snoop1130 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Assembly told losses from rice pledging scheme total about 745 billion baht Losses from the rice pledging scheme undertaken by Yingluck administration and previous governments amounted to 745 billion baht from 15 projects, including 11 initiated by Yingluck government, Deputy Finance Minister Wisut Srisuphan told lawmakers at the parliament on Friday. The deputy finance minister’s statement was in response to an interpellation raised by Mr Somchai Sawaengkarn, a member of the National Legislative Assembly. Mr Somchai asked how much are the losses from the rice pledging scheme implemented by the Pheu Thai-led government and its previous administrations and also the loss from the fake government-to-government rice deal with China in which former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyaphirom and his deputy, Mr Poom Saraphol, were implicated. Mr Wisuit said that the loss incurred during the Yingluck administration was estimated at about 536 billion baht while the previous governments were accountable for loss amounting to 163 billion baht. The deputy finance minister said that a committee considering civil lawsuits regarding losses from rice pledging scheme was expected to wrap up the case later this month for submission to the Finance Ministry for finalization about civil litigation to be taken against those responsible. Regarding the fake G-to-G case, Mr Wisut said three officials and three politicians are to face charges and held accountable for the loss to the deal estimated at about 25.7 billion baht. Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/assembly-told-losses-rice-pledging-scheme-total-745-billion-baht/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2016-08-05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigntax Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Another day, a different amount. I suppose when Prayut stated yesterday that the amount of the losses would increase from less than 300 billion, his plebs have just followed his orders. They are either incompetent and have no idea or they are really convincing actors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbthailand Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Mr Wisuit said that the loss incurred during the Yingluck administration was estimated at about 536 billion baht while the previous governments were accountable for loss amounting to 163 billion baht. So where is Mark these days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesbrock Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 41 minutes ago, Reigntax said: Another day, a different amount. I suppose when Prayut stated yesterday that the amount of the losses would increase from less than 300 billion, his plebs have just followed his orders. They are either incompetent and have no idea or they are really convincing actors. ...or they are getting their share with the full knowledge they they will get away with it before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 (edited) "Regarding the fake G-to-G case, Mr Wisut said three officials and three politicians are to face charges and held accountable for the loss to the deal estimated at about 25.7 billion baht. " In Hua Hin 25.7 billion baht would be (including bar fine) 19,769,230 short times. Edited August 5, 2016 by NCC1701A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sulasno Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Divide by 2 to get LTSent from my SM-J700F running Android 6.01 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alive Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 This spread in the numbers makes the government's finance ministry look ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus1830 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Wasn't the previous administration aphisit or was it the army lost track that lost 165 billion or because its a smaller amount it does not count oh of course they are not related to Thaksin. The current administration and its dictator leader are responsible for far greater losses the stagnation of the economy the job losses due to their policies of knocking down businesses that have been there years have put thousands of local people out of work in phuket alone. The crime rate has increased due to peoples need to eat and live. This person should wake up and look in the mirror or at least go and get an education that qualifies him to run a country not an army camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eggers Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 How come Finance Ministry is releasing information to Gov't Assembly on the Rice Pledging Scheme losses when a Supreme court hearing is proceeding on the very issue? Isn't that perjury?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 38 minutes ago, Remus1830 said: Wasn't the previous administration aphisit or was it the army lost track that lost 165 billion or because its a smaller amount it does not count oh of course they are not related to Thaksin. The current administration and its dictator leader are responsible for far greater losses the stagnation of the economy the job losses due to their policies of knocking down businesses that have been there years have put thousands of local people out of work in phuket alone. The crime rate has increased due to peoples need to eat and live. This person should wake up and look in the mirror or at least go and get an education that qualifies him to run a country not an army camp. The members of the triumphant mob that cheered the army to power are still enjoying their victory. Playing politics with the economy is an expensive business. The costs to Thailand’s economy are still piling up. Compared with trend economic growth the cost will be perhaps $20 billion to $30 billion from 2014 to 2016, which makes it roughly equal in value to the wealth of the Thai monarchy. One can only hope the junta’s upcoming performance is good enough to offset such a loss (The Economist). That is USD20-30 B and will larger than the rice scheme cost and do not include other populist policies for rubber, rice and other agricultural produces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smarter Than You Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Looks like most of these unelected, Junta appointed NLA members don't bother to show up to work. Bet they still pocket the cash though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamgeorgeallen Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 wonder how much of a dent this would make in her personal fortune if she actually paid it back. would it bankrupt her? she has certainly had a lot of time to hide her money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKDfella Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 It seems well on the way to a Billion Baht...wonder who they're going to get it from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 16 hours ago, tbthailand said: Mr Wisuit said that the loss incurred during the Yingluck administration was estimated at about 536 billion baht while the previous governments were accountable for loss amounting to 163 billion baht. So where is Mark these days? Where is Somchai as well? Samak, well sadly he died. There was a military government before that and then we are back to Thaksin. So how far do you want to go back? Only to Abhisit as that suits your agenda or further than Abhisit which may not suit your agenda. I shouldn't think that there is any rice left from 2007 and earlier which just leaves Samak, Somchai and Abhisit. The first 2 were hand picked by Thaksin as was Yingluck, so 3 out of the last 4 PMs were Thaksin's choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 On 05/08/2016 at 11:25 PM, tbthailand said: Mr Wisuit said that the loss incurred during the Yingluck administration was estimated at about 536 billion baht while the previous governments were accountable for loss amounting to 163 billion baht. So where is Mark these days? It seems you and your Thaksin sycophant likers missed the previous paragraph - " how much are the losses from the rice pledging scheme implemented by the Pheu Thai-led government and its previous administrations " (my bold for emphasis) Or was it just more convenient to deflect blame from where it rightfully belongs? Abhisit did not have a rice pledging scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorecard Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 On 8/6/2016 at 10:07 AM, Smarter Than You said: Looks like most of these unelected, Junta appointed NLA members don't bother to show up to work. Bet they still pocket the cash though! Better example is yingluck: - Never attended even one rice meeting - God knows how many unneeded trips abroad when many things at home needing attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbthailand Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 16 hours ago, halloween said: It seems you and your Thaksin sycophant likers missed the previous paragraph - " how much are the losses from the rice pledging scheme implemented by the Pheu Thai-led government and its previous administrations " (my bold for emphasis) Or was it just more convenient to deflect blame from where it rightfully belongs? Abhisit did not have a rice pledging scheme. of course the Dems had a rice subsidy and it also lost money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Just now, tbthailand said: of course the Dems had a rice subsidy and it also lost money. Yes they had a rice subsidy paid directly to farmers, but the OP specifically refers to rice pledging "implemented by the Pheu Thai-led government and its previous administrations " There is no mention of the losses incurred by the Abhisit government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winniedapu Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 On 8/5/2016 at 7:49 PM, Reigntax said: Another day, a different amount. I suppose when Prayut stated yesterday that the amount of the losses would increase from less than 300 billion, his plebs have just followed his orders. They are either incompetent and have no idea or they are really convincing actors. Yes. To all of the above. The next guy to add it up using the omnipresent calculator could probably make it a round trillion if they try hard. Sublime to the ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike324 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 1 hour ago, halloween said: Yes they had a rice subsidy paid directly to farmers, but the OP specifically refers to rice pledging "implemented by the Pheu Thai-led government and its previous administrations " There is no mention of the losses incurred by the Abhisit government. Under the Abhisit, there were losses too, mainly due to corruption, but just not on the scale of TRT/PTP's version of Rice Scheme. But many outside organizations have said DEMS's version is the more sustainable one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Off topic posts and replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now