LosLobo

Have you tried MedConsult Clinic | International Medical Clinic in Bangkok (medconsultasia.com or Pharmacy Refill Service | MedConsult Clinic (medconsultasia.com? The doctor there is a UK GP and also qualified in Thailand. Possibly she may be able to fill International prescriptions from overseas.

I recently bought an Acer for daughter, great specs and weight just over 1kg from Advice, not plastic, with win11 and Office, branches everywhere been dealing with them for over 10 years. Notebook Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-41-R2QM (Pure Silver) (advice.co.th)

The Lancet found that roughly 40 percent of the nation’s COVID deaths—as many as 188,000 people out of nearly 470,000—could have been avoided. This figure was attributed to various factors in the Trump administration’s response to the pandemic, including the downplaying of COVID, promoting unproven treatments, and de-emphasizing public health. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/10/us-coronavirus-response-donald-trump-health-policy

Thank you for your compelling reply. 'This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes'. Morpheus to Neo, The Matrix Click the Blue Pill to remain here. Click the Red Pill to begin discovery of the world of reason and critical thinking. The Blue Pill The Red Pill Tip: Click on the emoji

Deleted

It is commendable that you wish for me to explain your error, but your ad hominem comment is not so much. Ad hominem is another logical fallacy. As a primer, this fallacy is when you attack the person and not the issue in a discussion. It is often used as a diversion tactic to shift attention to an unrelated point like a person’s character or motives and avoid addressing the actual issue and is irrelevant to the discussion. As the law itself uses reasoning and logic for its adjudication of a case, ergo, it can be seen as inappropriate and invalid to use logical fallacies here to support Trump in his legal cases. Example: In a property settlement case, a lawyer uses an ad hominem fallacy by asking the husband about his erectile dysfunction, a personal health issue is irrelevant to the case. This attack on the person rather than addressing the legal issues at hand is generally seen as invalid and illegitimate in a legal context. In closing, would you still like a detailed analysis of your OP?

Congratulations, you have used multiple logical fallacies in your response and perfectly mimicked Trump in the art of 'Logical Fallacy' to appeal to the base. More critical thinkers and certainly the courts use reasoning and logic and to these audiences I suggest your arguments fail as being legitimate and valid. Briefly on analysis, you have used the ‘Tu Quoque’, ‘Hasty Generalization’ and ‘False Equivalence' fallacies. I could go into more depth and explain these and where you have gone astray but would you really be interested?

When I first got Windows 11, I felt a bit overwhelmed by the scope of how little I knew about the massive content of this Operating System. I find Bing AI Co-Pilot a great resource. Just press the mic symbol and ask away and it will present anything you require from free online tutorials, paid online manuals with tips to answers to any ad hoc query. In fact, it will open required applications for you. I rarely use Google anymore. I suggest with the abundance of free online content, purchases are unnecessary. PS If you need any help getting started just ask via direct message!

Perhaps if rapist Trump stopped defaming his victim this case and thread could be closed. Then you could provide a more focused support of Trump in his other litany of crimes against society.

Joe looks like a young fit and confident Indiana and his Last Crusade, to save the US from the evil Nazi dictator.

Reacher (TV Series 2022– )- IMDb 8.1 Series 2 is a disappointment, don't know if I will continue with it. The Courier (2020) - IMDb 7.2 Excellent movie, my thanks to @xylophone. These just dropped: True Detective (TV Series 2014– ) - IMDb 8.9 S04E01 Monsieur Spade (TV Series 2024– ) - IMDb 7.3 S01E01 May be interesting stars Clive Owen.

Here's a better one! Two pictures taken on the same day, Trump and Biden Two pictures taken on the same day, Trump and Biden : (Reddit.com)

I agree CNN buried it. Right where most or a CNN viewer would not expect to find it. Top of the Google search page with a link to CNN's YouTube Video Site. I assume by their narrative you mean, hold the interviewee accountable? After watching the video, I would suggest O'Leary as a Canadian businessman would have little experience in US property development and law and would not qualify as an expert in this field. O'Leary's justification for siding with Trump is that 'everyone is doing it' and he even advocates Tax Fraud for the same reason. O'Leary is a rightwing Canadian millionaire businessman and TV personality who ran for PM and leader of the Conservative Party in 2017 on a similar platform to Trump, with some even saying that he is a Trump clone. Seems, the only subject where he is not a fan of Trump, is with impeaching Biden. I watched the video, which wasn't buried. O'Leary did not go off message, his message was always the support of Trump. The only change was like a good journalist, she finally pushed back on his justification for breaking the law of 'everyone does it'. She commented on his rhetoric by suggesting getting a larger prosecutor's office to cope with the hordes 'as everyone does it'. Obviously, you are only used to the 'soft balling' with zero accountability done on rightwing media. The close was respectful and cordial and she was not rude and did not dismiss him. What I thought didn't make sense was O'Leary, when talking about the US 2024 elections, used 'we' multiple times and also said 'I want to make a decision as a voter', yet he is a Canadian citizen and cannot vote.

There were losses, the banks did lose money. Trump cost banks $168M by inflating his company's worth: fraud trial expert - Raw Story

Not directly. Apologies, I erred here. Through an editing error, I didn't indicate that the Trump default was likely outside the scope of this trial, as the loan was taken out in 2005, and he defaulted in or before 2010, as mentioned in my post. It was obvious to anyone who has a knowledge of this case that the scope of the OP charges was limited to the 10 years from 2011 to 2021. Though this episode would have been considered by Letitia James in one of her cases against Trump LLC for fraud, more likely because he failed to pay tax on the income from the 'forgiveness' of the loan. It also demonstrates Trump's MO of trying to 'screw' the banks and the taxpayer, with his 'Ponzi' schemes.

"Who lost money? Deutsche Bank did! Donald Trump borrowed money from Deutsche Bank et alia for the construction of his Trump International Tower Chicago. However, due to construction delays and the lack of sales, Trump defaulted on the loans owing Deutsche $334M including interest. Trump unable to pay sued the bank for 'predatory lending practices' and Deutsche sued Trump for $334M. During a private settlement in 2010, Trump was able to get most of the loan 'forgiven'. There is speculation as to why Deutsche settled in this way, possibly as both had a common interest in illegal dealings with oligarchs with dirty money, obviously Deutsche had more to lose than Trump. Trump’s $287M loans that he did not pay

Is demonstrating "which type of video is capable of carrying a virus' necessary to suggest that downloading any file is potentially risky? When you stream a video, you’re watching it directly from the source over the internet without saving a copy of it on your device. On the other hand, downloading involves saving a copy of the video or in fact it could be anything, onto your device, which could potentially include or be malicious software. I suggest, no method is completely safe, and caution should always be exercised when streaming or downloading content online.

The pursuer of a 'licence to kill' is a serial denier of those he has known, from Stormy Daniels to Vlad Putin. People Trump Knows and Then Claimed He Didn't: Photos (businessinsider.com) PS (I am sure a 007 NFT would help pay his NY $370M fine).

I used to live on a mountain durian farm in Ranong, a province with the highest rainfall in Thailand. Once the kids had crossed the flooded bridge over the flooded river on the way to school, they would find the school under three metres of water and have to return home for a few days while the waters subsided, and the mess was cleaned up. One day a politician showed up and to increase his chances in the next election promised to resolve the problem, though he claimed he had limited funding. This was the same one who years before committed billions to spend on submarines because he claimed the money would only be wasted elsewhere. Not sure if he thought the submarines would be useful to help kids get to school. Let's hope for the kids and country's sake things will change.

I understand your commitment to your original post. There may be good reasons why the reporter did not use the photographs from Monsoon Garbage Facebook, possibly there may have been difficultly getting permission from the individual posters. Journalists often use representative stock photographs like Getty Images for their articles, in this case they used India Today. From my point of view, logic would suggest a photo with a credit to India Today, would obviously not be a genuine one of a local event on Koh Phayam, in Ranong Thailand.

Yet the OP clearly gives the photo credit to India Today, for anyone who cares to read it.

Why anyone downloads files, which are more subject to viruses when you can stream.

Trump has played the US Edition of Monopoly where the stakes are high, and the outcome is uncertain. His strategy has lost him most of his hotels, houses and cash, with a pending move to 'Go Directly to Jail'. His only chance now lay in a dice throw to Community Chest and a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. In real life, decisions have consequences, more so if you don't play by the rules.

I agree, many will be tuning into Truth Social for instructions. Have you considered buying some NFT's? I am sure the $370M plus 9% compound interest will promote more crowdfunding requests from the proven grifter.

You, Fox and Trump are misrepresenting the facts. Who would have guessed? You must remember the context of what the two Democrats said. Trump had a day or so before the China restriction, expanded his Muslim travel ban (which surprisingly did not include Saudi's) to include some black African countries. Biden did not call the president’s travel restriction xenophobic or racist, but he did denounce Trump’s coronavirus response as “xenophobic” as he was responding to a tweet in which Trump used a racist term 'the China Virus' to describe the virus. There’s no direct quote from Sanders criticizing the travel restrictions. However, during a Fox News town hall, Sanders insisted that he wouldn’t consider closing the U.S. border to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Possibly some media outlets criticized the restriction because they don't work. Fact check: Did Biden call Trump's China travel restrictions 'xenophobic?' (nbcnews.com) Sanders tells Fox News Town Hall he wouldn't close US borders during coronavirus-type contagion Trump’s ‘early’ travel ‘bans’ weren’t early, weren’t bans and didn’t work - The Washington Post