1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Have they proved that claim?

 

Not exactly renowned for their fact based comments.

You could say that about any comment made by anyone official here...

2 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Have they proved that claim?

 

Not exactly renowned for their fact based comments.

Well the sad thing is none of your statements are proven Baer.

 

This was an issue that was not allowed to be examined. Keep up with proceedings.

19 hours ago, bluesofa said:

Yes, just what he needs with all the flooding (and drowning in criticism). He's a very forward-thinking man you know, buying submarines.

   

On 02/08/2017 at 4:27 AM, Baerboxer said:

 

Why, she can't stand as she's already banned.

If the court does clear her. The ban will have to be lifted. Unless Prayut gets his coup gun out and says no with his section 44.

1 hour ago, William C F Pierce said:

If the court does clear her. The ban will have to be lifted. Unless Prayut gets his coup gun out and says no with his section 44.

The court will not clear her as the man is the court but many think she is stupid staying here when it would be easy for her to leave so there is another reason she puts up with this crap and the sooner the better as its time for change

53 minutes ago, wakeupplease said:

The court will not clear her as the man is the court but many think she is stupid staying here when it would be easy for her to leave so there is another reason she puts up with this crap and the sooner the better as its time for change

Defence or prosecution is only as good as the argument presented in a court of law. She is going to surprise a lot of people and win , because she is one very smart woman. Prayut only exist with the barrel of a gun not brains. He pre-empts too much. If she did lose it is now only a couple of years before she can stand for Parliament again. She will return one way or another.