Or to say it another way, he is a civil servant. The DSI is responsible to the government.

Nah, don't need to say it another way. Tarit persecuted 281 red shirts with a vendetta. He loved it. He wanted to see those red shirts suffer. He was working for Ahbisit.

As soon as the PTP bribed the electorate with unsustainable polices Tarit changed sides. Remember Tarit with complete conviction wanted to see those red shirts suffer. He wanted them persecuted. When his new boss came on the scene everything changes. See my previous comment for his ability to remove those charges against the terrorists.

As Tarit changes his view point some will change there stance depending on what the PTP and UDD narrative is..

A civil servent in Australia or the UK or the USA as you fondly like to compare the PTP too cannot be compared to Tarit. Tarit was a pawn, a boss, a leader and a major player. He was not a civil servant and to think that is showing that the only ministry of the PTP that was successful was the ministry of propaganda. The last ministry of propaganda was 70 years ago and they needed it too!

That is why I pity some. Not because they support terrorists, but because they have weak minds that follow a terrorist narrative.

As you you Fabie…I hope we can share a beer on Soi 11 at the TV bar.

I have a beer ready for you and I will pay for it. Rest assured I will not throw sh@t on you like the red shirts would if we disagree! I will pat you on the back and say………..

May peace and reconciliation be with you my dear dear friend because that's what people that don't support terrorists say.

What we don't do is condescend. Look at your previous 6 posts to see what I mean about condescension.

Djjamie, you must fight condescension with sarcasm, it is the only way you can win.

I don't know what you're reading, but there is nothing in the link suggesting that the court said they should be charged either.

From the link

However, the court found that Abhisit’s and Suthep’s decisions to authorize security forces to use live ammunition had led to the high number of casualties and that dispersal operations did not follow international standards on the use of lethal force. Prosecutors can appeal the criminal court’s ruling denying jurisdiction.

The ruling on excessive force by the security forces, which could open the door to criminal prosecutions of those involved in the bloody crackdown, was more promising.

See also http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/756007-tarit-shrugs-off-court-decision-to-reject-case-against-abhisit-suthep/?view=findpost&p=8319632

And you've extrapolated that to say that "the court says they should be charged"??