Leaderboard

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced a new Department of Defense programme to screen soldiers aged 30 and above for testosterone deficiency, describing it as a way to support readiness and long-term health. In a video posted on X on Wednesday, Hegseth said the department would authorise annual testing for “warfighters” aged 30 and over as part of their routine health assessments. He said service personnel under 30 would be able to opt in to the screening. Hegseth said the move is intended to ensure troops have “right testosterone levels” to operate at their best, linking the programme to what he described as the demands of modern combat. He said addressing health indicators early would help maintain psychological and mental readiness, and that the initiative formed part of the department’s commitment to provide “elite medical care”. Annual testing and voluntary treatmentUnder the plan, annual tests would be carried out for eligible personnel over the age of 30. Hegseth said treatment, including testosterone replacement therapy, would be voluntary. He said the programme is designed to “restore and optimise” capabilities and to prioritise long-term health, with the aim of keeping service members “strong and resilient” for their entire lives. The announcement also framed the screening as part of maintaining physical and mental readiness for modern combat. Hegseth did not give further details on how the tests would be implemented beyond describing them as part of ongoing health assessments. Medical body urges caution on diagnosisThe initiative comes as “low T” has become a prominent political topic in the US. It is not the first time figures in the Trump administration have discussed testosterone levels publicly. In a statement, the American Urological Association said it appreciates the administration’s recognition of the importance of screening for testosterone deficiency. However, it cautioned that diagnosing testosterone deficiency should not rely on a single blood test. The association said testosterone testing can provide a baseline value for people who need further evaluation, but that a diagnosis should be based on symptoms and two separate tests rather than one result. “Low T” debate and gender care not addressedHegseth’s announcement did not address active duty women in the US military. According to the text, more than 231,000 women serve on active duty. The wider debate around testosterone has been taken up across parts of the political right and online. The article says Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, has spoken about testosterone as part of his personal anti-ageing approach, and warned in October that teenagers have significantly less testosterone than older men, despite saying the claim was not backed by evidence. The report also points to right-leaning media commentary, including Tucker Carlson criticising what he described as a masculinity crisis in films such as The End of Men, alongside influencers promoting “T-maxxing” and direct-to-consumer testosterone injections. Research cited from the journal Social Science & Medicine says young men are being targeted online by influencers and wellness companies promoting hormone tests and treatments as essential to being a “real man”, despite screening for low testosterone being medically unwarranted for most people in that age group. Join the discussion? 16 July 2026

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, one of US President Donald Trump's closest political allies and a leading voice on American foreign policy, has died at the age of 71 following what his office described as a "brief and sudden illness." Get today's headlines by email A statement released by Graham's office said he died on Saturday evening. His family requested privacy during "this incredibly difficult period." The South Carolina senator had recently returned from Ukraine, where he met President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. There had been no public indication of any health concerns before the trip. Leading Republican VoiceGraham was first elected to the US Senate in 2002 and went on to become one of Washington's most influential Republican lawmakers, particularly on national security and foreign policy. He also served as chairman of the Senate Budget Committee. A long-time advocate for strong US support for Ukraine, Graham had been working on a new version of a Russia sanctions bill during his latest visit to Kyiv. He said the legislation would provide "tools to President Trump to end this war." President Donald Trump paid tribute to his longtime ally in a social media post, describing Graham as a "true American Patriot." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he was "deeply saddened" by the senator's death. Writing on X, Zelensky said Graham had visited Ukraine 10 times since Russia's full-scale invasion began and had stood "with our people when it was most needed." "America and the world have lost a determined leader," Zelensky added. From Critic to Close AllyGraham's relationship with Trump underwent a dramatic transformation over the past decade. During the 2016 presidential campaign, he was one of Trump's harshest Republican critics. In a 2015 interview with CNN, Graham described Trump as "a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot." He also warned on social media that nominating Trump would lead Republicans to defeat. Following the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol, Graham appeared to distance himself from the president. "Trump and I, we've had a hell of a journey. I hate it to end this way," he said in a speech on the Senate floor. "All I can say is count me out. Enough is enough." Despite those remarks, Graham later became one of Trump's strongest supporters. He voted against convicting Trump during his 2021 impeachment trial and backed his successful 2024 presidential campaign. In a 2023 interview with the BBC, Graham acknowledged what he called Trump's "dark side" but said he continued to support him because of his record on border security, the killing of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani and the appointment of conservative judges. Strong Foreign Policy AdvocateThroughout his Senate career, Graham was known for advocating a robust US role in global security. He strongly opposed the 2021 withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, calling it "a sad and dangerous event for US national security" and warning that extremist groups would view it as a sign of American weakness. Graham was also a staunch supporter of Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu paid tribute on Sunday, saying Graham understood that "the security of Israel and America are inseparable." "Lindsey understood that the security of Israel and America are inseparable," Netanyahu said, adding that Israel had lost "one of its greatest friends." Join the discussion? 12 July 2026

President Donald Trump has said he has left standing instructions for the United States to launch an overwhelming military strike against Iran if he is assassinated, amid renewed attention on threats against him and heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran. Get today's headlines by email Speaking to the New York Post on Friday, Trump said Iran had targeted him for years and claimed he had already directed how the U.S. should respond if such an attack were carried out. "I've been on their list for a long time. That's what we're dealing with," Trump said. "The only thing is, I've left instructions — if anything happens, to just literally bomb them at levels that they've never seen before." Assassination ThreatsTrump's remarks came a day after The Wall Street Journal reported that Israel had shared intelligence with U.S. officials suggesting there was a new Iranian plot to assassinate the president. However, Trump dismissed suggestions that Israel had uncovered fresh information. "No, no. Israel came up with nothing. No, no," he said. "I've been No. 1 [on Iran's kill list] for a long time, and it's the way life is." CNN, citing U.S. officials, reported that the Israeli intelligence may have been intended to influence Trump's thinking as he considers whether to expand military action against Iran. According to the report, Israel has advocated for stronger military intervention, while Trump has continued to pursue negotiations despite the escalating conflict. Long-Running HostilityIran has been accused of seeking revenge against Trump since he ordered the January 2020 U.S. strike that killed senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani. Reuters also reported that during funeral processions this week for Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, crowds chanted "Death to America," while banners reading "We Will Kill Trump" were displayed. Earlier this week, Trump also referred to the threats while speaking to reporters at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey. "I'm their No. 1 target because they're scum," he said. Questions were also raised after Trump returned from Turkey aboard the older Air Force One rather than the newer aircraft gifted by Qatar. The White House played down any suggestion that the decision reflected increased security concerns. Military EscalationRelations between Washington and Tehran have deteriorated sharply in recent days. The United States carried out strikes on 90 targets inside Iran on Wednesday after Tehran targeted shipping vessels in the strategic strait. The military action marked a significant escalation in the confrontation between the two countries. On Friday, Trump said Iran had requested that peace talks continue and that Washington had agreed to further negotiations. At the same time, he declared that the ceasefire between the United States and Iran was "over." Earlier in the week, the president also ended the U.S. sanctions waiver covering Iranian oil exports, increasing economic pressure on Tehran. Join the discussion? 11 July 2026

A village on the shores of Italy's Lake Como has introduced fines of up to €200 (£170) for visitors who walk around shirtless or wearing swimwear, as local authorities seek to tackle the impact of growing tourism. Get today's headlines by email The new regulations in Varenna, a popular fishing village, are intended to preserve the area's character and improve the quality of life for its approximately 650 permanent residents, who have increasingly felt the effects of rising visitor numbers. New Rules Introduced to Curb Tourist BehaviourUnder the rules, tourists are prohibited from walking through the village with bare chests or wearing swimsuits outside designated lakeside beaches or while on boat trips. Anyone who breaks the dress code faces fines ranging from €50 to €200. Limits on Tour GroupsThe measures also place restrictions on organised tour groups, limiting them to a maximum of 25 people. Groups are expected to avoid blocking the village's narrow cobbled streets, while tour guides are no longer permitted to use loudspeakers. Varenna's mayor, Mauro Manzoni, said the village remained proud to welcome hundreds of thousands of visitors each year but stressed that tourism should not come at the expense of local residents. He said protecting the quality of life for those who live in the village year-round was a priority alongside maintaining Varenna's appeal as a tourist destination. Residents Welcome the ChangesThe rules, which came into force several days ago, have been broadly welcomed by local residents and business owners, particularly the restrictions on inappropriate clothing. One shop owner told Italian broadcaster Mediaset's TGCom24 that beachwear was acceptable by the lake but said visitors should dress appropriately when entering shops, restaurants, churches or public squares. Another local business owner described the regulations as overdue, adding that effective enforcement would be essential for the measures to succeed. Part of a Wider Trend Across ItalyVarenna joins a growing number of Italian destinations that have introduced rules to manage the effects of overtourism and encourage respectful behaviour from visitors. In 2022, the mayor of Sorrento introduced fines for people walking around the town in swimwear or bare-chested, describing the practice as inappropriate and damaging to the town's image. The following year, the coastal resort of Portofino created temporary "no-waiting zones" in popular locations to discourage visitors from lingering for photographs, including selfies, in an effort to ease congestion. Join the discussion? 8 July 2026

France’s National Assembly has passed a bill to create a right to assisted dying, with strict safeguards, after years of debate and repeated reversals in the upper house. MPs voted 291 to 241 to approve the measure, which had previously been rejected three times by the Senate. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu is expected to refer parts of the bill to France’s Constitutional Council to determine whether it complies with the constitution before it can become law. Eligibility and safeguardsThe legislation would allow assisted dying for French adults with a “serious and incurable” illness that is life-threatening and in an advanced or terminal stage. It would require that the condition leaves the person in constant physical or psychological suffering that is unbearable and resistant to treatment. The patient would have to make a request to a doctor, expressing their intention freely. After consultation, the doctor would decide within 15 days. Two-step confirmation and administrationOnce the doctor has agreed that the criteria are met, the patient would be given a two-day period to reflect, after which they would confirm their request again. The final step would involve the patient administering a lethal substance themselves. If they were unable to do so, a doctor or nurse could carry out the administration. The decision to proceed would also need to be verified by the physician on the day of the procedure. Constitutional review and political delayWednesday’s vote means France could join a number of European countries that have decriminalised assisted dying in some form. On the eve of the vote, Lecornu said he intended to submit provisions of the bill to the Constitutional Council, a nine-member body that checks whether laws comply with the constitution. President Emmanuel Macron has previously backed end-of-life legislation, but the process was delayed after he called snap elections two years ago. Since 2024, French prime ministers have shown greater reluctance to advance the assisted dying bill, and Lecornu is known to have reservations about its terms. Ahead of the vote, Lecornu’s office said the National Assembly had debated the bill extensively, but that the Senate had not allowed scrutiny that addressed “both the aspirations of its supporters and concerns of those worried about its implementation”. It said the constitutional review should focus on three specific elements: whether the two-day reflection period is too short; whether patients protected under the law but with impaired judgement can still give free and informed consent; and the role of health and social care facilities in providing assisted dying services, given their stated mission to deliver palliative care for those who are terminally ill. European context and UK debateThe assisted dying issue has been highly contentious in France, with opposition from the Catholic Church and parts of the medical profession. Despite the political conflict, opinion polls have indicated that a large majority of people in France support giving terminally ill patients a choice between palliative care and assisted dying. Similar arguments have played out elsewhere in Europe. The UK’s bill to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales stalled earlier this year and is due to return to Parliament in September. In the Netherlands and Belgium, assisted dying has been legal since 2002 for people with unbearable suffering from incurable illness, with the practice carried out under a physician’s oversight. Switzerland has long allowed assisted suicide where the person who helps acts unselfishly. Join the discussion? 16 July 2026

The US House of Representatives on Tuesday passed legislation that would make daylight saving time permanent across the country, clearing a key step for the measure as it moves to the Senate. House passes Sunshine Protection ActIn a vote of 308-117, the lower chamber approved the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025. If enacted, the bill would establish daylight saving time as the permanent standard time nationwide. The legislation now goes to the Senate for further consideration. Trump backs measure backed by Florida lawmakersPresident Donald Trump said he supports the bill, posting on Truth Social that the change would help avoid the costs and disruption associated with switching clocks twice each year. He argued that “Hundreds of Millions of Dollars are spent every year” by people, cities and states because they are “forced to change their Clocks,” and said he wants the measure signed into law. The House bill was introduced by Republican Rep. Vern Buchanan of Florida and has been popular in the state. Supporters in Florida have said extending evening daylight could boost tourism and outdoor recreation. Buchanan previously said Floridians and Americans are “tired of the biannual time change,” adding that he believes permanent daylight saving time can improve public health, reduce traffic accidents, lower crime and encourage more outdoor activity. He also described ending the clock change as a “commonsense reform” that would improve daily life for millions of Americans. The top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. of New Jersey, has also backed the bill. Senate consideration after 2022 pushThe Senate unanimously approved a similar measure in 2022, but it stalled in the House. While this time around the House has advanced the new text, the legislation could still face resistance in the upper chamber. Sen. Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas, has warned that making daylight saving time permanent would “push winter sunrises to an absurdly late hour.” Cotton said the change could force children to walk to school in the dark, or that schools would need to move start times later. As the process moves forward, lawmakers will consider whether any of those concerns could affect the bill’s prospects in the Senate. Join the discussion? 15 July 2026

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett has said he will not include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in his annual charitable giving after new disclosures linked the Microsoft co-founder to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Get today's headlines by email In a statement released Tuesday, Buffett said he would donate about $6 billion to four foundations connected to his own family. He did not mention the Gates Foundation in the announcement, which follows renewed public attention on Epstein after the release of related court materials. Donations and end-date for Buffett’s remaining sharesBuffett also outlined a change to how his remaining wealth will be given away. He said his remaining shares of Berkshire Hathaway, worth nearly $146 billion, will be donated to the four foundations by December 31, 2034. He previously had planned for his three children to distribute his remaining fortune within 10 years after his death. Buffett said Tuesday that timing is uncertain, but insisted the donations would still be completed by the end of 2034. “Of course, mortality is unpredictable, but my remaining shares will be donated to the four foundations one way or the other by December 31, 2034,” he said. He added that the aim is for grants managed by his children to grow year by year, and for the annual grant to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation to increase at a somewhat higher rate. Buffett’s statement came as CNBC said he is scheduled to give the US business network an exclusive interview on the matter on Wednesday morning. The Gates Foundation and Buffett did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday. Gates, Epstein and review of the foundation’s pastBuffett has long directed substantial parts of his giving to the Gates Foundation. Since he announced plans to distribute his fortune in 2006, more than $61 billion in gifts have gone to the Gates Foundation, including regular transfers of Berkshire Hathaway stock and donations from Buffett’s family foundations. The relationship between Gates and Epstein has been scrutinised again following the disclosure of court materials. Gates has denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and has not been accused of wrongdoing. He has said he met Epstein because he believed it would help him raise money for charitable causes. Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls, was found dead at a Manhattan federal detention facility in August 2019. New York City’s medical examiner later ruled his death a suicide. The Gates Foundation said it hired someone in March to assess its past engagement with Epstein and to review policies for vetting future partnerships. Gates and other board members are expected to receive an update on the assessment during the summer, the foundation said. Court documents tied to a Justice Department investigation into Epstein include references to Gates, including email correspondence about philanthropic projects, calendar entries recording meetings, and photographs of Gates at events attended by the two men. Buffett’s past comments and earlier disputeBuffett previously said in 2024 that he would cut off donations to the Gates Foundation after his death, allowing his children to decide how to distribute the remainder of his fortune. The decision announced Tuesday accelerates the shift for the annual donations while he is still alive. Buffett and Gates were close friends for years, speaking often, playing bridge online and taking vacations together. Gates served on Berkshire’s board for years, and Buffett sat on the board of the Gates Foundation. Buffett told CNBC in March that he had not spoken with Gates for months before the Epstein files were released in the autumn of 2025. In earlier years, Buffett defended Gates publicly. Three years ago, Buffett cut off a man who tried to question Gates’ character during a Berkshire shareholder meeting, citing Epstein ties. The man, Peter Flaherty, was arrested for trespassing despite being approved to make the presentation; charges were later dropped, and a lawsuit stemming from the incident is still pending. Buffett told CNBC in March that it was “astounding” how someone could succeed as a con person, adding that he did not want to be involved with anything that could be investigated later. He also said he was glad Epstein never came to Omaha, where he has lived for more than six decades. Buffett stepped down as Berkshire Hathaway chief executive in January after 60 years at the helm, but remains chairman and the largest shareholder. Greg Abel is now CEO. Join the discussion? 15 July 2026

Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they launched attacks on American military facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait, while also claiming to have destroyed radar systems in Oman and struck fuel tanks and ammunition depots at Prince Hassan Air Base in Jordan. Get today's headlines by email The attacks were described by Tehran as retaliation for the latest US strikes and marked a significant escalation in the growing confrontation between the two countries. Jordan said it intercepted and shot down four missiles fired from Iranian territory. Meanwhile, Kuwait's military said it had intercepted "hostile aerial targets" within the country's airspace. Iran Expands Retaliatory StrikesThe latest exchange of attacks comes as Iran seeks to reinforce its position over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which it regards as its strongest source of leverage in negotiations with Washington. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said Tehran is attempting to establish a joint mechanism with Oman to manage the waterway. He accused the United States of hindering those efforts by pressuring Oman, although he did not explain how that pressure was being applied. Oman Proposal Under DiscussionTalks held on Saturday aimed at easing tensions over the Strait of Hormuz included a proposal from Oman to fully reopen both shipping lanes through the waterway, according to Axios, citing a diplomat briefed on the negotiations. Under the reported proposal, the southern shipping route through Omani waters would reopen without requiring prior approval, restoring arrangements that existed before the conflict. According to the diplomat, Iran's delegation was unable to approve the proposal during the talks and returned to Tehran to seek further guidance from its leadership. US Seeks Public CommitmentThe United States is demanding that Iran publicly commit to ending attacks on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz and guarantee that all shipping lanes remain open without tolls or other charges. Iran has instead established a system directing vessels through northern lanes close to its coastline, where it has argued it can impose fees or tolls. Tehran has also insisted that ships use those routes or risk consequences. Join the discussion? 13 July 2026

US Congressman Ro Khanna has said he was detained by armed Israeli settlers while visiting the occupied West Bank, describing the incident as a stark example of the conditions faced by Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. Get today's headlines by email The California Democrat told Reuters that the incident occurred on Wednesday during a visit to a Palestinian village in the southern West Bank that has experienced repeated attacks by Israeli settlers. Khanna said his delegation had been inspecting a village where buildings, including a school, had been destroyed when settlers carrying US-made M4 rifles surrounded their vehicle and blocked the road. Khanna Criticises Israeli ForcesAccording to Khanna, the settlers prevented the group from leaving before contacting the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). "And these hoodlums ... detain us. They block off the road. And then they call the IDF and the IDF is on their side, not on the side of the Americans," Khanna told Reuters. He said the settlers and Israeli soldiers showed little concern that US citizens, including a member of Congress, were being held. Khanna said the experience highlighted what he described as "the arrogance of power" and a culture created by a lack of accountability. His aide, Cameron Kasky, also said on X that he witnessed the incident, writing that Israeli forces "showed up to back up the settlers, not the US congressman." Khanna later told The New York Times that the group remained detained for about 90 minutes before being able to continue after contacting the US Embassy and Israeli police. He said the experience left him feeling powerless and offered insight into what many Palestinians endure under occupation. Israeli Military ResponseThe Israeli military said troops and police responded after receiving reports that settlers were obstructing vehicles near the Palestinian hamlet of Khirbet Zanuta. The village's residents were forced to leave following violent settler attacks after the Hamas assault on Israel in October 2023. More than 700,000 Israelis live in settlements across the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The United Nations considers the settlements illegal under international law, although Israel disputes that position. Israel has also faced repeated international criticism over settler violence in the territory. Political RemarksAsked whether he plans to seek the US presidency, Khanna told Reuters he was "strongly considering it" and said the events during his trip had strengthened that resolve. Khanna has been among the most outspoken Democratic critics of Israel's military campaign in Gaza and its occupation of the West Bank. He has also argued that US support for Israel's actions contributed to the Democratic Party's defeat in the 2024 presidential election. Join the discussion? 12 July 2026

Iranian officials have privately told advisers to U.S. President Donald Trump that attacks on commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz were a mistake and were carried out by an "errant" group of hardliners seeking to derail ongoing negotiations, according to senior U.S. officials. Get today's headlines by email The officials said Tehran has expressed a desire to continue talks with Washington, with negotiations scheduled to take place in Oman on Saturday. The White House is pressing Iran to publicly acknowledge what it describes as a violation of the ceasefire after the attacks on commercial shipping. Trump Keeps Diplomatic Effort on TrackPresident Trump has instructed his negotiating team, led by Vice President JD Vance, Jared Kushner, special envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, to continue pursuing a diplomatic agreement. U.S. officials said Washington remains prepared to use military and economic pressure if Iran carries out further hostile actions. One senior official described Iran's message as an admission of error, saying Tehran had returned to negotiations after acknowledging it had "made a mistake" and wanted discussions to continue. Dispute Over Shipping AttacksAccording to U.S. officials, Iran has claimed the attacks on commercial vessels were initiated by a rogue faction within its system that was attempting to undermine the negotiations. The Trump administration, however, disputes that explanation. Officials said the United States believes Iran reacted after being surprised by the volume of commercial traffic using the southern shipping lane along the Omani coast. Washington had expected that route to remain open under an existing memorandum, but officials believe Iran reversed course after seeing how much oil and gas shipping continued through the passage. Following Saturday's talks, the administration expects Iran to confirm that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open and managed as it was before the recent conflict. One official warned that if Tehran adopts a different position, the outcome would not be favourable for Iran. Another official described the current situation as a "wait-and-see" moment. Nuclear Issue Still LoomsU.S. officials said President Trump is allowing negotiators time to seek an agreement, although they stressed that patience is limited. They also said Washington would prefer to recover what the president has referred to as the "nuclear dust" — the remaining elements of Iran's nuclear programme — through peaceful means. However, officials said other options remain available if Iran does not, in their words, behave like a "normal country." Officials argued that if Iran cannot honour what Washington considers the simplest part of any agreement — keeping the Strait of Hormuz open to international trade — negotiations are unlikely to progress to the more difficult issue of Iran's nuclear programme. The officials declined to comment on reports that Israeli intelligence uncovered alleged plots targeting President Trump, but said the president does not make decisions based on fear or threats. Join the discussion? 11 July 2026

Podcaster Joe Rogan has questioned President Donald Trump's decision to resume military strikes on Iran, saying the president "might’ve f---ed it up" by becoming involved in the conflict. Get today's headlines by email Speaking on Wednesday's episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan argued that many conservatives never wanted a war with Iran and said the military action appeared to contradict one of Trump's key campaign promises. He continued: "They’re the only people that seem to be thinking it’s a good idea in this country. Most people are horrified by the idea because Trump was elected. One of the pillars that he stood for apparently was that he doesn’t want any more wars." Conservative Criticism IntensifiesRogan's remarks echo criticism from several prominent conservative commentators, including Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh. The group has argued that Trump entered the conflict to advance Israeli interests without fully considering the consequences for Americans, who have faced fluctuating fuel and energy prices since the fighting began. Growing Opposition on the RightBritish politician Rupert Lowe, who appeared as Rogan's guest on the podcast, said Iran remained a regional threat but questioned whether military action served U.S. interests. "There’s only a reason to go to war if it’s going to benefit you," Lowe said. Although he described Iran as "a sort of malevolent state" that spreads harmful ideology, he said it was difficult to identify a clear benefit for the United States. Lowe also pointed to Iran's backing of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas as evidence that Tehran continues to pose a security challenge. Fighting ContinuesThe comments came as efforts to secure a diplomatic breakthrough appeared to falter. While Trump's team had been working to negotiate an agreement, fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon threatened hopes for a broader peace deal. Israel has maintained control of a security zone along its border with Lebanon, saying the buffer is needed to prevent Hezbollah operations. Iran has said regional peace was secured under the ceasefire agreement and urged Trump to adhere to the terms outlined in the memorandum of understanding. However, after Iran attacked three ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday and clashes between U.S. and Iranian forces continued on Wednesday, Trump declared that the ceasefire agreement was "over." Next Moves AwaitedInternational leaders are now watching closely for Washington's next military decisions as they assess whether the conflict with Iran will escalate further or move back toward diplomacy following the latest exchanges of strikes. Join the discussion? 10 July 2026

President Donald Trump's proposal to build a 250-foot (76-meter) triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., is set for another review on Thursday as the federal agency responsible for approving construction on federal land considers the project. Get today's headlines by email The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) will discuss the proposal during its meeting, with the arch among the items on its agenda. Agency staff have recommended that commissioners grant preliminary approval for the site and building plans. However, they also advise requiring design changes before the project can receive final approval. Planning Commission to Consider Revised DesignAccording to a 185-page staff report, the proposed design should be revised to comply with the federal Height of Buildings Act, which limits building heights in downtown Washington to protect the city's skyline. The report recommends that the commission ask the applicant to revise the design and return for final approval. It says the required changes would involve redistributing the height of the main structure, the habitable roof section and the three gilded statues planned for the top of the arch. Height Rules and Design ChangesDespite those revisions, the overall structure, including the public observation deck and statues, would still reach Trump's proposed height of 250 feet, the report said. Staff also recommended that commissioners seek additional information on vehicle traffic around the site, the proposed granite exterior and other aspects of the project before the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service, submits the proposal for final approval. Trump plans to build the monument on a traffic circle at the Virginia end of Memorial Bridge, opposite the District of Columbia. Opposition and Legal ChallengeThe proposal has already received approval from the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, which signed off on the design in May. The NCPC began its review in June. Critics argue the arch would dominate Washington's skyline and disrupt the historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, a view designed to symbolize national reunification after the Civil War. However, opposition has had little impact on the two federal commissions reviewing the project. Both include members closely aligned with Trump, who appointed senior White House aide Will Scharf to chair the planning commission. A group of veterans and a historian have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block construction, arguing the project would damage the historic vista. Funding Questions RemainThe proposed arch would stand more than twice the height of the 99-foot (30-meter) Lincoln Memorial and nearly half the height of the 555-foot (169-meter) Washington Monument. Trump previously said the project could be financed using unused funds from hundreds of millions of dollars he said had been raised from corporate and private donors for a new $400 million White House ballroom. However, public funds are now expected to contribute to both the ballroom and the arch project. The White House has not released an estimated cost for the monument. Join the discussion? 9 July 2026

A federal judge in New York has ordered President Donald Trump to pay the $5 million judgment awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll after a jury found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her. Get today's headlines by email The order was issued on Wednesday while Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara. Judge Lewis Kaplan directed that the $5 million judgment, along with nearly $800,000 in accrued interest, be paid to Carroll. Appeals ExhaustedIn his ruling, Kaplan said Trump had delayed the case for years despite repeated court defeats. Jury Verdict and Supreme Court DecisionA New York jury in 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s and for defaming her in 2022 after he denied her allegations. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal of that verdict without any recorded dissents, leaving the judgment in place. Trump's lawyers filed a notice on Wednesday stating they intend to appeal Kaplan's latest order. Appeals Court Rejects Delay RequestTrump's legal team also sought an administrative stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in an effort to delay payment. However, the appeals court rejected the request in a one-page order on Wednesday, allowing the funds to be released to Carroll. The Second Circuit had previously rejected Trump's attempts to overturn the verdict before the Supreme Court declined to review the case. Three years ago, Trump deposited approximately $5.55 million into the federal Court Registry Investment System, where the funds were held while his appeal proceeded. Kaplan has now ordered the court clerk to transfer the money to an account belonging to Carroll's lawyers. Court records do not yet indicate whether the transfer has been completed. Separate $83 Million Judgment Still Under AppealFollowing the Supreme Court's decision, Carroll's attorneys asked the court to release the funds, arguing that after years of litigation there was no reason for further delay, despite indications that Trump might seek reconsideration from the Supreme Court. "[A]fter four years of litigation across every level of the federal court system, it is time for this case to end," Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, wrote in a court filing. Trump responded to the Supreme Court's decision in a post on his social media platform, saying he would continue challenging the case. "I will continue the fight against this Weaponization and Lawfare Case against me, including the ridiculous claim of Defamation, with all of my power and strength," he wrote. A separate jury has also ordered Trump to pay Carroll an additional $83 million in damages in a related defamation case. That judgment remains under appeal. Join the discussion? 9 July 2026

Iran says it has launched attacks on American military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait in retaliation for US strikes on dozens of Iranian military targets. Get today's headlines by email The announcement came after the United States said it had carried out large-scale attacks on Iranian positions late on Tuesday. US strikes dozens of targetsThe US Central Command said its forces struck more than 80 targets across Iran, including more than 60 small boats belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). According to Iranian state media, areas including Bandar Abbas and Sirik were hit during the operation. Some people were reported to have been injured by shrapnel. Escalating regional tensionsThe latest exchange follows attacks earlier this week on three oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has not directly claimed responsibility for those incidents. The retaliation marks a further escalation in tensions between Tehran and Washington, raising concerns about the potential for a wider regional conflict. Dispute over ceasefireNato Secretary General Mark Rutte said the US military action was "absolutely necessary", accusing Iran of "basically violating the ceasefire". Iran's parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, rejected that claim, saying it was the United States that had breached the truce. Join the discussion? 8 July 2026

US President Donald Trump has suggested renaming the country's immigration enforcement agency from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to “NICE”, arguing that the change could improve public perceptions of the agency and counter criticism of its work. Get today's headlines by email In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he was considering launching a public poll on the proposal, which would add an “N” for “National” to the agency's name. Trump Suggests New NameTrump claimed that ICE officers had been unfairly portrayed by media organisations and praised their work enforcing immigration laws. “ICE has been abused by the Fake News Media at levels never seen before,” he wrote, describing agency personnel as “great patriots” operating in a difficult environment. He argued that changing the name to “NICE” would alter how journalists and the public discuss immigration enforcement activities. Trump said reporters would be forced to use phrases such as “NICE facility” or “NICE agents,” adding that the change would make it harder for critics to portray the agency negatively. Mixed Reaction Within AdministrationThe president said the idea had been discussed with border enforcement official Tom Homan, who he described as “legendary”. According to Trump, the proposal has been well received by many people, although ICE agents themselves may be less enthusiastic. “Everyone loves it, but I have been told by Tom Homan that the agents do not love it as much as the other population,” Trump wrote. He also described the proposed rebranding as a way to give the agency what he called a “more prestigious name”. Immigration Debate ContinuesThe proposal comes as immigration enforcement remains a contentious political issue in the United States. According to reports by the New York Post, recent demonstrations outside the Delaney Hall migrant detention facility in Newark have led to clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers. Several people from outside the state were arrested during confrontations at the site. The newspaper reported that some of those detained had connections to the Sunrise Movement, a progressive organisation that has campaigned for the closure of Delaney Hall and the abolition of ICE. The report also referenced anti-ICE protests in Minneapolis earlier this year that drew national attention and became a rallying point for immigration activists. Agency's HistoryThe immigration enforcement body was originally established under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 as the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. However, the acronym “BICE” failed to gain widespread use, and the Department of Homeland Security formally adopted the shorter name “ICE” in 2007. Trump's proposal has generated discussion online but no formal plans for a name change have been announced. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

A team of astronomers has reported strong evidence that the rocky exoplanet LHS 1140b, located a few dozen light-years from Earth, has an atmosphere rich in helium. The finding, published in Science, adds to evidence that some worlds beyond the Solar System may have conditions consistent with habitability. Researchers said the planet meets three broad criteria associated with life as understood on Earth: it appears rocky, it orbits within its star’s habitable zone where liquid water could exist at the surface, and it now shows signs of an atmosphere. Collin Cherubim, a planetary scientist who recently completed his doctorate at Harvard University, said there is no evidence of life on the planet. However, he said the observations indicate that key components relevant to habitability are present. A rocky planet in the habitable zoneLHS 1140b was first identified in 2017. It orbits a star at a distance that places it in the habitable zone, described as neither too hot nor too cold for liquid water to exist on the planet’s surface. The exoplanet is cooler than Earth, but larger in both size and mass. Although it is often labelled Earth-like, astronomers say there are important differences between the planet and our own world, including how it moves and rotates relative to its star. Helium signals point to a real atmosphereThe new data indicate that LHS 1140b likely has a helium-rich atmosphere. The research team said the detection provides the first clear evidence for a potentially habitable planet with an atmosphere. An atmosphere is considered important for habitability because it can help a planet retain water, regulate climate conditions and protect the surface from harmful radiation. Scientists have confirmed atmospheres around giant gas planets, but have previously had less certainty about whether rocky planets can hold on to gases over time. Helium escape appears to change over timeCherubim previously built a theoretical model of how a rocky planet’s atmosphere might behave. His calculations suggested that lighter elements, including helium, may escape more easily under certain conditions. He argued that LHS 1140b is a candidate for active helium loss to space. LHS 1140b orbits a red dwarf, the most common type of star in the galaxy. Red dwarfs are smaller and cooler than many other stars, which can make rocky planets around them easier to detect. At the same time, such stars can be energetic, emitting flares that may strip atmospheres from nearby planets. Cherubim said the star hosting LHS 1140b appears less active than typical red dwarfs. In 2024, he and colleagues observed the planet transiting in front of its star using a telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. Their measurements showed helium at high altitudes, suggesting helium was escaping from an atmosphere that is otherwise difficult to detect. In 2025, the team observed the system again during another eclipse, but this time reported no sign of helium escaping. Shreyas Vissapragada, a planetary scientist at the Carnegie Observatories in Pasadena, California, and an author of the new study, said the change in results was surprising but not entirely unexpected. He noted that differing amounts of helium have been seen in the atmospheres of gas giants and that the new work represents the first time the effect has been observed on a rocky exoplanet. Vissapragada said the observations amount to tracking changes in a planet’s atmosphere over time. Earth-like, with key differencesAstronomers describe LHS 1140b as Earth-like, but it diverges from Earth in several ways. The planet completes an orbit in less than 25 days, compared with Earth’s 365 days. It also always shows the same face to its star, meaning it does not experience a regular day-night cycle in the way Earth does. The planet’s atmosphere is expected to be helium-rich, while Earth’s atmosphere is dominated by nitrogen. In 2020, Sara Seager of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology led research suggesting that yeast and E. coli could survive in an atmosphere of pure helium. While that does not establish that life exists on LHS 1140b, it illustrates that such an environment has been considered plausible in laboratory-based scenarios. Vissapragada said finding an atmosphere on LHS 1140b is a step towards characterising exoplanets that may be truly Earth-like. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

President Donald Trump said in a primetime address on Thursday that the White House has published documents on its website which he said are aimed at showing vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems. Trump, speaking after the White House press secretary previewed an announcement about election integrity, also accused China of compromising voter data from the 2020 US presidential election. He has previously pushed claims of election wrongdoing despite findings by officials that no widespread voter fraud changed the outcome. Documents on VulnerabilitiesTrump said the White House release consists of what he described as a set of previously classified assessments from the US intelligence community and other reports. He said the material shows weaknesses in electronic voting, framing the publication as part of a wider effort to protect electoral processes. The White House later released details online, in line with his remarks. Democrats and some Republicans have been watching closely for any implications of the speech for voters ahead of future elections, with Trump positioning the message as focused on election security and transparency. China and Voter Data ClaimsIn his speech, Trump accused China of compromising voter data tied to the 2020 election. He did not provide additional publicly confirmed evidence in the text of the remarks provided, but the allegation aligned with his longer-running narrative that foreign actors sought to influence the election. Earlier reporting included that officials in the first Trump administration had described efforts by Iran, China and Russia to influence the 2020 vote, while later determining that none of their interference would have altered the result. Press Secretary Ties It to Election IntegrityAhead of Trump’s address, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said she expected the president to discuss “protecting the integrity of our elections” during her daily briefing, offering few details beyond that focus. When asked about worries among some Republicans that Trump might be “litigating” the 2020 contest again and turning off swing voters, Leavitt said he would instead concentrate on secure elections as a foundation for American democracy. Leavitt urged reporters and the public to listen to the speech, arguing that it would be backed by facts and evidence that the president would present. When pressed further about the political concerns raised by Republicans, she said people should wait until they heard the remarks. Democrats Criticise the TimingDemocrats launched a pre-emptive response on Thursday. Senator John Ossoff called the speech “a prime-time presidential sour grapes address”, saying it would pursue Trump’s previous grievances about the 2020 election. Trump’s remarks come after years in which he has maintained claims that his 2020 defeat involved fraud. US officials have said they found no evidence of widespread voter fraud. In the days leading up to the address, Trump told supporters on his social media platform that the announcement was “really big news” and stressed the importance of “free and fair elections”. He also said from the Oval Office that it would be a major disclosure. The speech also arrives as Trump has made changes in national security personnel. He recently installed loyalist Bill Pulte, who has not previously held national security experience, to lead the Director of National Intelligence. Trump has also said he wanted Pulte to declassify information and remove senior career staff. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

The Trump administration has issued final notice of plans to introduce tighter visa rules for foreign students, including limiting how long they can remain in the United States without federal permission. Under the changes, which are set to come into effect in September, foreign students on F-1 and J-1 visas will no longer be allowed to stay for the full duration of their studies under the existing “duration of status” approach. Instead, the rules will introduce a time limit on length of stay, restricting how long students can remain in the country before they must obtain permission from the US Department of Homeland Security. Restrictions on transfers and extensionsThe Department of Homeland Security said the policy would also narrow student options to switch programmes and transfer between universities and colleges. Until now, higher education institutions had the authority to grant visa extensions for students. The new rules reduce that flexibility, placing tighter controls on how students maintain their status while studying. DHS said the policy “combats rampant visa abuse, and strengthens national security through regular vetting”. New grace period after graduationThe new framework also changes the period students have after completing their course. Foreign students will be given 30 days to leave the US after graduation or to change to another visa category. This is a reduction from the previous 60-day grace period. Department officials argued that the previous system allowed students to remain in the US indefinitely. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said that, “for decades, foreign students have been admitted into the US indefinitely, allowing thousands to abuse our immigration system by perpetually enrolling in courses to avoid having to leave the US.” Duration-of-status set to endUnder the prior rules, F-1 and J-1 students were able to remain in the US as long as it took to complete their degrees. The new policy replaces that approach with a cap, preventing students from staying for more than four years unless they receive permission from the federal government. Most undergraduate programmes in the US are typically four years, but graduate studies, including doctorates, often take longer to complete. The administration said this could affect fields where students frequently need additional time, particularly in science and technology disciplines. Graduate courses often require more time and involve research activities that can extend study periods. DHS also noted that funding shortfalls and personal circumstances can lengthen the time needed to finish a programme. Criticism from international education groupNAFSA: Association of International Educators, a non-profit that advises schools on foreign student enrolment, criticised the new rules. Fanta Aw, its chief executive, said the policy “injects uncertainty, bureaucracy, and fear into a system that has long worked effectively. It is a solution in search of a problem.” The new rules form part of a wider Trump administration effort to reduce the number of foreign students in the US and tighten immigration controls. The administration has sought to cap the number of students at some elite colleges and has also moved to revoke visas of students who have been critical of US foreign policy. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

Polish prosecutors have charged an 18-year-old Ukrainian man with carrying out sabotage acts on behalf of Russian intelligence, allegedly aimed at stoking tensions between Poland and Ukraine. The suspect, identified as Illia K under Polish privacy rules, faces 47 criminal charges covering the period from November 2024 to August 2025, when he was arrested. Alleged acts targeting memorialsProsecutors said the alleged operations included the desecration of memorials for Polish victims linked to the Volyhnia massacre, which they said was carried out by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) during the Second World War. The UPA is widely known for involvement in mass killings of Polish civilians in areas that were then part of Poland and are now in western Ukraine. Poland’s Internal Security Agency (ABW) said the objective was to “incite ethnic tensions” between the two countries. Prosecutors also said that although the defendant allegedly acted for financial reasons rather than ideology, most of the alleged sabotage was carried out for the benefit of foreign intelligence. Espionage investigations riseIn May, the ABW said it had launched 48 espionage investigations in 2024, more than double the number started the previous year. It said Russian intelligence services had focused on discrediting Poland internationally and exploiting “historical ethnic antagonisms”, particularly in Polish-Ukrainian relations. The charges against Illia K included alleged vandalism at the Monument to the Jewish Heroes of the Warsaw Ghetto in Warsaw, as well as damage to memorials to Polish victims of the Volyhnia massacre in Domostawa and Wrocław. Prosecutors said the defendant placed inscriptions and symbols that, they alleged, glorified the UPA. Drone plan and alleged recruitment via cryptoProsecutors further alleged that the man made preparations to fly a drone over President Karol Nawrocki’s vehicle during the Polish Armed Forces’ Day parade in Warsaw on August 15. They said he was arrested three days before the event. ABW said the suspect allegedly recruited people to take part in the crimes, using cryptocurrencies registered in Russia and China to pay participants. According to prosecutors, Illia K received tasks from an unidentified handler through a messaging service. He then allegedly sent back photos to show the tasks had been carried out. If convicted, he faces life imprisonment. Long-running dispute over UPA legacyThe Volyhnia massacre took place between 1943 and 1945, as the UPA fought to create an independent Ukraine for Ukrainians. Prosecutors said up to 100,000 members of the minority Polish population were killed during the conflict. The issue continues to affect relations between the neighbours. At times, Kyiv has blocked Polish requests to exhume victims’ remains from mass graves, although exhumations have resumed. The dispute came to the fore again in May, when President Volodymyr Zelensky issued a decree naming a Ukrainian military unit after the “Heroes of the UPA”. In response, Nawrocki removed Poland’s highest state honour, the Order of the White Eagle, from Zelensky. The action had previously been taken only once in more than 300 years. A Polish academic specialising in eastern affairs, Wojciech Konończuk, director of Warsaw’s Office for Eastern Studies, said Poles and Ukrainians view the UPA differently. In a recent interview with the BBC, he said many Ukrainians regard the group as heroes for fighting the Soviet forces, while in Poland the UPA is seen as a criminal formation responsible for killings of Polish civilians. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

Vice President JD Vance said the Trump administration mishandled communications around the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, arguing that everything should have been made public immediately while insisting the administration was not trying to conceal information. Speaking on The Joe Rogan Experience in an episode released on Wednesday, Vance said officials had “absolutely screwed up the comms” relating to the files. He was asked whether attempts to keep the documents under wraps involved “undue influence” or were intended to hide something. “I say this with all candor, like we absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files, like we just did,” Vance said. He added that he did not believe the reason for the communications failure was concealment. “But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No,” he said. Blowback over handling of the filesVance’s comments came as the administration faced criticism from within the president’s own support base over how it dealt with the Epstein records. In discussing what he said went wrong, the vice president pointed to public remarks made by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi, who suggested a purported client list was on her desk. Vance also referenced a set of binders provided to right-wing social media influencers in February 2025, describing them as “largely documents that were already released”. He said he did not know the purpose behind those actions, but argued their impact was to increase public mistrust in the overall effort. “I don’t know what the purpose of it was, but I know the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort,” Vance said. He added that he did not think Bondi was acting “anything malicious”. Bondi “overstated” what the administration hadVance said Bondi was trying to respond to the political moment but overstated what materials were available. “I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn’t have, and I think she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me,” he said. He returned to the broader handling of the case, describing himself as an early proponent of Epstein-related conspiracy theories and saying he had “gone down every single rabbit hole”. Vance argued that the “original sin” of the Epstein investigation was in 2007 and 2008, when he said it was pursued “way too narrow”. He cited former US Attorney Alex Acosta, who negotiated a controversial plea deal with Epstein, as central to what he described as the failure of the investigation. “If there was a broader conspiracy — and you know my view is that there probably was — the evidence that existed in 2007, that was the opportunity to get it out,” Vance said. He also responded to questions about claims that Epstein may have had links to Israel’s Mossad or other intelligence services, saying: “Yeah, Mossad or CIA or some other deep state.” “He clearly had connections to the upper, the highest levels of American intelligence. He clearly had connections to the highest levels of Israeli intelligence,” he added. Defending Trump’s decision to release recordsVance defended President Donald Trump’s role in releasing the Epstein files, rejecting claims that Trump acted only because of pressure. He argued that Trump could have prevented the congressional push to compel the Justice Department to release the records if he had wanted to. “Trump could have killed” the effort, Vance said, referencing prior attempts by Trump and Republican leaders to quash the move before he reversed course at the last minute. Despite defending the decision to release the files, Vance conceded the process took longer than it should have. “If people want to say we mishandled the Epstein release, guilty. We did mishandle it, especially the communications of it,” he said. He added that the administration should have moved faster. “I think that we should have just dropped everything at the very beginning,” Vance said. “We should have just done it as quickly as possible.” Join the discussion? 16 July 2026

President Donald Trump reversed a temporary move to pause most vehicle stops by Immigration and Customs Enforcement after complaints from supporters, according to two people familiar with the matter. CNN reported on Tuesday that ICE officers had been instructed to largely suspend vehicle stops until further notice, with some exceptions. Tom Homan, the White House border czar, said the step was meant to be temporary, following ICE-related shootings in Houston, Texas, and Maine. ICE Review After Fatal ShootingsThe shootings have led senior officials within the Department of Homeland Security to consider interim changes to operations, sources said. The pause—however brief—removed a key enforcement tool as the administration sought to increase arrests tied to Trump’s mass deportation plans. Officials have also been working under pressure to meet the administration’s self-set target of 2,000 arrests per day. Markwayne Mullin, the Homeland Security secretary, and Homan did not inform Trump about the traffic stop change before it was put in place, according to two people familiar with the timeline. Trump Reacts to Coverage and Orders OverturnTrump became angry after seeing media coverage that described the temporary policy shift as weakening immigration enforcement. Early on Wednesday, he ordered that the guidance be reversed and posted on Truth Social that “The Radical Left Dumocrats would like to see this done, but it won’t happen on my watch.” CNN asked the White House for comment. A reversal followed amid heightened criticism from prominent figures in the MAGA base. Steve Bannon, a longtime adviser to Trump, and conservative lawyer Mike Davis criticised the decision to suspend traffic stops in comments broadcast on Wednesday. Davis, speaking on Bannon’s “War Room” programme, said Mullin should not be aligned with Senate Democrats and Susan Collins, and called for stronger action if the administration could not carry out enforcement priorities. Guidance Reversed, Officers Told to Keep OptionsThe traffic stop guidance was later rolled back, a White House official said, describing it as an effort to ensure ICE officers had appropriate options while carrying out arrests aimed at deporting undocumented people. Mullin said in a statement that he and Trump shared the same position and that ICE officers should have “all options available” to keep them safe while pursuing the administration’s mission of removing “as many illegal alien criminals” as possible. Earlier on Wednesday, Mullin posted an image of Trump’s Truth Social message reversing the guidance. On X, he added that the top priority was to keep officers safe and remove criminals from US streets, and that anyone in the country illegally should leave. According to the source, the guidance applied to ICE staff in Enforcement and Removal Operations, the unit responsible for arrest and deportation of undocumented immigrants. It imposed a pause on initiating vehicle stops. Officers were instead told to coordinate with partner agencies to conduct a stop when executing a criminal warrant involving an individual in a vehicle. Killings Spur Body Camera PledgeThe administration ordered the vehicle stop pause after two fatal shootings during federal immigration enforcement operations drew renewed scrutiny of ICE. Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was killed in Houston and Joan Sebastian Durán Guerrero was shot in Biddeford, Maine. Sources said neither man was the target of the operations in which they were killed. In the aftermath of the shootings, the Department of Homeland Security said it would “rapidly” deploy body cameras to officers across the country, as pressure mounted for independent investigations. Join the discussion? 16 July 2026

China is now viewed more positively than the United States in many countries worldwide, according to a new study by Pew Research Center, the first time the organisation has recorded that pattern at that scale. The non-partisan, US-based think tank found favourable opinions of China have reached record highs in multiple countries, while perceptions of the United States have weakened. Pew said respondents also showed low confidence in both US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, though Xi was rated more positively than Trump. Global views shiftPew surveyed more than 42,000 people across 36 countries between February and May. Participants were asked whether they had a very favourable, somewhat favourable, somewhat unfavourable or very unfavourable view of each superpower. Across the 36 countries, Pew reported that in 25 nations there were more respondents with favourable views of China than of the US. The centre said this marked the first time it had seen such a result across so many countries since it began tracking global sentiments towards the two powers in 2002. Pew research director Jonathan Schulman said the organisation previously recorded dips in positive views of the United States, including in 2008 at the end of George Bush’s presidency and in 2017 at the start of Trump’s first term. Even during those declines, favourable views of China were generally similar to, or slightly below, those of the US, Schulman told the BBC. In this year’s survey, major swings towards China were reported in Spain, Indonesia, Italy, Greece and Canada. Only six countries still preferred the United States more: Poland, the Philippines, South Korea, India, Japan and Israel, which are described as staunch US allies. Pew also found that median favourable views followed different trajectories in its wider dataset. The median favourable opinion of the US across 20 countries fell steadily in recent years, while the median favourable opinion of China rose. Pew said favourable views of China increased in more than a third of the countries surveyed in recent years, based on an expanded dataset that included the United States. The study also pointed to record highs for China in several places, including Italy, Spain, Colombia, Mexico, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria and Turkey. Allies still back USPew said the pattern of attitudes often differed by country income level. Middle-income countries tended to hold more positive views of China, while wealthier countries were more likely to have negative views. One exception was Singapore, where Pew recorded both a high GDP per capita and a high level of positivity towards China. In Asia-Pacific, Pew reported especially sharp contrasts. It said about 90% of respondents in Pakistan appeared to favour China, compared with 11% in Japan. Confidence in Xi and TrumpPew’s survey also asked respondents about confidence in Xi and Trump to do the right thing regarding world affairs. Overall, confidence scores were low for both leaders, with most countries recording results below 50%. Many countries, however, expressed more confidence in Xi than in Trump. For Xi, Pew reported the highest rating was in Pakistan at 83% and the lowest was in Japan at 7%. For Trump, the highest confidence rating was in the Philippines at 68% and the lowest was 4% in the West Bank/East Jerusalem. Schulman said the survey suggested people did not have as firm a view of Xi as they did of other political leaders, while respondents were more likely to give answers at the extremes when rating Trump. Pew also found that while more people believed the US government respected personal freedoms more than China’s government did, the gap had narrowed. When asked about foreign policy, Pew said China was viewed as interfering less than the US in the affairs of other countries. Foreign policy assessmentsIn additional questions Pew asked in several middle-income countries, a median of 75% said the US interfered in other countries’ affairs a great deal or a fair amount, while 45% said the same of China. Similar studies by other groups have produced related but not identical results. Gallup reported last year that China surpassed the US in global approval ratings, with the widest gap in China’s favour recorded in 20 years. Separately, the Asia Society’s Global Public Opinion on China survey said China’s image, which dipped during the pandemic, had made only a modest recovery. Carnegie China scholar Chong Ja Ian said Pew’s findings were consistent with expectations, citing what he described as the volatility of US policy and its economic effects, and saying that China can appear more predictable. He added that while people may not necessarily hold strong confidence in Xi personally, they can still show more positive views of China overall. Join the discussion? 16 July 2026

The UK government has announced plans for a midnight social media curfew for 16 and 17-year-olds, saying the measure will be switched on by default but can be avoided by changing account settings. Get today's headlines by email Under the proposal, popular platforms including Instagram, TikTok and YouTube would be set to be unavailable between midnight and 06:00 for older teenagers. The government said the curfew would be paired with changes to “addictive” design features, including auto-play and infinite scroll, which it wants to disable during the same period. The government argued that the combination would help improve teenagers’ sleep, attention at school and college, and family time. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the steps were designed to ensure young people “enjoy the benefits of technology” while having tools to help them “thrive” online. Critics, however, said the approach was incomplete. Laura Trott, the Conservative shadow education secretary, described the plan as a “dog’s dinner”, arguing that it amounted to a curfew that can be bypassed. Child safety organisations and experts also raised concerns about whether a time-based restriction would protect vulnerable children. Linked with wider online restrictions for childrenThe announcement comes after the government said in June that children under 16 in the UK would be barred entirely from a range of social media platforms. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said it intends to put the new proposals before Parliament by the end of 2026, with a goal of bringing them into effect next spring alongside the planned ban for under-16s. Alongside the curfew, the government said it wants measures to improve the safety of children using AI chatbot services. It said providers should introduce regular breaks for under-18s. Government cites curfew trials; critics question impactThe government said it had trialled several approaches, including overnight curfews, in households across the UK. It reported that 300 teenagers took part in tests in which social apps were disabled overnight from 21:00 to 07:00, or capped to one hour, while some participants saw no changes. The government said the tests lasted one month and were designed to compare experiences. In a report published on Tuesday, officials said the overnight curfews produced the biggest gains in sleep, alongside more engaging family evenings and a lighter burden for parents. It added that the option was also the most manageable to enforce compared with the other interventions tested. Kendall said the findings supported what parents have long told the government: reducing time on social media brings benefits. However, Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, said the plan was “piecemeal” and not the comprehensive child safety framework needed. Prof Sonia Livingstone, an expert in children’s digital rights at the London School of Economics, warned that a curfew could be harmful for vulnerable children if it restricts access to support at night. “If it’s a curfew on companies using push notifications to wake someone up in the night, absolutely have a curfew,” Prof Livingstone told the BBC. She said a restriction that prevents a child in need of help or comfort from reaching trusted sources during the night could cause harm. Ofcom powers, VPN concerns and Australia comparisonDame Rachel de Souza, England’s children’s commissioner, said young people do not want a ban but do want protection from addictive features such as infinite scrolling. She said she wanted to understand how the policies would be delivered and said she would monitor whether they are effective while also urging Ofcom to use its powers to make online services safer for children. The government’s moves have been framed as following steps taken in Australia, where restrictions on social media for under-16s began in December. In Australia, providers were required to close existing accounts and stop teens from opening new ones, but the measures have been criticised as ineffective, with many young people reporting they can still access sites that were meant to be blocked. Questions have also been raised about the practicality of age checks for under-16s, and about how any UK regime might handle virtual private networks (VPNs). On Tuesday, the government said research it commissioned found little evidence that many children use VPNs to bypass age checks. Join the discussion? 15 July 2026

Sir Keir Starmer has become the first serving prime minister of the United Kingdom to receive France’s highest award, the Legion d’honneur. Get today's headlines by email He was presented with the decoration at the end of a meeting associated with the “Coalition of the Willing”, a group of countries set up with French President Emmanuel Macron to support Ukraine following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. Starmer and Macron helped establish the coalition, according to the account of the event. Macron praises Starmer’s roleAt the ceremony in the French presidential palace, Macron said he wanted to express gratitude for Starmer’s “years as prime minister”. He praised Starmer’s “human qualities” and described him as a “reliable and friendly partner”. Macron also referenced commitments from the UK that, he said, supported not only the country but “the security of Europe” and Ukraine, alongside the bilateral relationship between France and the UK. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was among those attending to recognise Starmer ahead of his departure, also paid tribute to the outgoing prime minister. Starmer is due to leave office next week. Zelensky and Merz thank the outgoing leaderDuring the event, Zelensky and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz both publicly thanked Starmer. Zelensky’s comments were part of the acknowledgements made at the conclusion of the meeting in Paris. Merz thanked Starmer in person at the French presidential palace, as did Zelensky, who was listed among those paying tribute. What the Legion d’Honneur isThe Legion d’honneur is awarded each year to around 2,000 French people and 200 foreign nationals. Recipients are recognised for “outstanding merits”. Among past honours in the order is Sir Winston Churchill, who received the highest rank of the decoration, known as Grand Croix (Grand Cross). That level is awarded for continued “outstanding merit” over an extended period. A controversial decoration with notable recipientsThe Legion d’honneur has faced criticism since it was created by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802. Past recipients include leaders such as Nelson Mandela and former US President Dwight Eisenhower, as well as Zelensky. It has also been granted to figures including Russian President Vladimir Putin and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, and earlier to Benito Mussolini of wartime Italy and Spain’s dictator Francisco Franco. So far, only one foreign recipient has had the honour withdrawn: former Panamanian President Manuel Noriega. Under Macron, French officials also removed the award from Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein following a series of accusations of sexual harassment and rape, according to the report of the decision. Join the discussion? 15 July 2026

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent fatally shot a Colombian national during an immigration enforcement operation in Biddeford, Maine, after a vehicle attempted to flee, the agency said. Get today's headlines by email The incident comes about a week after ICE used deadly force in a separate case involving another migrant in a traffic stop in Texas. Operation linked to final removal orderICE said agents were surveilling an address in Biddeford for a person with a final order of removal at around 07:00 EDT (11:00 GMT) on Monday. Agents attempted to stop a driver who was leaving the address. ICE said the vehicle tried to flee the scene, and that “fearing for public safety”, an officer discharged a weapon. ICE added that the driver was struck. After the shooting, dozens of demonstrators gathered in Biddeford. Prosecutor, lawmakers order investigation as officer placed on leaveMaine’s top prosecutor said the officer worked for ICE’s Enforcement Removal Operations and has been placed on leave while an investigation is carried out. The state’s Attorney General, Aaron Frey, said initial information indicates the individual “attempted to flee in a vehicle in the direction of the officer and was fatally shot”. Frey said the man’s name would not be released until he is formally identified and his family is notified. The Department of Homeland Security inspector general office is taking over the investigation, Senator Susan Collins said, citing the agency overseeing ICE. Collins and other Maine officials faced questions after reports that the circumstances of the operation changed. Fellow senator Angus King said he was first told by DHS chief Markwayne Mullin that the person shot was a target of an arrest warrant in an immigration operation. Hours later, King said Mullin told him the man was not the target of a warrant. Governor Janet Mills said the death of someone the government was not seeking “makes this tragedy even more disturbing and infuriating”. She said it showed what she called the “reckless and haphazard manner” in which immigration enforcement operations are being conducted in Maine and across the country. Embassy, rights groups confirm victim’s nationality; witnesses describe gunfireColombia’s embassy confirmed the deceased man was Colombian. The embassy said it has requested information and clarification from DHS about the circumstances and will follow the case as the investigation continues. The Maine Immigrants’ Rights Coalition said the man was a 26-year-old Colombian authorised to work in the United States, and said he was part of its community. The organisation did not identify him. Protests also took place outside the office of Collins after she voted to fund ICE, with demonstrators calling for what King described as a “full and impartial investigation”. Witness accounts to local and national media described the shooting and the response by federal agents. The Biddeford Gazette reported that around 07:20 local time, a resident saw flashing lights from an unmarked white SUV and at least two officers wearing green ICE vests. The witness said agents surrounded a white sedan and that at least four gunshots were heard. Another witness speaking to the Associated Press said the victim lived nearby with his wife and daughter and described seeing his spouse fall to her knees and a child crying with a pink backpack. King said Mullin told him the man was shot after attempting to drive his car at officers. King said that involved “weaponised” use of the vehicle, and that an ICE agent fired. King also said officers did not wear body cameras and that officials would investigate whether deadly force was necessary. The case has renewed attention on DHS and ICE operations. On 7 July, ICE officer Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a 52-year-old builder, was shot and killed in Houston while driving to a construction site. Federal officials later said he was not the intended target but that he tried to run over an ICE agent. Mullin took over leadership of DHS in March, replacing Kristi Noem after she was fired by US President Donald Trump. Noem’s tenure followed fatal shootings by immigration officers of two protesters, Alex Pretti and Renee Good, both American citizens, after immigration enforcement surges were announced in Minnesota and other states. A similar operation in Maine, launched in January and dubbed Operation Catch of the Day, has also drawn legal challenges. Civil rights organisations filed a lawsuit alleging aggressive tactics by federal agents during enforcement surges. Join the discussion? 14 July 2026

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Monday that President Donald Trump’s administration would try to “dismantle” the International Criminal Court and called on other governments to support the effort. Get today's headlines by email Rubio accused the court of pursuing the United States through what he described as “so-called international law”, rather than military force. His comments signalled a sharper phase in Washington’s long-running dispute with the Hague-based institution. The Trump administration’s opposition to the ICC dates to the president’s first term, when the court sought to examine alleged war crimes by US forces in Afghanistan. In Trump’s second term, Washington has imposed several sanctions on ICC personnel over efforts to investigate the United States and Israel. Aid Scrutiny ThreatenedA State Department official said the new campaign, led by the department and involving the wider US government, is aimed at isolating the ICC diplomatically. The official said countries receiving US assistance could face closer examination if they do not reject the court’s authority. Rubio wrote in the Wall Street Journal that Washington would use available government measures and work with allies to take the court apart “brick by brick, if necessary”. The State Department official said possible measures include travel bans, visa cancellations and additional sanctions. The official said Washington is pressing countries that cooperate with US law enforcement, host American troops or rely on US security support to reject any ICC claim to prosecute US officials or service members. Senior US officials, including Rubio, the deputy secretary of state and US ambassadors, are contacting foreign governments as part of the effort. Members Urged To LeaveAccording to the official, the administration wants ICC member states to withdraw from the court and end financial support. It is also asking countries outside the ICC, including the United States, to use their diplomatic ties to encourage similar steps. CNN reported that it had sought comment from the ICC. In his opinion article, Rubio accused the court of being supported by leftist non-governmental groups, “smug globalists” and governments hostile to the United States. He also rejected claims by outside organisations that US deportations to El Salvador and deadly boat strikes on alleged narco-terrorists breached international law. DAWN Disputes RubioRubio also dismissed a call from Democracy for the Arab World Now, known as DAWN, for the ICC to look into alleged US war crimes in Iran. He said such claims could expose US actions to court scrutiny. Omar Shakir, DAWN’s executive director, told CNN that Rubio had misrepresented the group’s request to investigate possible war crimes committed during the war. He asked whether Rubio believed US personnel should face investigation over war crimes allegations in Iran. Shakir said governments would be judged by whether they defended institutions created to uphold international law, and argued that Rubio’s campaign was weakening the rules-based order established after World War II. Join the discussion? 14 July 2026

A bull bison said to weigh about 2,000lb (900kg) injured a 65-year-old man in Yellowstone National Park after charging at him and his grandson near a campground in Wyoming. Get today's headlines by email Video Shows Sudden ChargeViral video of the encounter shows the pair stopping to photograph the animal while it was lying in grass. Moments later, the bison rose and ran toward them, eventually striking the older man and throwing him into the air. US media have identified the man as Carl Isom-McDaniel. He suffered multiple injuries and was taken to hospital, the New York Times reported. Witnesses said he appeared to be in significant pain after the impact. The National Park Service has not issued details about the incident. The BBC reported that it had sought comment from the agency. Attack Near Yellowstone LakeThe encounter happened on Friday evening at Bridge Bay Campground, close to Yellowstone Lake, during the last hour before sunset. In the footage, Isom-McDaniel and his grandson appear to be some distance from the bison when they stop walking and lift their cameras. The animal rolls on its side several times before getting up. A white truck then approaches slowly. The bison charges toward the vehicle, prompting the driver to leave quickly, before the animal continues after Isom-McDaniel and the boy, kicking up dust as it runs. The pair attempt to get away by moving through a stand of trees, but the bison catches up with Isom-McDaniel. Mike Macleod, who filmed the scene, told the Cowboy State Daily that the bison caught the man on the hip with its left horn and threw him upward. Macleod said Isom-McDaniel flipped and landed on his side. He added that the man had leg pain but remained conscious and was still joking afterward. Park Warns VisitorsThe NPS says bison have injured more people in Yellowstone than any other animal in the park, despite often seeming calm. The agency says they can run three times faster than people and urges visitors to keep well away. Its guidance tells visitors to stay at least 25 yards (23 metres) from bison and not to approach them for photographs. Summer is Yellowstone’s busiest period, with almost 60% of yearly visits taking place in June, July and August, according to the NPS. Mating Season RisksJuly also falls during the bison breeding season, when bull bison have higher testosterone levels, said Jennifer Barfield, scientific lead at Colorado’s Laramie Foothills Bison Conservation Herd. Barfield said that can make the animals more unpredictable than at other times of the year. She said her team avoids getting close to bison during the breeding period except when observing from inside a vehicle. For visitors on foot, Barfield said the 25-yard rule should be treated as the minimum safe distance. Join the discussion? 14 July 2026

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has vowed to avenge the death of his father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, in his first public statement since taking over the country's leadership. Get today's headlines by email The written message, read on Iranian state television, described revenge as the "will of the nation" and came as funeral ceremonies for Ali Khamenei continued. The former supreme leader was killed in a US-Israeli air strike on 28 February, the opening day of the conflict between Iran, the United States and Israel. Ali Khamenei was buried on Friday in his hometown of Mashhad. Vow of RetaliationMojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public since before the war, amid reports that he was injured and disfigured in the strike that killed his father. In his statement, he pledged to continue the campaign for retaliation. He added that the effort would continue regardless of who remained in office, saying its fulfilment did not depend on his personal leadership or that of other officials. During funeral events across Iran, many mourners carried placards calling for the death of US President Donald Trump. On Saturday, Trump warned that any attempt to assassinate him would prompt the United States to "decimate and destroy all areas" of Iran. Conflict and Diplomatic EffortsUS media, including The Wall Street Journal, reported this week that Israel had shared intelligence suggesting Iran had recently developed a plan to assassinate Trump. However, the US president denied both that Tehran had launched a new plot and that Israel had been the source of such intelligence. He told the New York Post that he had been Iran's "No. 1" target for a long time. The conflict began on 28 February when US and Israeli forces launched strikes against Iran. Tehran responded with attacks on Israel as well as US targets and allies in the Gulf. Although the United States and Iran agreed to a ceasefire in June to facilitate negotiations, tensions have risen again following attacks on three commercial tankers travelling through US-recommended shipping lanes in waters off Oman. Iran has maintained that the only safe route is through its own territorial waters. Iranian officials said subsequent US strikes killed 17 people and injured 115. Tehran then launched retaliatory strikes against US allies in the Gulf. The latest exchange led Trump to declare the ceasefire over, although he said negotiations would continue with the help of international mediators. US officials have reportedly demanded through intermediaries that Iran publicly guarantee the Strait of Hormuz will remain open to international shipping and commit to ending attacks on commercial vessels. According to US media reports, Iranian officials privately told their American counterparts that the tanker attacks were a mistake carried out by a rogue internal group. Join the discussion? 12 July 2026

South Florida's Palm Beach International Airport officially became President Donald J. Trump International Airport on Thursday, with workers beginning to replace signs across the terminal following the formal name change. Get today's headlines by email New name unveiled as signage is replacedAirport officials said the transition would take several weeks, meaning travelers will temporarily see a mix of the airport's previous branding alongside the new identity. "Because an entire airport transformation doesn't happen overnight, you'll notice a combination of both our classic look and our new brand elements coexisting while traveling through the terminal over the next several weeks," the airport said in a Facebook post. Trump family marks first dayThe first aircraft to arrive under the airport's new name was "Trump Force One," a Boeing 757 owned by The Trump Organization, shortly after 5 a.m. Eric Trump was among those on board. The Trump family frequently uses the airport when traveling to President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence in nearby Palm Beach. Earlier this year, a road connecting the airport to the estate was renamed Donald J. Trump Boulevard. Eric Trump welcomed the change in a post on X, saying his father was deserving of the recognition and adding that he would be proud to see the airport's future code, DJT, on his boarding passes. Although the airport's new name took effect immediately, its three-letter code will remain PBI until Aug. 18, when it is scheduled to change to DJT. Trump welcomes the movePresident Trump also praised the renaming in a post on Truth Social, describing it as "a very big day" for Palm Beach. He thanked local supporters for approving the change and said the airport's ongoing renovation would be "spectacular," calling it one of the world's greatest airports. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation earlier this year authorising the renaming. Officials estimate the project will cost up to $5.5 million, covering new signs, branding and related updates. Mixed public reactionSome travellers expressed little concern over the change. Keegan Collett, who was departing for Cincinnati on Thursday morning, said he did not believe Trump should have an airport named after him but added that the issue was not especially important. "At the end of the day, it's just the name of an airport," Collett said. "There's bigger things. I feel like it's just more of a distraction. Why even worry about it?" Elsewhere on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Senators Marsha Blackburn and Bill Hagerty, and Representative Tim Burchett attended a ceremony in Dandridge, Tennessee, to rename the Interstate 40 Bridge as the Donald J. Trump Bridge. Speaking before the event, Bessent said that "no one is more deserving" of the honour than Trump. Trump won 82% of the vote in Jefferson County, where Dandridge is located, in the 2024 general election. Join the discussion? 11 July 2026

Nigel Farage's decision to resign as the member of parliament for Clacton and force a by-election has drawn sharp criticism, with Britain's main political parties refusing to contest the vote and leaving him facing a satirical challenger instead. Get today's headlines by email Farage, leader of Reform UK, stepped down on Tuesday while facing allegations that he failed to declare millions of pounds' worth of gifts from wealthy donors. He has denied any wrongdoing and is under investigation by Parliament's standards watchdog. Announcing his resignation, Farage said he wanted voters in Clacton, in southeast England, to decide his political future rather than what he described as an "establishment" campaign against him. "I've decided the people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions," he said, adding that he intended to continue the "political revolution" led by Reform UK. Major Parties Boycott ContestFarage's strategy quickly met resistance from Britain's three main political parties. Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats all announced they would boycott the by-election, arguing that the contest was an unnecessary political stunt. Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the move as a "desperate stunt," while a spokesperson for Andy Burnham, widely viewed as a potential future prime minister, called it a "gimmick" intended to divert attention from questions surrounding Farage's financial backers. Rachel Reeves, the finance minister who formally accepted Farage's resignation from Parliament, also criticized the move. Writing on X, she said the people of Clacton deserved better and remarked that if Farage wanted to spend the summer "arguing with a bin," she would not stop him. Count Binface Emerges as Main ChallengerWith the major parties opting out, the most recognizable candidate to enter the race is Count Binface, a satirical character created by comedian and writer Jon Harvey. Known for wearing a metallic bin on his head, Count Binface has regularly contested British elections as part of the country's long tradition of novelty candidates challenging high-profile politicians. His campaign often combines political satire with deliberately humorous policy proposals. Following Farage's resignation, Count Binface declared "Game on, Nige" in a post on X. The comedian later told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that he wondered whether politicians were avoiding the contest because they feared him rather than Farage. Asked why voters should support him, he replied simply: "I'm not Nigel Farage." Supporters Defend Farage's DecisionFarage's allies argued that the boycott showed Britain's established parties were unwilling to challenge the Reform UK leader directly. Reform UK's home affairs spokesman, Zia Yusuf, accused the other parties of avoiding the contest despite years of attacking Farage politically. "The establishment is on the ropes," Yusuf wrote on X. Although Count Binface is not expected to win the seat, some political commentators have suggested he could attract a notable protest vote as dissatisfaction with the by-election and the surrounding controversy continues to dominate attention. Join the discussion? 10 July 2026

President Donald Trump mistakenly referred to the "Islamic Republic of Japan" while describing an alleged missile attack on a U.S. aircraft carrier during remarks to reporters alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on July 8 at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey. Get today's headlines by email Speaking about the USS Abraham Lincoln, Trump said: "We have an aircraft carrier which is one of the most beautiful in the world, it's one of the biggest, the (USS) Abraham Lincoln. And a few months ago, we had, I told this story yesterday, we had 111 missiles shot by the Islamic Republic of Japan." He went on to claim the missiles were fired at the aircraft carrier over the course of an hour and that every one of them was intercepted. USS Abraham Lincoln and IranThe USS Abraham Lincoln has been involved in heightened tensions with Iran in recent months. In February, the U.S. military said it shot down a drone that approached the aircraft carrier aggressively while it was operating in the Arabian Sea, about 500 miles off Iran's southern coast. The following month, Iran claimed it had struck the USS Abraham Lincoln with a ballistic missile. U.S. Central Command rejected the claim, stating that the carrier was not hit and that the missiles "didn't even come close." The military said the vessel continued launching aircraft in support of operations aimed at countering threats from Iran. Longstanding US-Japan AllianceTrump's reference appeared to confuse Iran with Japan. The United States and Japan have maintained a close military alliance for nearly 75 years. The two countries signed a security treaty in 1952, several years after the end of World War II, and continue to cooperate under a mutual defense agreement. Around 60,000 U.S. military personnel are currently stationed in Japan as part of the alliance. Join the discussion? 9 July 2026

A U.S. appeals court has rejected President Donald Trump's request to halt a lower court order requiring his name to be removed from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, after judges found no evidence that the decision would cause irreparable harm. Get today's headlines by email A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an unsigned order on Wednesday denying the request from Trump and fellow members of the center's board. The court noted that Trump's name had already been removed from the building's facade. The judges said the board had "failed to show how they will be irreparably injured absent a stay," rejecting its argument that removing Trump's name could damage fundraising efforts and contribute to the center's financial decline. The panel, which included Trump appointee Gregory Katsas, also said the board had not provided any specific facts or evidence to support its claims about potential financial harm. Lower Court DecisionThe ruling leaves in place a May decision by U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, who found that the Trump-controlled board acted unlawfully when it voted in December to rename the venue the "Trump-Kennedy Center." Judge Cooper also invalidated the board's decision to close the performing arts center for renovations beginning this month. Reaction and Next StepsFollowing the appeals court's decision, Joyce Beatty welcomed the ruling, saying it reaffirmed that the administration's efforts to rename the Kennedy Center were unlawful and urged the administration to accept the outcome. Judge Cooper has instructed the Kennedy Center's leadership to provide an update on any programming or renovation plans that emerge from a board meeting expected to take place in mid-July. Join the discussion? 9 July 2026

Police are continuing a manhunt for a suspect believed to have killed a mother and her two children before leaving the UK. Officers from Bedfordshire Police forced entry to a home on Carnoustie Drive in Great Denham, near Bedford, on Monday after receiving reports that the family had not been seen for several days. Get today's headlines by email Assistant Chief Constable John Murphy said investigators had identified a suspect who was known to all three victims and believed the individual had since left the country. Murphy described the case as "a deeply distressing incident" in which a mother and her two children were believed to have been murdered. Police identify suspect believed to have left UKFloral tributes have been placed outside the property, with mourners gathering to pay their respects. One woman, while laying flowers at the scene, said: "We're really sorry to lose her. She was such a gracious mother." The driveway of the house remains cordoned off as officers continue their investigation. Residents described their disbelief at the incident, saying violent crime was rare in the quiet village. Community in shockJess Roland said she was stunned when her husband told her about the deaths. "I actually almost wanted to fact check it to see if it was true because it just doesn't seem like something that would happen here – but obviously it could happen to anybody," she said. Her husband, Tim Roland, said the incident was "just incredibly shocking and just really sad". Appeal for informationAnother resident, Brian Cheyne, said the deaths of the two children made the case especially distressing. "It's absolutely shocking, especially the two young children," he said, adding that the discovery several days after the family was last seen made the incident "absolutely horrific". Laura Watson-Smith described Great Denham as a quiet and friendly village where the news had left residents deeply shaken. "Everyone's very shocked and it's incredibly sad and scary to hear that something like that has happened in the village," she said. Police said there was nothing to indicate any wider threat to the public but confirmed that additional patrols would be carried out in the area to reassure residents. Investigators have appealed for anyone with information about the deaths, or who noticed suspicious activity in Great Denham on Friday or Saturday, to contact Bedfordshire Police. Join the discussion? 8 July 2026

A US federal judge has rejected Elon Musk’s attempt to overturn a jury verdict that found he defrauded Twitter investors during his 2022 acquisition of the social media company, while ruling that he was not liable for one of the disputed tweets. Get today's headlines by email Judge Upholds Jury's DecisionUS District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco on Monday denied Musk’s request to dismiss the jury’s March verdict, rejected his bid to decertify the investor class, and granted the plaintiffs’ request for prejudgment interest. Lawyers representing Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Tweets at the Centre of the CaseA jury found on 20 March that Musk sought to depress Twitter’s share price in an effort to renegotiate or withdraw from his $44 billion takeover of the company in 2022. The case centred on tweets posted by Musk on 13 and 17 May 2022, in which he questioned whether Twitter had significantly more fake and spam accounts, commonly known as bots, than the company had disclosed. One Tweet Upheld, One DismissedBreyer said there was "substantial evidence of falsity" in Musk’s 13 May tweet, finding that it caused Twitter’s share price to fall sharply and supported the jury’s verdict. However, the judge ruled that Musk was not liable for the 17 May tweet because there was no meaningful market reaction following that post. Following the March verdict, a lawyer representing the investors estimated that potential damages could amount to about $2.5 billion. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 July 2026

President Donald Trump has posted a manipulated image on his Truth Social platform showing former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama appearing to board an Air Force One aircraft covered in graffiti, marking the latest in a series of altered images targeting his predecessor. Get today's headlines by email The image depicts the Obamas smiling and waving while standing at the top of the aircraft stairs beside a light blue and white presidential plane that has been digitally altered with graffiti. The markings include the slogans "Yes We Can," "Obama," and "BLM," referring to Black Lives Matter. Another inscription, written in Arabic, reads "alhamdulillah," meaning "praise be to God" or "thank God." Latest in a Series of PostsThe post comes several months after Trump shared another altered image portraying the Obamas as primates in a jungle. That post, published during the first week of Black History Month, was deleted following widespread criticism from civil rights groups and members of both major political parties. Although the post was later blamed on a staff member, Trump declined to apologize for it. Donald Trump posts about the Obamas on Truth Social. / Truth Social Trump has long directed personal criticism at Obama, including promoting the false claim that the former president was not born in the United States. He has also drawn criticism over remarks and social media posts that opponents have described as racially inflammatory. The use of graffiti in the latest image has also attracted attention, with critics arguing it evokes stereotypes linking Black communities with crime and urban decay. Air Force One in the SpotlightThe manipulated image was shared days after Trump flew for the first time aboard a newly retrofitted Boeing 747-800 that is serving as Air Force One. The aircraft, valued at about $400 million and gifted by Qatar, features a redesigned exterior that replaces the traditional light blue paint scheme with Trump's preferred navy-blue underside and red and gold stripes. Trump had no public events on Sunday after delivering a speech in Washington the previous evening to mark Independence Day and the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. He spent the day at his golf club in Virginia before preparing to travel to Turkey on Monday for a NATO summit. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and a spokesperson for the Obamas also declined to comment. More Doctored Images SharedSunday's post followed another manipulated image Trump shared last month depicting Obama's presidential library in Chicago with what appeared to be a large bag of rubbish on its roof and a surrounding wasteland. Trump claimed the library would become a "Mecca" for people who hate America and posted the altered image twice on Truth Social. Among Sunday's other posts was an old photograph that appeared to show Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni smiling at Trump beneath the caption "RESTRAINING ORDER NEEDED." The post comes after Trump claimed Meloni repeatedly asked to have her photograph taken with him during the recent G7 summit. Meloni rejected the account as "completely fabricated," saying neither she nor Italy had begged for a photo. Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani subsequently cancelled a planned visit to Washington. Join the discussion? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 7 July 2026

President Donald Trump said his children manage his investments and that he has no direct involvement in his business affairs, responding to questions about potential conflicts of interest after financial disclosures showed he earned more than $2 billion during his first year back in office. Get today's headlines by email Trump denies involvement in personal business decisionsSpeaking in an interview with CNBC on Thursday, Trump was asked about concerns surrounding his investments after disclosures indicated he made about $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures in 2025. Trump said he was not involved in those business activities and claimed he had no knowledge of the investments. "I could know about it. I didn't," he said. "There's nothing illegal, there's nothing wrong with it." Conflict of interest questionsThe discussion followed a reference by CNBC host Joe Kernen to federal ethics rules that prohibit most executive branch employees from taking part in government matters that could affect their financial interests or those of close associates. Those restrictions, however, do not apply to the president or vice president. Unlike several previous presidents, Trump has not divested his business holdings or placed his assets in a blind trust. His financial arrangements have prompted continuing criticism from Democrats, who argue they create potential conflicts between his public duties and private business interests. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on X that Trump had made more than $2 billion during his first year in office, accusing Republicans of enriching themselves while Americans faced rising living costs. Says Eric Trump oversees portfolioAsked whether he was concerned that Democrats could investigate his investments if they regain control of Congress, Trump said he has no role in managing his businesses. "I don't do anything having to do with my business. My kids run it," he said. Trump identified his son Eric as the person overseeing his investment portfolio and said they do not discuss financial matters. He added that his money is managed by large investment firms and said he does not know the individuals responsible for handling those investments. Defends crypto and family businessWhen questioned about profits from his cryptocurrency businesses, Trump instead emphasized the importance of the United States remaining competitive in the digital asset industry. He said the country needed to lead in cryptocurrency development or risk falling behind China, adding that he had been involved with crypto before returning to office. Trump also said he sympathized with his children, arguing that almost any business decision they make attracts scrutiny because of his position as president. He said he encourages them to avoid activities that could create the appearance of conflicts but acknowledged they still have businesses and personal lives. The president said his business background was one of the reasons voters elected him, but insisted financial gain is no longer his priority. He said serving as president is a "much bigger purpose" than making money. Join the discussion? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 4 July 2026

Donald Trump earned at least $2.2bn (£1.7bn) during his first year back in the White House, according to a newly released financial disclosure report, marking an unprecedented level of personal income while serving as US president. Get today's headlines by email Historians say the figure represents a sharp departure from the longstanding practice of presidents distancing themselves from their private financial interests while in office. The contrast with earlier presidents is striking. Harry Truman left office with little income beyond a monthly Army pension of $113 (£85) and argued that former presidents should not profit from the prestige of the office. Trump's earnings dwarf those of past presidentsGeorge W Bush placed his investments in a blind trust before becoming president and later said he did not know how the 2008 financial crisis had affected his personal wealth. Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia's Miller Center, said there was "no precedent" for Trump's level of personal earnings while in office. Cryptocurrency drives record incomeAccording to the disclosure, cryptocurrency generated the largest share of Trump's reported income in 2025. He declared about $1.4bn from cryptocurrency-related ventures, including $635m in royalties from Celebration Coins, the company believed to be behind the $TRUMP meme coin launched shortly before his second term began. Trump also reported more than $500m from World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency business founded by his sons, Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump, together with the sons of Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East and Ukraine. His reported income for 2025 was almost four times the $622m disclosed for 2024, before his return to office. White House rejects conflict claimsThe White House denied that Trump or his family had benefited improperly from the presidency. Deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said neither the president nor his family had engaged in conflicts of interest and insisted all decisions made by the administration were in the interests of the American people. She accused critics of repeating longstanding political attacks. Before both of his presidential terms, Trump transferred day-to-day control of the Trump Organization to his adult sons but, unlike several previous presidents, did not place his business assets in a traditional blind trust or sell his holdings. The Trump Organization said before his second inauguration that Trump would play no role in its daily operations, while Eric Trump said the company would follow strict ethical standards. Ethics concerns remainCritics argue several actions taken by the administration have benefited businesses connected to Trump and senior officials. Last July, Trump signed legislation supporting stablecoins, months after World Liberty Financial launched its digital currency business. Later, he pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao as his administration promoted the cryptocurrency industry. A New York Times report also said Trump secured a deal with Kazakhstan that gave an American company access to a major critical minerals project. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr later acquired a minority stake in a company involved in the venture, while Cantor Fitzgerald, led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's sons, also participated in the deal. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump said his wealth reflected investment gains and maintained he was not involved in managing his family's business interests. "I don't get involved in my personal [finances]," he said. "I've made a lot of money before I became president." Richard Painter, who served as the chief White House ethics lawyer under George W Bush, said Trump's cryptocurrency earnings represented a clear conflict of interest. "This is a very, very troubling situation for the American people to see their president making so much money," he said. Join the discussion? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 2 July 2026

Sir Keir Starmer has unveiled a major defence investment plan, promising to build an army that is "10 times more lethal" through increased military spending and greater use of advanced technology. Get today's headlines by email Launching the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan (Dip) on Tuesday, the prime minister announced an additional £15 billion for defence, £1.5 billion more than had previously been pledged to former defence secretary John Healey. The strategy had originally been due for publication last year but was delayed amid disagreements within government over funding levels, a dispute that ultimately contributed to Healey's resignation last month. Bigger military budget aims to modernise UK forcesStarmer said defence spending would rise from 2.3% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024 to 2.7%, putting the UK "on a trajectory" to reach 3% during the next parliament. Annual defence spending is expected to increase from £54 billion to £80 billion by 2029. Starmer argued that strengthening the armed forces was essential to preventing future conflict, saying that "the best way to avoid war is to prepare for it". Investment focused on technology and deterrenceThe four-year investment programme includes funding across several major defence projects. The largest allocation, £63 billion, will support the UK's nuclear deterrent through the Dreadnought and SSN-AUKUS submarine programmes, as well as the purchase of 12 F-35A fighter aircraft. A further £8 billion will be invested in the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP), which is developing a next-generation stealth fighter for the Royal Air Force. Picture courtesy of PA Project Royal Oak, described as the biggest upgrade of Britain's naval bases in more than 45 years, will receive £26 billion. More than £5 billion has been earmarked for transforming the armed forces through drones and autonomous systems, including £650 million for unmanned aerial and ground vehicles. Another £2 billion will fund a Digital Targeting Web using software and artificial intelligence to speed military decision-making and target engagement. The government also plans to spend £11 billion on munitions and weapons stockpiles, including the construction of at least six new energetics factories by 2030. Lessons from Ukraine shape strategyStarmer said the investment would ensure Britain was prepared to confront Russia by 2030 if required, describing the programme as a "generational transformation" built on lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. He highlighted the growing role of autonomous technology in modern warfare, saying future warships and aircraft would increasingly operate alongside autonomous systems as part of an integrated force. The UK has closely monitored the widespread use of drones during the conflict in Ukraine, where around 200,000 are reportedly used each month, as well as their deployment in conflicts involving Iran. The prime minister acknowledged that some infrastructure projects, including spending on roads and energy, might not proceed as originally planned to accommodate the higher defence budget. However, he insisted the increased military investment would not come at the expense of frontline public services such as health and education. He also ruled out reducing day-to-day defence spending, arguing that cutting public services to fund defence would leave Britain "fundamentally weaker as a nation". Political criticism and NATO pressureThe Defence Investment Plan has been viewed as a key part of Starmer's legacy, though Labour leadership contender Andy Burnham has indicated it could be reviewed if he succeeds him. Burnham has suggested future defence contracts should place greater emphasis on supporting British-based defence companies. Opposition parties criticised the plan, with Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge describing it as "too little, too late". He argued the additional funding was only marginally higher than the amount disputed before John Healey's resignation and said the strategy had been delayed for almost a year. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey also called the plan "late and underfunded". The announcement comes as NATO allies face increasing pressure to raise defence spending. At next week's NATO summit in Ankara, members are expected to outline a credible path towards spending 5% of GDP on defence by 2035. The White House said on Monday that US President Donald Trump expects the UK and other alliance members to meet their defence spending commitments. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 June 2026

Russian soldiers reaching some of the most contested areas of the front line in Ukraine can expect to survive an average of only 20 to 35 minutes, according to estimates shared by Russian military bloggers and cited by Oxford historian Peter Frankopan in a Foreign Policy report. The claim has not been independently verified by CBS News. Get today's headlines by email Similar accounts have become increasingly common on Russian military channels, suggesting growing awareness among some Russians of the war's human cost, despite longstanding efforts by the Kremlin to limit public discussion of battlefield losses. Russian Military Bloggers Highlight Front-Line RisksThe conflict has inflicted heavy casualties on Russian forces. The head of Britain's GCHQ intelligence agency said last month that Russian military deaths have likely approached 500,000. Meanwhile, Ukraine's defence ministry says more than 1.4 million Russian troops have been killed or wounded since the full-scale invasion began. Drones Reshape the Battlefield The widespread use of drones has transformed the front lines into what military analysts describe as a "kill zone," forcing both sides to adapt their tactics. With heavy artillery increasingly vulnerable to inexpensive first-person-view (FPV) drones, Russian forces have relied more heavily on small assault groups travelling on foot or motorcycles to probe Ukrainian defences and exploit weak points. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said drones now account for more than 80% of Russian battlefield losses. Some estimates also suggest that Russian forces are now suffering more fatalities than injuries, a pattern described as unprecedented in modern warfare. Ukraine has also faced significant manpower shortages and has increasingly used similar infiltration tactics during efforts to hold or regain territory. Rob Lee, a military analyst based in Ukraine, said personnel shortages have persisted since the end of Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive. "Manpower's been a problem since the end of the summer of 2023 offensive," Lee told CBS News. "We've had some cases where infantry have spent more than a year in position with no rotation." Ukraine Expands Drone OperationsUkraine has sought to reduce troop exposure by expanding the use of drones beyond combat missions. Uncrewed systems are increasingly used for logistics, medical evacuation and other battlefield support roles. "We say there is no need to send a human being where the robot can do the job," Oleksandr Kamyshin, the Ukrainian official overseeing the country's defence industry, told CBS News earlier this year. Some estimates indicate Russia is losing roughly eight soldiers killed or seriously wounded for every Ukrainian casualty. Despite those losses, Russia has continued to make gradual territorial gains. Ukraine's top military commander said Ukrainian forces have recaptured more than 230 square miles of territory this year, but Russian troops have advanced in strategically important parts of the Donetsk region. Ukrainian commanders said last week that Russian forces were attempting to infiltrate the outskirts of Kostyantynivka, a key industrial city in Donetsk. War's Impact Felt More Widely in RussiaA nationwide Russian public opinion survey released on Monday by the Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia, a Ukrainian think tank, found that 31% of respondents said at least one family member had been mobilised, up from 17% in 2022. Oleksandr Shulga, head of the institute, cautioned against overstating the findings, saying that "even after four years, the majority of Russians do not perceive this war as existential." However, he noted that the conflict has become increasingly personal for many Russians. According to the survey, only 29% of respondents said none of their relatives or acquaintances had been killed in the fighting since the war began. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 June 2026

Ukraine has stepped up its military campaign against Russian-controlled Crimea, with repeated strikes disrupting electricity supplies, fuel distribution and daily life across the peninsula as Kyiv seeks to increase pressure on Moscow. Get today's headlines by email Power outages have continued in Sevastopol, Crimea's largest city, after a series of Ukrainian attacks. Kremlin-installed governor Mikhail Razvozhayev said on Thursday that electricity restrictions had been introduced and urged residents to reduce pressure on the grid. Ukraine's drone forces commander, Robert Brovdi, said Kyiv struck Sevastopol's main power substation seven times early on Wednesday. Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 after Ukraine's Maidan protests led to the removal of then-president Viktor Yanukovych, a move widely condemned by the international community. Sevastopol has long served as the headquarters of Russia's Black Sea Fleet. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly pledged to restore Ukrainian control over Crimea, a goal that has become more prominent since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. In recent weeks, Ukraine has intensified strikes on the peninsula as part of a broader effort to increase military pressure on the Kremlin. Disruptions Spread Across CrimeaThe attacks have had growing consequences for civilians. Residents have reported more frequent air raid alerts, repeated drone activity and power disruptions, while authorities have restricted fuel sales to government agencies, leaving ordinary residents and businesses without access to petrol and diesel. A Sevastopol resident, speaking anonymously for security reasons, told CNN that air raid warnings now occur several times a day and that drone interceptions increasingly take place over the city rather than above the Black Sea. She said fuel had disappeared from filling stations, although public transport was still operating. Before supplies ran out, she purchased fuel at significantly higher prices. Crimea has long been a popular holiday destination for Russians and Ukrainians. Once a flagship Soviet resort region, the peninsula received billions of dollars in Russian investment after the 2014 annexation, transforming many tourist areas. However, the latest disruptions have cast uncertainty over the peak holiday season. Tourism and Businesses Face UncertaintyCrimea's Russian-installed leader, Sergey Aksyonov, announced that all children's summer camps would remain closed until September 1. Videos posted online from Simferopol appeared to show unusually quiet streets and nearly empty public spaces. One resident described the city as resembling "some sort of apocalypse," while another said supermarket shelves were empty after cafes and canteens stopped operating. Despite the disruption, a guesthouse owner in the resort town of Noviy Svet said visitors were still arriving. She described the atmosphere as cautious rather than panicked, adding that beaches, cafes and tourist facilities remained open, although guests were closely following developments. Residents Voice FrustrationThe fuel restrictions have prompted widespread complaints on social media. Responding to Aksyonov's announcement on Telegram, residents questioned how they would continue working or supporting their families. One taxi driver said he would soon be unable to repay loans or buy food after banks refused payment holidays because no state of emergency had been declared. Another resident said her poultry distribution business required diesel fuel to deliver perishable goods across Crimea, while a third complained that overcrowded trolley buses left many commuters unable to reach work. Ukraine has increasingly targeted military and logistical infrastructure inside Russian-controlled territory, including oil refineries and transport networks, alongside large-scale drone attacks on Moscow and St. Petersburg. In Crimea, Kyiv is focusing on transport links and supply routes supporting Russian forces in southern Ukraine. Zelensky said on Wednesday that operations in Crimea were carefully planned to create conditions that would force Russia to choose peace. Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of political analysis firm R.Politik, told CNN that although the situation in Crimea had become more difficult, she did not believe the growing domestic pressure would alter President Vladimir Putin's strategic objectives. Instead, she argued, the attacks were more likely to strengthen anti-Ukrainian sentiment within Russia than produce any significant political shift. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 June 2026

British hygiene brand Dettol has apologised after an advertising campaign in China drew widespread criticism and prompted calls for a boycott. Get today's headlines by email The five-minute advert, produced in the style of a short online drama, was intended to challenge sexist attitudes. However, many viewers said the message was poorly executed and offensive, leading the company to withdraw the campaign. Advert Intended to Criticise SexismThe advert begins with a man searching for a partner who is “clean” and “untainted by other men”, language that many viewers regarded as misogynistic. Later in the story, a twist reveals that the man's girlfriend rejects his views and ends their relationship. The advert then compares “toxic men” to bacteria, presenting a Dettol multipurpose disinfectant as the solution. Dettol said the campaign was designed to criticise harmful gender stereotypes. However, the company argued that clips of the advert shared online removed important context and distorted its intended message. Company Issues ApologyIn a statement released on Monday, Dettol acknowledged the criticism and apologised for the offence caused. “We recognise that it has offended many people, especially women. We take responsibility for any negligence in creating and reviewing the content of the advert,” the company said. Dettol added that it would review its content moderation and approval processes to prevent similar incidents in the future. The brand said its mission has always been to protect families' health, but stressed that respect and equality are also important values. “True protection also lies in safeguarding the dignity of every individual and their right to be treated equally,” the statement said. Social Media Users Condemn CampaignThe advert triggered heated debate across Chinese social media platforms, where many users criticised the campaign for linking ideas of personal “purity” with the cleaning power of disinfectant products. On Weibo, China's equivalent of X, some users described the advert as offensive and poorly conceived, while others questioned how it had passed internal reviews. Several comments called for consumers to stop buying Dettol products, arguing that the company had damaged its reputation through the campaign. Previous ControversyAccording to digital culture analyst Manya Koetse, the campaign was particularly problematic because it came from a company whose products are closely associated with cleanliness and hygiene. She said that even if the advert's goal was to portray the male character negatively, the message was communicated so poorly that it ultimately failed and generated a strong public backlash. The controversy is not the first involving Dettol in China. Last year, the brand faced criticism over another advert that included the line: “The woman was ‘returned’ just before her wedding; it must be because she was not clean.” Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 June 2026

Iran has denied a US claim that it agreed to allow international nuclear inspectors back into the country, highlighting early differences between Washington and Tehran after a new round of negotiations aimed at securing a broader agreement following last year's conflict. Get today's headlines by email The disagreement emerged after talks in the Swiss resort of Bürgenstock, where the two sides met for the first round of discussions on a potential final deal. Dispute Over Nuclear InspectionsUS Vice-President JD Vance said discussions with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) could begin "as soon as today" and suggested inspectors could return to Iran as early as this week. US President Donald Trump also said on social media that Iran would agree to extensive weapons inspections. However, Iran's foreign ministry rejected those assertions. Speaking to state news agency Irna, foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqai said Tehran had made "no new commitments" regarding nuclear inspections. Baqai said any future cooperation with UN inspectors would take place under existing procedures established by Iran's parliament and Supreme National Security Council. The IAEA did not immediately comment on the conflicting claims. Sanctions Relief and New CommitmentsThe diplomatic dispute came as Washington temporarily eased sanctions on Iran. A 60-day waiver issued by the US Treasury allows the production, sale and delivery of Iranian crude oil and petrochemicals until 21 August. The measure also permits transactions involving banking, insurance and transport services and allows Iranian oil exports to be conducted in US dollars. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the sanctions relief was granted in exchange for Iranian commitments to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and permit the return of IAEA inspectors. The waiver marks a significant easing of restrictions that have constrained Iran's economy for decades. Roadmap for a Broader DealIn a joint statement, mediators Qatar and Pakistan said the talks had produced a roadmap aimed at reaching a final agreement within 60 days. Vance described the negotiations as laying a "very good foundation". He said discussions covered reopening the Strait of Hormuz and mechanisms to prevent incidents that could threaten a regional ceasefire. The mediators also announced the creation of a communication channel intended to reduce misunderstandings and ensure safe passage for commercial shipping through the strategic waterway. In addition, the parties agreed to establish a "de-confliction cell" involving the US, Iran and Lebanon, with Qatar and Pakistan acting as facilitators. Regional Tensions RemainIranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said Lebanon would be the first real test of the new arrangements. Fighting between Israel and Hezbollah has largely subsided since Saturday night, with a fragile ceasefire continuing to hold. Vance also revealed that Iranian negotiators had threatened to leave the talks after Trump warned on social media that the US could strike Iran again if tensions escalated. According to Vance, he reassured the Iranian delegation that Trump's comments were a response to Iranian rhetoric rather than a sign that negotiations were collapsing. Speaking later from the Oval Office, Trump repeated his warning, saying the United States would act if Iran failed to honour any agreement. Meanwhile, Iranian state media reported that specialist negotiating groups covering nuclear issues, sanctions and other areas would be established as talks move into their next phase. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 June 2026

Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson says he no longer supports the Republican Party, citing what he described as a lack of loyalty to the United States among party leaders. Break With the GOP Get today's headlines by email Speaking on the "Can't Be Censored" podcast, Carlson said he would not support Republican candidates in future elections. Criticism of Party LeadershipCarlson argued that Americans should not support a political party they believe is not acting in the country's interests. The former Fox News host said he had voted Republican throughout his life and spent decades defending the party, but now believes its actions are indefensible. Split With Trump Over IranCarlson's break with the party follows a growing rift with President Donald Trump over U.S. policy toward Iran. Once a prominent supporter of Trump, Carlson has sharply criticized the administration since the U.S. military campaign against Iran and its allied groups began earlier this year. He has accused the administration of being influenced by Israel in its approach to the conflict and has repeatedly attacked Trump over the issue. Future Political Support UnclearCarlson said his opposition extends beyond the president and that he does not intend to vote for Republican candidates in upcoming elections. While ruling out support for Republicans, he said he does not currently know what political path he will take instead. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 June 2026

President Donald Trump said multiple people have been arrested in connection with alleged vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which has come under scrutiny after algae growth and peeling paint appeared shortly after a costly renovation project was completed. Get today's headlines by email The president made the announcement on social media on Saturday, accusing those involved of committing serious crimes against national monuments. He did not provide details about the number of arrests or the specific acts that led to them. “These are very serious crimes having to do with the destruction of National Monuments,” Trump wrote, adding that those responsible could face prison sentences. Renovation Problems Draw AttentionThe Reflecting Pool has attracted widespread attention in recent days after visitors shared photos and videos online showing algae forming in the water and sections of the newly painted lining peeling away. The Interior Department recently completed a repainting project at the site, with the final cost exceeding $14.65 million, about $4 million above the original estimate. Picture courtesy of CNN/Aaron Schwartz/Reuters Trump said repair work would begin immediately and suggested that part of the pool may need to be drained to address the damage. “We met with contractors today, will probably be forced to release and drain much of the water in order to do the necessary repairs,” he wrote. Sabotage Claims Without EvidenceThe president also repeated claims that the damage was the result of deliberate sabotage. He alleged that vandals poured “corrosive and destructive chemicals” into the pool, causing the lining to peel. Trump further claimed that someone used a knife or blade to create a 250-foot gash in what he described as the structure’s facade. He did not clarify whether he was referring to the Reflecting Pool itself or another nearby monument. No evidence was publicly presented to support the sabotage allegations. Trump linked the alleged vandalism to the large “86 47” message recently marked in grass on the National Mall and described the incidents as an insult to Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. Olympian Denies WrongdoingHours before announcing the arrests, Trump shared a report about the arrest of a man near the Reflecting Pool on Friday. According to The Washington Post, the man was identified as 67-year-old David Hearn, a three-time U.S. Olympic canoeist. Hearn denied damaging the pool in an interview with the newspaper. “I didn't vandalize anything,” he said. “I didn't destroy or break or peel anything.” He said he had only touched a section of material that was already peeling and remained attached to the bottom of the pool. According to the Post, Hearn was arrested on a misdemeanor charge of destruction of government property and is scheduled to appear in D.C. Superior Court on July 9. The U.S. Park Police did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the arrests mentioned by Trump. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

President Donald Trump joked this week that Vice President JD Vance would be responsible if the administration's Iran agreement falls apart, a remark that highlighted Vance's increasingly prominent role in one of the White House's most closely watched foreign policy efforts. Get today's headlines by email Speaking on Wednesday, Trump said he would take the credit if the Iran initiative succeeds but would blame Vance if it fails. “You better be careful, JD!” Trump quipped. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who had advocated a tougher approach toward Iran earlier in the conflict, stood nearby but did not join the exchange. The comment drew laughter but also underscored a political reality that has emerged during the war and the negotiations that followed. Trump Joke Highlights Political StakesAs talks over a potential agreement progressed, Vance became the administration's most visible representative on the issue, a notable shift given his earlier opposition to military action. His elevated profile has prompted discussion among Republican strategists and political observers about why he, rather than Rubio, has taken center stage during negotiations. The development has also fueled speculation that Vance could end up carrying political responsibility for an agreement that remains controversial within parts of the Republican Party. One former Trump administration official argued that Trump's joke reinforced a growing perception among Republicans that the agreement has become associated with Vance. The former aide said comments from Republican figures, including Senator Lindsey Graham, have increasingly linked the deal to the vice president rather than to other senior administration officials. Vance Becomes Face of Iran NegotiationsThe focus on Vance has intensified as he promotes his new book, Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith. During a series of high-profile interviews, the vice president has frequently been asked about the Iran negotiations alongside questions about his political future and the possibility of a presidential run in 2028. On Thursday, Vance appeared at a White House briefing for the second time in recent weeks, standing in for press secretary Karoline Leavitt. He answered questions about the Iran agreement and ongoing discussions with Tehran. Vance also responded to criticism from Israel and supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning against attacking the United States while it remains Israel's most powerful ally. When asked about Trump's joke, Vance dismissed it, saying the president was "joking as he often does." Republicans Debate Risks and RewardsDespite Vance's public response, Republican strategists said the remark reflected a familiar pattern in Trump's political approach. Veteran Republican strategist Doug Heye said Trump traditionally claims credit for successful outcomes while directing blame elsewhere when things go wrong. He argued that anyone working closely with Trump understands that political fortunes can change quickly and that no ally is guaranteed protection if circumstances deteriorate. Republican strategist Susan Del Percio echoed that view, suggesting Trump could eventually point to communication failures or other issues if the agreement encounters problems. Supporters of Vance, however, contend that his leading role demonstrates Trump's confidence in him. They argue that the vice president helped guide efforts to end the conflict and that his visibility reflects the trust placed in him by the president. Rubio Steps Back as Vance Takes Center StageAt the same time, Vance's prominent role has drawn attention away from Rubio, who was initially viewed as one of the administration's strongest advocates for military action. Reports have since indicated that Rubio privately argued against the agreement, citing intelligence assessments suggesting Iran was unlikely to abandon its pursuit of nuclear capabilities. Political observers noted that Rubio has largely remained out of the spotlight as negotiations have advanced, leaving Vance as the administration's primary public defender of the deal. Iran Deal Could Shape Vance's FutureStrategists say Vance could benefit politically if the agreement proves durable and successful. However, they also warn that a breakdown in the deal could create challenges for a potential 2028 presidential campaign by tying him closely to an issue that has divided Republicans. Del Percio compared the situation to the difficulties former Vice President Kamala Harris faced when attempting to distinguish herself from the policies of former President Joe Biden during the 2024 election campaign. Others argued that Vance may find it even harder to separate himself from the administration's Iran policy if he remains its most visible advocate. For now, the vice president remains closely associated with an agreement that could either strengthen his political credentials or become a significant liability. As one former Trump administration official put it, the vice president who initially opposed the war is now increasingly identified with the effort to secure the peace. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 21 June 2026

Brexit has reduced UK exports to the European Union by an estimated 12%, with most of the decline linked to the country's departure from the EU single market rather than its exit from the customs union, according to new research. Get today's headlines by email The analysis, conducted by economists John Springford and Anton Spisak of the Centre for European Reform (CER), comes as debate over the UK's future relationship with the EU gains renewed political attention nearly a decade after the 2016 referendum. Exports to EU Remain Below Pre-Brexit ExpectationsTheir findings indicate that UK services exports to the EU are around 7% lower than they would have been had Britain remained a member of the bloc, while goods exports are 16% lower. Using trade data and economic modelling, the researchers conclude that around 10 percentage points of the overall 12% decline in exports can be attributed to leaving the single market. They argue that regulatory barriers introduced after Brexit, including certification requirements and checks to ensure compliance with EU standards, have had a greater effect on trade than customs-related obstacles. Single Market Departure Seen as Main FactorAccording to the study, sectors experiencing the largest losses include travel, finance and insurance, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and agrifood. The researchers also suggest that previous estimates may have understated the impact on services exports. Their assessment takes into account a rise in services trade among EU member states following the Covid-19 pandemic, growth from which the UK has largely been excluded. Political Debate Over Future EU TiesThe findings emerge as Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves continue to emphasise the importance of improving trade relations with the EU. A UK-EU summit is scheduled for next month. However, the government has maintained its position that it will not seek to rejoin either the single market or the customs union, nor restore freedom of movement. At the same time, potential future Labour leadership contenders Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting have both indicated support for eventual UK re-entry into the EU. The Liberal Democrats have also shifted their stance. Party leader Ed Davey recently announced that the party would campaign for the UK to rejoin the single market, moving beyond its previous support for customs union membership alone. Customs Union Benefits Viewed as LimitedThe CER study argues that rejoining the customs union would provide only modest economic gains. While it would remove the need for businesses to comply with complex "rules of origin" requirements governing tariff-free trade, it would do little to address the challenges facing the services sector. The researchers found that relatively few current exports are affected by those rules, suggesting the overall boost to trade would be limited. They also note that customs union membership would restrict the UK's ability to negotiate independent trade agreements, since members must apply the EU's external tariff regime. By contrast, regaining access to the single market could recover a much larger share of lost trade. However, the economists say such a move would involve significant political compromises, including accepting freedom of movement, contributing to the EU budget and aligning with EU regulations without direct influence over their creation. The report also finds little evidence that stronger trade relationships with non-EU countries have compensated for reduced trade with Europe, contrary to arguments made by some Brexit supporters before the referendum. Its conclusions are broadly in line with other studies estimating that Brexit has reduced UK economic output by between 4% and 8%. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 19 June 2026

Ukraine carried out its largest attack on Moscow since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, sending nearly 200 drones towards the Russian capital and triggering fires, flight disruptions and injuries across the surrounding region. Get today's headlines by email According to Moscow region governor Andrei Vorobyov, 17 people were wounded in the attack. Russia’s Defence Ministry said almost 1,000 Ukrainian drones and four cruise missiles were intercepted and destroyed across the country over a 24-hour period. In the southern Rostov region, an oil depot was hit and one person was killed. Moscow Region Hit by Mass Drone StrikeUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the strikes on the Moscow region as “long-range sanctions”, a term Kyiv has increasingly used for attacks deep inside Russian territory. video screenshot Zelensky said the operation was a response to a major Russian assault on Kyiv last week that set a prominent religious landmark on fire. He argued that Russia must take diplomatic steps to end the conflict. “We don’t want this war and have never wanted it,” Zelensky said. “But if Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn too.” Refinery Fire and Airport DisruptionsOne of the main targets was the Kapotnya oil refinery in south-east Moscow, which was struck for the third time in a month and for the second time this week. Thick black smoke rose above the facility as fires broke out. Videos circulating on social media appeared to show the top of a large oil storage tank being blown high into the air by an explosion. A nearby shopping centre also caught fire, reportedly after drone debris fell onto the building. Several residential tower blocks in the area were evacuated as a precaution. The attack caused major disruption to air travel. Moscow’s four airports were temporarily closed, while more than 500 flights were delayed or cancelled. Despite restrictions imposed by Russian authorities on publishing images from strike sites, numerous videos appeared online showing drones crossing the sky in daylight and explosions near industrial areas on the outskirts of the capital. Ukraine Expands Long-Range CapabilitiesMore than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, fighting continues along the front line. Kyiv’s growing ability to strike targets deep inside Russia reflects Zelensky’s stated goal of bringing the consequences of the war closer to the Russian public. Drone attacks on Moscow, located roughly 500 kilometres from the Ukrainian border, have become increasingly common since Ukraine began expanding its long-range strike capabilities. The first successful attacks on the capital took place in 2023, but involved far fewer drones than recent operations. Russia has since strengthened air defences around Moscow, although Ukrainian attacks have also grown in scale and sophistication. Russia and Ukraine Trade Fresh BlowsAt the same time, Ukrainian officials said Russia launched more than 200 drones and several ballistic missiles against Ukraine overnight. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is attending a summit with Southeast Asian leaders in the city of Kazan, has not publicly commented on the attack. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha used social media to address residents of Moscow directly, saying Russians should ask Putin when he intends to bring the war to an end. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 June 2026

London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has been named as one of 26 new peers who will take seats in the House of Lords, in one of Sir Keir Starmer's final acts before leaving office as prime minister. Sir Sadiq is among 16 Labour nominees, alongside broadcaster June Sarpong and former Trades Union Congress general secretary Christina McAnea. The appointments also include five Liberal Democrat peers, three Conservatives and two cross-bench members. Although membership of the House of Lords could make Sir Sadiq eligible to serve as a government minister, the BBC understands he is not seeking a post in Andy Burnham's incoming administration. Cross-party appointments announcedDowning Street released the list of nominations, saying the King had "been graciously pleased to signify his intention of conferring peerages" on those selected. The appointments come just days before Sir Keir is due to leave office on Monday, when Andy Burnham is expected to become the UK's next prime minister. The BBC understands the nominations were prepared before Sir Keir announced his resignation as Labour leader last month. Rather than being a traditional resignation honours list, they are political peerages agreed across the parties. Among the two cross-bench appointments are former Cabinet Secretary Sir Chris Wormald and retired senior judge Sir Brian Leveson. Khan to remain focused on LondonSir Sadiq, who was first elected London mayor in 2016, is serving his third term in office. The BBC has been told he has not yet decided whether he will seek re-election for a fourth term in 2028. A government source described him as "a brilliant mayor who has transformed London for the better", citing reductions in violent crime, cleaner air, the delivery of the Elizabeth Line and increased council house building as reasons the peerage was deserved. A spokesperson for the mayor said Sir Sadiq was "honoured" by the appointment and remained committed to serving the capital. "He is excited about what more can be delivered in the years ahead and he will devote his time and energy to standing up for our city and building a fairer, safer and greener London for everyone," the spokesperson said. Reform debate continuesReform UK did not receive any peerages in the latest appointments. Party leader Nigel Farage criticised the list, calling it "the uniparty writ large" and arguing it left the upper chamber even less representative. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey welcomed his party's five new peers, including agricultural economist Julia Aglionby, former Barnsley councillor Hannah Kitching, economist Tim Leunig, campaigns director Dave McCobb and offshore wind entrepreneur Mark Petterson. He said they would help hold the government to account and support efforts to reform the House of Lords. The Conservatives' new peers include former head of the Army General Sir Patrick Sanders, Carphone Warehouse co-founder David Ross and University of Warwick professor Swaran Singh. The party said all three would bring valuable expertise from defence, business and healthcare. Calls for House of Lords reformMembers of the House of Lords are formally appointed by the King on the advice of the prime minister once nominees have completed the vetting process. Labour pledged in 2022 to abolish the House of Lords and replace it with a new second chamber, but later softened that commitment. Instead, the party promised to consider wider reform while immediately removing the remaining hereditary peers, a change completed earlier this year. Andy Burnham has continued to argue for a fundamental overhaul of the unelected chamber, saying it is difficult to justify having half of the UK's national legislature made up of unelected members. The Electoral Reform Society also questioned the latest appointments, saying Labour supporters would be puzzled by the expansion of the Lords while the party continues to promise reform. The group's chief executive, Darren Hughes, urged the next prime minister to create a smaller, democratic upper chamber that is more representative and accountable. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

The United States military launched another wave of strikes on Iran, while Tehran said it retaliated with missile and drone attacks against US military assets in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan. Iran’s Health Ministry said at least 35 people were killed and more than 300 injured since fighting resumed last week. US Central Command (CENTCOM), which oversees operations in the Middle East, said it carried out an evening operation that began as part of a wave of strikes against Iran, concluding at 9pm ET on Wednesday (01:00 GMT on Thursday). CENTCOM says 90-minute strikeCENTCOM said the 90-minute mission targeted what it described as Iranian command centres, air defence sites, missile and drone capabilities, and coastal surveillance facilities. It said the aim was to reduce Iran’s ability to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The command said the operation hit Bandar Abbas, a southern port city and naval hub overlooking the waterway. It also targeted coastal defence and cruise missile sites on Greater Tunb island, one of three islands near the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian air defences were activated over Tehran, according to state media reporting attacks across much of the country. Picture courtesy of Al Jazeera Iran reports attacks across multiple provincesExplosions were reported in Bandar Abbas and on Qeshm island in the south. Iranian media also reported strikes in Sirik, Chabahar and Konarak on the southeastern coast, along with attacks further inland in Rask, Khondab, Khorramabad and Semnan. Iranian authorities said there were no casualties in Pakdasht or at the Parchin military complex near Tehran. In Semnan, the state broadcaster IRIB, citing a senior security official, said there were no deaths or injuries following the attack. Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera said a civilian airport building in Semnan was attacked, with only minor damage reported. The network said a storage facility in the same city was also hit. In Khuzestan province, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it intercepted and shot down a US MQ-9 drone over Andimeshk. Retaliation claimed across Kuwait, Bahrain and JordanIran said it carried out retaliatory missile and drone attacks against facilities used by US forces in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan. The Iranian army said its missiles targeted US radar and air defence systems in Kuwait and Bahrain. Kuwait’s military said its air defences were confronting attacks by “hostile drones”. It said any explosion sounds were the result of interceptors handling the attacks. Kuwait said it intercepted four cruise missiles and 21 drones launched from Iran between Wednesday and early Thursday. Iranian state media said missiles struck Patriot missile batteries and fuel tanks used by US forces at Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait. The Iranian army added that drones targeted communications equipment, Super Hawk radar systems and Patriot air defence installations used by US forces at Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain. It also claimed missile and drone attacks on Jordan’s al-Azraq Air Base. Jordan’s military said earlier on Wednesday it intercepted eight Iranian missiles. In a statement addressed to the Jordanian public, the IRGC said it had “targeted and destroyed” what it called a fighter jet storage ramp and a new command and control centre in West Asia at a “very large base” in Al-Azraq, using Khyber-Shakan ballistic missiles. Iran’s army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia warned that attacks “will spread to new areas” if the US continues its strikes, saying Iran’s response would be commensurate and exceed expectations. Blockade enforcement and Trump commentsThe latest escalation comes less than a month after Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding extending an April ceasefire and setting out plans for negotiations to end the war that began on February 28, following Israeli and US strikes on Iran. Both sides have since accused the other of violating the agreement. Separately, CENTCOM said US forces disabled an oil tanker attempting to sail towards an Iranian port. It said the Curacao-flagged M/T Belma was observed transiting towards Kharg Island despite warnings, and that a US aircraft fired Hellfire missiles into the ship’s smokestack. CENTCOM said the vessel stopped transiting towards Iran, and that during the first 24 hours of enforcement it redirected two compliant commercial vessels and disabled one non-compliant vessel. Reporting from Washington, Al Jazeera said President Donald Trump has indicated he could broaden US military operations beyond targeting Iranian military facilities, including storage and naval assets, and has raised the possibility of striking parts of Iranian infrastructure, such as power plants and bridges. Join the discussion? 17 July 2026

The UK's highest appeal judges have begun hearing a case that could determine whether Trinidad and Tobago's colonial-era law criminalising consensual same-sex intimacy should remain in force. Get today's headlines by email The appeal centres on whether Trinidad and Tobago's Court of Appeal had the legal authority to overturn a 2018 High Court ruling that declared the country's anti-gay law unconstitutional. The so-called "buggery law", first introduced in 1925 and incorporated into Trinidad and Tobago's 1986 Sexual Offences Act, criminalises anal sex between consenting men and carries a prison sentence of up to five years. Challenge to Colonial-Era LawIn 2017, LGBTQ+ rights activist Jason Jones challenged the legislation, arguing that it violated his constitutional rights to privacy and equality. A High Court agreed in 2018, striking down the law as unconstitutional. However, the country's Court of Appeal reversed that decision in 2025 after intervention by the attorney general, restoring the legislation. Jones has now appealed to the London-based Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC), which serves as the final court of appeal for several Commonwealth countries, British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. A ruling is expected within three to six months. Wider Constitutional QuestionsThe case is being closely monitored across the Caribbean because its outcome could extend beyond LGBTQ+ rights. Trinidad and Tobago's government is contesting Jones's appeal, arguing that the case could affect the interpretation of constitutional "savings clauses". These provisions preserved many laws inherited from British colonial rule after countries gained independence. Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar said the Privy Council's decision could provide guidance on whether other colonial-era laws protected by savings clauses should remain in force. Darrell Allahar, a minister in the Office of the Prime Minister and one of the government's lawyers, said the proceedings were important because they concerned the broader constitutional role of savings clauses, which were designed to preserve existing laws following independence rather than allow widespread legal changes based on new constitutional rights. Activist Criticises GovernmentJones, 61, said the matter should never have reached the Privy Council, arguing that the government or parliament could have repealed the legislation years ago. He accused the state of spending millions of dollars in public funds defending laws that, he said, criminalise and stigmatise LGBTQ+ people. Jones expressed confidence that the Privy Council would rule in his favour, arguing that the legislation is incompatible with modern human rights protections. Regional SignificanceSeveral Caribbean countries have recently repealed or struck down similar colonial-era laws. The Bahamas decriminalised homosexuality in 1991, while courts have more recently invalidated comparable legislation in Barbados, Dominica, St Lucia, and Antigua and Barbuda. The UK also repealed such laws in several British Overseas Territories in 2001. However, consensual same-sex intimacy remains criminalised in Guyana, Grenada, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and St Vincent and the Grenadines. Former Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar said the remaining countries in the Americas that still criminalise homosexuality all share a history as former British colonies. Writing in a recent paper for Harvard University, he argued that this reflected the continued existence of colonial-era laws that have already been repealed in the United Kingdom, where rights including privacy and personal autonomy are protected under domestic law. Join the discussion? 9 July 2026