candide

The rioters have been convicted by juries who had access to all the avaible evidence. The defendant's lawyers also had access to all the avaible evidence and had the opportunity to present evidence to the jury. They also had the right to appeal. You have nothing, as usual. 🙂

So waht does what does that mean? 🙂 "History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare towards political opposition in mass for rioting! Bidens Mao’s Hitlers

Complete B.S. https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_price_rankings?itemId=11 On top of it's futures, not actual price. What you have circled is the language, 😆

In Beijing! 🤣

So Juries legally convicting rioters who assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to stop a legitimate democratic process and to overturn the election, are the same as the Gestapo arresting political opponents or Mao's political police arresting Chinese peasants protesting because they were starving!? 😆

A judge thinks it's unconstitutional. I'm not a constitutional lawyer, so I won't comment it. Anyway, the SC will ultimately make a decision, so we need to wait. A discussion about it below. For the same reason, I cannot assess the validity of arguments put forward. How the modern Supreme Court might view the 14th Amendment and birthright citizenship https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/23/politics/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-14th-amendment-wong-kim-ark

I tried. Both links work perfectly. The problem seems to be on your side.

It has, but no giant tech companies able to make such an investment. The problem is that EU laws are restricting national industrial policies without replacing them with a European industrial policy. They also de facto restrict the concentration of industries at the European level, so the "natural" emergence of European giants is also hindered. The AI battle has already been lost long before this announcement.

Lame to attempt to divert attention from what I was replying to. It's not what your pal wrote in his post. It was about the rioters, in accordance with the title of the thread. Quote: "History lesson ,what regimes jailed and used lawfare towards political opposition in mass for rioting!" That was dumb! 😆

Factually correct, suuure! 😆 Juries legally convicting rioters who assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to stop a legitimate democratic process and to overturn the election, are the same as the Gestapo arresting political opponents or Mao's political police arresting Chinese peasants protesting because they were starving!

Your reply is unrelated to my post. It's the importer who pays tariffs, not the exporter. Do you disagree with this fact?

More B,S. for the gullible! It's American businesses and consumers who will pay tariffs! 😆

Another intrusion from the MAGA alternate universe... 😆

You earned the prize of the dumbest post of the day! 🤣

You are not well informed. It's Trump who claimed the 2016 election was rigged and that the Dems cheated! 😆

Ridiculous B.S, conspiracy theory! 😆

So Trump lied when he said he will bring down food prices immediately! 5555 And drill baby drill is just a slogan for the gullible. Oil companies are not going to spend money in order to drive prices down and reduce their profits.

In particular as the army forces stationed in Bangkok are now under direct royal command and Prawit's regiment has been send back to the East. Prawit (and the others) can do nothing. About Thaksin's statement, I doubt he made it without checking first the absence of stratospheric headwind.

Complete B.S.! There was no such threat! There had been no attempt to bring missiles closer to Russia. NATO could have put missiles in Poland etc, it would have been just as dangerous for Russia as in Ukraine. It didn't. There was no plan to do so. Apart from the U.S., the share of NATO countries' defense budgets have been declining over decades. They have been criticized as being too weak and peace oriented. U.S. military presence in Europe has been declining for decades. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/nuclear-weapons-europe-mapping-us-and-russian-deployments

Yet, NATO countries are the main export market for BRICS countries (except Russia, of course). So there's a leverage.

He promised he would bring them down immediately. So he lied? 🙂

It's obviously a competitive threat to his Grok project.

In 2023, about 423.9 billion U.S. dollars worth of goods were exported from Russia. So it's around 1% of Russia's exports. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263663/export-of-goods-from-russia/

It confirms what I quoted. Thank you.

Well, as he's now President and there's been no ceasefire before that, everyone with a brain is able to find out he was lying.