Prawit defends Bt26.9m Army projects given to Preecha’s son

[webfact]

PM'S BROTHER

Prawit defends Bt26.9m Army projects given to Preecha’s son

The Nation 

 

Prawit

 

BANGKOK: -- There was nothing wrong in Defence Ministry permanent secretary General Preecha Chan-o-cha’s son securing Bt26.9 million worth of Army construction projects, Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan said yesterday.

 

Prawit said, "Anyone can place a bid. There is no rule to ban Preecha's son [Pathompol, also a nephew of Prime Minister Prayut] from bidding for the contracts as long as he proposed the lowest price and the right specifications to meet the requirements of the Third Army Area." 

 

Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Prawit-defends-Bt26-9m-Army-projects-given-to-Pree-30295900.html

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2016-09-22

[Denim]

Let's settle this for once and for all for all those nasty people disrespecting the government and the military.

 

These people are great guys who are totally above self aggrandizement. Patriots one and all they are completely free from the taint of corruption or nepotism. When compared to the Shinawatras they are gods from above come to move Thailand forward towards the past. Forward towards a glorious new era of the haves and have not's. So stop knocking them and get with the programme or go get some attitude adjustment.

[z42]

Said like a true despot ??

[NongKhaiKid]

No shame, no embarrassment so isn't it time for another fine speech about fighting corruption and calling on all officials to be honest and moral to benefit the public and the country ?

[craigt3365]

If there is not law prohibiting this, there should be. 

[HiSoLowSoNoSo]

Was this guy a second hand car salesmen before he joined the "gang" ? 

[JAG]

No shame, no embarrassment so isn't it time for another fine speech about fighting corruption and calling on all officials to be honest and moral to benefit the public and the country ?

Maybe even wheel out the big guns, and publish another list of corrupt officials?

[SABloke]

"...as long as he proposed the lowest price and the right specifications..."

Well, I actually agree with the toad on this.one. So let's settle this by making public the bisding process and showing all the other participants who had higher costs etc.

Sorry what's that? I should just take your word for it? No, thanks. Just show us the books plz.

[Chris Lawrence]

Can I also have a look at the other tenders before I put mine in. Then I go to the second lowest tender and start to negotiate a new deal. Just a couple of phone calls and quite a bit of money for the winning tender? These guys are professionals. They have been groomed for positions like this, knowing what to do and say. They then tell the public how good it was in the 1960's and how the country should aspire to return to these values, whilst they use all the new mods and cons to pull the wool over your eyes. So what did Mr T do again?

[colinneil]

There is no law against what we have done, still doesnt make it correct.

Only 2 things matter, making money, family, and making more money.

The present government are no better/ diifferent to the Shinawatras.

Greed self interest, honesty well that is something else that doesnt matter.

[PatOngo]

Thailand Inc......more a business than a country.

[ChrisY1]

This guy would protect Pol Pot were he still around!

But of course, the army does look after their own...even to the detriment of society.

[leeneeds]

Amazing that he just happened to have the lowest bid !

Prior experience in meeting all the requirements of the build !

A true saving of tax payers money !

What great integrity in LOS

[terminatorchiangmai]

For only 8,000 Bath i also want a  dyke with my name on it

 

[whatproblem]

If the bids to do the work are made public and anyone can bid on the job with guaranteed bids and guaranteed work then surely that is acceptable ,if it's closed bids then there is a chance of corruption and if it's only estimated bids same applies ,if the works guaranteed for a number of years with no extra cost ,no problem,alls fair

[Brer Fox]

21 minutes ago, terminatorchiangmai said:

For only 8,000 Bath i also want a  dyke with my name on it

 

I can arrange that for you. Does she have to be attractive?

[NongKhaiKid]

1 hour ago, craigt3365 said:

If there is not law prohibiting this, there should be. 

Would laws, administrative instructions etc on bids, who can make them and so on make any difference ?

Everything here is so flexible especially for those further up the pecking order and transparency is just a word that gets trotted out when appropriate but has absolutely no meaning.

[LomSak27]

Okay, about time for my 2nd cup of coffee, .... lets check how Tom Brady is holding up ... 

....

Edited September 22, 2016 by LomSak27

[yellowboat]

All friends and family members are eligible for cash rewards.  It is pretty obvious; same trough just a different set of unelected pigs.  Shame on those who wanted the coup.  It has changed nothing, only hindered freedom of choice.

[aussieinthailand]

The few here on TVF screaming corruption, nepotism of the last government are now missing in action yet again when it's those they supported and claimed hero's of the nation that have yet again been caught out,  their silence is deafening...

But uncle P will soon come home and all will be forgotten ,   until the next time and the next and the next,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

[chainarong]

As they say , things don't change they remain the same , General Pawtwit , well the record so far speaks for itself, would U trust this man.....................................................

[Srikcir]

3 hours ago, SABloke said:

showing all the other participants who had higher costs

One might hesitate making a lower bid if it was known that Prayut's son was a bidder. It might have been advisable otherwise to make a much higher bid that would make Pathompol's bid appear to be generously low and maybe share in some of the spoils later. 

[Broeno]

He shows the fundaments of a rotten and corrupt system.

[Bung]

Those poor buggers were probably genuinely shocked that people had the nerve to question this at all. 

[williamgeorgeallen]

3 hours ago, whatproblem said:

If the bids to do the work are made public and anyone can bid on the job with guaranteed bids and guaranteed work then surely that is acceptable ,if it's closed bids then there is a chance of corruption and if it's only estimated bids same applies ,if the works guaranteed for a number of years with no extra cost ,no problem,alls fair

unfortunately the tendering process does not work in a country as fantastically corrupt as thailand. i have an english mate who worked for a private thai company that built sewerage treatment plants. he was instructed to go quote a job and was told to over quote it by 150%. when he asked why he was told they were going to be paid a 10% cash fee to the other company bidding on the project who was going to over quote it 130%.  have to wonder if it is really going to change in 20 years.

[elgordo38]

6 hours ago, JAG said:

Maybe even wheel out the big guns, and publish another list of corrupt officials?

Yes what ever  happened to all those "lists" of corruption being drawn up anyways. Kind of reminds me of the serials that used to be shown in theatres when I was young. Hoppy dives off of the moving train and is frozen and the words come on the screen. "Come back next week for another episode of Hopalong Cassidy." Where are these lists Mr. PM along with so many other subjects that seem to have ridden off into the sunset unresolved.  

[elgordo38]

Wasn't Mr. Prawit a member of the old tv series "All In The Family?" Opps sorry that was Carroll O'Connor. 

[Baerboxer]

7 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

If there is not law prohibiting this, there should be. 

 

There should certainly be rules that require declaring conflict of interest - ouch, that would be well used here.

 

But, providing they can show contracts were awarded to the lowest bidder providing to the agreed solution, or most competitive bid based on the evaluation criteria then why should a company be excluded? However, that would be a construction company with appropriate skills, qualifications and experience to do the work. All of which would have been verified at the pre-tender bidder qualifications. 

 

On the other hand......................... - and we'll never know.

[harada]

How dare anyone have the audacity to even question their faction.. 

[nausea]

New faces, same old story.