Jump to content

UK man must notify police if he plans to have sex


Jonathan Fairfield

Recommended Posts

UK man must notify police if he plans to have sex


LONDON (AP) — A British man has been ordered by a court to give police 24 hours' advance notice if he plans to have sex with a female.


The unusual "interim sexual risk order" will be in effect until a further hearing is held in four months.


The man cannot be named for legal reasons and his address cannot be revealed.


He must give police the name, age and address of any female he plans to have sex with at least 24 hours before engaging in any sexual activity.


The man can be sent to prison if he does not provide proper notification.


The order was sought by North Yorkshire Police and issued by York Magistrates' Court.


Police declined to comment on the case Monday.


aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-01-25


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know what he has done etc but just from a legal point of view, how can this be enforceable? How can it even be issued as a court order?

Again even without knowing what has been done, doesn't this infringe on the rights of the other person. Why should the police be informed that an innocent party (the woman) is having sex at a particular place and time? Invasion of privacy?

It says notification if he intends to have sex with a female???

I am sure a decent lawyer would have a field day with this.

Where are the TV lawyers, what do our learned friends have to say on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This must be about some nasty communicable disease?

Better explanation here .........

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/how-police-can-ban-you-7224574

No porn either!

All part of the UK becoming a police state.

These orders can be placed on any Brit, anywhere in the world at any time.

No previous convictions, no evidence or warnings needed .............. total madness.

Edited by MaeJoMTB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if he says the he will have sex, today. But when he tries, he can't get it up ?

And will they call the girl to see if he did have sex ? Was it good for you ? Did he spank her, use Handcuffs, did he smoke after sex ?

What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was with this guy in Pattaya......he had the number on his speed dial....he took someone back to his room, they talked.....he was going to dial....then they negotiated rates.....went to call....then she was a he......

few night later he almost called but then just lost the mood right before....she didn't like the phone in one hand.....so much pressure....and her name and address were not in a database.....M was her name......soi 43 address......that caused delays!!!!!.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be he has something like HIV or worse and has had sex with one or more persons before without informing them. In the end he may have been charged with the crime of endangering their lives. The result being in him being given this order by the judge so that in the future the police could inform the intended sexual partner of the danger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if he says the he will have sex, today. But when he tries, he can't get it up ?

And will they call the girl to see if he did have sex ? Was it good for you ? Did he spank her, use Handcuffs, did he smoke after sex ?

What a joke.

I don't smoke after sex, but it does get a bit steamy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made agreement with my wife and every time we jump in bed for naughty ..i shouted to her that i need to use the typewriter and works fine but one day she takes so long and when she comes along and and said i am ready darling ..and i said forget it...because i use the handwriting and works too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Men who have no scruples about infecting their (unknowing) sexual partners with serious (maybe fatal) diseases do not deserve the same 'rights' as the rest of us.

Same goes for men who use drugs to help them commit rape - then claim consensual sex.

Or, men who abuse women, sexually or otherwise.

(IMHO).

We do not have the details of this particular case but it appears that the police, the Crown Prosecutor and the Courts have all agreed that there is a need to monitor this man's sexual activity - that is 3 levels of scrutiny before restriction of his rights.

Also, I believe he has the right to take the matter to a Judge in Chambers to overturn the order - if he has the evidence to justify it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...