Jump to content

Questions raised over Queen's ancestry after DNA test on Richard III's cousins


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so ? ?

When they did not do a good job for the last generations, they would be out of the throne long ago.

I am Dutch, and.. do not give a damn for the "bloodline" of our royal house, as long as.. the present... does the job he / ( she ) is hired in for,

Looking to the support in Netherlands, the royals did a good job the last 125 years: from queen-mother Emma ( 1890) via queen Wilhelmina, Juliana, Beatrix, and now king Willem-Alexander. And I must say: his from origin Argentine wife, Maxima, proves, a blood line is worth nothing, but a good sense of what brings people together... is worth a lot more.

Advantage of an inherited crown: the next gets a 35+ years of training, no discussion / fighting between the heirs as we saw in history so often.

Power... they do not have , only influence, which they have to earn.

Till now: well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there was a full investigation into this a few years ago and it was found that the TRUE heir to the throne was actually a Brit living in OZ who was a sheep farmer (a huge number of sheep) the investigators offered to fly him to the UK as part of the documentry...he declined

The Royal as thery are now have as much right as my stray cat...the name Windsor was only intruduced in around 1938 as they were crapppping themselves of a British backlash with war against GERMANY their cousins.

The Queen really gave up soverenty in 1970 or 1972? to brussels as she signed the agreement of laws from Brussels would over power uk laws... so many have no idea what the queen of england controls ...its basicallty the world (crown est and holdings is really run by a group of approx 40 and Lord Rothschild is the main rep)

The name was changed from Saxe Coburg Gotha to Windsor in 1917 due to ill feeling against people and businesses with German names during The First World War

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elizabeth is not Britain's queen anyway.....................................

By Jonathan Pearlman, Sydney

7:06PM BST 03 Jul 2012

Michael-Abney-Hast_2266696b.jpg

Abney-Hastings, who was 69, was widowed but has several children

Michael Abney-Hastings, or "King Michael", was a British-born self-proclaimed republican who made international headlines in 2004 when a Channel 4 documentary suggested that King Edward IV was conceived illegitimately. It said the crown should have been passed down the Plantagenet line – ending at Abney-Hastings.

The reluctant, would-be king was born in Sussex and went to school at Ampleforth College in Yorkshire but moved as a teenager with his family to the small Australian town of Jerilderie, population 768, about 400 miles from Sydney.

His "claim" to the throne first became apparent after the documentary, Britain's Real Monarch, put forward a thesis by a historian, Dr Michael Jones, who said King Edward, who reigned from 1461 to 1483, was conceived when his parents were 100 miles apart.

At the time, according to a document unearthed by Dr Jones in a library in Rouen, Edward's supposed father, Richard, 3rd Duke of York, was said to be fighting the French near Paris, while his mother, Lady Cecily Neville, was at court in Rouen.

Furthermore, Lady Cecily was said to be spending a great deal of time with a local archer named Blaybourne and the two were rumoured to be having an affair. King Louis XI of France is said to have once claimed about King Edward: "His name is not King Edward – everybody knows his name is Blaybourne."

It was therefore proposed that Abney-Hastings, the direct descendant of George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence and brother of Edward IV, should be the rightful King.

When the claim was raised with Abney-Hastings at his farm in Jerilderie, he said he had been elected to the local shire council and would prefer to focus on his duties as councillor.

"When they told me I was surprised all right," he said. "But I don't think it will worry us too much. Titles don't mean much out here and I have no intention of leaving Jerilderie ... Why would you want to be King anyway? They can't do anything without someone on their back."

Abney-Hastings, who was 69, was widowed but has several children. He once joked that his eldest son would have to wait until he died before pressing a claim to the throne.

"He'll have to wait," he said. "It's not available till I go."

He had been battling a debilitating illness and had been in and out of hospital in the lead-up to his death on Saturday.

Though he did not budge from his support for Australia to become a republic, he did once note that his friends and family stood up and broke into God Save the King at a Christmas dinner shortly after the documentary was broadcast.

The new potential heir to the throne, Simon Abney-Hastings, the 15th Earl of Loudon, is a 37-year-old bachelor who works for a fabrics company in the town of Wangaratta, about 140 miles from Melbourne. He said he was aware he was "possibly" the rightful king but would prefer not to take the throne.

"I have always known about this – I have lived it," he said. "It does make you think about how things could be different. I am quite happy with how things have turned out. I have made my own life."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no blood line between him and the queen (House of Windsor)

The House of Windsor is the royal house of the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms. It was founded by King George V by royal proclamation on 17 July 1917, when he changed the name of the British Royal Family from the German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (a branch of the House of Wettin) to the English Windsor, due to the anti-German sentiment in the British Empire during World War I.[1] The most prominent member of the House of Windsor is its head, Queen Elizabeth II, who is the reigning monarch of 16 Commonwealth realms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HM the Queen has no problem with her Realm (or the Commonwealth) discussing the way she heads them. As a constitutional Monarch she leaves politics to her ministers, who themselves are subject to the will of the people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The illegitimacy of British royalty is no surprise to antipodeans, reflected in the common endearing description of those from that region.

I seem to remember it has something to do with being a POMMY (POME as in red cheeks of an apple). so me mum told me! tongue.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see you join the discussion on royal b4 stards, Harry.

wink.png

Didn't know Ginger Harry was a member of TV

Finally someone got it.clap2.gif

if anyone's DNA needed to be checked.........

Edited by steve187
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Masuk, I always thought the term of endearment 'Pom' originated back in the day when everything in the early Aus colony was stamped with the acronym 'POHM', which stood for 'Property of His/Her Majesty'. Or was that 'Prisoner OHM'? :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we allowed to discuss this? Surely this is the British people's skeletons. It doesn't serve well to point.....

As a Brit myself we don't give a toss who talks about what, we leave that to the countries who restrict you from speech, we just don't care
I'm a Brit. I thought all the other Brits would have caught the irony. Edited by draftvader
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we allowed to discuss this? Surely this is the British people's skeletons. It doesn't serve well to point.....

As a Brit myself we don't give a toss who talks about what, we leave that to the countries who restrict you from speech, we just don't care
I'm a Brit. I thought all the other Brits would have caught the irony.

We Brits are free to choose to catch or drop the irony as we see fit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard III was killed at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 the last British Monarch to die in Battle.

Famous for the quote "A horse a horse my Kingdom for a horse".

No one gave him a horse and he was battered to death by the forces of Henry VII who started the Tudor Dynasty. Father of Henry VIII and Grandfather to Queen Elizabeth I.

The Tudors were of Welsh descent and created the greatest period in British history prior to Queen Victoria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"So, all the nasty words about Obama, Abbott, et al, are illegal."

"Obama I do not know about but Abbott is not and I hope never will be a head of state the arrogant bast,.d and dick head he is."

Queen Elizabeth is also the Queen of Australia and therefore the Head of State. She is represented in Australia by the Governor General, who is appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Although I never voted for Julia Gillard and her party I found that many of the remarks made about her were insulting to her and her position as the PM. I find your insulting remarks about the current PM equally objectionable. If you don't like him then don't vote for him or his party - that's the way a democracy works.

Incidentally I am a republican and hope the next King of the UK does not become the King of Australia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"So, all the nasty words about Obama, Abbott, et al, are illegal."

"Obama I do not know about but Abbott is not and I hope never will be a head of state the arrogant bast,.d and dick head he is."

Queen Elizabeth is also the Queen of Australia and therefore the Head of State. She is represented in Australia by the Governor General, who is appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Although I never voted for Julia Gillard and her party I found that many of the remarks made about her were insulting to her and her position as the PM. I find your insulting remarks about the current PM equally objectionable. If you don't like him then don't vote for him or his party - that's the way a democracy works.

Incidentally I am a republican and hope the next King of the UK does not become the King of Australia.

I have every right to say what I think of Abbott especially as it is true. I could add lying to that statement if you like. LM only protects Heads of State and as you have clearly acknowledged he is not one. I believe though that the US President is Head of State of the US and is probably covered.

Edited by harrry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we allowed to discuss this? Surely this is the British people's skeletons. It doesn't serve well to point.....

As a Brit myself we don't give a toss who talks about what, we leave that to the countries who restrict you from speech, we just don't care
I'm a Brit. I thought all the other Brits would have caught the irony.

I did,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard III was killed at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485 the last British Monarch to die in Battle.

Famous for the quote "A horse a horse my Kingdom for a horse".

No one gave him a horse and he was battered to death by the forces of Henry VII who started the Tudor Dynasty. Father of Henry VIII and Grandfather to Queen Elizabeth I.

The Tudors were of Welsh descent and created the greatest period in British history prior to Queen Victoria.

I am now reading 'The King's Deception' by Steve Berry. This novel suggests that Elizabeth daughter of Henry VIII actually died as an infant. In order to cover up the death, a girl of the same age was sought in the neighbouring village. All that the nanny could find was an infant boy, so in fact Elizabeth I who never married and had no children was actually a man!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there was a full investigation into this a few years ago and it was found that the TRUE heir to the throne was actually a Brit living in OZ who was a sheep farmer (a huge number of sheep) the investigators offered to fly him to the UK as part of the documentry...he declined

The Royal as thery are now have as much right as my stray cat...the name Windsor was only intruduced in around 1938 as they were crapppping themselves of a British backlash with war against GERMANY their cousins.

The Queen really gave up soverenty in 1970 or 1972? to brussels as she signed the agreement of laws from Brussels would over power uk laws... so many have no idea what the queen of england controls ...its basicallty the world (crown est and holdings is really run by a group of approx 40 and Lord Rothschild is the main rep)

The name was changed from Saxe Coburg Gotha to Windsor in 1917 due to ill feeling against people and businesses with German names during The First World War

indeed, and therefore any tenuous link with Richard III or any monarch before the House of Hanover is mainly a red herring, given that William of ORANGE was invited to take over the English throne , and he certainly shared little or no blood with the Stuarts or the Tudors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

indeed, and therefore any tenuous link with Richard III or any monarch before the House of Hanover is mainly a red herring, given that William of ORANGE was invited to take over the English throne , and he certainly shared little or no blood with the Stuarts or the Tudors.

William III was a nephew of Charles II and James II - his mother was their elder sister. Edited by Richard W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Richards identity was proved by his mitochondrial DNA, handed down in an unbroken chain through the female line from his sister to two living relatives, the conclusion is stark: there is a break in the claimed line of Beaufort descent, what the scientists described as a false paternity event, which may also affect the ancestry of their distant cousins, the Windsors.

The other possibility is that the cuckold was in the line of York. Indeed, if you look in the Wikipedia article (last edited in May 2014) for Richard III's paternal grandfather, Richard of Conisburgh, Earl of Cambridge, you'll find it suggested that he was not actually the son of Edmund of Langley, Duke of York (5th son of Edward III). If this is the case, it matters very little, for the claim of the house of York chiefly depends on their descent from Lionel of Antwerp, 3rd son of Edward III.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...