I think Buttigeig is brilliant, but I am hearing he is a sellout to corporate interests.
Walz is attractive but actually to the left of Harris.
Standard political advice is to balance the ticket.
Shapiro is to the right of Harris.
Other advice is that Harris must be bold now to keep her momentum up.
In that sense Kelly is probably the least bold choice.
The others are probably bold enough.
As far as my own prediction I still think it will probably be Shapiro but because Walz is trending I picked him. But I think she can make any of those six work so I would only be shocked if it's someone else.
Total B.S.
I've dealt with the issue.
Those two boxers are women.
I have NEVER said that any "self proclaimed "woman" can compete!
You know I haven't. Yet you lie thinking you're winning a point.
No point in wasting time engaging with posters who constantly lie.
You're busted dude.
You're tripping.
I said nothing of the kind.
The IOC has judged that these specific two boxers are legitimately women and also not transgender women either.
The IOC has judged that previous actions against these two women by the corrupt Russia linked IBA hold no credibility.
This pick will happen within the next few days.
I have included the names that I know to be the finalists.
This poll asks who she WILL pick, NOT who you WANT her to pick.
I will try to post the final results at the time of the pick when it happens (if possible).
Obviously votes AFTER the pick are garbage so please don't even do that.
I did.
Obviously not anyone can be a woman.
Some men transition to trans women. Nobody is saying they are the same as females from birth.
The two boxers under scrutiny in Paris were born female, are NOT transgender, but are now adult women.
Fair enough.
There are no men competing in the women's boxing in Paris.
So nothing to stop.
Just fight or if you're too chicken to compete with women, don't.
Olympic gender row turns boxers into pawns in someone else's fight (inews.co.uk)