unanimosity Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 James is more likely to turn up as a middle name. Simply because if he's James, he'd be James VII (and all the English people will be going - when were James II - James VI ?). No he wouldn't; he'd be James III of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth countries which have the monarch as their head of state and James VIII of Scotland. Some of us English do know our history; maybe some Scots don't! Of course, whatever names he is given now, he could easily choose another when he becomes king. Of course being England and looking at the odds regarding the name, the Royal Baby will be named by FIFA.
Popular Post geriatrickid Posted July 24, 2013 Popular Post Posted July 24, 2013 I hate all the hype over this and how people from all around the world were getting so excited over a family/baby that they will probably never meet and who couldn't give a shit about them. I'd rather people celebrate a birth and the happiness that accompanies it, then to celebrate at a public execution, or a riot, or whatever negative activity the scum of the world can instigate. Let people have a bit of harmless fun and to enjoy themselves in a non-destructive manner. 5
Scott Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 A post discussing moderation has been removed. Please stay on topic and post in a civil manner.
trompelemonde Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 James is more likely to turn up as a middle name. Simply because if he's James, he'd be James VII (and all the English people will be going - when were James II - James VI ?). No he wouldn't; he'd be James III of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth countries which have the monarch as their head of state and James VIII of Scotland. Some of us English do know our history; maybe some Scots don't! Of course, whatever names he is given now, he could easily choose another when he becomes king. Not that I care much but the names Stephen and John will certainly not be chosen for reasons of history. You mention James and what he would be referred to as, this was also made an issue by some Scots when the present Queen ascended to the throne. The first Elizabeth was never Queen of Scotland (true) and so they wanted Elizabeth II to be Elizabeth I - but in Scotland only. Daft but true.
JimmyTheMook Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 Good Lord ! Have they named the little bugger yet ?
phutoie2 Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 Wonder how many pubs will be called the "Prince of Cambridge" over the next few years I understand the Queen Vic in East benders will be first. Sent from my i-mobile IQ 2 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app
Chicog Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 I'm guessing the Franklin Mint commemorative Dolls/Plates/Teacosies/Toilet seat covers are already being churned out in Zhangzou sweat shops. 1
Scott Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 Off-topic posts removed. The topic isn't about the US. 1
Scott Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 Off-topic post deleted. This thread is about the birth of a royal baby. It's not about the monarchy in general. Stick to the topic.
webfact Posted July 24, 2013 Author Posted July 24, 2013 RT @CBSNews: JUST IN: Queen Elizabeth visiting her new grandson, England's new prince, CBS News confirms
David48 Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 Hey there Georgie Boy So ... Prince William and Kate Middleton name son George Alexander Louis ... poor bugger ... . 1
Jingthing Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 The baby will be known as His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge.
Satcommlee Posted July 24, 2013 Posted July 24, 2013 I thought the government was trying to discourage people on state benefits to have children! Why the fuss??
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now