Thai at Heart Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Can a slick lawyer site this precedence for farang convicts? How about all murderers....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 So do you think, these crooked cops will do a runner? I bet nooooo they will be back to serve their death sentence... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPI Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 It makes one wonder what was going through the Judges mind when he made this decision? These "men" have been sentenced to death, of course they're going to flee, of course they're going to take revenge on the witnesses....it's very sad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 It makes one wonder what was going through the Judges mind when he made this decision? These "men" have been sentenced to death, of course they're going to flee, of course they're going to take revenge on the witnesses....it's very sad! You/I/we do not know what goes on behind the scenes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnniey Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 The cop wjo murdered the English couple in Kanchanaburi a few years ago is probably walking around a free man. Thai authorities refuse to confirm he is still incarcirated. thats a guy who shot the husband and then chased the wife in his car ran over her then shot her. Now probably free. Cops and plolotitions imune from punishment. The guy did spit in his face. Thais murdering farang is acceptable here. I used to work with a guy who allegedlly threw his girlfriend off a balcony. By the time his trial came the guy was so beaten up he looked like another man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 It makes one wonder what was going through the Judges mind when he made this decision? These "men" have been sentenced to death, of course they're going to flee, of course they're going to take revenge on the witnesses....it's very sad! You/I/we do not know what goes on behind the scenes. Fabulous, public courts with behind the scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnniey Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Where do a few of you come from even in the states a murder defendant can be granted bail as well as a convicted murder awaiting appeal. This is more likely granted to someone of influence kind of the same as Thailand. I know some who was accused of murder and they were locked up for a month awaiting the second bail hearing as the first was sandbagged by the district attorney. The bail amount was reduced 500,000dollars from 1 million when friends of the charged testified to his sterling character. Eventually the DA dropped the murder charge for lack of evidence but the ddefendant had to plead to a lesser charge of destroying evidence and it was finished as time served. The system is not perfect at home or in Thailand. Exactly - this is similar to that famous footballer in the uSA who got off with murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 The cop wjo murdered the English couple in Kanchanaburi a few years ago is probably walking around a free man. Thai authorities refuse to confirm he is still incarcirated. thats a guy who shot the husband and then chased the wife in his car ran over her then shot her. Now probably free. Cops and plolotitions imune from punishment. The guy did spit in his face. Thais murdering farang is acceptable here. I used to work with a guy who allegedlly threw his girlfriend off a balcony. By the time his trial came the guy was so beaten up he looked like another man. if i remember well, the english guy did punch the cop face. Because the thai did behave improperly with the english lady... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricci Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 (edited) the credibility goes down the toilet ... again ... like any other day in other countries actions like that would create a breeding ground for some dangerous and radical individuals ... but not in the "mai-bpen-rai" state Edited August 1, 2012 by Ricci Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theanimaster Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 (edited) Well... now you know what those Cheshire cat grins were all about from the recent photos: "Just smile and wave boys. You'll be out sooner than you can say 'It wasn't me'!" Predictable. Edited August 1, 2012 by theanimaster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surangw Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 It makes one wonder what was going through the Judges mind when he made this decision? These "men" have been sentenced to death, of course they're going to flee, of course they're going to take revenge on the witnesses....it's very sad! its not what is going through his mind , its whats going into his out held hands that counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cms22 Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 What is so so sad is that the media in this country (and particularly TV and newspapers) don't even bat an eyelid. In a country that has any degree of democracy or is not faced with a dictatorship, good journalism often highlights and then prompts changes in bad systems/processes/laws etc. The pliable Thai journalists, editors and media owners should hang their head in shame... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKvampire Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) What is so so sad is that the media in this country (and particularly TV and newspapers) don't even bat an eyelid. In a country that has any degree of democracy or is not faced with a dictatorship, good journalism often highlights and then prompts changes in bad systems/processes/laws etc. The pliable Thai journalists, editors and media owners should hang their head in shame... Of course there is no investigative journalism into Police, Justice, politics and exposing all associated corruption. Where's the back bone and principals a journalist worth the name should have to find the truth and expose the sewer of Thailand? Nothing . Edited August 2, 2012 by KKvampire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorecard Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) What is so so sad is that the media in this country (and particularly TV and newspapers) don't even bat an eyelid. In a country that has any degree of democracy or is not faced with a dictatorship, good journalism often highlights and then prompts changes in bad systems/processes/laws etc. The pliable Thai journalists, editors and media owners should hang their head in shame... Agree with your comments about the media. Unfortunately reporting, by Thai reporters, of a matter like this is a process. Listen to the words spoken by the judge, take a copy of any handout material and then put it into a 'story'. As you see again and again there are large gaps and many unanswered obvious questions, even conflicting information. In almost all instances journalists / reporters don't quickly analyse what they have and quickly identify the gaps, don't identify the other facts or information needed to give a complete picture, and don't form and ask the questions that Jo public would want quickly answered. They just don't ask questions (lots of reaons behind this). There is no such thing as investigative journalism. (Would you be brave enough to investigate a large number of Thai politicians, would you be brave enough to investigate senior police officers?) On the other hand I've had dealings with the English language dailies, in terms of providing materials for their business pages. They arrived at my office, would not accept prepared literature (written profesionally with media in mind, on a thumb drive), insisted that we explain the research based concept etc., and barely listened to what was being said. Then I asked if they would provide a draft so that I could be sure important details weren't missing or weren't explained the way my company wished. The journalists reaction - they were insulted that I was suggesting they cannot write English. My Thai staff and myself explained carefully that my comment was not about their English language abilities. Bottom line, they were insulted, left and deliberately didn't take the thumb drive. A few days later the article appeared, full of mistakes and destroying the value of the research findings. We withdrew from any further work with this newspaper. Edited August 2, 2012 by scorecard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassdude007 Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Did I read this right????? The Bangkok Criminal Court handed down the death penalty on Monday for the three senior police sergeant-majors in the murder of Kiattisak Thitboonkrong, 17, Then BANGKOK: -- Five policemen convicted of killing a teenage boy as part of a government crackdown on narcotics during the first Thaksin Shinawatra government were yesterday granted temporary releases on bail. So on Monday you get the Death Penalty and on Tuesday your doing Happy hour with the boys down at the station house??? WOW and how was your day yesterday????? Geeez...TIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapfries Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 There ought to be a law against Moron-Judges in this country ! ! ! I would hope that the Opposition will drag this affair into some Cabinet meeting very soon ! ! This is too absurd for words and this Judgement should be overturned forthwith ! ! ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maidu Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Here's how I would explain it: The court was compelled to find the men guilty of murder, because of firm evidence. The judges were compelled to sentence them. But the deal to let them off with just a reprimand had been agreed prior with police boss. Other factors, Thaksin (and in turn PT and Reds) would lose face if the executions were carried out, because it was T's quota system (in war against drugs) which inspired so many extrajudicial killings. It's in the record: more deaths required for larger population provinces and less deaths for smaller provinces - the directive handed down from CEO PM Thaksin. ......and there was likely a good deal of money slipped to the judge(s) who shat upon their benches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chooka Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 This story is Satire, right? This couldn't possibly be an authentic story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colabamumbai Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 They could get a boat to Australia or Sri Lanka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chooka Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 They could get a boat to Australia or Sri Lanka. Yes they could seek asylum in Australia, Australia won't send them back if they face execution. There is a boat leaving for Australia everyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitker Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 This news is simply beyond understanding for any rightly wired brain. Pathetically amazing Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chooka Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) This shows the Thai judiciary in a very bad light indeed. The judge should have considered what will happen to the 3 key witnesses, who are now living in fear and may well end up dead. the teenage victim's aunt, Pikul Prohmchan, as saying she would seek to extend her enrolment in a witness protection programme now that the convicted killers have been set free. “I'm afraid that we might be killed before the convicts receive the capital punishment,” she said. An Unidentified judge of the Bangkok Criminal Court ordered the execution of former senior sergeants Angkarn Kammoonna, 48, Sudtinan Noanting, 43, and Pansin Uppana, 42, after the were found guilty of premeditated murder and hiding a corpse. http://www.southeastasiantimes.com/ Edited August 2, 2012 by chooka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waza Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 This shows the Thai judiciary in a very bad light indeed. The judge should have considered what will happen to the 3 key witnesses, who are now living in fear and may well end up dead. the teenage victim's aunt, Pikul Prohmchan, as saying she would seek to extend her enrolment in a witness protection programme now that the convicted killers have been set free. “I'm afraid that we might be killed before the convicts receive the capital punishment,” she said. An Unidentified judge of the Bangkok Criminal Court ordered the execution of former senior sergeants Angkarn Kammoonna, 48, Sudtinan Noanting, 43, and Pansin Uppana, 42, after the were found guilty of premeditated murder and hiding a corpse. http://www.southeastasiantimes.com/ This quote from the same news item is very interesting............ The committee’s report said: “On January 14, 2003 Thaksin chaired a meeting of provincial governors, police chiefs and heads of agencies and instructed them to wage all-out war on illicit drugs, classified as a national security threat which must be resolved without mercy, and any casualties were deemed necessary.” The result of the instruction was the formation of a National Drug Suppression Centre that compiled a blacklist of alleged traffickers. The police and other authorities were then encouraged to shorten the blacklist by extrajudicial killings. The report includes a statement by Thaksin at a March 23, 2003 meeting that traffickers could go to only two places, jail or a funeral It lists 2,656 drug-related killings involving 2,921 deaths during the three-month campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickymaster Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) If one police officer is charged with murder, it would mean that there were extra-judicial killings during Thaksins war on drugs. Therefore, these 5 policemen will eventually be cleared. Thaksin will try everything possible to avoid policemen being charged. If there were "proven" extrajudicial killings, Thaksin could be charged for crimes against humanity. He knows that. So don't expect any official to be punished. Not now, not the last 8 years and not in the future. Wait and see. Edited August 2, 2012 by Nickymaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softgeorge Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 I was listening to Melbourne radio this morning and the anouncer and guests were discussing this briefly and absolutely wetting thier pants at thailand and the judicial system, the jokes were flying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttelise Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) Where do a few of you come from even in the states a murder defendant can be granted bail as well as a convicted murder awaiting appeal. This is more likely granted to someone of influence kind of the same as Thailand. I know some who was accused of murder and they were locked up for a month awaiting the second bail hearing as the first was sandbagged by the district attorney. The bail amount was reduced 500,000dollars from 1 million when friends of the charged testified to his sterling character. Eventually the DA dropped the murder charge for lack of evidence but the ddefendant had to plead to a lesser charge of destroying evidence and it was finished as time served. The system is not perfect at home or in Thailand. While I am lawyer, I don't practice criminal. I did clerk for Court of Crminal Appeals and Supreme Court a long time ago and criminal attorney while under grad. I have never heard of a convicted murder, especially one sentenced to death, being granted bail of any kind. We have multiple billionaires right now in securities cases that are incarcerated waiting on appeals and they are not getting out for <deleted> unless all counts of their convictions are over turned. It is possible to get bail while awaiting trial for murder. The higher the grade and better the evidence, the less likely to be granted. I also doubt bails being granted to many death eligible cases. This is all, of course, pre trial bail to which I am speaking. I doubt post trial bail in murder is feasible. Even if permissible, I would wager that no state judges in my state would let a murder out on bail. If they did and the murder harmed or killed another, the state judge would be looking for a new job come next election day. Edited August 2, 2012 by ttelise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanaka Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Bail was "arranged," judges were coached, promises were made not to flee by "condemned death row" prisoners. Passports were not confiscated. No, they need to be able to go to Dubai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mobi Posted August 2, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2012 It is a stark fact that the police in Thailand very, very, rarely end up in prison for committing crimes, with the possible exception of rogue cops who have themselves made enemies within the higher echelons of the police service. It is an unwritten code that whatever crime you commit as a cop, you will be protected from the force of the law. Through the years, we have seen numerous examples of this. Usually, when a cop is involved in crimes against ordinary Thai citizens – which happen somewhere in Thailand almost every day – the crimes are never reported and the cops are never arrested or go to court. It is only when a high profile crime reaches the national or international press that the police go through this process of apparently arresting the perpetrators and bringing them to justice. This is purely to placate the public and is all part of a clever charade that has been played out time and time again. There was the drunken police sergeant in Pae back in 2008, who shot two Canadian back packers, killing one. Three years later, he had still not been brought to trial, and was still working as a police officer. In the meantime, while out on bail, he had killed his own wife, and by all accounts tried to intimidate witnesses to the killing of the Canadians. I lost track of this case in 2011, but you can bet your bottom dollar he will never spend much time in jail for any of these crimes. Then of course is the case of Duang, the son of our Deputy Prime Minister, Chalerm Yoobamrung, who back in 2001 was found guilty murdering of a junior cop and was discharged from service and stripped of his rank. Yet upon appeal, he was acquitted, when the key witnesses changed their testimony. He subsequently enlisted in the army and recently he has been transferred back to the police service as a Police Lieutenant!!! The usual MO of the ‘powers that be’ is that whenever one of their own is involved in a high profile crime, to delay the trial for many years, in the hope that it fades from public memory. If they are unsuccessful in silencing all witnesses and are eventually brought to court; and then due to overwhelming evidence, the judges feel obliged bring a guilty verdict; the convicted cops will be immediately given bail. They will then continue to pressure the witnesses in the hope that the appeal will succeed – which is usually the case. In the unlikely event that the cop actually ends up in jail – maybe 10 years after the crime was committed - he will be well taken care of, and will have his sentence substantially reduced by royal pardon, once the spotlight has turned elsewhere. Contrast this to a vast majority of arrests of ordinary, working class citizens, where the arrested person has little money and knows nobody of influence to help them. They are brought before a preliminary court, without the benefit of a lawyer or any advice and great pressure is brought to bear upon them to plead guilty in return for a reduced sentence. They are threatened with all manner of harsh treatment if they insist on their innocence. As a result, a vast majority of these poor, intimidated folk are left with no choice but to plead guilty – innocent or not – and are never given the opportunity for a proper trial, let alone bail. And many of the sentences, often for relatively minor crimes - like encroaching on forest preserves to grow food for their families - are very, very long. It was ever thus in the ‘Land of Smiles’, and there is little prospect of anything changing in the near future, when all the politicians are only concerned with fighting each other and getting an amnesty granted to the man who is ultimately responsible for the crimes that these cops were charged with. That alone is sufficient reason to assume they will never spend very long behind bars. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beetlejuice Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) Kiattisak, who was found hanged in his cell, was one of an estimated 2,800 people killed during the crackdown on drug trafficking in 2003-2004. That’s 2800 less chances of drugs being brought into the system and becoming available to vulnerable young people. The Staunch clamp down on drug dealers and drug cartels was all part of the Taksin regime at the time, a policy that I totally agreed with. Otherwise if left unchecked, than Thailand could become another Mexico, in control of criminal gangs. As far as I’m concerned these policemen are heroes, not criminals. These men are being used as fall guys to pacify the do gooders and world opinion plus to add more bad marks against Taksin. This is purely political and to help Thailand save face against it`s critics. I do hope that these policemen are treated with leniency and not put to death in order to sweep under the carpet what were the policies of the Government during that period. Edited August 2, 2012 by Beetlejuice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simple1 Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Kiattisak, who was found hanged in his cell, was one of an estimated 2,800 people killed during the crackdown on drug trafficking in 2003-2004. That’s 2800 less chances of drugs being brought into the system and becoming available to vulnerable young people. The Staunch clamp down on drug dealers and drug cartels was all part of the Taksin regime at the time, a policy that I totally agreed with. Otherwise if left unchecked, than Thailand could become another Mexico, in control of criminal gangs. As far as I’m concerned these policeman are heroes, not criminals. These men are being used as fall guys to pacify the do gooders and world opinion plus to add more bad marks against Taksin. This is purely political and to help Thailand save face against it`s critics. I do hope that these policemen are treated with leniency and not put to death in order to sweep under the carpet what were the policies of the Government during that period. Not sure if your post is a troll. If not, as you know, extra judicial killing is a criminal offense. However, wouldn't you agree the criminal gangs are in control of Thailand; just a matter of the naming convention for the "gangs". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now