I didn't cherry pick it. The BBC news site either the UK or the England page had a high lighted top story, then six other high lighted stories. The Emma Watson story was one high lighted by the BBC. No cherry picking. Clearly the BBC thought that was a top story. Ignore the comments others make.
Why? What's the value proposition? It has higher fees than when I use banks, I have to worry about paying tax every time I want to use it because it's taxed as an asset, not a currency. It's way too volatile to be used as a stable currency. Real world applications are limited to mostly shady stuff - you're not going to buy groceries with Bitcoin. Etc etc etc. Just the volatility and tax worries guarantee most people would never view it as a currency.
I keep hearing this mantra pumped by people who are already heavily invested into it. But answer this question: why would I ever NEED it? aside from investment.
There is a select group of men who cannot be alone. It's in their DNA to be in a relationship aka married. IMO the only reason to have a steady lady is if you have a kid together.
I enjoy cooking, quite capable of taking care of myself. The idea of having a wife who will take care of you in your old old age would not be my choice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now