Jump to content








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Awarded Nobel Peace Prize for Nuclear Disarmament

    2. 0

      Controversy Surrounds Guardian Review of Oct 7 Documentary on Hamas Massacre

    3. 0

      Unlikely Justice for Victims of Novichok Poisoning, Says Former PM Theresa May

    4. 0

      The Growing Influence of the US Far Right on Ireland's Extremist Movements

    5. 0

      Boris Johnson Hints at Potential Return to Front-Line Politics

    6. 0

      Pro-Palestinian ‘mob-rule tactics’ Force Postponement of Braverman’s Cambridge Speech

    7. 0

      Taylor Swift Donates $5 Million to Hurricane Relief Efforts

    8. 0

      Honeymoon Period Over for Kamala Harris Polls Show Tight Race

    9. 0

      DeSantis Pushes Back on Climate Change’s Role in Stronger Storms

    10. 0

      German Politician Calls for Ban on Greta Thunberg Over Pro-Palestinian Protest Involvement

    11. 0

      U.S. Seeks to Weaken Hezbollah’s Grip on Lebanon Amid Israeli Offensive

    12. 0

      YouTuber and BBC Star Yung Filly Arrested in Australia Over Alleged Hotel Rape

    13. 4

      Thailand Live Saturday 12 October 2024

Songkhla power plant hearing goes off smoothly


webfact

Recommended Posts

SONGKHLA
Power plant hearing goes off smoothly

The Nation

30265352-01_big.jpg?1438035444424

But Opposition claims it was kept out; supporters of coalfired project 'bribed'

SONGKHLA: -- THE hearing on the construction of a coal-fired power plant in Songkhla's Thepha district passed off without violence yesterday, although the opposition claimed that supporters who joined the public review were bribed.


Songkhla Governor Thamrong Chareonkul chaired the first day of the third public hearing on the Thepha power plant at Tambon Pak Bang Administrative Organisation. The venue was reportedly heavily guarded and there were claims the opposition group was kept away from the event.

Pol Kongsue, assistant governor generation 3 of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (Egat), said that in the next step after the hearing, the completed environmental and health impact assessment (EHIA) report would be forwarded to the Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning for consideration before it is presented to the Cabinet.

"The public hearing today was conducted legitimately according to the EHIA procedures, so the Thepha coal-fired power plant is for the benefit of the local communities," Pol said.

According to Egat, the Thepha plant will use high-quality coal from abroad for two 1,100-megawatt power generators. Egat claims that it has pulverised-coal combustion technology, which can reduce pollutant emissions.

On the first day, 12,000 registered attendees came to the forum, while it was reported that around 20,000 people had turned up to the event. It was estimated that more than 10,000 people would be joining on the second day of the public hearing today, which will review the opinion on seaport construction for coal transport.

Describing the scene, a reporter said a 5-kilometre radius of the compound was strictly guarded by some 1,600 police and soldiers, while within the forum there were around 700 civil defence volunteers and the village security team is providing security for both days of the hearing. The highway between Hat Yai city and Pattani province was also partly closed and patrolled by military transports.

On the opposition side, Kittipob Sutthisawang, leader of the Songkhla and Pattani People against Coal-Fired Power Plant Network, said he had led some 100 people who disagreed with the project to the event to raise their concerns but they were not allowed to attend the forum.

"The officers should not bar people who object to the project from attending the public hearing, especially the final hearing, which is very important. The last two public hearings were also done without local knowledge and participation," Kittipob said.

On Sunday, the network submitted a petition to defer the public hearing but its pleas were ignored.

Yesterday, a receipt for a Bt500 payment for the cost of transport to the public-hearing forum was shared on social media. Opponents of the project claimed that it was a bribe for supporters to attend the event.

Somporn Chuai-Aree, a researcher at Prince of Songkla University who attended the public hearing, disclosed that he was not sure about this payment but he noted that there were some attendees who came in a group and registered separately from the others.

"I have seen in the social media as well that there is a receipt for transport costs. I myself have not received one, but I don't know what is inside the others' bags," Somporn said.

Wilawan Mudman, one of the organisers of the event, denied that any payments were made to the attendees.

Somporn described the event as peaceful, adding that 49 people shared their opinions at the forum.

"Everyone had five minutes to express their opinion, and most of them agreed with the project," he said.

"I myself do not oppose the plan to build a new power plant but I want Egat to consider other sources of energy rather than coal," he added.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Power-plant-hearing-goes-off-smoothly-30265352.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-07-28

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Egat claims that it has pulverised-coal combustion technology, which can reduce pollutant emissions.

Use of pulverized-coal combustion technology in the fuel burner does increase combustion efficiency by about 30% with about a 12% decrease in CO2 emissions.

But this technology has little effect on SO2 and NOx gas or particulate pollution emissions. Mitigation of those contaminates lies not in the burner design but in the downstream plant design such as electrostatic precipitators and flue gas recycling. There is no mention of such environmental features for this plant which I would think Egat would want to publisize as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Egat claims that it has pulverised-coal combustion technology, which can reduce pollutant emissions.

Use of pulverized-coal combustion technology in the fuel burner does increase combustion efficiency by about 30% with about a 12% decrease in CO2 emissions.

But this technology has little effect on SO2 and NOx gas or particulate pollution emissions. Mitigation of those contaminates lies not in the burner design but in the downstream plant design such as electrostatic precipitators and flue gas recycling. There is no mention of such environmental features for this plant which I would think Egat would want to publisize as well.

Bag filters have replaced electrostatic precipitators in any quality installation for at least 25 years, and are much more efficient. High quality coal (anthracite), especially that sourced in Australia is typically less than 1% S content, far different from the locally mined muck (lignite) they have been burning here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Egat claims that it has pulverised-coal combustion technology, which can reduce pollutant emissions.

Use of pulverized-coal combustion technology in the fuel burner does increase combustion efficiency by about 30% with about a 12% decrease in CO2 emissions.

But this technology has little effect on SO2 and NOx gas or particulate pollution emissions. Mitigation of those contaminates lies not in the burner design but in the downstream plant design such as electrostatic precipitators and flue gas recycling. There is no mention of such environmental features for this plant which I would think Egat would want to publisize as well.

Bag filters have replaced electrostatic precipitators in any quality installation for at least 25 years, and are much more efficient. High quality coal (anthracite), especially that sourced in Australia is typically less than 1% S content, far different from the locally mined muck (lignite) they have been burning here.

Presumeably the Australian coal is far more expensive as well having been mined in Australia at their workers pay rates, shipped to a port, transported by sea to Thailand and then finally moved to the power station.

While Egat may promise to use that sort of coal it will hit their profits considerably it won't be that many years when they will start to use lignite to cut costs and provide more employment for the Thai coal mines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presumeably the Australian coal is far more expensive as well having been mined in Australia at their workers pay rates, shipped to a port, transported by sea to Thailand and then finally moved to the power station.

While Egat may promise to use that sort of coal it will hit their profits considerably it won't be that many years when they will start to use lignite to cut costs and provide more employment for the Thai coal mines.

There are other environmental costs with lignite, paying extra for the fuel ends up making more sense, and Oz competes on the world market with comparable prices. An anthracite PF plant would require extensive and expensive modifications to burn lignite, as it relatively wet. Heat otherwise used to increase efficiency would have to be diverted to dry it, and as the calorific value is much lower, output would be considerably reduced.

Lignite also has a much higher ash content so the ash plant would have difficulty coping. Really this is a non-starter. While I was at Bayswater there was an attempt, politically driven, to burn green wood chips at a small percentage. Nothing but problems even at less than 1% mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...