Jump to content

US ambassador Kristie Kenney declines to give comments on Thai politics


webfact

Recommended Posts

US ambassador declines to give comments on Thai politics

BANGKOK, 27 February 2014 (NNT) – The US ambassador to the Kingdom of Thailand has denied to give any comments on the ongoing political uncertainty in Thailand, while dismissing a rumor that she was being transferred to South Korea.


During her visit to Khao Yai National Park, US ambassador Kristie Kenney refused to give her thoughts on the current political situation in Thailand. She also disclaimed a report that said she was moving to South Korea, saying such rumor was false and she would be serving in Thailand until the end of 2014 after having been given a 1-year extension on the post.

Her visit to Khao Yai National Park was to celebrate the strong relationship between the Great Smoky Mountain National Park in Tennessee and Thailand's Khao Yai National Park.

Ambassador Kenny, the first female US ambassador to Thailand, has been serving since January 2011. She was selected by US President Barack Obama and was confirmed by the United States Senate.

nntlogo.jpg
-- NNT 2014-02-27 footer_n.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Make a comment, and immediately alienate an entire political party and their supporters?

Get real!

I said comment, not take sides....... In the past, the United States has been

more than happy to take sides with rebel fighters against a dictator, and give

aid as well. Just take a look at what happened in the middle east in countries like Libya. So clearly the situation here in Thailand is not quite so easy to see. But I am also sure that the United States has a favorite horse in the race, they are just not saying who it is........

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Make a comment, and immediately alienate an entire political party and their supporters?

Get real!

Surely she's intelligent enough to make a comment without alienating either side.

Do you always alienate people when they ask you a question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Make a comment, and immediately alienate an entire political party and their supporters?

Get real!

I said comment, not take sides....... In the past, the United States has been

more than happy to take sides with rebel fighters against a dictator, and give

aid as well. Just take a look at what happened in the middle east in countries like Libya. So clearly the situation here in Thailand is not quite so easy to see. But I am also sure that the United States has a favorite horse in the race, they are just not saying who it is........

But well all know which side they favor. But they favorite is looking likely to lose, so they have opted to keep quiet while they work out out to change sides.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

correct, as I've said before various statements in the past from all foreign governments have been generally neutral over the last few months despite PTP on occasion using out of context selective quotes to make it sound otherwise - no foreign government has actually endorsed either side which from the Thai governments position is a snub

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not the place of an ambassador from any country to make a comment on the internal wrangling's of a country , the comments are sent each evening on the scrambled electronic system back to their elected head of state, in this case the President or foreign Affairs department, sure would be interesting to read some of the comments especially from the five spying eye'scoffee1.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not the place of an ambassador from any country to make a comment on the internal wrangling's of a country , the comments are sent each evening on the scrambled electronic system back to their elected head of state, in this case the President or foreign Affairs department, sure would be interesting to read some of the comments especially from the five spying eye'scoffee1.gif

Ok so I guess we have to wait for Wikileaks to get the real story. I have

read those leaked comments from the previous ambassador a few years

ago, it certainly made for some amazing reading to say the least......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Make a comment, and immediately alienate an entire political party and their supporters?

Get real!

I said comment, not take sides....... In the past, the United States has been

more than happy to take sides with rebel fighters against a dictator, and give

aid as well. Just take a look at what happened in the middle east in countries like Libya. So clearly the situation here in Thailand is not quite so easy to see. But I am also sure that the United States has a favorite horse in the race, they are just not saying who it is........

It's pretty easy to see which horse their favorite is. It's the horse allowing a US naval base in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Quite frankly as a US citizen I believe she did the exact correct think and the US should keep their bloody noses out of different country's internal politics unless invited to the table. Her prior comments, although probably well intentioned, resulted in demonstrations in front of the US Embassy which is never a good thing to occur. Hope she keeps this "neutral" position in the future since comments from the Embassy officially represent the position of the US government. Let the UN or other "invited" parties work on a solution together.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it should be about truth and nothing else. if an ambassador feels unable to commment they should not be in a position to comment

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the
relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship
could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she
wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment
is in effect a type of comment.

Make a comment, and immediately alienate an entire political party and their supporters?

Get real!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How odd not to give a comment, as her very existence is based upon the

relationship between Thailand and the United States. This relationship

could be radically affected by a change of governments here. Guess she

wants to sit on the fence and see who wins...... For me, no comment

is in effect a type of comment.

Could be. The most obvious response would have been to trot out the usual American line about the rule of law, democracy etc., but she didn't. This could mean she's taking the traditional Swiss approach (wait and see who's winning before deciding who to support) or perhaps Michelle's had a word in hubby's presidential ear.

Or maybe she's just as fed up with the political kindergarten here as the rest of us. thumbsup.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Americans have read the tea leaves and they don't know whether the Shinawatras will make it through this mess or whether Thailand will see a new government. Whatever the case is, better keep quiet now then praise the clear winner later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time they made a political comment (in support of elections I believe) a yellow buffulo herd stampeded outside the embassy.

Can't really blame them for not commenting. If comments need to be made, do it through a different channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time they made a political comment (in support of elections I believe) a yellow buffulo herd stampeded outside the embassy.

Can't really blame them for not commenting. If comments need to be made, do it through a different channel.

BlueSky is best

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...