Yet you shared it in the most lazy manner possible, without even so much as an explanation...
What you posted, with an exaggerated headline is alike clickbait - its going to put off any potential sensible viewer.
If his conviction were "final," then he couldn't appeal. A little glossary is just that, and used as shorthand. It's all a little more complicated, which is why I suggested you just use common sense.
Nothing that you quoted supports your belief.... it only illustrates your poor understanding.
Do you have evidence that the NY judge didn't fulfill his duties and sign the judgement delivered by the jury... I'm pretty sure you don't.
Good for you - no sarcasm.
I'm sure that many retirees would be willing/eager to pay double that price to join the Thai Universal Coverage or Social Security schemes, if they were available.
Indeed.. but look how reluctant he was to give up such basic information... why is that ?
Recommended Posts