6 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

2 ACM's mate. Interestingly no naval personnel. And the conference is on maritime security???

I stand corrected on the ACMs, sorry dazzled by all the scrambled egg.

It was claimed specialists  went so non-naval personnel were the ' experts ' on maritime matters !

Edited October 5, 20169 yr by NongKhaiKid

21 hours ago, KhunBENQ said:

These ignorant country rubes want names of the untouchables?

Criticize a former three star general?

Who do they think they are!!

They are simply jealous that they were not invited 

10 hours ago, tbthailand said:

ah, so maybe you have an example where one of the previous governments (Yingluck, Mark, ... pick any of them) spent $6-$7 Million on air travel for a single trip... 

 

Right? I mean, just imagine if that had happened. ... Of course. It would have been a horrible misuse of public funds. I bet it would have been investigated, and investigated. Heck if that had happened, there would have been a coup on-the-spot.... 

 

But of course nothing like that ever happened, now did it?

 

Jeeez, ... 

 

 

"...  But of course nothing like that ever happened, now did it? ..."

 

Is that your joke of the day?

19 hours ago, smedly said:

The plane was a charter - I am sure there were empty seats, why not fill them if they have the space, I see nothing wrong with that at all provided any extra required accommodation wasn't paid for with expenses although it wouldn't surprise me if it was

you are joking, right?

1 hour ago, scorecard said:

 

 

"...  But of course nothing like that ever happened, now did it? ..."

 

Is that your joke of the day?

Yawn, ... Links, please.... 

 

Not that you have any.

 

Adios.

7 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

2 ACM's mate. Interestingly no naval personnel. And the conference is on maritime security???

The Navy got an aircraft carrier and are still looking at it saying, what the heck is this thing and what's it used for.  To many things at once, work out what the carrier thingy  is for first then attend to minor details.

Edited October 5, 20169 yr by Thechook

On 10/4/2016 at 3:32 PM, scorecard said:

Just imagining the response if some group had demanded same information about trips made by members of the previous shin governments.

Well, you can imagine anything you want. Many yellow shirts do. Sometimes it's even honest delusion.

2 hours ago, Thechook said:

The Navy got an aircraft carrier and are still looking at it saying, what the heck is this thing and what's it used for.  To many things at once, work out what the carrier thingy  is for first then attend to minor details.

Oh, dear. You thought the military buys expensive toys because it wants to use them? How misguided. Look, it's just like in America with the F-35 Flying Swiss Army Knife, the X-1000 Destroyer, the $2 billion (before cost overruns) Aircraft Carrier, a whole generation of armored fighting vehicles. They aren't for use, they are supplements to the retirement pensions of the Generals and Admirals who are required to certify compliance and need. Why is the Navy still trying to get the government to approve buying two submarines? To assist the Border Patrol Police drug interdiction program?