heybruce

Feeble. Trump took no action for three hours while the mob he sent to the Capitol was on a rampage. He was POTUS, he had a duty to act and did nothing. Regarding lack of charges, I hope they still may be filed. Calling out the National Guard wasn't Pelosi's responsibility: “As Speaker of the House, Pelosi does not direct the National Guard,” the AP reported in its fact check. “Further, as the Capitol came under attack, she and the Senate Majority leader called for military assistance, including the National Guard.” https://thehill.com/homenews/house/565221-ap-fact-check-rates-gop-claim-pelosi-blocked-national-guard-on-jan-6-false/ Don't allude to evidence of a conspiracy, give us credible sources or stop trolling. Trump committed treason by sending his mob to the Capitol and refusing to call them off until it was clear they would not accomplish anything. I stand by that statement.

To be fair Bush froze for seven minutes because he didn't have a clue as to what to do. Trump refused to take action for three hours because he wanted to see if the assault on the Capitol might play out to his advantage. Bush was incompetent. Trump committed treason.

No I didn't. Trump didn't take action for hours, ignoring pleas to do something to call off his mob. He only sent out a lame tweet after it was clear the mob wasn't going to accomplish anything. That was clear to most people who read my post. Do you have reading comprehension problems?

Very much related to your nonsense post.

And your news sources are...?

Because Putin refuses to do interviews with good journalists. "Countless reporters from Western countries, including the BBC's Russia Editor Steve Rosenberg, have sent the Kremlin repeated interview requests. All of the BBC's requests have been ignored." "Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov acknowledged this, telling the BBC: "Mr Carlson is not correct, and he couldn't have known that. We receive a lot of requests for interviews with the president."" https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68247956 If you didn't know this, you can't pretend to be informed. Just like Tucker.

The surest sign that a poster can't back up his claims is when he tells others to do the research instead.

Prove it.

Many Putin fan boys claim the US is responsible for the Maiden revolution, and none of them give sources showing it to be true.

That's hilarious.

It's really dark in your rabbit hole, isn't it?

That old shibboleth. Employers aren't going to pay high wages for legal residents if they can get away with paying lower wages to illegal immigrants. So where is the harsh crackdown on the employers of illegal workers? BTW: What do you think would happen to the prices of domestically produced food if all the employers in the farm to table process had to pay wages high enough to attract legal workers? I'll tell you, the prices would shoot up, people would buy more imported food, US farmers would scale back or stop production, and the Republicans would gleefully blame it on the Democrats. That's why Republicans never crack down on the employers of illegals when they are in charge.

Provide a link to the CBO statement if you want me to comment on it. I'll make it easy for your, here's a link to the CBO Ten year Projection. https://www.cbo.gov/data/budget-economic-data Now show us where it states that illegal immigrants will force down wages. I want to read the context in which that statement was made. Some people in the country worked under the table. However the "respectable" employers of illegals, like the Trump resorts, prefer illegals with fake papers so that they can pretend to not know the workers were illegal. Those employers deduct taxes and Social Security. How many work under the table and how many pay taxes? I don't know, and neither do you. How does having a declining working age population supporting an increasing number of retirees benefit anyone?

Is that sarcasm? Trump watched the rampage on television for hours and ignored all pleas to do something until it was clear that the mob was not accomplishing anything beneficial for Trump. Then he praised them, called them patriots, repeated the stolen elect lie and asked them to go home.

One, and only one: What is your source for your genocide claim? I know you won't provide one, I just want to make sure others understand that as well.

Seriously? Are you denying that Russian interference was not proven? Or that there were links between prominent Russians and members of Trump's campaign staff? "However, the report states that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was illegal and occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion"[10][11][12] but was welcomed by the Trump campaign as it expected to benefit from such efforts.[13][14][15] It also identifies myriad links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies,[16] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] Mueller later stated that his investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".[17]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report

Your point being?

You mean you are now going to a source other than YouTube for your information? Wow!

Two very important questions: Do you think it is acceptable that Putin "wants Ukraine only"? Do you believe Putin?

Is that the only information choice available to you? The US government does not control the news outlets that report in the US, and both Tucker and Putin were primarily targeting a US audience.

The US is spending less than 10% of it's military budget and less than 05% of it's GDP on Ukraine. https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-aid-has-us-sent-ukraine-here-are-six-charts What's Russia spending?

Take a chance. Show us the source for your claim. AP, UPI, BBC, or any number of reputable print publications will be perfectly acceptable. We'll let you know if you chose poorly.

You're all in on MSM conspiracy theories, aren't you? Long ago I concluded that the 24 hour news channel were more interested in ratings and infotainment than reporting the news. That's why I read the news from credible sources. That's how I know that most of the "pseudo event and hoaxes", whatever they might be, have a basis in fact. Once again, the investigation was into Russian interference in the 2016 election, which was proven, and possible links between Russia and members of the Trump campaign, which was found.

Do you have a credible source showing that Ukrainian civilians were being targeted by the Ukrainian government, or are you just parroting Russian propaganda?

Do you think that excuses Trump's inaction when his mob war rampaging through the Capitol? Too pathetic.