Jump to content

Chinese firm seeks CSD hand after accusing a Thai firm of fraud


webfact

Recommended Posts

Chinese firm seeks CSD hand after accusing a Thai firm of fraud

BANGKOK: -- A Chinese investment firm today lodged a complaint with the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) accusing a Thai firm of fraud after it was deceived to purchase majority stake of a luxury hotel in Chiang Mai but was later denied management right with the change of the articles of association that increases stake holding to 80% to gain the management right from earlier agreed 51%.

The Chinese firm Yunnan Haicheng Industry Group Co Ltd has paid the Thai firm, Naddasri Co Ltd, the company that owned the Dhara Dhevi Chiang Mai hotel, 1.1 billion baht.

According to the Chinese firm’s executive Mr Choey Loey, the purchase deal was agreed at 1.1 billion baht to gain 51% stakes in Dhara Dhevi Chiang Mai hotel, formerly known as Mandarin Oriental hotel which was owned by Naddasri Co Ltd.

The Chinese businessman told CSD police that Yunnan Haicheng Industry Group had bought the agreed stake from Naddasri which had promised to sell its 49% stake in the hotel and to persuade other shareholders to sell another 2%.

He said he had been led to believe with a 51% stake, his company could obtain immediate management right of the hotel.

A contract was then signed and payment was settled at 1.1 billion baht.

However after the payment, he said his company received only 45% of the whole stakes.

Later he learned that the Thai firm has changed its articles of association at a shareholders’ meetings to increase management control to have 80% of all shares from earlier stipulated at 51%.

With the unusual change, he said that his firm would not be able to manage the hotel even it has 51% stakes.

He said this was a fraud as he was deceived.

The Chinese firm also lodged complaint with the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the Bank of Thailand, urging the state agencies to probe the behaviour of ACAP Advisory Plc, the parent firm of Asset Management Co Ltd, the creditor of Naddasri which owed it 922.5 million baht.

Mr Choey claimed the creditor refused to accept repayment of the last instalment of 2.5 million baht after being paid 920 million baht earlier.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/chinese-firm-seeks-csd-hand-accusing-thai-firm-fraud

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-01-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't wait for the next announcement of general happiness that foreigners are lining up to invest in Thailand.

The OP isn't about being defrauded in buying a bar, this is scamming at top level, and will be known by all major players in the business world.

Edited by Anthony5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should a billionaire company be any different than all of us other foreigners owning anything in Thailand.

Thailand better quit looking at obtaining Chinese money and start thinking that the rich Chinese will not sit back and let Thailand take advantage of them.

Welcome to International Business 101. DONT DO BUSINESS WITH CHINA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both players are experienced in their chosen field, the percentage of ownership should have been back dated to the start of these proposals, one has been outsmarted , the other too smart by half , then again doing business with both countries, there is a certain amount of sovereign risk. coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Thai business dealings. WHY would anybody in their right mind want to do business with Thai businessmen. I have heard so many stories of Thai cheating foreigners and cheating other Thai all so that they can get their hands on another's money. Let's see how this plays out and how it impacts ongoing business dealings with other Chinese firms foolish enough to trust Thai or planning to do business with them. I think only a fool would try.

Hopefully more and more people and companies will fully understand "Thainess" and that LOS stands for Land of Scams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will and should amount to criminal behaviour if the shareholders involved in the sale exercised their rights to vote on the increase of ownership levels required for management control. If this had been terms of a contract between the parties, all securities laws aside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Thai business dealings. WHY would anybody in their right mind want to do business with Thai businessmen. I have heard so many stories of Thai cheating foreigners and cheating other Thai all so that they can get their hands on another's money. Let's see how this plays out and how it impacts ongoing business dealings with other Chinese firms foolish enough to trust Thai or planning to do business with them. I think only a fool would try.

Thai business 101, a contract is just a pause in the negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Well someone didnt read the small print

What small print? The Chinese made a deal to purchase 51% that would give them control for operational purposes and all they got was 45%. That's fraud by the Thais. Then the Thais secretly change the Articles of Incorporation to require 80% ownership to control hotel operations. That;s also fraud. So even if the Chinese did get 51% that they purchased, they wtill wouldn't have operational control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...