Free movement of people to continue for at least two years after Brexit - media

[webfact]

Free movement of people to continue for at least two years after Brexit - media

 

Flags are arranged at the EU Commission headquarters ahead of a first full round of talks on Brexit, Britain's divorce terms from the European Union, in Brussels, Belgium July 17, 2017. REUTERS/Yves Herman

 

LONDON (Reuters) - The free movement of European Union citizens to Britain will continue for at least two years after Brexit as part of a transitional deal, British media reported on Friday.

 

The first full round of talks to extricate Britain from the EU ended on Thursday with few compromises and differences over how to protect the future of expatriate citizens.

 

Britain is due to leave the EU by the end of March 2019, after a June 23 referendum last year in which many Britons backed Brexit to restrict immigration and regain powers from Brussels.

 

Some senior members of Prime Minister Theresa May's cabinet, including finance minister Philip Hammond, have been pushing for a transitional period designed to protect the economy and reassure businesses.

 

As part of Hammond's plans, EU citizens would still be able to move to Britain for up to two years, The Times newspaper reported on Friday. The Guardian newspaper cited a senior cabinet source as saying free movement could last for up to four years.

 

A spokeswoman at May's office did not offer an immediate comment when contacted by Reuters on Friday.

 

(Reporting by Costas Pitas; editing by Kate Holton)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-07-21

[wombat]

why ? brexit is brexit. close the borders.

[gamini]

1 hour ago, wombat said:

why ? brexit is brexit. close the borders.

If thats what you all want, OK, but no acess to the common market and a decline in the UK economy of about 30%. I don't think all brexiteer want that!

[Kenegg]

21 minutes ago, gamini said:

If thats what you all want, OK, but no acess to the common market and a decline in the UK economy of about 30%. I don't think all brexiteer want that!

Border restrictions yes just like here in Thailand....where do you get 30% decline from.. we voted out because we want out...

[rudi49jr]

3 hours ago, Kenegg said:

Border restrictions yes just like here in Thailand....where do you get 30% decline from.. we voted out because we want out...

Yes, and with such a convincing majority, 52-48. I think if there were to be a do-over, these figures would be quite different now.

[dunroaming]

6 hours ago, wombat said:

why ? brexit is brexit. close the borders.

If only life was that simple.  How about if you have a blister on your foot, amputate your leg.  Stupid to do that? Absolutely, just as stupid as leaving the EU without a deal.

3 hours ago, Kenegg said:

Border restrictions yes just like here in Thailand....where do you get 30% decline from.. we voted out because we want out...

Some of you want out but many have changed their mind about that. I suppose it might depend on how it impacts on your daily life.  I think a 30% decline is being conservative, especially in the early days if you have a no deal Brexit.  However that isn't going to happen with the Conservatives doing the deal with the DUP.  They have said they would never vote for a no deal solution and they hold the deciding vote.

[Thongkorn]

51 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

Yes, and with such a convincing majority, 52-48. I think if there were to be a do-over, these figures would be quite different now.

Even if it was 51 to 49 there is still a  clear winner.

[dunroaming]

13 minutes ago, Thongkorn said:

Even if it was 51 to 49 there is still a  clear winner.

This not a horse race.  When a vote is won by less than 5% then it is a very close call.  A win it was but re-run it today and see what the result is.  It would be good to hear the Brexiteers saying "Go on then, try it and you will see that the leave vote is still the winner".  Of course that is never going to happen as they know very well that a re-run would give a resounding vote to remain. 

 

Anyway this is just sour grapes on my side.  The divorce will continue for now but I fear that the Brexiteers are going to be bitterly disappointed by the end result and so will the Remoaners.  No winners here.

[Grouse]

2 hours ago, Thongkorn said:

Even if it was 51 to 49 there is still a  clear winner.

"Winner"? We will all be losers at this rate. The fact that there was a Brexit majority at all is a sad indictment of the state of UK education generally and the obscene levels of inequality. Ever heard Brexiteers being interviewed? Dear god, how embarrassingly awful

[Grouse]

Great point made on Any Questions

 

There have been 9 UK defence reviews since the war

 

How many reviews of the welfare state have there been? 

 

1

 

The Beveridge Report in 1942!

 

Instead of wasting so much time and effort on this ridiculous Brexit farce. Why are we not looking at what REALLY matters?

 

It embarrasses me that we always so damned cheap. Fifth largest economy? Look at the state we are in. ?

Edited July 22, 2017 by Grouse

[Baerboxer]

3 hours ago, Grouse said:

"Winner"? We will all be losers at this rate. The fact that there was a Brexit majority at all is a sad indictment of the state of UK education generally and the obscene levels of inequality. Ever heard Brexiteers being interviewed? Dear god, how embarrassingly awful

 

You shouldn't say that Grousey. It's a tad rude. And I hope your not in favor of criteria for right to vote? 

 

There were some very well educated people, Boris Johnson, Gove, Farage all lobbying for Brexit - and all driven by their own agendas.

Some academics and business leaders also supported it. Of course many academics, business people and politicians, seedy and not so seedy, also supported remain.

 

The issue is that the referendum was described as "advisory" during the legislation's parliamentary passage, enacted without any rules appertaining to necessary winning margins, and the voter turnout wasn't 100% or even close.

 

The fact many chose to believe the fairy tale idea that we could simply "leave", save all this money and pump it into the NHS, education etc; stop all immigration and send swathes back out, and that would cure unemployment and crime, and that it could all be done without the slightest difficulty in a couple of months or less reflects the increased influence social media and increased communications has on people so dire for better things that they'll snatch at any old straw and put blame on old phobias.

 

The absolute ineptitude of the Tories, who want to go back to the social paradise of the industrial revolution is only mirrored by Jeremy and his militant tendency type cronies who think Venezuela is a socialist paradise and people there so lucky. 

 

Very worrying, especially as Vince Cable starts to sound sensible!

 

 

[tryasimight]

Hope the border remains open for the taxpayer funded pensioners in Thailand when the pound plummets.

[Kenegg]

On 22/07/2017 at 3:45 PM, dunroaming said:

If only life was that simple.  How about if you have a blister on your foot, amputate your leg.  Stupid to do that? Absolutely, just as stupid as leaving the EU without a deal.

Some of you want out but many have changed their mind about that. I suppose it might depend on how it impacts on your daily life.  I think a 30% decline is being conservative, especially in the early days if you have a no deal Brexit.  However that isn't going to happen with the Conservatives doing the deal with the DUP.  They have said they would never vote for a no deal solution and they hold the deciding vote.

Not some of us wanted out THE MAJORITY WANTED OUT....people haven't changed their minds..we owe Europe nothing we paid with blood in both world wars....