Jump to content

Thaksin 'urges Yingluck to stay' as Prayuth demurs


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prbkk - I dont want to reply to you again but i see you are very misguided man.Thailand CANNOT move on from Thaksin he is using his wealth to STOP us from doing that. Also can you see that you are providing false fact - you are misrepresenting fact -in 2010 Red people bring guns and shoot rockets at innocent people in Silom. They post stickers on walls around Bangkok and proclaim "President Thaksin" Do you not understand that as long as this man is here there will never be any rest for anyone. My own University was having student shot three weeks ago - unarmed students - yet you need we move on from thaksin - why you think he go to Kampouchea so much to talk to Hun Sen? You are farang we dont expect you to know same as we know - but please - do not call us trett thugs and insult us like this!!

Well said ... many of us here are getting tired of Prbkk's totally one-sided (and ill-considered) view of the situation here. He talks about how ridiculous it is that Yingluck can be held responsible, and yet spews out venomous comments on how Abhisit and Suthep should be jailed, or even killed...!

You should ignore Prbkk's comments because, as you so rightly point out, he is a very misguided individual!

Misguided or not George, there is an obligation to tell the truth. Please do not suggest that I have posted that Abhisit or Suthep should be jailed or killed. I have not, ever. Why you feel the need to make that claim is for you to contemplate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 293
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Prbkk - I dont want to reply to you again but i see you are very misguided man.Thailand CANNOT move on from Thaksin he is using his wealth to STOP us from doing that. Also can you see that you are providing false fact - you are misrepresenting fact -in 2010 Red people bring guns and shoot rockets at innocent people in Silom. They post stickers on walls around Bangkok and proclaim "President Thaksin" Do you not understand that as long as this man is here there will never be any rest for anyone. My own University was having student shot three weeks ago - unarmed students - yet you need we move on from thaksin - why you think he go to Kampouchea so much to talk to Hun Sen? You are farang we dont expect you to know same as we know - but please - do not call us trett thugs and insult us like this!!

Yes, I understand you don't like criticism or questioning. Perhaps that's why , in a post yesterday, you advised foreigners to leave Thailand if they didn't like what is happening and that too many farang had been listening to their Isaan wives. You are not quite the ingenue you appear at first glance.

And a student of RU? Well, indeed we have all seen the pictrues of those peaceful RU students students attacking innocent citizens in taxis and on a bus, and those arrested with guns.

Many of the protesters are peaceful. Some are thugs. I have not provided any "false facts".

There are incidents of violent student behavior, I will re word your last sentence ( Near ALL the protesters are peaceful very few are thugs) I have not provided "false facts"

Again you want to compare true facts---well compare REDS in BKK petrol soaked rubber tyres sharpened bamboos--barracades. armed/ burnt and pillaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is Thaksin saying?

"Thaksin, who said the Constitution did not allow her to resign, according to the sources."

Well this is imply not true. Yingluck has the right to resign at anytime and would face no penalties for doing so.

"If she did resign, the protesters would ask the court to rule that she had violated the Penal Code's Article 157, which punishes officials who abandon their duty. She would face a jail term, he warned."

Again this is simply untrue, article 157 is a subsection of the Penakl code that deals with corruption..........

"The provisions of the Penal Code incriminating acts of corruption are contained in Articles 147 to 157 and those that aggravate the punishment for specific officers are stipulated in Articles 200 to 202.

In addition, Articles 153 to 156 impose criminal sanctions, up to imprisonment for life, on corrupted of officers whose duties concern ccountancy functions. A general offence is prescribed in Article 157 as misconduct in office punished with a maximum imprisonment of 10 years." http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No83/No83_22PA_Pinthip.pdf

So that means Thaksin is manipulating his sister with unsubstantiated threats of imprisonment if she doesn't do what he says and remains in the caretaker PM position, even though it is against her will. What a great and thoughtful brother he is.

The reality is Thaksin doesn't want Yingluck to resign because he will loose control of the government and that leaves them open to a uncontrolled investigation of their corrupt practices. This would obviously lead to charges for most of the PTP members and maybe prison sentences. No wonder the blanket amnesty bill is so important for this administration, Yingluck must stay in her role, win the election and push through the blanket amnesty bill then she is free to resign.

"The reality is Thaksin doesn't want Yingluck to resign because he will loose control of the government and that leaves them open to a uncontrolled investigation of their corrupt practices. This would obviously lead to charges for most of the PTP members and maybe prison sentences. No wonder the blanket amnesty bill is so important for this administration, Yingluck must stay in her role, win the election and push through the blanket amnesty bill then she is free to resign."

Well said.

Here's another maybe: Yingluck says 'enough, I resign', the paymaster appoints his cousin surapong as pm. How about that for a twist?

Edited by scorecard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it very difficult to believe that the rest of the world would accept Yingluck being held accountable if "something happens". What kind of rubbish is this? Thailand would become (even more of) an international laughing stock in the event that an elected PM is held responsible for the actions of anti-democratic street thugs. That would lead to sanctions, trade embargoes, investors fleeing the country, ASEAN intervention. It's complete rubbish. Classics case of blaming the victim.

totally unfair indeed, but that the lot of a PM even if she's only caretaking PM with a golf caddy as special advisor.

With the 'we told you so' I guess the charge can be 'premeditated' rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prbkk - I dont want to reply to you again but i see you are very misguided man.Thailand CANNOT move on from Thaksin he is using his wealth to STOP us from doing that. Also can you see that you are providing false fact - you are misrepresenting fact -in 2010 Red people bring guns and shoot rockets at innocent people in Silom. They post stickers on walls around Bangkok and proclaim "President Thaksin" Do you not understand that as long as this man is here there will never be any rest for anyone. My own University was having student shot three weeks ago - unarmed students - yet you need we move on from thaksin - why you think he go to Kampouchea so much to talk to Hun Sen? You are farang we dont expect you to know same as we know - but please - do not call us trett thugs and insult us like this!!

Yes, I understand you don't like criticism or questioning. Perhaps that's why , in a post yesterday, you advised foreigners to leave Thailand if they didn't like what is happening and that too many farang had been listening to their Isaan wives. You are not quite the ingenue you appear at first glance.

And a student of RU? Well, indeed we have all seen the pictrues of those peaceful RU students students attacking innocent citizens in taxis and on a bus, and those arrested with guns.

Many of the protesters are peaceful. Some are thugs. I have not provided any "false facts".

There are incidents of violent student behavior, I will re word your last sentence ( Near ALL the protesters are peaceful very few are thugs) I have not provided "false facts"

Again you want to compare true facts---well compare REDS in BKK petrol soaked rubber tyres sharpened bamboos--barracades. armed/ burnt and pillaged.

Yes, I don't disagree. But I didn't support those activities by the reds or the invasion of the airport by the others.I do want an amnesty for them all...so the country can move on. Yes, amnesty is a painful concept for may, I get that but still think it's worthwhile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to imagine an army chief in a western democracy talking to an elected leader in this way. Can you imagine Chuck Hagel telling Obama, 'I'm not going to give you my opinion, but if you get it wrong, it's on your head and you will see what happens next'? People here keep saying that the Isaan farmers don't understand democracy. Well, they're not the ones I worry about....

This is not a western country.

The armed forces relationship with 'elected' government is different in pretty much every country in the world.

The armed forces relationships with the populace is different in every country.

Yep - I know that. Still amazing to see it in action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it very difficult to believe that the rest of the world would accept Yingluck being held accountable if "something happens". What kind of rubbish is this? Thailand would become (even more of) an international laughing stock in the event that an elected PM is held responsible for the actions of anti-democratic street thugs. That would lead to sanctions, trade embargoes, investors fleeing the country, ASEAN intervention. It's complete rubbish. Classics case of blaming the victim.

It really is audacious of the general to tell the elected leader that she would be held responsible.

I completely agree with your statement! I am continuously sickened when I read the newspaper where the army is asked if they're going to have a coup. Can you imagine this in any developed country!?! <deleted> the military!!! What they think doesn't matter. They're a tool and that's all. It just shows how screwed up Thailand is when they openly talk about coups. It legitimizes coups and shows that the military here has WAY too much power and influence.

Instead of demanding a suspension of democracy, these people should be demanding the military be neutered. Sent from my vagina with a wooden spatula

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Deleted Posts edited out*

When was Thaksin guilty of terrorism???

He travels freely around the world because the world accepted him as a politically persecuted person. AV administration even lied to the whole world that it had an international arrest warrant.

They are many with terrorism charges but have not step a step into jail. Their cases got postponing for about six year by now. As for the redshirt/UDD, they are many of them still in jails without trail while some on bail waiting trial.

Edited by Scott
Deleted post edited out
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how Thaksin is such an expert on legal and constitutional matters yet didn't see a problem hiding his assets in his maid and gardners name, bribing a court official with 2 million stuffed in a pastry box, selling Thai national communication satellites to another country and trousering the proceeds, and having countless thousands of innocents slaughtered after catching a family member dusting his nose. A legal expert when it suits him?

He would have gotten away with it to if it weren't for those meddling kids!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't see a whole lot wrong about Yingluck talking to her brother for advice. I'm sure George W Bush sought advice from his dad (not to mention other family members), that Hilary Clinton seeks advice from Bill, that Singapore PM Lee Hsieng Loon seeks advice from Lee Kwan Yew, etc etc etc. I just don't understand why they 'advertise' it like this, as it just feeds the perception that Yingluck is a puppet/mouthpiece for Thaksin [which she very well may be]. Total lack of political savvy. Or is it that PTP supporters find comfort in Thaksin's involvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yingluck later called a meeting with Pheu Thai Party executives and talked via Skype with Thaksin, who said the Constitution did not allow her to resign, according to the sources.

Thaksin does not run the country, I do, says Yingluck, after getting her daily orders from Dubai.

Thaksin, if the report is correct, referred to the Thai Penal Code Section 157; Section 157 quoted below. There must be hundreds, if not thousands of Thai officials to whom this would apply, including Thaksin. I wonder how many have been convicted and serving their sentence.

Criminal Code Section 157: Whoever, being an official, wrongfully exercises or does not exercise any of his function to the injury of any person, or dishonestly exercises or omits to exercise any of his functions, shall be punished with imprisonment of one to ten years or fined from two thousand to twenty thousand Baht, or both.

"shall be punished with imprisonment of one to ten years or fined from two thousand to twenty thousand Baht, or both."

I think the penalty formulation "and/or" is poor. These types of formulations can be found in many legal texts.

The minimum penalties are a joke and have no deterrent effect.

The law is open to corruption here. Many rich criminals using this, to get a soft sentence with a pre agreement.

Also the bail regulation is urgent to reform.

For example:
§ 376
Any person who without justifiable grounds shoots an explosive gun in a town, village or amongst a public gathering shall be

liable to imprisonment for not more than ten days, or a fine not exceeding five hundred baht or both.

So you can fire a gun in a crowd: 15 Dollar (500 Baht)
§ 385
Any person who, without lawful authorisation and without necessity, obstructs a public way by placing or leaving any object on it or by any other act to such an extent that the traffic safety or convenience is likely to be disturbed shall be liable to a fine not exceeding five hundred baht.
So you can block a highway: 15 Dollar (500 Baht)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it very difficult to believe that the rest of the world would accept Yingluck being held accountable if "something happens". What kind of rubbish is this? Thailand would become (even more of) an international laughing stock in the event that an elected PM is held responsible for the actions of anti-democratic street thugs. That would lead to sanctions, trade embargoes, investors fleeing the country, ASEAN intervention. It's complete rubbish. Classics case of blaming the victim.

cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif but same does not apply to attempt to charge Abahist with murder - unbelievable the hypocrisy and double standards of some people

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't see a whole lot wrong about Yingluck talking to her brother for advice. I'm sure George W Bush sought advice from his dad (not to mention other family members), that Hilary Clinton seeks advice from Bill, that Singapore PM Lee Hsieng Loon seeks advice from Lee Kwan Yew, etc etc etc. I just don't understand why they 'advertise' it like this, as it just feeds the perception that Yingluck is a puppet/mouthpiece for Thaksin [which she very well may be]. Total lack of political savvy. Or is it that PTP supporters find comfort in Thaksin's involvement?

Except for the fact he's a convicted criminal on the run?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well surprise surprise ! He would come out with something like that ! Wouldn't want to compromise his own long term position would he ! Time the UN or some outside body took a hold of this place and shook it by its throat !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't see a whole lot wrong about Yingluck talking to her brother for advice. I'm sure George W Bush sought advice from his dad (not to mention other family members), that Hilary Clinton seeks advice from Bill, that Singapore PM Lee Hsieng Loon seeks advice from Lee Kwan Yew, etc etc etc. I just don't understand why they 'advertise' it like this, as it just feeds the perception that Yingluck is a puppet/mouthpiece for Thaksin [which she very well may be]. Total lack of political savvy. Or is it that PTP supporters find comfort in Thaksin's involvement?

Except for the fact he's a convicted criminal on the run?

Why shouldn't she do what he 'urges' her to? He is the de facto PM.

Edited by bigbamboo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is more certain that the shinawatras have to be removed from Thai politics for there to be any peace in the country.And the Issan and Chiang Mai disciples of their fugitive crook and darling puppet better realize or you know what.You can have your "Isaanland'

Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Edited by kingalfred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

'sources said' 'the source said' ... Why not name the sources if they are credible? If not, this article is a joke and will no doubt be discredited by Yingluck and all others present.

 

Me thinks some of you guys have been on the sauce!

The OP said "To protect themselves from being attacked by unknown parties, soldiers should dress in plain clothes while guarding the many buildings of government agencies and their command posts, according to a source."

which is all the source said, That doesn't attribute the whole Post to a source does it?

But Hey lets not try to actually understand what is being said lets just spout off for the fun of it!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Thaksin is not aware of the true picture in Thailand. Don't forget that he is being served by yes-men who tell him what he wants to hear, and reading the foreign press which for the most part is putting a different spin on what is happening to the local press. So perhaps he is not being mean to his little sister (if you can believe that you can believe anything) but really believes that an election is possible on 2 February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Thaksin is not aware of the true picture in Thailand. Don't forget that he is being served by yes-men who tell him what he wants to hear, and reading the foreign press which for the most part is putting a different spin on what is happening to the local press. So perhaps he is not being mean to his little sister (if you can believe that you can believe anything) but really believes that an election is possible on 2 February.

Thaksin should not be in the picture, Our PM is wrong in keeping him there and will have to answer that on judgment day.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...