Bangkok Citizens Pleased With Drainage Test, But Unsure Of System Effectiveness: Poll

[webfact]

Suan Dusit Poll reveals citizens pleased with drainage test, but unsure of system effectiveness

BANGKOK, 8 September 2012 (NNT) - Suan Dusit Poll, conducted by the Rajabhat Suan Dusit University, surveyed the opinions of 1,152 citizens in Bangkok. The subject of the poll was on the government’s drainage test which was conducted during 5-7 September.

It was found that 38.26% of the people surveyed were quite pleased with the test on drainage capability of Bangkok.

They felt the test helped create confidence, ensuring them that there were efficient water drainage plans in place.

Of those polled, 29.5% were quite displeased, because they were of the opinion that the test could send an impact to citizens living in other areas or close to the test zones, due to the daily heavy rains.

In addition, 31.77% of the respondents were not quite confident that the aforementioned drainage test would really prevent or resolve the flooding problem.

They were of the opinion that natural disasters could not be controlled.

-- NNT 2012-09-08

[Thai at Heart]

Interesting analysis of these numbers.

I know people manipulate stats, but no where do the stats support that headline.

[kimamey]

Interesting analysis of these numbers.

I know people manipulate stats, but no where do the stats support that headline.

I was thinking the same. The headline contradicts the poll.

[Pushit]

Better order more "Water pushing machines" pronto !!

[hellodolly]

Seems to me that a four hour test under controlled conditions would have no reality in connection to the flood waters last year or hopefully not but in future years.

How long would the Nation stay in business if they had to print honest headlines?

[Pib]

The govt probably ordered/paid for the survey; therefore, the analysis worded to please the customer.

[Thai at Heart]

The govt probably ordered/paid for the survey; therefore, the analysis worded to please the customer.

Well they didn't even get the results they wanted. Do another survey i guess?

[rubl]

government's drainage test which was conducted during 5-7 September.

Tomorrow: government's tests were conducted during three days

Day after tomorrow: government tests were conducted during a week

A wee bit later: government tests under rainy circumstances left people dry

(tests on Wednesday for a few hours only, flooding in Ayutthaya totally unrelated, rain caused by opponents which need eradication, farang don't understand Thai water)

[phiphidon]

government's drainage test which was conducted during 5-7 September.

Tomorrow: government's tests were conducted during three days

Day after tomorrow: government tests were conducted during a week

A wee bit later: government tests under rainy circumstances left people dry

(tests on Wednesday for a few hours only, flooding in Ayutthaya totally unrelated, rain caused by opponents which need eradication, farang don't understand Thai water)

So much negativity, not to mention naiveity and some pure nonsense.

[rubl]

government's drainage test which was conducted during 5-7 September.

Tomorrow: government's tests were conducted during three days

Day after tomorrow: government tests were conducted during a week

A wee bit later: government tests under rainy circumstances left people dry

(tests on Wednesday for a few hours only, flooding in Ayutthaya totally unrelated, rain caused by opponents which need eradication, farang don't understand Thai water)

So much negativity, not to mention naiveity and some pure nonsense.

The 'nonsense' might be correct, the naivity is puzzling and the negativity I don't understand.

Didn't I say "government tests under rainy circumstances left people dry"

[trainman34014]

IMO it's all a show and a waste of time. The real test will come when the floods come, then we will find out how satisfied people are !

[SlideRiceFC]

Interesting analysis of these numbers.

I know people manipulate stats, but no where do the stats support that headline.

Haha. Sure it does. Over 38% were "quite pleased". The headline doesn't say it was a majority. It's definitely a misleading headline but it is supported by the usual worthless poll figures that they based the article on.