Jump to content

UK police: Schoolgirls who went to Syria are not terrorists


webfact

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, katana said:

There's an argument to be made that rather than bring her back to the UK, she, along with the other captured ISIS fighters in Syria, should be put on trial in the country she broke the law in.

Trump knows that without US help, the European special forces who quietly "fight" against the jihadists (that is to say, neutralize them before they return), can do little or nothing. We will therefore repatriate them and judge them. They will do everything to claim they are the victims, mislead justice and after spreading their ideas in jails, will resume the fight upon their release.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2015 at 10:10 AM, klauskunkel said:

Of course they are not terrorists. They are now playthings for terrorists.

  Pleasure and  breeding  machines. for terrorists,    Stupid  UK , pay up and take care ..

     Maybe our next PM ,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It emerged today that Begum has called her son Jerah, in what historians have interpreted as a reference to Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, a 7th century Islamic warlord..who massacred infidels."
[Jarrah also means 'able fighter' or 'one who wounds' in Arabic.]
Continued:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6716167/Jihadi-bride-east-London-Shamima-Begum-family-lawyer-says-want-baby-son-home.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, roo860 said:

Isn't it the custom that the wife goes to live with the husband's parents?

Sent from my SM-G920F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

That is what normally happens, but looks like she is trying to get back to the UK, then get her husband/ family over to sponge off the state.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anythingleft? said:

It's treason, the option to return to the UK should not even be on the table

Same goes for the other daisy in the news right now......

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
 

You're blatantly disregarding the law.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, transam said:

Well the bird was aiding and abetting murderers of innocent folk for not having a beard or smoking a fag and other daft stuff. She KNEW who she was aiding AND their atrocities..I don't give a flying flush about her age and shagging predicament, and am sure most Brits don't..

Which is related to my comment about legalities how?

Edited by stevenl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Anythingleft? said:

How? Is it not treason to support and fight alongside those that fight against your own country?..

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
 

And between 1939 and 1945 a few folk were hanged in the UK for such stuff..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And between 1939 and 1945 a few folk were hanged in the UK for such stuff..
They still should be IMO, only now we don't, or won't even bring about the law when it should be used

Treason was only downgraded to life not death it was never abolished.......

Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, overherebc said:

Interviewed by BBC and she said she understands why they bombed the concert in Manchester.

In my mind that makes her just as guilty as the bombers.

Let her rot in her own sh-t.

So someone who understands perpetrators is just as guilty as the perpetrators.

What a load of crap.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...