Liverpool Lou

Why? What has his family and the security of their assets got to do with this?

Surely, she is entitled to a holiday break during her tenure as a Senator?

Not long, but running the plate does not mean that the driver will be at the address to which the vehicle is registered.

The majority of the Thai armed forces are not conscripts.

I think that, as foreigners in the position to buy cars here comprise maybe only 5% of the population, the likelihood that they represent an above average percentage of EV buyers is a very odd suggestion. I'd suggest that, statistically, foreigners could represent, probably, no more than 5% of "early adopters".

Probably not having the right license to carry tourists. Probably best if you read the article!

"^^ Drinking?". No. Read the article in full properly.

Why did you not read the report in full?

no point you keep asking the same question Apart from my being able to ask anything I want here without the benefit of your august opinion as to whether my query had a point, I did not ask the same question. He was suggesting/asking if it was a fraudulent site, I asked him what made him suggest that...two very different questions.

The sh*t grammar Re-reading it, yes, I see the massively grave and oh, so, confusing grammatical error of simply using the word "received" instead of "receive". I also see the irony of a grammar complainant posting "The sh*t grammar" as though that was a grammatical sentence.

Actually the OP completely fails to discuss the tricky issue of savings - how defined and whether taxable. Yes, I am well aware of that. I did not suggest that it did make any other definitions. Actually.

it was a question, the poster said it was a fake website I know it was, that's why I asked that poster why he suggested a fraudulent website. It clearly wasn't judging from the OP's lack of such a suggestion. Perhaps you have something that suggests that it may be a fraud?

Jackpot of ฿0 ???????? For the punter in the OP, sure, but not if someone else bought those tickets with the winning number, as the OP also stated.

The tickets are duplicated by the GLO, that's why some winners get multiple jackpots...that's how this woman was able to "buy" five tickets with the same number.

Yes, it is perfectly clear, what part of it do you not understand?

Why do you say that? No one lost anything, the woman did not confirm her order nor pay for the tickets.

Where was it stated that the vendor was a "fake"?

You just need to read the article in full, all the details that you need are there.

Looks like a strong case Looks as though it's a strong case for the vendor as they buyers didn't confirm their order and were not contactable and the numbers were sold to others!

Can't you read? He specifically stated that he was not generalising and he did specify the words that were used that confirm the racist verbal attack of the group involved.

He very clearly specified the reason he was upset by the treatment and the the words he received,

The OP does not state that will be the case, it specifically states that only income from employment or assets may be liable.

Why? Where has it been stated that banks are going to be deducting tax at source? Which part of your visa terms gives tax advice?

How would the banks know whether tax was due when it only applies to income from employment or from assets and some people would be below the tax threshold?

Bolt thugs, in a car. The report did not state that it was a normal metered taxi that turned up.