40k a month
Used to be able to get a 50b BJ from the bush babies... ahh those were the day. -
90
British Woman Arrested at Phuket Airport for 207-Day Visa Overstay
IDC staff do not have them available at all, never mind "inflated prices". -
20
Thai Authorities Order Closure of 55 Buildings Post-Quake
Most likely on prime real estate.... the closures will bankrupt the owners so will firesale and will be scooped up by wealthy politicians!!
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now