webfact Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 BURNING ISSUEWill an interim prime minister spark civil strife?Attayuth BootsripoomBANGKOK: -- Two major issues - legitimacy and feasibility - hang over the latest call by the People's Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) for the Senate speaker, presidents of the three top courts and chairman of the Election Commission (EC) to nominate a premier under the Constitution's Article 7.PDRC's proposal has attracted criticism and begged the question over what would happen if the proposal were pushed through. Would it end the current political conflict or would it plunge the country into civil strife? Fearing Suthep's plan will meet success, the government camp is trying hard to have him and other PDRC leaders arrested.At this critical juncture, the public is split over whether the country really needs an appointed prime minister. Government supporters say there is no need because Niwattumrong Boonsongpaisan is already serving as acting PM, while the anti-government camp believes otherwise. The latter has been calling for a prime minister to be nominated under the so-called Article 7.The issue of appointing a prime minister is also being highly politicised by the two rival political camps. Chiefs of the country's three highest courts - the Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court and Constitutional Court - the Senate Speaker and EC chairman have a lot to consider before deciding to jump on the bandwagon and getting involved in politics by accepting PDRC's proposal.The judiciary is extremely important to maintain justice, law and order in the country. In order to preserve public trust and faith in the institution, the courts need to be non-partisan or politically neutral. The stake would be huge if the public lost confidence in the judges. The ramifications and damage in this scenario would be much greater than that if the public loses faith in independent agencies.A senior judge, who refused to be named, recently voiced disapproval over getting the judiciary involved in politics. He said judges could not cross the line since the proposal had no legal basis and there was no law empowering the courts to nominate a PM.Although the EC secretary-general has voiced opposition to the PDRC's proposal, the commission is one independent agency with a tendency to take a stance against the government camp - and it might just accept the suggestion.Newly-elected acting Senate Speaker Surachai Liengboonlertchai allegedly has close ties with the PDRC. After being elected, he called a special session saying that without the Lower House, the Senate was the only institution that could solve Thailand’s political crisis. However, he said, he had not considered nominating a non-partisan PM.If these top officials reject the PDRC's proposal, Suthep would be forced to find other ways to nominate the PM, as his group wishes. Even if he finally succeeds with his plan, the political conflict is not likely to end because opponents will reject it, leaving people to believe the PM in question would serve the interests of the PDRC and its allies, not that of the country.-- The Nation 2014-05-15 1
Popular Post Mango Bob Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. 11
Popular Post stickyrice2000 Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Run by the courses of the laws. Stop trying to make matters worst for the country. Listen to the "real" citizens' needs, not the people who conquered the government house. If all groups do not get off track, Thailand would not be in this situation. 3
Stradavarius37 Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. Depends on if they clear it with Thaksin first or not. 1
Popular Post stickyrice2000 Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. 3
Popular Post noitom Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 It's not about Thaksin and Suthep. It's about individual freedom and justice, law and order for all people. It's about ridding Thailand of the culture of corruption that is pervasive. Thais are actually arguing over which faction should be in charge of the take. The Thai press feeds n to this sickness. 5
noitom Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 The Thai press should try answering their own headline question instead of pontificating around the real issues.
Popular Post ChrisY1 Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Don't call the interim person a PM.....call him an admistrator.....! 3
Popular Post The stuttering parrot Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 The last paragraph pretty much sums it up ! An election on july 20 is the way to go! Stop shutting the people out.Its gone on long enough and Thailand and it's people are now in tis state limbo and the frustration and violence will continue as nobody on either side will except any decision that goes against them. 4
Popular Post ginjag Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. When you have a democratically elected government that governs UNDEMOCRATICALLY, it will cause conflict. 6
Popular Post ginjag Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 The last paragraph pretty much sums it up ! An election on july 20 is the way to go! Stop shutting the people out.Its gone on long enough and Thailand and it's people are now in tis state limbo and the frustration and violence will continue as nobody on either side will except any decision that goes against them. YOUR government should NOT be electable. It has gravely broken so many laws during it's 3 years. and you are advocating elections are the answer---they are but should not include PTP or a large section of them. There is only 1 side that is guilty of diabolical governing, PTP. all the rest is the result of this. Why not clamp up--or tell the truth. This post of mine is not a lie. your post is avoiding the cause of the problem as always. 3
Popular Post chainarong Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. It is not an elected government the government resigned, then placed into caretaker mode , if the PTP volunteered to resign that is there problem , also I doubt that the caretaker part is quiet correct either, as the number of days has expired under the constitution for caretaker mode , the EC is in-fact the rulers of Thailand at the moment. 3
Stradavarius37 Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. You are a fool to think that the red shirts don't do exactly what Thaksin tells them to do. Love him? I despise him, he is a power hungry troll. But to pretend that he is not the power, brains, controlling arm behind the red shirts, Puea Thai, etc, is just stupid. 2
northernjohn Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. Depends on if they clear it with Thaksin first or not. Well they did not use unconstitutional means. Yingluck shut it down herself. The Constitution ruled on her breaking the law laid out by the constitution. Get your facts straight.Will there be conflict. Depends entirely on Thaksin.I think he lost a lot of people recently when he refused to pay them the 1,000 baht bribe and they took it to the police. Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. Well you are correct in what you say except you under estimate Thaksin and give honor where it does not belong.Thaksin has many of these people on his pay roll.
chainarong Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 You have mine and buckley's, strife will haunt Thailand even if you have a proper elected government, let alone an interim PM , the Thaskin one sure managed to mess up a great country with he's totalitarian dreams, trouble is the rest of the PTP dream with him, their body language, double speak alone tells me to avoid these people like the plague 1
Stradavarius37 Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. Depends on if they clear it with Thaksin first or not. Well they did not use unconstitutional means. Yingluck shut it down herself. The Constitution ruled on her breaking the law laid out by the constitution. Get your facts straight.Will there be conflict. Depends entirely on Thaksin.I think he lost a lot of people recently when he refused to pay them the 1,000 baht bribe and they took it to the police. Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. Well you are correct in what you say except you under estimate Thaksin and give honor where it does not belong. alt=coffee1.gif width=32 height=24> Thaksin has many of these people on his pay roll. alt=facepalm.gif> You folks don't know how to read apparently. 1
h90 Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 Don't call the interim person a PM.....call him an admistrator.....! yes give it a different name. "interim reform administrator" or anything else. Or if he is from the other side, for example Tida: "Central Secretary Of The Peoples Revolutionary Committee" .
Cobragold Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 If Suthep gets his way of a non elected PM, you can be very sure that there will no longer be any need for an elected PM as the PDRC will block any election called by simply forcing the closure of a couple of election centers during any election so as to make the election null and void. They will play this game until Suthep is satisfied. If there is an elected PM all sides must agree to a timetable for a national elections and only allow the non elected PM to be in place for 6 months at a max. 1
jcisco Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 It's not about Thaksin and Suthep. It's about individual freedom and justice, law and order for all people. It's about ridding Thailand of the culture of corruption that is pervasive. Thais are actually arguing over which faction should be in charge of the take. The Thai press feeds n to this sickness. Exactly you sum it up quite well. I am utterly tired of this cultural need to Win or appear to win. Can live and let live, and accepting that not everyone can agree and all live their lives to their own tune. The big picture of Law, liberty and self determination for the people of thailand being threatened by this continued crap and its potential outcomes really concerns me. Furthermore and a bit off the reply, is everyone realise, yeah they liked democracy under Thaksin and Thai Rak Thai and are eager for a second swing at prosperity or whatever it was that attracts them to it. But time to see the position not the person in the position, put your vote where it will bring you the leadership they want. But noo, lets tear apart the country, over what, the past. 1
Popular Post Robby nz Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 Do people really have to answer this? Of course it will. When you want to use unconstitutional means to overthrow an elected government it is going to cause convict. When an elected Govt uses unconstitutional means to farther their own interests then that will cause conflict. When an elected Govt refuses to accept the authority of the courts and abide by the rule of law that will cause conflict. That is what we see now. 3
The stuttering parrot Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 My government? It's not my government or your government it's the thai people government! And the thai people should have the right to vote for whatever party they chose.Not being told who will govern them by people who crave power by the way of intimidating bullying and blocking people their basic right to vote. So the yellows claim they have the numbers. That's a good thing! Now call for an election and all parties put up their policies and go for it! The only problem I see lately is that the leader of the democrats has been missing in action for a few days now.Not one statement from him on anything. I just hope he is doing his own planning for Thailands future and gives the people other alternatives to chose from. Sutep should be made irrelevant and as for the mad monk he has his own plans if sutep fails and who knows what's install then!
Popular Post Local Drunk Posted May 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted May 15, 2014 My government? It's not my government or your government it's the thai people government! And the thai people should have the right to vote for whatever party they chose.Not being told who will govern them by people who crave power by the way of intimidating bullying and blocking people their basic right to vote. So the yellows claim they have the numbers. That's a good thing! Now call for an election and all parties put up their policies and go for it! The only problem I see lately is that the leader of the democrats has been missing in action for a few days now.Not one statement from him on anything. I just hope he is doing his own planning for Thailands future and gives the people other alternatives to chose from. Sutep should be made irrelevant and as for the mad monk he has his own plans if sutep fails and who knows what's install then! "And the thai people should have the right to vote for whatever party they chose.Not being told who will govern them by people who crave power by the way of intimidating bullying and blocking people their basic right to vote." Been to a Red village lately? 3
culicine Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 The last paragraph pretty much sums it up ! An election on july 20 is the way to go! Stop shutting the people out.Its gone on long enough and Thailand and it's people are now in tis state limbo and the frustration and violence will continue as nobody on either side will except any decision that goes against them. The Dems won't run in any election, thus there will never be enough seats filled to form government. Thus the election will be voided...again. The Dems have enough support to make this happen, as has been seen. So either there 1) will be an election with the dems running (not likely), 2) an interim PM is put in place, or 3) there is a coup. No much of a choice, is it? T me, a coup at least kicks out both thugs and will let their heads cool for a couple of years. It also slams the lid shut on the cookie jar to stop more wastage of tax payers money. 1
Bernard Flint Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. Excuse me The majority of Thailand love Thaksin, thats what a vote proves, 1vote 1 person. Seems like the yellows dont like this, and want to keep the majority down, scared they might get more education and wealth. 1
Bernard Flint Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 Stradavarius37, you must really love Thaksin. You seem to give him so much credits. You have various types of citizens with various educational levels and experiences. They can analyze the political matter and make the decisions for themselves. Excuse me The majority of Thailand love Thaksin, thats what a vote proves, 1vote 1 person. Seems like the yellows dont like this, and want to keep the majority down, scared they might get more education and wealth.
ginjag Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 (edited) My government? It's not my government or your government it's the thai people government! And the thai people should have the right to vote for whatever party they chose.Not being told who will govern them by people who crave power by the way of intimidating bullying and blocking people their basic right to vote. So the yellows claim they have the numbers. That's a good thing! Now call for an election and all parties put up their policies and go for it! The only problem I see lately is that the leader of the democrats has been missing in action for a few days now.Not one statement from him on anything. I just hope he is doing his own planning for Thailands future and gives the people other alternatives to chose from. Sutep should be made irrelevant and as for the mad monk he has his own plans if sutep fails and who knows what's install then! Hey Freddy Davis (ex parrot face-comic fame UK tv.) Who knows who your post is answering to ??? you do not use the post to reply WHY ?? #13 is the original---get on board mate. I said Your government because of your over protective denials. The rest of this post is a photo copy of Land fill. Until you post and give true accounts of the initial problems you will never be a favourite poster, posters are looking for genuine replies. Edited May 15, 2014 by ginjag
jennywren Posted May 15, 2014 Posted May 15, 2014 There are not even enough in the Judiciary to push this through. You have a few Senators who say they will nominate a PM ... Maybe... if they do, he'll be rejected and that is a guarantee. Won't work and every decision he (they'll never dream of a woman in power!) makes will have to be enforced at gun point where they have the man power and will be ignored in most of the country where they don't. Telling yesterday was suthep leaving Gov House under a cloud and calling on the EC to ensure elections are free of vote buying!!!! Now that spoke voumes to me. Not sure on links to Thai PBS but that's where I read it. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now