Lupatria Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 19 hours ago, webfact said: He said it was irrelevant that her guilt has not yet been established by the court, Tell it like it is... Courts are irrelevant as long as I rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 One more time: Referring to Thailand or the government as a dictatorship, military dictatorship or other such terms will be removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemonltr Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 18 hours ago, metisdead said: That topic is running here: Yingluck says her bank accounts confiscated, money withdrawn Maybe I was trying to be too brief. Many were saying the money was only frozen not removed from the account. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yardrunner Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 20 hours ago, darksidedog said: He should be very careful. Public anger might turn around and bite him in the ass. hopefully Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zyphodb Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 19 hours ago, webfact said: Yingluck seizure follows law, won’t hurt reconciliation, says Deputy Minister By The Nation Deputy Minister of Defence Gen Udomdej Sitabutr said he believes that seizure of former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra’s assets would not affect the ongoing reconciliation attempt. The matter followed legal process, he said. Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan had already explained that actions being taken are within the law and the matter was currently proceeding through the justice system, he added. While declining to go into detail, Udomdej said that there was nothing to worry about concerning the case. Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30321976 -- © Copyright The Nation 2017-07-27 They really don't care what anyone thinks do they? This just might be the straw that broke the Camel's back, while it certainly needs to happen I hope it doesn't while I'm here with my young family..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saminoz Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 The silly little general can take this stance, having effectively given himself and his cronies immunity from any such malfeasance on their part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denim Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 'The matter followed legal process, he said. Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan had already explained that actions being taken are within the law and the matter was currently proceeding through the justice system, he added.' Which process and system they invent and interpret as they go along especially and exclusively for the Shinawatras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varun Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 Looks like a prejudgement seizure of assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natway09 Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 She will do a runner & there will most unfortunately be more blood on the streets. This one reminds me a bit of Jakarta 25 years ago. The PM wants to be a bit careful about "the power of the people" The kettle is not boiling but is coming up to a simmer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YetAnother Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 "He said it was irrelevant that her guilt has not yet been established by the court," Huge ego showing through here; he is in effect saying my government and I do not need courts Courts are irrelevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 23 hours ago, funandsuninbangkok said: Yes and her money is confiscated three weeks before her verdict. Perfectly normal. Have te your friend scheduled her funeral yet? Confiscated and frozen are not the same. But hey, don't let that little misquote stop your game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 2 hours ago, YetAnother said: "He said it was irrelevant that her guilt has not yet been established by the court," Huge ego showing through here; he is in effect saying my government and I do not need courts Courts are irrelevant that is what Art 44 is all about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 6 hours ago, Lemonltr said: Maybe I was trying to be too brief. Many were saying the money was only frozen not removed from the account. Sorry. The fact is we don't know. And probably never will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now