BangkokReady

Sounds like he's having a meltdown. It always actually surprises me that foreigners react like this, even when driven to frustration due to Thai driving. They must know that any kind of aggression is going to end badly for them. Even if they get the best of one Thai, others may join in, and the police will certainly side with the Thai.

I've heard it's deliberate because they think the smoke looks cool. I'm not sure about adding power. They're getting a concentrated dose, but you're getting a pretty good amount whenever you're outside without a mask on.

Again, that's all in your head. The thread is about someone saying that most women in Thailand are fat, while they used to be thin. Then someone responded that there are attractive women in universities and large hospitals. All this "standing outside staring at girls" came from your imagination. I'm not sure how you expect people to respond to what you are saying, when it's pure fiction.

Again, you made up the part about going to a university to just stare at the students. I'm not sure how you expect anyone to argue with something that only exists in your imagination.

Actually, no. Again, you made this part up. Someone suggested that the place to find the best looking women was universities and large hospitals. You added the part about hanging around outside them looking at the girls.

I'm not sure what this has to do with you pretending that universities are schools. You're being very strange.

He wouldn't acknowledge it. If someone said they saw a hot 19 year old outside a university, he'd say "Ew, you were looking at teens outside a school". I think he might be having a bit of a breakdown.

No. Schools are schools and universities are universities. Hence you changed university to school in order to make it sound like other users were expressing an interest in minors, when they were discussing adults. Your lie is lame and even your very weak attempt at bending the definition of school above is a failure. It is clear that you know the difference and why you made the change.

Yeah, I feel like the vapes are easier to sell illegally. Not exactly sure why.

Sure, but it seems that the Apache has such range that the chance of anything actually happening to Harry is near zero. I tried googling, and I couldn't find any clear evidence of an Apache being shot down in Afghanistan. It seems they were in more danger of crash landing, but I would imagine that the one carrying Harry would have the best pilot and be in the best condition. It seems that the only real danger for Apache helicopters in Afghanistan was human error or running out of fuel.

Yes. From the safety of a multi-million dollar helicopter. It's doubtful that he was in any real danger.

Illegal to look at 20yos? Nope Note that he has deliberately changed it from "universities and large hospitals" to "schools". So one user talks about university students (adults) but he changes it to school students (minors) so that he can accuse people of something illegal. You have to wonder why some users have an odd obsession with wanting other users to be doing these kinds of things.

"The prince recounts in his memoir his time as a gunner in an Apache attack helicopter while on his second tour in Afghanistan in 2012." He was chilling in the back of a helicopter. Doubtful that he was in any danger.

This is scary. We really need to be on the look out for White nationalism at this time.

Quite. Everyone knows that you can chill out in BKK with first world amenities, check out some nice views of mountains and forests in the North, enjoy rural life in the North East, or rediscover the Wild West in one of the tourists spots like Pattaya or Phuket. You take your life in your hands when you go there, but that's part of the fun. You never know what kind of violence or debauchery you will see. Family friendly it aint...

Yeah, it's weird to think that he's anti-Royalty, while wanting free money for being Royalty. He was clearly safely away from the conflict, protected by a gang of Ghurkhas. He posed for a few photos with some military equipment, before the press conveniently "broke the blackout" so he had to be sent back home.

Nope. Nobody cares.

Nope. See above. No idea what point you are making in response to me. Please make your points more clear.

Oh dear. You do seem to be having trouble with this topic. If it was that easy, don't you think they would already be doing that? Don't you wonder why, rather than simply making their own vapes, they try to pretend that vaping is worse than cigarettes? They obviously see that it's too easy for illegal vapes to be obtained, therfore making controlling them through licensing too difficult. So they ban them and demonise them instead.

So, how do you work it out? Apart from being White, this person seems to be totally in your team. Is it like a game of Top Trumps? (No, not that Trump.)

Same for alcohol and junk food, right???

Nice idea, but vapes are just too hard to control. It can't. Taxes aren't the same as income. You're thinking like these State just wants money for the State, which is not the case. The people who control the state want money for them. Doubtful. Plus, as with above, this is about money going into people's pockets. Lol. You're wrong on all points so, next???

I think you've become confused. This is someone from your side. You should be saying how this is a good thing and anyone who disagrees is a transphobic bigot. Remember, this person is anti-Elon, who is a proxy for Trump hate. They're also trans. So they're your version of "the good guys". Please try to at least keep up with your own warped ideology.

They simply don't want vapes being sold. They want people to buy cigarettes. The state owns the biggest tobacco producing company. The state controls who can sell tobacco products. The state doesn't want people vaping because that means less money for the state from cigarette sales.

They don't want to tax the vapes. This is about stopping people from vaping because that would lead to less cigarettes being purchased.