candide

The GOP's problem is that, after years of investigation, they still have nothing! FD-1023 anyone? 🤣

Projecting much....

It's Trump (and Vance) who decided to single out the case of eggs as a major campaign argument, not me. (Of ourse, they also lied about the actual price). He gets a taste of his own medicine! Ok, let's put eggs apart. He promised to bring down the price of food immediately. Did the price of most food items decrease immediately just because Trump has shown his determination to bring those prices down?

Same as his promise to end the war in Ukraine! “That is a war that’s dying to be settled. I will get it settled before I even become president,” Promise made, promise kept! 🤣 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542

And the price of eggs is decreasing immediately, as promised! Promise made, promise kept! 🤣 https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us

1. More MAGA lies. They did not destroy it. The transcripts have been kept per relevant regulation. https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/meme-rehashes-old-false-claim-that-j6-committee-destroyed-evidence/ 2. B.S. , as usual https://www.dccourts.gov/jurors/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_proceedings_in_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack Your problem is that that you make claims based on the propaganda you are fed with, without cheking anything.

I'm talking about the Juries of the Jan 6 rioters trials.

It's often funny!

So you have no evidence that the cited video footage was not accepted by the Judge.

Read Riclag's post.

Lame deflection. The price at which investors are speculating on the Beijing stock exchange futures market is not the current price of eggs in the U.S. 😆 This is the price in the U.S. and its doesn't decrease. It increases! https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us

Lame distraction. It's not what I was discussing.

So what is your proof/source showing that the judge did not allow this evidence to be presented?

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal. You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

So waht does what does that mean? 🙂 "History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare towards political opposition in mass for rioting! Bidens Mao’s Hitlers

Complete B.S. https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_price_rankings?itemId=11 On top of it's futures, not actual price. What you have circled is the language, 😆

In Beijing! 🤣

So Juries legally convicting rioters who assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to stop a legitimate democratic process and to overturn the election, are the same as the Gestapo arresting political opponents or Mao's political police arresting Chinese peasants protesting because they were starving!? 😆

A judge thinks it's unconstitutional. I'm not a constitutional lawyer, so I won't comment it. Anyway, the SC will ultimately make a decision, so we need to wait. A discussion about it below. For the same reason, I cannot assess the validity of arguments put forward. How the modern Supreme Court might view the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/23/politics/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-14th-amendment-wong-kim-ark

I tried. Both links work perfectly. The problem seems to be on your side.

It has, but no giant tech companies able to make such an investment. The problem is that EU laws are restricting national industrial policies without replacing them with a European industrial policy. They also de facto restrict the concentration of industries at the European level, so the "natural" emergence of European giants is also hindered. The AI battle has already been lost long before this announcement.

Lame to attempt to divert attention from what I was replying to. It's not what your pal wrote in his post. It was about the rioters, in accordance with the title of the thread. Quote: "History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare towards political opposition in mass for rioting!" That was dumb! 😆

Factually correct, suuure! 😆 Juries legally convicting rioters who assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to stop a legitimate democratic process and to overturn the election, are the same as the Gestapo arresting political opponents or Mao's political police arresting Chinese peasants protesting because they were starving!

Your reply is unrelated to my post. It's the importer who pays tariffs, not the exporter. Do you disagree with this fact?

More B,S. for the gullible! It's American businesses and consumers who will pay tariffs! 😆