'Plane wreckage' found in Thailand fuels talk of missing Malaysian jet

[Wilsonandson]

Another find.

http://blog.livedoor.jp/zamamidam/archives/51004942.html

[Rob13]

what are they gonna do with all that junk?

[Wilsonandson]

No doubt about it. You found a Japanese H2A rocket fairing.

[Bobotie]

Interesting, in light that immediately after the plane "disappeared" there were witnesses on gas rigs in the Gulf of Thailand that claimed to have witnessed a plane exploding and crashing at exactly the same time as contact was lost. This was way before the search shifted to the Indian ocean.

The Oil Rigs in the Gulf of Thailand, are only 120 - 250 +, miles from shore. The plane would have needed to crash, no more then 50 miles from the furthest rig to be seen( if it did explode) if it ran out of fuel then would be minimum fire. Sorry, sell your idea to the Coconut web site. Are you the same guy that said the Malaysian plane is being stored at Area 51, in the USA??

Fact is the report of the alleged siting came from an oil rig the south china sea off vietnam, not the gulf of Thailand, but of course we shouldnt let geography get in the way of a good conspiracy theory... Edited January 24, 2016 by Bobotie

[Puccini]

Well seeing that the part no's are all over U tube speculation should end in days if these are boeing parts no's the plot will thicken and the rig workeres theory may be correct.

Then if true all the other great rocket scientists who said it is down by the southern end of Aus will have egg on face.

What is part no's?

What is end of Aus?

[rocketman777]

Very unlikely given the distance and other land masses between the current search area and likely position of the downed plane

[Puccini]

Well seeing that the part no's are all over U tube speculation should end in days if these are boeing parts no's the plot will thicken and the rig workeres theory may be correct.

Then if true all the other great rocket scientists who said it is down by the southern end of Aus will have egg on face.

What is U tube?

What is part no's?

Edited January 24, 2016 by Puccini

[Rob13]

youtube

part numbers

[Puccini]

youtube

part numbers

Thanks. They didn't teach that in English classes in Italy.

[kcirtapyelrah]

It's been 2 years and I'm still waiting for a decent explanation on how you lose a jumbo jet

It's on Diego Garcia, nothing can fly over the Indian ocean without the Americans knowing, that's why their there!

[alfredthegreat]

It's part of the fairing from a Japanese HII-A rocket.

HIIA.jpg

That does look the same.

[IAMHERE]

It is of no significance unless the people are pointing at it.

I thought it was guilt is not assigned until fingers are pointed.

[TBWG]

Just more trash! Thailand hub of ................

http://www.pri.org/stories/2016-01-13/5-countries-dump-more-plastic-oceans-rest-world-combined

[Gonsalviz]

It is not an airliner part. Bolt heads sticking out in the breeze is a no no.

[JulianLS]

It is not an airliner part. Bolt heads sticking out in the breeze is a no no.

How can you tell, are we not looking at the underside????

I would put most of my money on Air Asia wreckage (as per two previous posts, the most likely source imho), a bit on Japanese rocket (a fun outside bet), and nothing on MH370 wreckage! (Oh, and by the way, it looks nothing like the flaperon than rocked up at Reunion, at least, not to the trained eye).

[khunPer]

Perhaps from AirAsia Flight 8501, Airbus A320, 28 December 2014 in Java Sea...?

[Tywais]

The location of the debris in Thailand "would appear to be inconsistent with the drift models that appeared when MH370's flaperon was discovered in Reunion last July," said Greg Waldron, Asia Managing Editor at Flightglobal, an industry publication.

"The markings, engineering, and tooling apparent in this debris strongly suggest that it is aerospace related," said Waldron. "It will need to be carefully examined, however, to determine it's exact origin."

Other possible sources of aerospace debris included the launching of space rockets by India eastwards over the Bay of Bengal, he said.

Full article here - Reuters

[Stargeezr]

I am wondering if the numbers on this piece of material will

help identity just what it is from. Until the right people have examined it and

let the rest of us know, it is all speculation right now. I do hope that some day

the wreckage of MH370 is located, and the families can have closure of where

their family members and loved ones were lost

[bubba]

That other newspaper is stating in their story this morning:

"Thai aviation experts who had inspected the plane wreckage confirmed Sunday serial numbers found on its bolt parts belong to the Boeing 777 model."

[dick turpin]

That other newspaper is stating in their story this morning:

"Thai aviation experts who had inspected the plane wreckage confirmed Sunday serial numbers found on its bolt parts belong to the Boeing 777 model."

Thai aviation experts........give me a break

[T_Dog]

Agreed it is Japanese rocket fairing. I don't think Hexcell aluminum core is used anywhere in a -777 anyway.

[Rob13]

From USA Today:

Thailand's The Nation, however, reported that the serial number found on the debris indicated it belonged to a Boeing 777, the same model as MH370, but that it was unclear whether it is the same aircraft

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/01/24/debris-could-linked-doomed-malaysia-flight/79267544

[mca]

It's an under cowling from a reverse cross rammed bloater......

It's quite apparent you know nothing about aeronautical design Nick. With my in depth knowledge attained from building Airfix Spitfires as a child and once living 20 mlies from Heathrow Airport it's quite obviously the cowling covering a flange inducer responsible for stabilising the in flight endoscope and hydraulic barometric conflagration and not a reverse cross rammed bloated as you naively suggested.

Edited January 25, 2016 by mca

[MockingJay]

It's an under cowling from a reverse cross rammed bloater......

It's quite apparent you know nothing about aeronautical design Nick. With my in depth knowledge attained from building Airfix Spitfires as a child and once living 20 mlies from Heathrow Airport it's quite obviously the cowling covering a flange inducer responsible for stabilising the in flight endoscope and hydraulic barometric conflagration and not a reverse cross rammed bloated as you naively suggested.

Don't forget to mention, that the white/red cable seen on the pictures definitely connects to an underhinged supersonic ramshaft infiltrator, short USRI, one of the most essential parts to control the flange inducer's low flow ratio, which never should drop under 0.62 cc/sec. The RCRB, Nick mentioned, sits further down, near the the superconducted hacktrembler which - on the other hand - is responsible for the air-sensitive gust impeller's RPM coordination but definitely not the harprider torque assembly of the RCRB Nick mentioned earlier. Hence I see little evidence that this is a part of the Malaysian Airlines machine... sorry.

[sandyf]

Actually may be part of the Thai navy's first sub?

More likely from a ufo that flew by from the Orion constellation.

How sure are you that it was from Orion?

Unlikely, none have crashed around here but it wouldn't be out of the question for the Thai Navy to have lost a panel.