tomacht8
-
Posts
5,222 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by tomacht8
-
-
3 hours ago, sandyf said:
Tell that to the Australians.
Plans by the UK and European Union to share quotas for cheap food imports after Brexit have come under fire from Australia.
Restrictions on how many products can be imported into the EU on favourable rates are set across the bloc and concerns have been raised internationally that exporters could take a financial hit when the UK quits.
It seems that Barry Gardiner is one of the few with expertise in details.
-
18 minutes ago, talahtnut said:
Strength in trade negotiations comes from integrity, not numbers of countries.
The European single market with the enlargement of the European Union to 28 Member States is the largest common market in the world.
Believe me,
The regulation of access to this market is a very strong bargaining position.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
18 minutes ago, Steve Mepham said:IMHO this does not make you stronger, it creates more difficulty because you have to negotiate for 27 Countries who all have different interests to protect. this is why trade deals take 7 8 9 10 years, because any one Country can veto.
On our overcrowded planet, there are no more undiscovered locations where speed for trade deals is important. A trade agreement with the EU is a treaty with 27/28 countries. How long would it take for a country to negotiate individual trade agreements with 27/28 countries separately?
The UK's exit from the EU is causing problems not only for its continued participation in the EU single market. Also, the total of 53 trade agreements that have been concluded by the EU with third countries are no longer valid for the UK economy after leaving.
As a result, the UK would have to renegotiate all these numerous treaties bilaterally. The renegotiation of so many individual contracts and details alone would occupy and push the British government for years to the limit of its capacity
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, nontabury said:We have a number of E.U citizens on this thread, who wish for the U.K. to remain in this so called union. I wonder why?
6 minutes ago, nontabury said:We have a number of E.U citizens on this thread, who wish for the U.K. to remain in this so called union. I wonder why?
Without British humor, EU policy will become a bit more boring in the future. Europe needs the British for funny ideas and good jokes.
- 3
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:
With his Joseph Goebbels rhetoric he did not make any friends. But he will go down in the history of the EU Parliament as the one who managed to personally insult all EU parliamentarians from 28 countries.
- 2
-
14 minutes ago, talahtnut said:
Thats a big post, but is it about distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society, ie. social justice?
To put it more simply: In the past 30 years, uk politicians in particular have blocked progress on social justice in the EU.
To blame the EU for social injustice in the UK is simply wrong.
And you know that.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, talahtnut said:After 44 years in the EU we have less social justice.
It appears to have trickled upwards.
Britain maintains an opposition culture with a long history. Blockage on social issues In 1984 Thatcher negotiated the British rebate ("I want my money back"), with which the United Kingdom gets back 66% of its net contribution to the EU. The British are still not a member of the Schengen Agreement, they vehemently block a financial transaction tax and just because the islanders (and the Czech Republic) did not want to join, the fiscal pact outside the EU structures had to be signed. So far, so well known. However, it is less well known which social policies were not supported by the British. When ex-EU Commission President Jacques Delors stated in the mid-1990s that the common internal market must also take the social dimension into account, various minimum standards were introduced in the EU: Great Britain in particular had a great need for improvement, such as maternity protection or parental leave. However, the British did not agree. At the beginning of the 1990s Britain - with the Conservatives in power - locked itself as the only country against the implementation of a "social charter". This laid down non-binding fundamental workers' rights, such as vacation entitlement and a right to leisure and recreation. Only in the late 1990s, the Labor government under Tony Blair drew in and signed. In 1993, the EU Commission drafted the Working Time Directive, which, in addition to other safeguards, required a maximum working time of 48 hours per week. Most of the countries already had higher regulations and voted in favor of the reform. Great Britain, on the other hand, had no upper limit and wanted to block the draft. However, the Commission invoked the area of health and safety, which allowed the European Council to pass the law by majority vote - which then happened. The Tory government, on the other hand, complained to the European Court of Justice, but the latter did not share the reservations. In 1998, Great Britain followed Labor under Labor and passed labor laws, but these provide all sorts of loopholes for working more than 48 hours a week. The average working time in the UK is higher than in most other EU countries, there is a culture of overtime, and almost half of all managers do unpaid extra work one day a week.
- 3
-
26 minutes ago, nontabury said:
Yes, let’s have another referendum, tens years after we finally escape this shambles of a E.U. Then we will know if all the scare stories had substance or not.
I believe by that time,if there is still an E.U. They will have a E.U. Army, in spite of the fact, that during the referendum,we were repeatedly told that no such thing had been contemplated. One of many lies told by the political establishment.
- 2
-
Fantasy story.
Nobody can be so stupid to fly with an oneway ticket around half the world, with no money in the pockets to meet for the first time their online date.
-
5 minutes ago, overherebc said:
Black faced submariner in 18ct obviously.
maybe the new model trainspotter will be added.
-
In every good wristwatch
collection belongs also a rolex submariner.
-
Prawit reportedly declared no assets worth more than Bt200,000 when he entered the Cabinet in 2014.
Only 200,000?
Terrifying this poverty.
-
41 minutes ago, SheungWan said:
How much does it cost to leave the EU's customs union? Britain doesn't know: bloom.bg/2kuD9AM
These studies should have been carried out before declaring withdrawal under Article 50.
Now one can see the result, if people only listen to the propagandists.
Were also nice words to get rid of the prison chains, aka shackles of the EU & free trade with the whole world & safe pensions & best free health care & without foreigners & higher wages & safe country borders.
And 52% believed in the promised miracle.That is not to be surpassed in naivety.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, SheungWan said:
From Bloomberg Brexit:
David Davis on Brexit studies:
December 2016 - officials "carrying out about 57 sets of analyses"
October 2017 - the work contains "excruciating detail"
December 2017 - "there are no systematic impact assessments"
"It is unbelievable that these long-trumpeted impact assessments don't even exist, meaning the government has no idea what their Brexit plans will do to the country."
That's scary. Same as someone distribute packs of razor blades in a kindergarten and give the children to play.
-
"It is unbelievable that these long-trumpeted impact assessments don't even exist, meaning the government has no idea what their Brexit plans will do to the country."
As a taxpayer, one wonders for what these people are actually being paid for. Amateurs who gamble with billions, but have not done their homework. In a company of the free economy such a manager would not even survive the probationary period.
-
1 hour ago, citybiker said:
Research is freely available for you, it’s also been well documented within the MSM.
Border T&C’s are applicable where necessary.
The only people that are over complicating the NI/RoI border is Brussels.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalkcan agree with you on one point: the EU (and the Uk is still a member!) has failed to properly protect its external borders. The unregulated influx of refugees made the brexit result possible. The distinction between true war refugees and economic immigrants did not happen at all. No one understands why European politicians are so strongly promoting the Islamization of Europe. Unfortunately, then, the whole has shifted to the question of immigration from EU citizens. Is the Polish plumber, cucumber tiller and nurse really the problem? in another point, I have to contradict. the eu has shown a lot of patience and has built many bridges for uk. if 65% of the ni population is for the remainding in the eu, why not search for them a Solution on that basis.
-
I do not remember seeing the UK in such a mess since the last 50 years.
Every headless chicken has more plan.
I'm sorry for the UK.
-
Allways nice to see how an expensive watch emerges from the depths to the surface.
-
Trump is arguably the most ruthless and stupid president in US history. Trump would sell all his friends for money. Well, the US has not so many friends now
Trump destroyed a lot. Except for the Saudis, which he loves as customers for his weapons.
-
3 minutes ago, Jip99 said:
I don’t think we intended them to be our enemy.
The main factor for the Billy Smart’s effect is the fact that 2 sides agreed the mechanics, of making a divorce decision, without having anything in place to implement/quantify that divorce.
For that I blame the EU and Cameron. The EU for having Article 50 in their locker without the manual explaining exactly what would happen if a member were to leave. Cameron (who would actually be the best PM to lead Brexit) I blame for either the arrogance in believing he could not lose the referendum, or the stupidity in not having an exit blueprint in place..
Can agree.
A systematic mistake if an organization provides for a 2-year notice period, but makes the economic and financial plans for 5 years or more. Clear that there are then delimitation difficulties. Basically, at the time of the referendum, no one, neither Brexiteers nor Remainers, has fully thought through the problems, details, issues and implications.- 1
-
14 minutes ago, aright said:
At the National Election, not so long ago, something like 90% of the electorate voted for parties which supported Brexit The decision was made last year, you have to live with it, but not necessarily agree with it. Yes you are obviously British in name if you have a British passport. No what it means is if you enjoy watching and hoping for the failure of your country on the basis of a "I told you so" attitude its un British . Many Remainers had their say at the referendum, still feel to stay is best, but have accepted the result and then hoped their country would leave with the best possible deal that could be negotiated for them. It's a pragmatic decision because the vast majority will continue to live in the UK. They are dismayed at what is going on, you are enjoying it. Ultimate failure would complete your enjoyment I assume. I mentioned it on another post.....there are people who when their football team goes 2nil down start cheering for the other team.
No one likes to see his homeland go to the dogs because, by chance, some weak-headed people want to play amateur theater. There is national pride in every country, that is not just a British phenomenon.
- 1
-
33 minutes ago, Khun Han said:
There are very few long-term benefits from putting all our eggs in the EU's basket. But we are in this situation because of corrupt, lazy politicians selling us down the river. We now have to take a financial hit (spread over several years btw) in order to buy time to set up new, better, less restrictive trade agreements elsewhere.
That's great.
Then write down which countries that will be, what these countries should deliver and what the UK is able to deliver in return to these countries, except for tickets to visit the old castles.
-
21 minutes ago, Khun Han said:
Excuses, excuses. The bald fact is that many, if not most of the types of goods you are referring to are manufactured in the east and re-branded with western names. Have a look at the country of manufacture on the boxes of products the next time you are in a retail store.
Applause for this.
All products that have undergone a quality check will get a sales approval in the EU. The quantities are subject to a trade agreement. If that were not the case, China would swamp the UK with Marmite copies. Sorry, but you have no idea about international trade. -
1 minute ago, Khun Han said:
Try to stop making stuff up about behind-closed-doors negotiations about which you know nothing.
It is obvious that you think you know everything.
But you have no idea of the theoretical premises of the perfect market.
Admit it.
Britain's new 3 billion pound warship has a leak
in World News
Posted
200 liters an hour is nothing. the installation of a small permanent submersible pump is enough. maybe welding in a few more planks and the kitchen could keep fresh sea fish there.