May 7, 20169 yr Just saw below Q1 car sales stats for Thailand. Kind of surprised to see that Mitsubishi still quite a bit ahead of Ford for pick ups. Thought that would change or maybe I read it incorrectly. http://auto.sanook.com/52859/
May 7, 20169 yr Those figures are for March only, and the "pickup" numbers are actually pickups + PPV's inclusive. Pickups only in Q1 looks like this: Isuzu: 9417 + 11245 + 11647 = 32,309 Toyota: 7640 + 8134 + 10525 = 26,299 Ford: 2012 + 2093 + 2598 = 6,703 Mitsubishi: 1791 + 1733 + 2489 = 6,013 Nissan: 1794 + 1743 + 1768 = 5,305 Chev: 900 + 909 + 1233 = 3,042 Mazda: 480 + 455 + 598 = 1,533
May 8, 20169 yr Author Those figures are for March only, and the "pickup" numbers are actually pickups + PPV's inclusive. Pickups only in Q1 looks like this: Isuzu: 9417 + 11245 + 11647 = 32,309 Toyota: 7640 + 8134 + 10525 = 26,299 Ford: 2012 + 2093 + 2598 = 6,703 Mitsubishi: 1791 + 1733 + 2489 = 6,013 Nissan: 1794 + 1743 + 1768 = 5,305 Chev: 900 + 909 + 1233 = 3,042 Mazda: 480 + 455 + 598 = 1,533 Thanks for this. So the reason for Mitsubishi to be ahead of Ford in the other statistic is that the Pajero is selling really well?
May 8, 20169 yr Those figures are for March only, and the "pickup" numbers are actually pickups + PPV's inclusive. Pickups only in Q1 looks like this: Isuzu: 9417 + 11245 + 11647 = 32,309 Toyota: 7640 + 8134 + 10525 = 26,299 Ford: 2012 + 2093 + 2598 = 6,703 Mitsubishi: 1791 + 1733 + 2489 = 6,013 Nissan: 1794 + 1743 + 1768 = 5,305 Chev: 900 + 909 + 1233 = 3,042 Mazda: 480 + 455 + 598 = 1,533 Thanks for this. So the reason for Mitsubishi to be ahead of Ford in the other statistic is that the Pajero is selling really well? Delivering well Let's not forget that these are all based on cars in actual customer's hands.
May 8, 20169 yr Not surprising the PJS is selling well. Not the prettiest but well equipped and priced. Ford and Toyota have been very nice to Mitsubishi. The New Fortuner is poorly equipped and just as awkward looking as the PJS. Meanwhile Ford cut the cheaper 3.2L Everest and continue with long delivery times for the T+.
May 8, 20169 yr Here's the PPV numbers: Toyota: 2033 + 2613 + 4195 = 8,841 Mitsubishi: 1797 + 1752 + 2983 = 6,532 Ford: 283 + 496 + 585 = 1,364 Isuzu: 681 + 71 + 188 = 940 Chev: 140 + 67 + 78 = 285 However, Isuzu's Jan numbers were bumped by bookings made in the December rush (pre new tax system), and Ford took a big hit with the new taxes (150K price increase), plus they still haven't figured out how to deliver 3.2's to people as fast as anyone wants them.
May 8, 20169 yr I suppose the most important thing to any manufacturer is that they are selling everything they make. I doubt most of them have similar capacity to Toyota (aren't Mitsu the 2nd largest here?)
Create an account or sign in to comment