lostoday Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 (edited) You keep telling yourself it's better to be old. I guess you need to believe that. The topic of this thread is why this cynicism against Thailand. It is better to be young in California and old in Thailand. If you are old in California or young in Thailand you are going to have problems and cynicism is one. I'm sure your visa is top secret but for most of us a retirement visa costs 1900 baht and takes about 20 minutes per year. Most young guys not married to a Thai national don't have it that easy (Except you, I imagine but don't know. Feel free to tell us how easy it is for you to stay in Thailand.). If you put words in my mouth you try and be accurate. Edited August 1, 2015 by lostoday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 Most of us aren't all that cynical about Thailand. We are merely being realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted August 2, 2015 Share Posted August 2, 2015 The corruption in everything makes me cynical about LOS. I didn't notice it till I lived here, but it's pretty bad where I live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig krup Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 (edited) David Hume nailed the problem over 250 years ago. Habit and custom are the great guides to human conduct. Reason plays a very minor part. So people see "easy wins" in Thailand and they can't understand why the Thais don't obey the dictates of reason, but (for example) Brits similarly seem to find it impossible to use reason to manage their affairs, and when they do it causes riots. For example, the "poll tax" - the community charge - meant paying an equal share of 20% of local government expenditure, with a further 80% rebate for students and the unemployed. The idea was to make people pay some attention to local government spending, which was out of control. Eighty percent of the funding would still come from central government, and that would be raised mainly from the wealthy. No American or Australian would think that this was so outrageous that it should provoke riots, but it did. People think their commitments and beliefs follow on from reason, but they don't. What actually happens is that they adopt the beliefs and practices of the community and then - maybe in their forties or fifties - they begin to see the sense in the policy. This person goes to Thailand and says, "Why can't you control these aggressive dogs and get the scooters off the pavement, for **** sake? It's obvious". Trouble is that it's obvious that Britain doesn't have the dough to keep paying single parents with three kids and a 16 hour a week minimum wage job three grand in benefits. It's "obvious", but we can't see it, just as the Thais can't see what reason (supposedly) dictates in their situation. It can take a lot of time to turn a country around. Edited August 3, 2015 by Craig krup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Off topic posts with overly derogatory generalizations toward Thai people have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillageIdiot Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 David Hume nailed the problem over 250 years ago. Habit and custom are the great guides to human conduct. Reason plays a very minor part. So people see "easy wins" in Thailand and they can't understand why the Thais don't obey the dictates of reason, but (for example) Brits similarly seem to find it impossible to use reason to manage their affairs, and when they do it causes riots. For example, the "poll tax" - the community charge - meant paying an equal share of 20% of local government expenditure, with a further 80% rebate for students and the unemployed. The idea was to make people pay some attention to local government spending, which was out of control. Eighty percent of the funding would still come from central government, and that would be raised mainly from the wealthy. No American or Australian would think that this was so outrageous that it should provoke riots, but it did. People think their commitments and beliefs follow on from reason, but they don't. What actually happens is that they adopt the beliefs and practices of the community and then - maybe in their forties or fifties - they begin to see the sense in the policy. This person goes to Thailand and says, "Why can't you control these aggressive dogs and get the scooters off the pavement, for **** sake? It's obvious". Trouble is that it's obvious that Britain doesn't have the dough to keep paying single parents with three kids and a 16 hour a week minimum wage job three grand in benefits. It's "obvious", but we can't see it, just as the Thais can't see what reason (supposedly) dictates in their situation. It can take a lot of time to turn a country around. Food for thought. Thanks for the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillageIdiot Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 The corruption in everything makes me cynical about LOS. I didn't notice it till I lived here, but it's pretty bad where I live. That's because you have a business here - don't you have a beach resort or something like that? Farangs who keep a low profile usually don't get shaken down so often. Among my Thai family and neighbours it's mostly live and let live. That's the way I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanLaew Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 Stop peeling the bloody onion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 David Hume nailed the problem over 250 years ago. Habit and custom are the great guides to human conduct. Reason plays a very minor part. So people see "easy wins" in Thailand and they can't understand why the Thais don't obey the dictates of reason, but (for example) Brits similarly seem to find it impossible to use reason to manage their affairs, and when they do it causes riots. For example, the "poll tax" - the community charge - meant paying an equal share of 20% of local government expenditure, with a further 80% rebate for students and the unemployed. The idea was to make people pay some attention to local government spending, which was out of control. Eighty percent of the funding would still come from central government, and that would be raised mainly from the wealthy. No American or Australian would think that this was so outrageous that it should provoke riots, but it did. People think their commitments and beliefs follow on from reason, but they don't. What actually happens is that they adopt the beliefs and practices of the community and then - maybe in their forties or fifties - they begin to see the sense in the policy. This person goes to Thailand and says, "Why can't you control these aggressive dogs and get the scooters off the pavement, for **** sake? It's obvious". Trouble is that it's obvious that Britain doesn't have the dough to keep paying single parents with three kids and a 16 hour a week minimum wage job three grand in benefits. It's "obvious", but we can't see it, just as the Thais can't see what reason (supposedly) dictates in their situation. It can take a lot of time to turn a country around. Actually, there is enough money in Britain to pay the unmarried mothers with a whole passle of kids, but is it a good thing to pay the uneducated and ignorant enough money to keep producing kids that will in turn be uneducated and probably hoodlums? More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 The corruption in everything makes me cynical about LOS. I didn't notice it till I lived here, but it's pretty bad where I live. That's because you have a business here - don't you have a beach resort or something like that? Farangs who keep a low profile usually don't get shaken down so often. Among my Thai family and neighbours it's mostly live and let live. That's the way I like it. That's because you have a business here - don't you have a beach resort or something like that? Wish I had a wife that had a beach resort. I'd be a happy, happy bunny. For myself, I'd stick a red hot pocker in my eye before I put any money into a business in LOS. I live in LOS as a retired man, I have no interest in subjecting myself to the uncertainties and hassles of owning a business here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? It's only the India and China bits that are overpopulated. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gecko123 Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 When you are fed up with Western world dogmas and you discover the anathema Thailand you think you found the real place to live your life, until 10 years later you realise Thailand is a lie. Then cynicism comes in at hand. I hear where you're coming from. But Thailand didn't lie to you. Thailand let you lie to yourself. There's a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig krup Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 Trouble is that it's obvious that Britain doesn't have the dough to keep paying single parents with three kids and a 16 hour a week minimum wage job three grand in benefits. It's "obvious", but we can't see it, just as the Thais can't see what reason (supposedly) dictates in their situation. It can take a lot of time to turn a country around. Actually, there is enough money in Britain to pay the unmarried mothers with a whole passle of kids, but is it a good thing to pay the uneducated and ignorant enough money to keep producing kids that will in turn be uneducated and probably hoodlums? More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? I was quite shocked to discover that a single parent with three kids working in London on a 16 hour a week minimum wage job earns £500 in a month and receives three grand a month in benefits, and it ain't all Housing Benefit - nothing like it. The whole of government accounts deficit is still above £150bn, and even their best measure is £75bn. Tax credits are £30bn, Housing Benefit is nearly as much and all in-work benefits come to £120bn. We currently raise nearly 30% of all income tax from the richest 1%, and the 50% tax band either cost money or raised less than a billion - we've pushed the rich as far as we can. The average Brit receives £11,000 a year in state services more than they pay in taxation. Any EU citizen can set themselves up in the UK, and Italy and Greece can turn anyone they like into an EU citizen. So - 1) we borrow to pay the benefits, 2) we can't borrow for ever, 3) we've pushed the rich as far as we can, and 4) we can't even cap the total number of claimants under existing rules. Any non-Brit can see that this has to pop, but Brits think it's just fine because people can't see what they're close to. Let's face it, most people pay no attention at all to anything until it's too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? It's only the India and China bits that are overpopulated. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Rubbish. Africa is totally overpopulated, which is why they are trying to move to the west. Overpopulation isn't just the numbers, it's the ability of the country to sustain the population and have jobs, heath care etc for everyone. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Fat chance of that happening voluntarily. The world has at least 50% too many people to be sustained in a decent lifestyle. If the human race continues to overbreed itself, it will be like the lemmings and many millions will die, one way or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? It's only the India and China bits that are overpopulated. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Rubbish. Africa is totally overpopulated, which is why they are trying to move to the west. Overpopulation isn't just the numbers, it's the ability of the country to sustain the population and have jobs, heath care etc for everyone. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Fat chance of that happening voluntarily. The world has at least 50% too many people to be sustained in a decent lifestyle. If the human race continues to overbreed itself, it will be like the lemmings and many millions will die, one way or another. You've never been to Africa then? A place where you can drive all day without seeing anyone. Happy for you to enter the Darwin awards though, good luck winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehelmsman Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 When you are fed up with Western world dogmas and you discover the anathema Thailand you think you found the real place to live your life, until 10 years later you realise Thailand is a lie. Then cynicism comes in at hand. Only if you were stupid enough to mistake a holiday destination for your future home. Some of us were more realistic about Thailand in the first place. You assume alot as always, so those of us whose lifestyle allows us to make Thailand our home after spending time here are stupid. My home can be anywhere, but I have a family here so this is where I live. The unrealistic aspect to living in Thailand is to burn your bridge on your way here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinsom Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 With this massive pr campaign going on in Thailand has anyone noticed how the slogan is incorrect Surely it should be CYCLE FOR MOM OR CYCLE FOR THE QUEEN bike for mom sounds stupid Gives inpression that thais should buy bike for their mother Or am I reading it wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoiBiker Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 (edited) When you are fed up with Western world dogmas and you discover the anathema Thailand you think you found the real place to live your life, until 10 years later you realise Thailand is a lie. Then cynicism comes in at hand. Only if you were stupid enough to mistake a holiday destination for your future home. Some of us were more realistic about Thailand in the first place. You assume alot as always, so those of us whose lifestyle allows us to make Thailand our home after spending time here are stupid. My home can be anywhere, but I have a family here so this is where I live. The unrealistic aspect to living in Thailand is to burn your bridge on your way here. When did I say that? I spent time here before moving here. I imagine most people do. What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the bridge burning stuff, though. Edited August 6, 2015 by SoiBiker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoiBiker Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 With this massive pr campaign going on in Thailand has anyone noticed how the slogan is incorrect Surely it should be CYCLE FOR MOM OR CYCLE FOR THE QUEEN bike for mom sounds stupid Gives inpression that thais should buy bike for their mother Or am I reading it wrong "Cycle" is a tricky word for Thai people to pronounce. "Bike" is easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. Six years so far and it's been one big long holiday for me, no disappointments yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoiBiker Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. Six years so far and it's been one big long holiday for me, no disappointments yet. I'm guessing your idea of a holiday isn't necessarily the same as anyone else's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIPinthailand Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 as long people fall in excessive consumerism, they won't find happiness. I tell you , live like a monk, you will feel better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. Six years so far and it's been one big long holiday for me, no disappointments yet. I'm guessing your idea of a holiday isn't necessarily the same as anyone else's. Holiday to me means cycling, running and hiking every day. When I was younger it meant, sailing, diving, ski-ing and swimming. Only the sports change! What's your idea of a holiday then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duanebigsby Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 With this massive pr campaign going on in Thailand has anyone noticed how the slogan is incorrect Surely it should be CYCLE FOR MOM OR CYCLE FOR THE QUEEN bike for mom sounds stupid Gives inpression that thais should buy bike for their mother Or am I reading it wrong Biking is commonly used as a verb in US and Canada, don't know about other English speaking countries. Bike for Cancer isn't unusual back home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehelmsman Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 When you are fed up with Western world dogmas and you discover the anathema Thailand you think you found the real place to live your life, until 10 years later you realise Thailand is a lie. Then cynicism comes in at hand. Only if you were stupid enough to mistake a holiday destination for your future home. Some of us were more realistic about Thailand in the first place. You assume alot as always, so those of us whose lifestyle allows us to make Thailand our home after spending time here are stupid. My home can be anywhere, but I have a family here so this is where I live. The unrealistic aspect to living in Thailand is to burn your bridge on your way here. When did I say that? I spent time here before moving here. I imagine most people do. What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the bridge burning stuff, though. As in selling all you own in your home country to invest in your new life in LOS. With enough money you can overcome any disappointments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehelmsman Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. Six years so far and it's been one big long holiday for me, no disappointments yet. I'm guessing your idea of a holiday isn't necessarily the same as anyone else's. Holiday to me means cycling, running and hiking every day. When I was younger it meant, sailing, diving, ski-ing and swimming. Only the sports change! What's your idea of a holiday then? My favorite sporting event is 12oz. curls with good friends or new friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeahSiam Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 More to the point, is it a good thing to be paying people to have children in an overpopulated world? It's only the India and China bits that are overpopulated. Are you suggesting that white and black people all commit racial suicide by not reproducing? Rubbish. Africa is totally overpopulated, which is why they are trying to move to the west. That's an unbelieveably stupid thing to say. Africa isn't over populated. Don't open your mouth unless you know what you're talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulse Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 We currently raise nearly 30% of all income tax from the richest 1%, and the 50% tax band either cost money or raised less than a billion - we've pushed the rich as far as we can. Since the richest 1% possess over 50% of the wealth, it doesn't seem fair that they only pay 30% of the taxes. As far as pushing them as far as we can? Not even close. That's what they want you to think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoiBiker Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 You assume alot as always, so those of us whose lifestyle allows us to make Thailand our home after spending time here are stupid. My home can be anywhere, but I have a family here so this is where I live. The unrealistic aspect to living in Thailand is to burn your bridge on your way here. When did I say that? I spent time here before moving here. I imagine most people do. What's foolish is to believe that life here will be like one long holiday, and that Thailand really is the carefree paradise that tourists perceive it as. If you were naive enough to come here with those expectations, then you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the bridge burning stuff, though. As in selling all you own in your home country to invest in your new life in LOS. With enough money you can overcome any disappointments. I didn't own much in the last place, either. Possessions weigh you down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmh8 Posted August 7, 2015 Share Posted August 7, 2015 are you sure it is cynicism and not realism? why do you think it goes against Thailand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now