webfact Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 Govt urged to withdraw Amnesty Bill to prevent political violenceBy English NewsBANGKOK, July 27 – The opposition Democrat Party has called on the government to abort a parliamentary debate on the Amnesty Bill to prevent political conflicts in the country.Democrat spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra must be held responsible for violence if the controversial bill is slated for debate in the House of Representatives next month.Anti-government protesters who identified themselves as members of the People’s Army vowed to stage a rally to protest against the bill on August 4.Pheu Thai MP Vorachai Hema who proposed the Amnesty Bill said earlier that the legislation was tentatively scheduled for debate in the Lower House on August 7 as decided by the government’s whip.Mr Chavanond said the Amnesty Bill was aimed at whitewashing lawbreakers, including pro-government Red Shirt core leaders and activists – a move which led to widespread oppositions among various groups of people.He said the Democrat Party strongly opposed to the Amnesty Bill and called on the premier to reconsider if it should be debated in the Lower House as planned.There are reports of preparations by city police to deal with protesters, while Mr Chavanond claims Interior Minister Charupong Ruangsuwan instructed provincial officials to stop people from entering the capital to join the rally, while complaining that Red Shirt activists would, however, be freely allowed to rally in the city.The government is thus adopting double standards in dealing with the issue, he said. (MCOT online news)-- TNA 2013-07-27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post gl555 Posted July 27, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted July 27, 2013 "The government is thus adopting double standards in dealing with the issue, he said." Not just this issue but everything else. Double standards are all the Red Shirts and PTP are about. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 If the PTP, UDD and Red Shirts held Abhisit and Suthep as responsible for the actions in 2010 then certainly Yingluck, the government, the PTP, UDD and Red Shirts must be held responsible for anything that happens to the protestors. After all there is democracy and no double standards from the government isn't there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 "double standards" - the foundation of ALL Thai Politics/Politicians and the cornerstone of all that Thaksin/Pheu Thai thinks and does. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post robblok Posted July 27, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted July 27, 2013 I am pro democrat but I dont believe that the PTP should be held responsible for the actions of people going to the streets anymore then the previous Democrat government is responsible what happened tot he protesters. If you got to the streets and act violent then you are responsible not the government in charge. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 I think it is reasonable to assume that the ball is in the PTP court and any reactions to this shoddy piece of legislation, is all there doing, as it has been since they came into power , PTP need to understand that to have this passed as a law, opens the flood gates,any person breaking the law can apply for amnesty, you cannot separate one case from another , what's good for the goose is good for the gander , to favour one section of the community, is a failure of principals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluespunk Posted July 27, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted July 27, 2013 (edited) " Peoples Army" Those two words never lead anywhere good. Edited July 27, 2013 by Bluespunk 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeforeTigers Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 This whole, ripping apart your country just because your politically aligned with one man, sounds really f stupid to me, as an outsider. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siampolee Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 (edited) Can we really think that this current puppet maladministration will concern themselves with the morals of double standards? Their paymaster is a professional megalomaniac and in his multiple mindsets he is the new Messiah on the Thai political scene, much the same mindset applies to his family and their brown nosing acolytes. All driven by greed and to hell with the people of Thailand. Indeed I have seen corkscrews with less twists and turns in them compared to this current maladministration Edited July 27, 2013 by siampolee 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunisalom Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 There are reports of preparations by city police to deal with protesters, while Mr Chavanond claims Interior Minister Charupong Ruangsuwan instructed provincial officials to stop people from entering the capital to join the rally, while complaining that Red Shirt activists would, however, be freely allowed to rally in the city. -Can somebody please translate, or explain the above to me, as I do not understand. Who complains; city police, Mr. Chavanond, Mr. Ruangsuwan or people entering the city? Sunisa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonneke breda Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 There are reports of preparations by city police to deal with protesters, while Mr Chavanond claims Interior Minister Charupong Ruangsuwan instructed provincial officials to stop people from entering the capital to join the rally, while complaining that Red Shirt activists would, however, be freely allowed to rally in the city. -Can somebody please translate, or explain the above to me, as I do not understand. Who complains; city police, Mr. Chavanond, Mr. Ruangsuwan or people entering the city? Sunisa. Mr. Chavanond complains that Interior Minister Charupong Ruangsuwan instructed provincial officials to stop people from entering the capital to join the rally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 A spreadsheet with all seven or so 'Amnesty Law' proposals and the similarities and/or differences would be nice. Also the relation between Amnesty enforced and reconciliation reached willingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrain Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 " Peoples Army" Those two words never lead anywhere good. Peoples Army, This is the one who extablished the formation isn't it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 A spreadsheet with all seven or so 'Amnesty Law' proposals and the similarities and/or differences would be nice. Also the relation between Amnesty enforced and reconciliation reached willingly. width=20 alt=wai.gif> "Amnesty enforced and reconciliation." They have nothing to do with each other. Amnesty for Thaksin and the rest of the red shirt leaders would just cause a deeper divide in the population. I agree that the red shirts who have been sitting in Jail for over two years should get amnesty or a pardon or what ever it takes to let them out now. They have done their time. But one for the leaders and the financier should not come.They should be tried immediately and do their time the same as their misguided loyal subjects have done. The problem with that is it would be justice and justice is unacceptable to the red shirts. " Peoples Army" Those two words never lead anywhere good. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyLew Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 Please bring Thaksin home So tired of readng about him IMO he will get what he merits upon his return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 A post containing veiled comments on the HM the King has been removed. Posts containing libelous and defamatory comments and replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Pattaya administrators are thinking: "Why don't they just hold a katoy beauty contest instead?" "....or a marathon kissing contest?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshiwara Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Never underestimate Thaksin's ability to shoot himself in the foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluespunk Posted July 28, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted July 28, 2013 Never underestimate Thaksin's ability to shoot himself in the foot. Or have others shoot innocent people to meet their war on drugs quota. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CIHUAHUA Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Maybe democracy does not work for everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomross46 Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I do not see any reason for this discussion Big Brother Mr. "T" has already signed the bill. If he signed the bill it is for his followers to get in line and follow. He will be like Emperor Napoleon, riding in on his white horse. Oh that could not be because Napoleon was exiled by the French government, and MR "T" is self exiled on the run from the court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I do not see any reason for this discussion Big Brother Mr. "T" has already signed the bill. If he signed the bill it is for his followers to get in line and follow. He will be like Emperor Napoleon, riding in on his white horse. Oh that could not be because Napoleon was exiled by the French government, and MR "T" is self exiled on the run from the court. Unfortunately for the French, Napoleon Bonaparte was driven into exile on Elba by a coalition of France's enemies including Austria, Prussia, Russia and the UK among others. After escaping he returned to power only to be beaten at Waterloo and finally confined on St Helena. Any comparison between Elba and Dubai is pure imagination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILOOKFORWORK Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Warring mafia factions getting ready for another round of battle. Thailand in a nutshell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagwan Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I think it is reasonable to assume that the ball is in the PTP court and any reactions to this shoddy piece of legislation, is all there doing, as it has been since they came into power , PTP need to understand that to have this passed as a law, opens the flood gates,any person breaking the law can apply for amnesty, you cannot separate one case from another , what's good for the goose is good for the gander , to favour one section of the community, is a failure of principals. I think you meant to say principles. But on the other hand you may also be right. Does Thailand have something similar to the UK's Riot Act? AFAIK after the public reading of the Act if you get hurt it is your own stupid fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 The Shinawatres' and PT and Reds definition of the word 'reconciliation' : create conflict. Their definition of the word 'Democracy' : Do as the mob dictates, or get beat up. Their definition of 'peaceful protest': Have leaders shout 'Burn down Bangkok!' from a stage, and have peons follow it up with petrol bombs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 (edited) I think it is reasonable to assume that the ball is in the PTP court and any reactions to this shoddy piece of legislation, is all there doing, as it has been since they came into power , PTP need to understand that to have this passed as a law, opens the flood gates,any person breaking the law can apply for amnesty, you cannot separate one case from another , what's good for the goose is good for the gander , to favour one section of the community, is a failure of principals.I think you meant to say principles. But on the other hand you may also be right.Does Thailand have something similar to the UK's Riot Act? AFAIK after the public reading of the Act if you get hurt it is your own stupid fault. I think the riot act was repealed in 1973, hadn't been used that much in 20 century before that anyway, last time was just after world war 1. It has kind of been replaced by public order act, but nothing is read out to the crowd anymore. It didn't really work anyway as the Peterloo Massacre and 1743 Gin Riots showed, because most people couldn't hear it being read if there was a large crowd. Edited July 30, 2013 by Bluespunk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now