Dancealot Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 (edited) Ok next: What do we see? (Taken from the Lonprayah ferry KP-Ko Tao 2013) Edited May 3, 2013 by Dancealot 1
candypants Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 (edited) You were saying, Jimmy? IMG_3447 (1000 x 562).jpg Pagnan 2013.. There appears to be a theme with them clouds that is brilliant, looks like the michelin man giving the world the finger. Dancealot, on another note, perhaps it is time you visit the different "film" or jpeg settings on your camera. you should be able to make some adjustments to in camera sharpening and colour processing. the pics all seem a little soft, and washed out, i think you could easily fiddle about a bit to give them more pop. Edited May 3, 2013 by candypants 2
Dancealot Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 You were saying, Jimmy? IMG_3447 (1000 x 562).jpg Pagnan 2013.. There appears to be a theme with them clouds that is brilliant, looks like the michelin man giving the world the finger. Dancealot, on another note, perhaps it is time you visit the different "film" or jpeg settings on your camera. you should be able to make some adjustments to in camera sharpening and colour processing. the pics all seem a little soft, and washed out, i think you could easily fiddle about a bit to give them more pop. Hmmm only thing worthwhile i could dig up was IS was set on continuous. Image stabalisation.....
candypants Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 another thing that would help is exposure compensation, the pic with the angry cloud man in it is over ecposed, you should be able to adjust your exposure using exposure compensation plus or minus. I tend to always slightly underexpose, it is much easier to bring the exposure up in post than it is to fix a blown highlight.
Dancealot Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 (edited) another thing that would help is exposure compensation, the pic with the angry cloud man in it is over ecposed, you should be able to adjust your exposure using exposure compensation plus or minus. I tend to always slightly underexpose, it is much easier to bring the exposure up in post than it is to fix a blown highlight. So when i accidentally hit a button and an annoying --2--1--0++1++2 screen appears when i take pictures is the exposure option? I found it AEB. Thanks!!! I also see now how i can use this option in combination with darker or lighter scenes. I owe you 1 candypants. Believe me I am serious. Edited May 3, 2013 by Dancealot
Tywais Posted May 6, 2013 Posted May 6, 2013 Not really sure where to put this one - trees, nature, clouds, ... 2
Guest Posted May 7, 2013 Posted May 7, 2013 Not really sure where to put this one - trees, nature, clouds, ... I never thought rainbows as clouds.. but.. why not. It's technically made out of same material.
Popular Post Dancealot Posted May 17, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 17, 2013 (edited) Clouds exposed @the lime farm Edited May 17, 2013 by Dancealot 3
samuijimmy Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 Clouds exposed @the lime farm IMG_0692.JPG IMG_0693.JPG smoking again while taking pictures !!!! tut tut! .... done in a few shots myself doing that!!!
Tywais Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 Nothing special, just a lazy day looking from my balcony in Chiang Mai. 2
samuijimmy Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 Pai 2013, Yoma Hotel swimming pool IMG_4171.JPG (thanks Shaggy!) I don't remember this place, but then not been to Pai for about 7 years now! That's one big swimming pool!
candypants Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 (edited) another thing that would help is exposure compensation, the pic with the angry cloud man in it is over ecposed, you should be able to adjust your exposure using exposure compensation plus or minus. I tend to always slightly underexpose, it is much easier to bring the exposure up in post than it is to fix a blown highlight. So when i accidentally hit a button and an annoying --2--1--0++1++2 screen appears when i take pictures is the exposure option? I found it AEB. Thanks!!! I also see now how i can use this option in combination with darker or lighter scenes. I owe you 1 candypants. Believe me I am serious. cheers. glad you are figuring it out, clouds at at pai is a nice image by the way you can also play with vibrance and clarity (in programs like lightroom) your original: quick edit to reduce the blown highlight a bit and push clarity and vibrance Edited May 18, 2013 by candypants 1
Dancealot Posted May 18, 2013 Posted May 18, 2013 cheers. glad you are figuring it out, clouds at at pai is a nice image by the way Thanks mate, and make sure next time we embark on a 'snappers delight' you can join. The next will have to be carefully planned bearing in mind everyone's personal responsibilities and availability.
Popular Post villagefarang Posted May 19, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 19, 2013 This one looks like something, just not sure what. 6
Dancealot Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 (edited) This one looks like something, just not sure what. I see the tip of a devil's trident in there. @Candypants, my mouth fell open after your quick edit. I still dont want to post process though, because it undermines the purity of making photographs... Edited May 19, 2013 by Dancealot 1
samuijimmy Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 (edited) @ DAL.....Quote: "@Candypants, my mouth fell open after your quick edit. " I still dont want to post process though, because it undermines the purity of makingphotographs..." I cannot say I agree with that statement DAL, it really can improve the quality of an image, even sometimes just enhancing the contrast... As much as we would all like to have perfect images "as shot" it don't always work that way! ... so sometimes post edits are necessary in IMHO Edited May 19, 2013 by samuijimmy
villagefarang Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 @ DAL.....Quote: "@Candypants, my mouth fell open after your quick edit. " I still dont want to post process though, because it undermines the purity of making photographs..." I cannot say I agree with that statement DAL, it really can improve the quality of an image, even sometimes just enhancing the contrast... As much as we would all like to have perfect images "as shot" it don't always work that way! ... so sometimes post edits are necessary in IMHO According to what I read, there are those who prefer their food raw as well, and I appreciate that, but personally I prefer my food to have been prepared by a good chef. I look at photography the same way.
Tywais Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 @ DAL.....Quote: "@Candypants, my mouth fell open after your quick edit. " I still dont want to post process though, because it undermines the purity of making photographs..." I cannot say I agree with that statement DAL, it really can improve the quality of an image, even sometimes just enhancing the contrast... As much as we would all like to have perfect images "as shot" it don't always work that way! ... so sometimes post edits are necessary in IMHO I already gave him a spiel over this. http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/272081-fabianfred-hdr-photo-challenge/page-7#entry6402141
samuijimmy Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 I know he never listens! .... I tried too when he was here! Oh dear !!!! I have run out of likes again for the day!
villagefarang Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 (edited) @ DAL.....Quote: "@Candypants, my mouth fell open after your quick edit. " I still dont want to post process though, because it undermines the purity of making photographs..." I cannot say I agree with that statement DAL, it really can improve the quality of an image, even sometimes just enhancing the contrast... As much as we would all like to have perfect images "as shot" it don't always work that way! ... so sometimes post edits are necessary in IMHO I already gave him a spiel over this. http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/272081-fabianfred-hdr-photo-challenge/page-7#entry6402141 That is a well presented and referenced post. If that can't convince someone, I suppose nothing could. Edited May 19, 2013 by villagefarang
candypants Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 well, we can lead the horse to water, but we can't make him drink.
Guest Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 Pai 2013, Yoma Hotel swimming pool Your photo quality is clearly improving! Nice one. @all: Sometimes the hilarious discussion here is even better than the photos. Thanks for the laughs.
Dancealot Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 In respect to Tywais, Samuijimmy and VF. I dont have the time for this! I am working 6 days a week. This is why i won't even start with photoshop. Tywais especially, got me convinced, sure! I am still reading his thorough post and learning about the benefits. When i retire from my day job i will get into it. Thank you,
Tywais Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 In respect to Tywais, Samuijimmy and VF. I dont have the time for this! I am working 6 days a week. This is why i won't even start with photoshop. Tywais especially, got me convinced, sure! I am still reading his thorough post and learning about the benefits. When i retire from my day job i will get into it. Thank you, That is a very valid point Dancelot. If you have not gotten into the post processing and don't have time to learn the 'tools' it can indeed take a lot of your time. I've used Photoshop and other kits for so many years now that it just takes a brief time to do appropriate enhancements. Didn't mean to pick on you.
candypants Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 Using lightroom, you can set the import to "punch" in the presets, and it will automatically do it for you to some extent
Dancealot Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 In respect to Tywais, Samuijimmy and VF. I dont have the time for this! I am working 6 days a week. This is why i won't even start with photoshop. Tywais especially, got me convinced, sure! I am still reading his thorough post and learning about the benefits. When i retire from my day job i will get into it. Thank you, That is a very valid point Dancelot. If you have not gotten into the post processing and don't have time to learn the 'tools' it can indeed take a lot of your time. I've used Photoshop and other kits for so many years now that it just takes a brief time to do appropriate enhancements. Didn't mean to pick on you. You never offend me, Sir I just felt the need to explain to you my personal situation because i like you all. In the mean time i will stick to RAW.
candypants Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 (edited) that explains why your photos lack pop and sharpness. raw is intended to be processed. if you want to avoid post, and greatly reduce file sizes shoot jpeg. http://www.slrlounge.com/raw-vs-jpeg-jpg-the-ultimate-visual-guide i would suggest you seet your camera to raw + jpeg just to see what you are missing. that way you will have side by side comparisons of each and every photo Edited May 19, 2013 by candypants
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now