Jump to content

Phuket Opinion: Deputy PM adds insult to injury


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Phuket Opinion: Deputy PM adds insult to injury
Phuket Gazette -

phuketnews_Phuket_s_international_conven

Phuket’s International Convention and Exhibition Center project was cancelled shortly before one sprouted up in Chiang Mai. Image: Gazette Graphics

PHUKET: Recent protests over inflammatory comments made in Chiang Mai by controversial Deputy Prime Minister Plodprasop Suraswadi are just one small reflection of growing national unease with the administration of Yingluck Shinawatra.

In an address to the people of Chiang Mai, Deputy PM Plodprasop said the refusal of the people of Phuket to elect a Pheu Thai Party candidate would cost our island a chance to have an international convention and exhibition center (ICEC) of the type recently completed in the home province of the family of Thaksin and Yingluck Shinwatra.

Mr Plodprasop, or anyone else seeking to win friends and influence people, may consider refraining from intentionally insulting any person or constituency; it seldom ends well at election time.

The comments were probably intended not as an insult to the people of Phuket, but rather as a way of stirring up support for the Pheu Thai Party in its traditional power base. Nevertheless, as a veteran politician on the national stage, Mr Plodprasop should have known better. We already have an ongoing, deadly insurgency in the Deep South; do we really need our leaders throwing more fuel on the fire of regional distrust?

The Pheu Thai Party’s political opponents, themselves now donning masks, are looking to put a face on the enemy. PM Yingluck, the nation’s first female premier, seems to enjoy a sort of teflon coating that harkens back to the days of US President Ronald Reagan.

Thus Mr Plodprasop’s comments – though hardly the first insult meted out by the current Cabinet, and not the first related to the ICEC – could not have come at a more ill-advised time for him and his party.

The now-defunct ICEC project, which had funding under the previous Democrat Party-led government, could only have been derailed through failure in the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process, conducted by the Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP).

ONEP falls under the Cabinet’s National Committee on the Environment, chaired by none other than PM Yingluck. A primary reason given for the proposal’s failure was that part of the project area was alleged to encroach on a sea turtle nesting site – though there have been no reports of nesting there in over a decade.

Other, far more credible excuses in the ONEP’s comments on the cancellation of the ICEC were related to the proposed project’s “long-term economic viability”.

Phuket’s booming private sector is planning to build a new mega-project with convention facilities near Central Festival. This is a far better location, literally more central than Tah Chat Chai, which should remain in its existing natural state. Who knows, maybe at some point in the future it will once again be a viable site for sea turtles to lay their eggs, much to the delight, we're sure, of Pheua Thai.

Source: http://www.phuketgazette.net/phuket_news/2013/Phuket-Opinion-Deputy-PM-adds-insult-to-injury-21330.html

pglogo.jpg
-- Phuket Gazette 2013-06-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when has Phuket ever cared about anything else other than Phuket? Phuket exists on greed and is not in a position to criticize others.

I believe that pre-sunami Phuket was in most aspects a more caring, friendly easy place to both live and to just visit.

Post sunami things have just gradually, at first as the place rebuilt ,declined as more and more lowlifes ''found'' the place [both Thai and farangs] and caused the decline to increase significantly year on year, until now it finds itself in the predicament its in..[iMO}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when has Phuket ever cared about anything else other than Phuket? Phuket exists on greed and is not in a position to criticize others.

I believe that pre-sunami Phuket was in most aspects a more caring, friendly easy place to both live and to just visit.

Post sunami things have just gradually, at first as the place rebuilt ,declined as more and more lowlifes ''found'' the place [both Thai and farangs] and caused the decline to increase significantly year on year, until now it finds itself in the predicament its in..[iMO}

Good point andreandre, difficult to disagree with that. It does attract many farangs and undesirables out to make a fast buck. If the police can't be bothered to enforce the law then it will continue to decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the rip offs from the taxi mafia, I wouldn't go to a convention in Phuket if it was offered. Chiang Mai much better, more tourist friendly. As far as building as a payoff, like they say "ya dance with the one what brung ya".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the rip offs from the taxi mafia, I wouldn't go to a convention in Phuket if it was offered. Chiang Mai much better, more tourist friendly. As far as building as a payoff, like they say "ya dance with the one what brung ya".

But it isn't actually a dance of course... these are things financed by money from ALL taxpayers, not just the ones who voted for the ruling party. Of course, Thaksin actually had the audacity to say this out loud himself around 2005, along the lines of: "Well of course those that voted for the Thai Rak Thai will receive more benefits - that is only logical."

On this one, he was even ahead of Lee Kwan Yew, who only more recently used it publicly as a threat against voters who dared to back the parties that have long since been gerrymandered out of any chance of forming a government.

Thatcher not only rewarded her supporting constituencies, but also punished those who voted against her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the rip offs from the taxi mafia, I wouldn't go to a convention in Phuket if it was offered. Chiang Mai much better, more tourist friendly. As far as building as a payoff, like they say "ya dance with the one what brung ya".

Yes, and not to mention the congestion near central world. Has anyone been there on the weekend lately? The roads are sometimes backed up for kilometers getting to try mall. Can they afford the additional traffic? Or, has nobody thought of that? Have they done a traffic mitigation study? LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember right a famous family comes from Chiang Mai ?

Your memory may be at fault I'm afraid. Can't think offhand of anyone famous from Chang Mai, but there is a clan that many consider infamous.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...