Incorrect. Her post implied that she was indifferent to whether or not the building was set on fire - it is not a crime to be indifferent to a bad thing happening. Her charges were inflated and she should not be in jail. Even if she had said what your echo chamber claimed she had said, it would still be impossible for a court to prove a causal link between what she said and whether that caused people to start fires, or even if those convicted of starting fires had even seen her post. But that isn't what she said, so is irrelevant.
People who set fires to buildings and/or attacked police officers in an airport, or set fire to buses in the previous riots (the Roma ones) should all be in jail. People who posted offensive tweets, even if you didn't like them, should not be in jail.
Those newer markets are aimed at people with money. I never see people who would actually shop there for staples though. They always seem to be empty of customers.
So, a Myanmar couple who confessed. 14 tm30 violations. And 2 Burmese working at a car wash. That's utterly pathetic.. just jobs for the boys. Cracking down? And military personnel? All so the brass get their names in the papers.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now