.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
cjinchiangrai
-
Posts
2,175 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by cjinchiangrai
-
As opposed to listening tor your internet nonsense? Yes! -
NIH, CDC, WHO. They have plenty of white coats.
-
Anything anti-vax is rooted in blatant lies.
-
A better question is why blatant disinformation gets published in the first place.
-
That would be women in their right mind, not Qanuts.
-
You could see more clearly by taking off the red hat.
-
In the long term, anti-vaxxers will be self limiting. I just hope the morons do not screw the rest of us in the short term.
-
Try again after the review. It is just a proposed paper and unverified.
-
On a normal 10 day overstay, you pay the fine, fly home and get banned for a year or two. Something is different here.
-
You don't have to read it.
-
Trump Revives Plan to Build $100 Million White House Ballroom
cjinchiangrai replied to Social Media's topic in World News
How fancy of a space does he need for Big Macs and KFC? Besides, it is only Un and Putin visiting anyway. -
Because none of it is about transgenders or sports. It is all a distraction while they steal the money.
-
The president has no say in the matter.
-
The Tucker Carlson method of drawing clicks with seemingly lurid questions about inane topics.
-
Mine does not have one either.
-
It is illegal without authorization of Congress.
-
That is also illegal.
-
Trans people can go where they like. Criminals are a minor percentage of immigrants, but trans people are not criminals.
-
That makes zero sense. Why would a politician pander to a group that is such an insignificant percentage of the electorate? The Federal Government has no standing to make a ruling on State run activities or privately run organizations. Trumps edict is meaningless.
-
It is far from fact if you have made it past the eighth grade.
-
No, but it is still illegal. The President has no business making such a proclamation.
-
No, like everything he does, there is no nuance and a great deal of grandstanding bigotry. An arbitrary ban is not the answer, nor is a lasse-faire approach. The sports need to be addressed based on the requirements of the activity, The stage of transitioning must also be considered.
-
As previously stated, there need to be rules, however, a presidential edict is not legal or appropriate.
-
It is a TV stunt promoted by a bigoted criminal.
-
There should be rules, but it is still much ado about nothing.
