Jump to content

Lawyers want DNA tested by UK police


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 290
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's the only way. Forget what's happened.

Hannah's body was sent directly to the UK. You can bet your bippy that the UK took DNA samples from her cavities. They have the DNA of the rapist(s).

Now all they need is verified swabs from the accused to compare and I'll bet my bippy they don't match.

So what if the alleged rapists pulled out before ejaculating or there was none?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the only way. Forget what's happened.

Hannah's body was sent directly to the UK. You can bet your bippy that the UK took DNA samples from her cavities. They have the DNA of the rapist(s).

Now all they need is verified swabs from the accused to compare and I'll bet my bippy they don't match.

So what if the alleged rapists pulled out before ejaculating or there was none?

There will still be body fluid from the rapist in the vagina. Sperm isn't the only thing!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KOH TAO KILLINGS

Lawyers want DNA tested by UK police

Suwannee Bantisak

The Sunday Nation

BANGKOK: -- NHRC sending a team to investigate crime scene as suspects retract confession

In a related development, British Ambassador to Thailand Mark Kent urged Thai social media users not to spread disturbing photos relating to the case or passport photos and details of the victims, saying their families had already suffered a lot. He made the request via his Thai-language blog on Friday. He also urged the Thai mainstream mass media not to prejudge the accused and let the justice process run its course.

Kent said the Thai media, including the social media, should be "responsible as well as free".

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Lawyers-want-DNA-tested-by-UK-police-30245295.html

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2014-10-12

I do not think Mr Kent has a clue about how the Thai justice system works. As for social media, people should take responsibility for their actions but that does not mean silence when there is such palpable corruption and incompetence exhibited nor should it stop people asking questions and demanding transparency.

As far as responsibility is concerned the Authorities and for that matter the Britsh Embassy have a far, far greater responsibility to seek the truth and justice and to ensure that Justice is SEEN to be done as well. That responsibilty comes from being representatives of the people regardless of who appointed them. Even the junta is there by consent of the people albeit implicit and uneasy.

Sent from my iPad using ThaiVisa app

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the only way. Forget what's happened.

Hannah's body was sent directly to the UK. You can bet your bippy that the UK took DNA samples from her cavities. They have the DNA of the rapist(s).

Now all they need is verified swabs from the accused to compare and I'll bet my bippy they don't match.

So what if the alleged rapists pulled out before ejaculating or there was none?

There will still be body fluid from the rapist in the vagina. Sperm isn't the only thing!

OK I withdraw -- I have avoided any discussion of evidence -- I'm only really interested in procedure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the only way. Forget what's happened.

Hannah's body was sent directly to the UK. You can bet your bippy that the UK took DNA samples from her cavities. They have the DNA of the rapist(s).

Now all they need is verified swabs from the accused to compare and I'll bet my bippy they don't match.

Yes, they have this DNA, for sure. We can trust them
Since lawyers are calling for Burmese against expertise they can easily compare.
And I bet the hat of my ancestor that DNA match.
It seems to me impossible that the Thai police have lied about the DNA. Too big, too random, too risky. This would obviously be a conspiracy by idiots.
Contrary to overall racist and contemptuous opinions posted here I do not feel the conspiracy and I think that Thais are not idiots.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really good news. It would end all the speculations if UK test the DNA from everyone involved. If the Burmese really did it , it would probably come as a shock for the rest of the world and clear RTP . So if RTP really wants to clear their name this is the only way. If they refuse , well this could very well be a coverup.

Be careful what you wish for. Without following proper testing procedures and chain of custody protocols any samples provided by the RTP would be worthless, or worse, implicate whomever they choose. In order to assure a good outcome, I would think all new samples would need to be collected from both victims and suspects, if indeed such samples still exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well lets see if the Junta will allow it.

Would be interesting if they allowed the Brits to investigate and they then asked if they could DNA test 'you know who. '

Now that would be interesting.

Never going to happen.

If past cases are anything to go by the Burmese will get off on corruption of evidence thus saving face with Burma and the real killers will remain at large.

.

DNA samples taken from victims and suspects is termed "referral" samples.

The RTP has publicly claimed they are following "international" criminal investigative procedures.

In the west, in addition to referral samples, "elimination" samples of DNA are also often taken, and in a very public case such as this one, always taken.

What does this mean? Well, first responders such as police and medics, but also "bystanders" who may have contaminated the scene (intentionally or otherwise) give samples to rule themselves out. This should be done contemporaneously, but since the UK has had access to the victims, and has presumably (only recently) collected DNA, could still be done now.

The detective in charge in the UK, should "request" elimination samples.

Guess who was in a number of photos smack dab in the middle of the crime scene, while the victims were still there?

Is there a UK detective in charge? Where dd you find that please name him/her? Seems extremely unlikely the truth will out.The fall gus will either die rot or be swiftly deported.

What many people do not nderstand that rich importan6 people are above the law and in many "isloated " places are the law.The law is to police coerce those to poor to object.

A wanted criminal is issued a passport,doznes are shot in the capital nobody brough to book,drag a cop to his death no consequences,nightclub fires.I regret those new to the local justice system are about to discover the local mores.How much justice can you afford?

Foreign agencies ,ambassador,and Reuters press can say what they wish the poor and non English soeakers will never read that.The wealthy with cash and passports don't care and the aspiring middle classes understand censorship,the meagre cost of a hit and why its safer not to ruffle pooyais. Phuketwan ase reveals the state of local investigative journalism.

There is no democracy,press courts or law enforcement in the way westerners are used to ,think feudal warlords power protecting face cash and phallocrats.

Edited by RubbaJohnny
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the OP:

British Ambassador to Thailand Mark Kent urged Thai social media users not to spread disturbing photos relating to the case or passport photos and details of the victims, saying their families had already suffered a lot. He made the request via his Thai-language blog on Friday. He also urged the Thai mainstream mass media not to prejudge the accused and let the justice process run its course.


Kent said the Thai media, including the social media, should be "responsible as well as free".

Link to the full text:

http://blogs.fco.gov.uk/markkent/2014/10/10/media-should-be-responsible-as-well-as-free/

Edited by evadgib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspaper that shall not be named reporting this morning that police say recanting of confession was just a "rumor" and that "suspects" are maintaining their guilt and "repented their crime"

Wasn't it the official from Burma who visited them, who told that they confessed only because they were tortured? Wasn't it to that person that they recanted the confessions?

So the RTP have them back and again they are confessing? Is that the story?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the weird thing in this case is the fact that Thai police have claimed they base their case on witness statements and cctv footage but no mention of the DNA match

If a sample of the DNA evidence originally obtained from the crime scene cannot be provided by the Thai police for independent testing then this case is far from solved - it has already been pointed out by the head of forensics in Bangkok that his team (which should have been involved from the start) had seemingly no involvement

So who is holding the DNA from the victim ? and why is it not being made available to defence lawyers

If the DNA doesn't match then there is no case

If Thai police won't provide samples of the DNA for independent testing - why not ?

Could the UK authorities have tested the bodies on return to UK, or would they have been scrubbed clean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newspaper that shall not be named reporting this morning that police say recanting of confession was just a "rumor" and that "suspects" are maintaining their guilt and "repented their crime"

Wasn't it the official from Burma who visited them, who told that they confessed only because they were tortured? Wasn't it to that person that they recanted the confessions?

So the RTP have them back and again they are confessing? Is that the story?

I think it is pretty clear the suspects have been warned that, if they persist in retracting their confessions, they will prove their guilt by committing suicide.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re post #48: There are plenty of persons on here already with whom you can debate the evidence. In Thailand, a judge or judge panel can throw out all the evidence and still make a guilty or not guilty determination.

Edited by JLCrab
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it's impossible a Thai bar girl would ask a farang for money for her sick father, if her father wasn't really sick?

Please do not compare bar girls with the RTP. Decent Thais despise bar girls.

This is not something you should joke about,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to repeat my request

It would be so easy to save the reputation for thailand and authorities

-release all cctv recordings from the crime night

-take DNA from Nomsod by an independence investigation group

It would be so easy to stop all speculations and outcry

Its so simple,isn´t it ?

You'd have to have access to the evidence (DNA profile from attackers) to compare Nomsod's DNA. An independent investigation thus would need that evidence from the Thai authorities. What's the liklihood of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well lets see if the Junta will allow it.

Would be interesting if they allowed the Brits to investigate and they then asked if they could DNA test 'you know who. '

Now that would be interesting.

Never going to happen.

If past cases are anything to go by the Burmese will get off on corruption of evidence thus saving face with Burma and the real killers will remain at large.

.

DNA samples taken from victims and suspects is termed "referral" samples.

The RTP has publicly claimed they are following "international" criminal investigative procedures.

In the west, in addition to referral samples, "elimination" samples of DNA are also often taken, and in a very public case such as this one, always taken.

What does this mean? Well, first responders such as police and medics, but also "bystanders" who may have contaminated the scene (intentionally or otherwise) give samples to rule themselves out. This should be done contemporaneously, but since the UK has had access to the victims, and has presumably (only recently) collected DNA, could still be done now.

The detective in charge in the UK, should "request" elimination samples.

Guess who was in a number of photos smack dab in the middle of the crime scene, while the victims were still there?

Who says anyone in the U.K. took samples from the victims? The bodies were released to the families (who would coordinate with a funeral home), were they not? Where was it said that the bodies were turned over to U.K. police or that autopsy or any other examination was done in the U.K.?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly as this is what it all boils down to.

Many posters are calling for outside agencies involvement without considering they have no jurisdiction and can only operate if invited to do so and with all that's being going on it's probably the last thing the BIB want.

Defence lawyers could perhaps petition a court for independent testing and even if it was granted it would likely be blocked by the junta and martial law is still in existence too.

Sorry, I don't think that is totally accurate.

Myanmar lawyers can come here and take their DNA any time they want. They have the jurisdiction in Thailand, as they are the Myanmar Embassy lawyers. So they almost certainly are licensed to practice in this kingdom.

They are completly within their rights to demand the ability to collect DNA from their clients which will be the main basis for their defence.

Neither the Junta nor the BIB have any right to block it. These are NOT Thai nationals..... They are Myanmar nationals.

They have rights under international law.

Specifically what rights under "international law" are you referring to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the blind faith by many posters here in that DNA will solve the case.

It might get the two Myanmar guys off, but will not help get the real killers!

You are not so naive, that you think the original DNA from the girl, is not conterminated from day one to cover the backside of the real culprits?

So their will never be a match to bind someone to the crime, but at best to exclude suspects!!coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...