webfact Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Lost New Zealand woman survives on breast milkWELLINGTON (AFP) - A New Zealand woman told Monday how she survived lost in rugged wilderness by drinking her own breast milk and burying herself in dirt.Susan O’Brien was taking part in a gruelling 20 kilometre (12.5 mile) run in forest south of Wellington on Sunday when she took a wrong turn and became disorientated.The 29-year-old said she was convinced she was going to die during a night of rain and high winds, spending the time praying and thinking of her family.Dressed in only light running gear, O’Brien said she scooped out a hole to keep warm and fed herself with breast milk."I just kept chucking dirt on top of me and every time I heard something I’d just scream ’help’," she told reporters after a helicopter fitted with heat-detecting sensors found her late Monday morning."One thing that helped me, I’m breastfeeding my baby, so I had a bit of my milk because I thought that would help me keep going for energy."O’Brien had an emotional reunion with husband Daniel, son Jayden, 2, and eight-month-old daughter Meisha before being taken to hospital for a check-up.Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/breakingnews/Lost-New-Zealand-woman-survives-on-breast-milk-30259791.html-- The Nation 2015-05-11
daoyai Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...ok unless I am mistaken, she spent 1 night away from food? If so, she didn't "survive" on milk though she probably took comfort in the act.
sawadee1947 Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...ok unless I am mistaken, she spent 1 night away from food? If so, she didn't "survive" on milk though she probably took comfort in the act. As I read it was only ONE night. It was raining. OK. She did not need to have food at all. Rain water was enough. So what is the article all about???
MaxYakov Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...ok unless I am mistaken, she spent 1 night away from food? If so, she didn't "survive" on milk though she probably took comfort in the act. As I read it was only ONE night. It was raining. OK. She did not need to have food at all. Rain water was enough. So what is the article all about??? Cannibalism or self-eroticism I guess.
maanoi Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Am I wrong in thinking that the food/ nutrients required to produce breast milk would be greater than what she would of received by drinking it.
Beetlejuice Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit.
maidee Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 now there is something a thai woman would never be able to do
Allseeingeye Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 covered in dirt and breast milk?? That's 2 fantasies off my bucket list right there.
falang07 Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...since the fella would have to be from Africa to accomplish this task :-)
Fullstop Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Am I wrong in thinking that the food/ nutrients required to produce breast milk would be greater than what she would of received by drinking it. The milk was already produced at the time. Answer the following question to answer your own. If she espressed the milk out into a paper cup ... would she get more nutrients if she drank it or threw it away? The answer is obvious ... so dispense with the cup and go straight to the source.
Gsxrnz Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit. It is actually a recommendation in the NZ Tramping and Bush Walking Handbook to do just this when going bush. In fact, two females (lactating or otherwise) are recommended if the trip is longer than three days. The Handbook (ISBN 58008-618) also advises Kiwi males how to eat, root, shoot, and leave(s) while in the bush with said lactating women.
Fullstop Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit. Wouldn't it be easier to just put a carton of UHT milk in your pack? A woman takes up too much room.
slipperylobster Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Her story is ho-hum. I once lived on Breast Milk for a year..... First time I went to Subic Bay.
Gsxrnz Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit. Wouldn't it be easier to just put a carton of UHT milk in your pack? A woman takes up too much room. True....but the delivery mechanism (nipple versus straw) is somewhat more appealing.
Beetlejuice Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit. It is actually a recommendation in the NZ Tramping and Bush Walking Handbook to do just this when going bush. In fact, two females (lactating or otherwise) are recommended if the trip is longer than three days. The Handbook (ISBN 58008-618) also advises Kiwi males how to eat, root, shoot, and leave(s) while in the bush with said lactating women. If I was lost in the bush with two big breasted lactating women, I would not want to leave or be rescued.. Even if none of them survived I guarantee the males in the group, if found, would have smiles on their faces.
tifino Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...haven't happened upon a Punters' Fantasy Thread for ages'n'ages... and now my cup runneth over, but I think we can squeeze a little more out of this yet...
Fullstop Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 I once lived on Breast Milk for a year..... Me too ... then I turned 1 y.o and upgraded to blenderised veges.
Seastallion Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Must have been an excellent heat detector to find her covered in cold wet dirt.
JetsetBkk Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 ...ok unless I am mistaken, she spent 1 night away from food? If so, she didn't "survive" on milk though she probably took comfort in the act. As I read it was only ONE night. It was raining. OK. She did not need to have food at all. Rain water was enough. So what is the article all about??? Titillation.
asdecas Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 Am I wrong in thinking that the food/ nutrients required to produce breast milk would be greater than what she would of received by drinking it. That depends on whether you believe in perpetual emotion.
ggt Posted May 11, 2015 Posted May 11, 2015 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> ..lucky that it wasn't a fella... Gross!
bbbbooboo Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 lol......the biggest advantage is you wouldn't have to talk to a pack of milk
biplanebluey Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Should be included in the survival guides, that anyone who intends trekking around the wilderness, should take a lactating woman with them as part of their survival kit. It is actually a recommendation in the NZ Tramping and Bush Walking Handbook to do just this when going bush. In fact, two females (lactating or otherwise) are recommended if the trip is longer than three days. The Handbook (ISBN 58008-618) also advises Kiwi males how to eat, root, shoot, and leave(s) while in the bush with said lactating women. you got it wrong mate--- the kiwi term for bum-bum is rooting so they say ---------- Kiwi males--------- Eats ,Roots,Shoots,and leaves!!!!!!!!
Fullstop Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 He used the Aussie word "root" ... where did he get it wrong? On a side note...Kiwi birds don't eat shoots and leaves ... Aussie wombats do. Another slang term stolen by the sheep shaggers across the ditch. Kiwi eat small invertebrates, seeds,grubs, and many varieties of worms. They also may eat fruit, small crayfish, eels and amphibians. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi Wombats are herbivores; their diets consist mostly of grasses, sedges, herbs, bark, and roots http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wombat I rest my case.
lvr181 Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 He used the Aussie word "root" ... where did he get it wrong? On a side note...Kiwi birds don't eat shoots and leaves ... Aussie wombats do. Another slang term stolen by the sheep shaggers across the ditch. Kiwi eat small invertebrates, seeds,grubs, and many varieties of worms. They also may eat fruit, small crayfish, eels and amphibians. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi Wombats are herbivores; their diets consist mostly of grasses, sedges, herbs, bark, and roots http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wombat I rest my case. Wow - "convict family tree" calling them over the ditch "sheep humpers" !!
Fullstop Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Wow - "convict family tree" calling them over the ditch "sheep humpers" !! Yes mate. I have evil criminal roots. Absolutely ruthless were my ancestors. My great great grandfather was thrown in chains on a leaky boat for 6 months for stealing a banana. Don't mess with me!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now